Obedience Why do we obey?. Why do we obey orders that we know are immoral or wrong? Germans who helped kill Jews in Europe. Serbs who killed Muslims in.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Social Influence 3: Obedience to Authority 20 May 2004.
Advertisements

The perils of obedience
Warm up! 1.Stand up 2.Shake the hand of the person next to you 3.Sit down 4.Clap your hands together five times 5.Moo like a cow.
Conformity How similar are we to sheep and lemmings?
Why do we obey authority?
Stanley Milgram A lesson in obeying. How far do you think people will go in the name of obedience?
Stanley Milgrim’s experiment
Social Psychology.
SOCIAL INFLUENCE Obedience Social Psychology Miss Bird.
Chapter 10 Social Psychology Title: Obey at Any Cost Author: S. Milgram (1963). Presented by Kelley Reinhardt May 5, 2004.
1 Obedience zObedience ycompliance of person is due to perceived authority of asker yrequest is perceived as a command zMilgram interested in unquestioning.
Obedience to Authority. What Makes People Obey Authority? Why do you do what I tell you to do? Why do you do what I tell you to do? Who else do you obey?
Obedience to Authority: The Stanley Milgram Experiments Mr. Koch AP Psychology Forest Lake High School Obedience = changing behavior in response to a demand.
Understanding Ethics in Psychology
1 Social Psychology Psychology 40S. 2 Focuses in Social Psychology Social psychology studies how we behave, think and feel in social situations. Social.
1 Conformity & Obedience Eunice Mun – Suzie Park – Sooji Seo “ It ’ s easy to stand with the crowd. It takes courage to stand alone. ”
____________ 1 ___________________ 2 __________ 3 ____________________________ 4 _______________ 5 students have been given instructions. You MUST follow.
BEHAVIORAL STUDY OF OBEDIENCE
The Milgram Experiment. The Milgram Experiment was a series of social psychology experiments conducted in the early 1960s by Yale University psychologist.
Chapter 11 Social Psychology.
The Milgram Obedience Experiment The Perils of Obedience "The social psychology of this century reveals a major lesson: often it is not so much the kind.
“Ordinary People” Doing Evil
Can people be forced to do something against their will? Have you ever? How?
Meeus and Raaijmaker (1986). Background Meeus and Raaijmakers were critical of Milgram’s research. They thought parts of it were ambiguous – for example,
THE MILGRAM EXPERIMENT
Chapter 12: Social Psychology Dr. M. Davis Brantley.
MILGRAM’S EXPERIMENT A STUDY IN OBEDIENCE
AICE.Milgram.
Adolf Eichmann. What is this man famous for? What do you think we will be looking at this lesson?
Introduction to Psychology Social Psychology Prof. Jan Lauwereyns
3 The Influence of Other People on Attitudes and Behaviour GV917.
ADAPTED FROM SIMPLYPSYCHOLOGY The Milgram Experiment.
Obedience Obedience compliance of person is due to perceived authority of asker request is perceived as a command Milgram interested in unquestioning obedience.
Obedience.
Milgram, obedience & environmental determinism
Milgram (1963)’The behavioural study of obedience’
Class Starter #1 ► You are going to complete 6 tasks.
Conformity and Obedience to Authority
Original study – the silent condition 65% of participants continued to give shocks up to 450 volts.
Stanley Milgram 1962, In Milgram’s Own Words What was Milgram’s motive for studying obedience to authority?
How Do Others Affect the Individual?
Conformity and Obedience to Authority. What is Conformity? Quick Write: What do you think of when you hear the word ‘conformity’? Why do people conform?
What is obedience? Lesson 2 – Social Learning Unit 2 – Understanding other people.
Groups & Obedience The Milgram Experiment
Experimental Psychology PSY 433 Chapter 13 Social Psychology.
The Psychology of Evil How far will people go in the name of obedience?
Social Psychology The tremendous power of the situation....
FINALIZE MYTHBUSTING Score Worksheets. SECRETS OF THE PSYCHICS Correct Worksheets.
Ethics and Psychological Research Psychology Ch. 1 The Science of Psychology.
© Hodder Education 2011 Recap on … Social psychology.
Dr. Shih-Shin Chen Business Psychology Dept. Health Care Management NTUNHS.
Conformity. Results Even though the correct answer was always obvious, the average subject conformed to the group response on 32% of the trials and 74%
Conformity & Obedience
Social Influence: Conformity & Obedience
What did Zimbardo’s research tell us about social roles?
Social Influence: Conformity, Compliance, Obedience
Special Update For DSM-5
Groups & Obedience The Milgram Experiment
Experimental Psychology PSY 433
Why Don’t People Always Help Others in Need?
Obedience to Authority: The Stanley Milgram Experiments
Find Your new seat – If you don’t cooperate it will be a zero for the Day Social Psychology.
Obedience: Milgram’s Research
Obedience Obedience compliance of person is due to perceived authority of asker request is perceived as a command Milgram interested in unquestioning obedience.
Milgram (1963)’The behavioural study of obedience’
Conformity and Obedience to Authority
Social Psychology Chapter 11.
Component 2: Psychological themes through core studies
Discovering Psychology Special Update For DSM-5
Presentation transcript:

Obedience Why do we obey?

Why do we obey orders that we know are immoral or wrong? Germans who helped kill Jews in Europe. Serbs who killed Muslims in Bosnia Were all of these people lacking morals or abnormal from the rest of us?

Obedience –compliance of person is due to perceived authority of asker –request is perceived as a command Milgram interested in unquestioning obedience to orders

Stanley Milgram’s Studies Basic study procedure –teacher and learner (learner always confederate) –watch learner being strapped into chair –learner expresses concern over his “heart condition”

Stanley Milgram’s Studies: Procedure Continued Teacher (S) goes to another room with experimenter Shock generator panel – 15 to 450 volts, labels “slight shock” to “XXX” Teacher (S) asked by Experimenter (E) to give higher shocks for every mistake Learner (A) makes

Stanley Milgram’s Studies Learner protests more and more as shock increases Experimenter continues to request obedience even if teacher balks saying, “The Experiment Requires that you continue.” “You have no other choice, you must continue.” “Ugh! Hey this really hurts.” “Ugh! Experimenter! That’s all. Get me out of here. I told you I had heart trouble. My heart’s starting to bother me now.” (agonized scream) “I absolutely refuse to answer any more. Get me out of here. You can’t hold me here. Get me out.” (intense & prolonged agonized scream) “Let me out of here. Let me out of here. My heart’s bothering me. Let me out, I tell you…”

How many people would go to the highest shock level? Two-Thirds (26 out of 40) of the subjects went to the end, even those that protested Those that did stop, not one stopped before the 300-volt level.

Milgram’s Obedience to Authority (Data from Milgram, 1974)

Obedience to Authority Play “Obedience: The Milgram Study” (4:04) Segment #34 from Psychology: The Human Experience. Or Click HERE to view actual video from his original experiment. (5 minutes)HERE

Explanations for Milgram’s Results Abnormal group of subjects? –Numerous replications with variety of groups shows no support – Milgram’s study has been repeated many times in the United States and other countries with identical results People in general are sadistic? –videotapes of Milgram’s subjects show extreme distress

Explanations for Milgram’s Results Socialization – We learn from childhood to obey authority figures. The teacher in the study was seen as an authority figure. Foot in the Door Effect – Once someone says yes to a minor request they will keep saying yes to slowly escalating requests. Confusion About Attitudes – As the situation got more disturbing the person is more likely to become confused about their own beliefs. Buffers - The physical and psychological separation from the learner made it easier to follow orders

Other Factors that Contributed to Obedience The situation, or context, in which the obedience occurred (Authority of Yale and value of science) New situation and no model of how to behave Experimenter self-assurance and acceptance of responsibility – Experimenter said they were responsible for the learner.

Follow-Up Studies to Milgram

Conditions that Decrease the Likelihood of Destructive Obedience Willingness to obey diminishes sharply when the buffers that separate the teacher from the learner are lessened or removed. Obedience decreased when the experimenter left the room and spoke to the subject over the telephone rather than in person. When teachers were allowed to act as their own authority and freely choose the shock level, 95 percent did not venture beyond 150 volts—the first point at which the learner protested People were more likely to defy an authority when they saw others do so

Were Milgram’s Obedience Experiments Ethical? Attacked for the emotional stress, tension, and loss of dignity experienced by the subjects Milgram suggested that what was disturbing to people were not so much his methods but his results Follow-ups of Milgram’s subjects indicate that a large majority were glad to have taken part in the experiment and had no signs of harm or traumatic reaction

Does this Apply to Today?

Asch, Milgram, and the Real World Being at odds with the majority or with authority figures is very uncomfortable for most people— Enough so that our judgment and perceptions can be distorted and we may act in ways that violate our conscience Each of us does have the capacity to resist group or authority pressure but… Will we do so?

Abu Ghraib Prison: “I was just following orders.”