D EDUCTIVE R EASONING By Kari Fowler. W HAT IS D EDUCTIVE R EASONING ?  Opposite of Inductive Reasoning  In Deductive Reasoning you are taking something.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
 Think of the federal government today (remember that the President, members of the House of Representatives, Senators, and Supreme Court Justices are.
Advertisements

Critical/“Critiquing” Thinking Objective & Subjective Claims Fact & Opinion Issue & Argument Cogency Reasoning Premise & Conclusion Cognitive Biases Belief.
Paragraph Development. Elements of a Paragraph A paragraph is more than just several sentences grouped together. In an essay or research paper, paragraphs.
Debate. Inductive Reasoning When you start with a probable truth, and seek evidence to support it. Most scientific theories are inductive. Evidence is.
Standardizing Arguments Premise 1: New Mexico offers many outdoor activities. Premise 2: New Mexico has rich history of Native Americans and of Spanish.
Inductive Reasoning.  Reasoning based on patterns that you observe  Finding the next term in a sequence is a form of inductive reasoning.
LogicandEvidence Scientific argument. Logic Reasoning –Deductive –Inductive.
Lecture 6 1. Mental gymnastics to prepare to tackle Hume 2. The Problem of Induction as Hume argues for it 1. His question 2. His possible solutions 3.
On Women’s Right to Suffrage
Inductive and Deductive Reasoning Geometry 1.0 – Students demonstrate understanding by identifying and giving examples of inductive and deductive reasoning.
The Preamble to the Constitution of the United States of America CE.2c.
Citizenship What does it mean to be a member of something?
Preamble to the United States Constitution
Click here to begin the activity. This slide show has been created by Eric Arbetter at Barrington Elementary School.
Find opposites of numbers EXAMPLE 4 a. If a = – 2.5, then – a = – ( – 2.5 ) = 2.5. b. If a =, then – a = –
An Introduction to Argumentative Writing
--- Hephizibah Roskelly and David A. Jolliffee, Everyday Use
 An argument is a reasoned, logical way of demonstrating that the writer’s position, belief, or conclusion is valid.  Arguments seek to make people.
Argument Basics Getting to Accept - Reject - Suspend Judgment.
Propositions A proposition is the declarative statement that an advocate intends to support in the argument. Some propositions are stated formally, some.
Academic VocabAcademic Vocab. Academic Vocab PacketAcademic Vocab Packet  If you lose this packet: It is mandatory after school tutoring It is mandatory.
Chapter 3 The Constitution
PowerPoint Presentation
Type of Rhetorical Appeals Logos, Ethos, and Pathos.
Suffering John 9:1-5 Introduction Many who refuse to believe in God claim to do so because of “the problem of suffering” –The thought goes something.
Deductive vs. Inductive Logic This course is about deductive logic. But it is important to know something about inductive logic.
Reasoning and Critical Thinking Validity and Soundness 1.
Properties and Numbers 1.4. Deductive Reasoning Using facts, properties or rules to reach a valid conclusion Conjecture: statement that could be true.
Defending the premises The key to a successful argument.
C HAPTER 1 T OOLS OF G EOMETRY Section 1.1 Patterns and Inductive Reasoning.
Women’s Rights Speeches Courtney, Nicole, and Caitlyn.
Argumentative vs. Analytical Writing An Introduction to Terms and Concepts.
Critical Thinking, Reading and Writing Part 2 Ed McCorduck CPN 101—Academic Writing II on Computer SUNY Cortland
SOL 2c The Preamble to the United States Constitution.
Page 222 Persuasive Rhetoric. using language to argue effectively and convince others to adopt an opinion.
Don’t be wordy; mind your style! “The results that were taken from a sample of people go to show some results that tell us some facts about how women and.
CHAPTER 1 Mathematical Reasoning Section 1.1 Inductive Reasoning.
1.2- Who Are America ’ s Citizens?. Path to Citizenship The US Constitution establishes two ways to become a citizen: by birth and naturalization a legal.
Emily Dawson AP Language and Composition Ms. Jarrell 1 st Period.
Errors in Reasoning. Fallacies A Fallacy is “any error in reasoning that makes an argument fail to establish its conclusion.” There are two kinds of fallacies.
Susan B. Anthony Kassandra Cuadra 1 st Block Ms. Winsley Class April 8, 2013.
Women’s right to vote.  In the 1800’s women in the U.S. had few legal rights and did not have the right to vote. The speech was given by Susan B. Anthony.
The Preamble What does it mean? Why is it important?
Rylee Russell.  There are two tests for deductive reasoning.
UNIT 3 TEST REVIEW DO NOW Please have your Unit #3 Review Sheet out and ready to be checked. Everyone starts out with 25 points. I am deducting.
Legal Studies * Mr. Marinello ARRESTS AND WARRANTS.
Writing an Argumentative Thesis Statement A thesis statement is a sentence that clearly and concisely indicates the subject of your paper, the main points.
R easons and E xamples. Review When you write about a fact or something you believe in, you need to support your topic sentence with reasons and examples.
Don’t Know Much About Liberty and Left Out in '08
Author’s Viewpoint and Strength of an Argument
Immigration and the Constitution
Fact File Notes If you are absent or if you were unable to finish the notes please take time to find the notes you missed and write them in your fact file.
Fahrenheit 451 Cycle 3, Day 6.
A state passes a law that allows males to vote, but not females.
Reasoning Chapter 15.
  The Preamble WE THE PEOPLE of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for.
Deduction and Probability
Do Now Determine how a conclusion was made (by observing a pattern, facts being provided, something that is repeated, etc.) 1. Every time Katie has worn.
The Preamble CE SOL 2c.
Who Were “We the People”?
Please have your Unit #3 Review Sheet out and ready to be checked.
The Rational Appeal Sydney Czurak Mariah Felt.
Chapter 3 The Constitution
Click here to begin the activity.
What is an ARGUMENT? An argument is a reasoned, logical way of demonstrating that the writer’s position, belief, or conclusion is valid. Arguments seek.
The Preamble.
Definitions: Evidence-Based Claims- 1.) the ability to take detailed
Mix & Match Series Interview: B-1.
ID1050– Quantitative & Qualitative Reasoning
Pull out your notebooks and clear your desks.
Presentation transcript:

D EDUCTIVE R EASONING By Kari Fowler

W HAT IS D EDUCTIVE R EASONING ?  Opposite of Inductive Reasoning  In Deductive Reasoning you are taking something general and applying it to a specific instance.  3 Steps to Deductive Reasoning  1) Take a general true conclusion  2) Apply the conclusion to a specific instances to demonstrate…..  3) The conclusion does indeed apply to the instance

T ERMS Y OU NEED T O K NOW Terms that you must use to argue deductively, Most, many, often etc. Absolute Terms: never use words like, all, never or always.

C HAPTER E XAMPLE Susan B. Anthony defended that fact that she had voted in the 1872 election- forty-eight years before women were given the right to vote. She claims she committed no crime but simply exercised her citizen’s rights. For support she commented on the preamble of the Federal Constitution. “We the People of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice…..and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”

D ID Y OU C ATCH THAT !?! “ We the People of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice…..and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.” The Preamble states that “We the people,” not we the male citizens. We the people as in meaning both male and female.

T WO T ESTS FOR D EDUCTIVE R EASONING First Test: Make sure it is valid. If it isn’t then it can’t be applied to specific instances. Needs factual support. Second Test: Whether the generalization applies to a particular case.

E XAMPLES Frogs are amphibians The Coqui is a frog native to Puerto Rico The Coqui is an amphibian. May I Have a Volunteer??????

1) Give a short example of deductive reasoning not used in the powerpoint. 2) What type of terms should you not use when arguing deductively? 3) What is one way to test deductive reasoning?

T HE A NSWERS 1) A variety of different answers! : ) 2) Do not use any terms that are extreme. For example, always and never. 3) First Test: Make sure it is valid. If it isn’t then it can’t be applied to specific instances. Needs factual support. Second Test: Whether the generalization applies to a particular case.

THE END I Feel Smarter!!