Vertical Scale Scores.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Accountabil ity System Student Achievement Index I Student Progress Index 2 Closing Performanc e Gaps Index 3 Postsecondary Readiness Index 4 Overview.
Advertisements

STAAR/EOC Information Meeting. What is the STAAR assessment program? The State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness or STAAR The new assessment.
Components of the 2015 Texas Assessment Program State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR) –STAAR Spanish –STAAR A –STAAR L –STAAR Alternate.
Accountability preview Major Mindshift Out with the Old – In with the New TEPSA - May 2013 (Part 2) Ervin Knezek John Fessenden
Testing for STAAR/EOC, TAKS Elizabeth Lalor Senior Director of Academic Support
Current legislation requires the phase-out of high school TAKS and replaces it with 12 EOC assessments in  English I, English II, English III  Algebra.
STAAR/EOC Overview of Assessment Program HISD Professional Support & Development High School Science Team.
TAKS VS. STAAR/EOC How does the TAKS compare to the STARR/EOC regarding…. ASSESSED CURRICULUM? Created by Shelby Waller, Region 9 ESC.
Components of the 2014 Texas Assessment Program State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR) –STAAR Spanish –STAAR L –STAAR Modified –STAAR.
Peaster Elementary. STAAR – What is it? State’s student testing program for Mathematics, Reading, Writing, and Science Emphasizes “readiness” standards,
NYS Assessment Updates & Processes for New Social Studies Regents Exams September 18, 2014 Candace Shyer Assistant Commissioner for Assessment, Standards.
Scaled Scoring.
Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) Report Presented to ACISD Board of Trustees 12/15/2011 ARANSAS COUNTY ISD – A TEA RECOGNIZED SCHOOL.
Accountability 101. State Accountability Federal Accountability # Students Met Standard # Students Tested If the Standard is not met: Apply Required.
Accountability: Are You Aware? Kim Gilson Senior Consultant Data and Accountability Region 10 ESC
Staar Trek The Next Generation STAAR Trek: The Next Generation Performance Standards.
1 The New York State Education Department New York State’s Student Reporting and Accountability System.
Introduction to GREAT for ELs Office of Student Assessment Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction (608)
Information provided by LISD Assessment Office.  STAAR stands for: › State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness  Implemented in for school year.
Common Core State Standards & Current Legislation.
2008 STAR Interpreting and Using Results August/September 2008.
Update on the State Testing Program November 14, 2011.
KCCT Kentucky’s Commonwealth Accountability Testing System Overview of 2008 Regional KPR.
+ Equity Audit & Root Cause Analysis University of Mount Union.
State & AYP Accountability Ratings Highlights District Ratings by Rating Category (including Charter Operators) ACCOUNTABILITY RATING 2009 CountPercent.
Fall Testing Update David Abrams Assistant Commissioner for Standards, Assessment, & Reporting Middle Level Liaisons & Support Schools Network November.
STAAR TEST Class of 2015 and beyond. What is STAAR? The State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR) is the new state assessment for students.
Region VII College and Career Readiness Data AVATAR Initiatives.
Jasmine Carey CDE Psychometrician Interpreting Science and Social Studies Assessment Results September 2014.
2015 Texas Accountability System Overview and Updates August 13, 2015.
School Performance Framework Sponsored by The Colorado Department of Education Summer 2010 Version 1.3.
Texas Projection Measure. What is TPM? TPM is a method for… – projecting future student scores -OR- – determining whether a student is likely to pass.
What are the STAAR Performance Standards? Copyright 2013 by Region 7 Education Service Center. All rights reserved.
10/19/2015 Academic Excellence Indicator System Woden ISD.
TAKS What Students And Parents Can Do To Prepare Brought to you by the teachers and administrators of BHS who want your child to succeed in life.
Preliminary Data: Not a Final Accountability Document1 SAISD TAKS Performance Board Work Session June 2004 Office of Research, Evaluation,
MMSD Value-Added Results January 3, Attainment versus Growth Grade 3Grade 4Grade 5Grade 6Grade 7Grade 8 2.
Annual Report and Public Hearing January 19, 2010.
Assigns one of three ratings:  Met Standard – indicates campus/district met the targets in all required indexes. All campuses must meet Index 1 or 2.
Suggested training for region, district, and campus professionals 9/24/2014Texas Education Agency – Student Assessment Division 1.
The latest and greatest STAAR © 2011 REGION XIII.
RESULTS Spring 2015 End-Of-Course tests Student Score Interpretation Guide.
Measuring College and Career Readiness 2015 PARCC RESULTS: YEAR ONE EDGEWATER SCHOOL DISTRICT ELEANOR VAN GELDER SCHOOL.
Understanding AzMERIT Results and Score Reporting An Overview.
Accountability 2013 Interpreting Your 2013 Accountability Report It’s Like Learning To Read All Over Again Ervin Knezek John Fessenden.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez January 2010.
1 Mississippi Statewide Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress Model Improving Mississippi Schools Conference June 11-13, 2003 Mississippi Department.
Kingsville ISD Annual Report Public Hearing.
Kentucky’s New Assessment and Accountability System What to Expect for the First Release of Data.
State Testing Program Update Sharon Nobis CHHS Assistant Principal Grapevine-Colleyville ISD November 7, 2011.
TAKS Release Plan  In 2007 SB 1031 changed the release of tests to every three years  In 2009 HB 3 changed the release of tests to exclude retests 2.
KHS PARCC/SCIENCE RESULTS Using the results to improve achievement Families can use the results to engage their child in conversations about.
Texas Assessment Management System Teacher Portal Tutorial.
Key Stage 1 and 2 Tests 2016 Presentation to Parents and Carers Otterbourne Primary School April 2016.
November 2009 Copyright © 2009 Mississippi Department of Education 1 Mississippi Department of Education Office of Research and Statistics Mississippi.
A STAAR Is Born Starring Criss Cloudt As Associate Commissioner, Assessment and Accountability, And Gloria Zyskowski As Division Director, Student Assessment,
1 Testing Various Models in Support of Improving API Scores.
State of Wisconsin School Report Cards Fall 2014 Results
Teacher SLTs
Teacher SLTs
Changes Ahead: Accountability
Texas Academic Performance Report TAPR)
2015 PARCC Results for R.I: Work to do, focus on teaching and learning
CORE Academic Growth Model: Results Interpretation
Timeline for STAAR EOC Standard Setting Process
Teacher SLTs
Teacher SLTs
Teacher SLTs
State of Wisconsin School Report Cards Fall 2014 Results
Measuring College and Career Readiness
Presentation transcript:

Vertical Scale Scores

Objectives: Explain how Texas defines value added and measures academic growth with TAKS. Use Vertical Scale Score to make instructional decisions to support student success.

Having an above average teacher for five years running can completely close the average gap between low-income students and others. -John Kain and Eric Hanushek

Placemat Consensus Each person at your table should have a different colored marker. Draw a large circle in the center of your chart paper. Each person in group will have a section outside the circle. In your section, explains what added value means.

Added Value Tracks the academic achievement of the same student over time. Minimizes the influence of economics, experiences, privilege, and race. Takes into account where a student begins the year academically and measures how much the student grows as a result of the school or teacher.

‘Passing & Preparedness’ 2100 Scale Score – Passing Standard 2200 Scale Score – Higher Education Readiness Component (HERC) 2400 Scale Score – Commended Performance

Regional College Ready Graduates All Af Am Hisp White Asian Male Female Eco Dis LEP ELA 52% 40% 47% 63% 67% 57% 42% 4% Math 56% 35% 45% 69% 73% 58% 48% 22% Both 37% 23% 29% 53% 38% 24% 3% November’s AEIS Reports will reflect the class of 2008.

Raw Score The basic score on any test is the raw score, which is simply the number of test questions or items a student answers correctly. A raw score can be interpreted only in terms of a particular set of test questions. Raw scores are converted to scale scores to determine which performance category is applied for each student in each content area assessed.

Horizontal Scale Scores A scale score is a conversion of the raw score onto a scale that is common to all test forms for that assessment. Scale scores can be interpreted across different sets of test questions. Scale scores allow direct comparisons of student performance between specific sets of test questions from different test administrations. The scale score takes into account the difficulty level of the specific set of questions on which it is based. It quantifies a student’s performance relative to the passing standards or proficiency levels for such tests as the TAKS. Vertical Scale Scores

Horizontal Scale Scores New Vertical Scale Scores Horizontal Scale Scores 2100 – Met Standard 2400 – Commended Performance Approximate Range: 1200 – 3300 These are consistent for all grades and subjects where the horizontal scale score is used. Met Standard and Commended Performance - vary by subject and grade (See page 4 of the guide.) Approximate Range: 0 – 1000

TAKS Horizontal Scale For TAKS, the scale scores were defined such that the Met Standard and Commended Performance cuts were always to same scale values across forms and grades Met Standard = 2100 Commended Performance = 2400 This is known as a horizontal scale

Horizontal Scales Limitations of horizontal scales Scale scores across test forms can be compared within a grade, but not across grades for a subject Performance standards (i.e. Met Standard and Commended) cannot be numerically compared across grade levels Example: 2100 in Grade 5 ≠ 2100 in Grade 6 It is difficult to evaluate individual student progress from grade-to-grade

TAKS Vertical Scale A vertical scale allows scores to be compared across grade levels for a subject Useful for tracking a student’s progress in performance across years Performance standards (i.e. Met Standard and Commended) can be numerically compared across grade levels

Academic Achievement Standards Raw Scores Horizontal Scale Scores Did Not Meet Standard Met Standard Vertical Scale Scores Commended Performance Scale Score Results Are Used To Determine the Student’s Level of Achievement

Vertical or Horizontal?

Why Vertical Scale Scores? Under Section 39.036 of Senate Bill 1031, TEA was required to develop a vertical scale for assessing student performance and progress on the TAKS assessments in reading and mathematics at grades 3–8 beginning with the 2008-2009 school year.

Read pages 4-7, Vertical Scale Score

VSS? First Turn – Last Turn Reflect and respond: “How can anyone be sure that a particular set of new inputs will produce better outputs if we don’t at least study what happens Inside?” --Paul Black and Dylan Williams

VSS? Decide who has the most experience in education at your table. This person is the first to share their reflections. All others at the table comment about that statement. The first person has the last turn to comment. Continue sharing star statements around the table using First Turn – Last Turn.

VSS Calculations

Reading and Mathematics Vertical Scale Scores 24

What about TAKS (Accommodated) TELPAS, Alternate Assessments, and EOC Assessments TAKS (Accommodated) will be reported on the same vertical scale as TAKS TELPAS will be reported on a vertical scale with score range from approximately 0-1000 TEA is considering a vertical scale for TAKS-M No plans currently in place for a vertical scale for TAKS-Alt or EOC assessments

Can we assess VSS growth? The student moved to Texas and was assessed on TAKS for the first time in 2009. The student was administered a Spanish mathematics TAKS in 2008 and an English version in 2009. The student was administered a TAKS-M in 2008 and TAKS (Accommodated) in 2009. The student was administered a TAKS test in mathematics for reading in 2008 and 2009.

Analysis Considerations: 1. It is important to note that expected growth calculations using TAKS and vertical scale scores represent a snapshot of growth using one assessment. While this information is useful, other data should also be used to conduct a more global analysis of the degree to which each student is making progress. 2. If analyzing students at grade levels other than 3rd to 4th or other subject areas, as noted in the example above, the VSS expected improvement calculations will differ. These differences occur: a. From subject to subject; b. From grade level to grade level; and c. When comparing growth from one year to the next for (1) ‘Met Standard to Met Standard,’ (2) ‘Commended Performance to Commended Performance.’ (3) ‘Met Standard to Commended Performance,’ and (4) ‘Commended Performance to Met Standard.’ 3. There are many variances from student to student which represent one year’s growth; these variances are based on the individual student’s starting point the previous year. 4. Because the VSS are statistical calculations, there exists a potential for + and - variances from the growth cut points. VSS provide growth data; however, when there are variances of a few points from the cut scores for one year's growth, educators should exercise caution when making decisions about student growth.

VSS Calculations

Your Calculations: A 6th grade student received a 2009 VSS of S-652 in mathematics. His 2008 VSS in mathematics was S-605. Analyze the growth. An 5th grade student received a 2009 VSS of E-770 in reading . This student’s 2008 VSS was E-720.

Questions and Considerations – Page 7 How close is the current vertical scale score from the ‘Met Standard’ level? If the score doesn’t meet this academic achievement standard, how far is the score from the ‘Met Standard’ level? How close is the current vertical scale score from the ‘Commended Performance’ level? et.al., ….

What about these Students? Susan 3rd-2008 4th-2009 5th-2010 6th-2011 Reading 680 725 750 770 Math 550 570 630 644 Maria 5th-2008 6th-2009 7th-2010 8th-2011 Reading 620 640 675 700 Math 610 637 665 Michael 4th-2008 5th-2009 6th-2010 7th-2011 Reading 780 800 834 850 Math 725 760 795 823 Frank 3rd-2008 4th-2009 5th-2010 6th-2011 Reading 400 480 600 650 Math 475 550 630

Student Plan What does the data say about the student? What will be you priorities? What is your intervention plan?

VSS Summary Statements Table Activity: Create a ‘T’ chart which outlines the key points and cautions related to VSS. Key Points Cautions