Executive summary prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 1 ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Strengthening the Medical Device Clinical Trial Enterprise
Advertisements

Introduction to the Supply Chain Risk Management Guide RPSGB, London 23 rd February 2010 Jill Jenkins - Pharmaceutical Quality Group.
Tax Risk Management Keeping Up with the Ever-Changing World of Corporate Tax March 27, 2007 Tax Services Bryan Slone March 27, 2007.
Integrating CMC Review & Inspection Industry Recommendations Joe Anisko April 24, 2003.
The Pharmaceutical Industry and ICH Q9
What’s New in the FDA’s Pharmaceutical Inspectorate and Risk Based Systems Inspection Rick Perlman Chair Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Division ASQ.
© CSR Asia 2010 ISO Richard Welford CSR Asia
Regulation, Law and Animal Health and Welfare The role of legal regulation GOLD John McEldowney, School of Law, University of Warwick.
Tony Gould Quality Risk Management. 2 | PQ Workshop, Abu Dhabi | October 2010 Introduction Risk management is not new – we do it informally all the time.
Annex I: Methods & Tools prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 1 ICH Q9 QUALITY.
Quality System Model ICH Q10
History and Background to the HACCP System
Quality Risk Management & its application in sterile processing
Manufacturing Subcommittee of the Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Science July 20-21, 2004 Ajaz S. Hussain, Ph.D. Deputy Director Office of Pharmaceutical.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 1 ICH Q9.
Quality Risk Management ICH Q9 Content
ICH Q9: Quality Risk Management
Quality Risk Management ICH Q9 Annex I: Methods & Tools
ONDQA Perspective on Post Approval Changes Eric P. Duffy, PhD Director, Division of Post-Market Evaluation, ONDQA, CDER, FDA Public Meeting: Supplements.
1 Revisions to 21 CFR Supplements and Other Changes to an Approved Application PhRMA Perspective FDA Public Meeting – 7 Feb 2007.
FDA’s Perspective Continued - Where We Are ?. GMP Task Groups.
Welcome ISO9001:2000 Foundation Workshop.
Internal Auditing and Outsourcing
Quality Risk Management ICH Q9 Background
FDA Supplement Reductions under 21 st Century GMP Initiatives Calvin Koerner I.Q. Auditing.
Mid-Shore CEDS Committee Meeting January 6, 2010.
Delivering a Modern Effective Pharmaceutical Quality System
1 Supplements and Other Changes to an Approved Application By: Richard J. Stec Jr., Ph.D. February 7, 2007.
Chapter © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Annex II: Potential Applications prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 1 ICH Q9.
Ajaz S. Hussain, Ph.D. Deputy Director Office of Pharmaceutical Science, CDER, FDA ACPS Subcommittee on Manufacturing Science: Identification and Prioritization.
PRODUCT TRANSFER.
Quality Management.  Quality management is becoming increasingly important to the leadership and management of all organisations. I  t is necessary.
1 PAT and Biological Products Tom Layloff FDA-SGE Management Sciences for Health The views expressed here are those of the author and not necessarily.
FDA’s Perspective on the “Pharmaceutical cGMPs for the 21st Century” Initiative David J. Horowitz, Esq. Director, CDER/FDA, Office of Compliance Advisory.
QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT RASHID MAHMOOD MSc. Analytical Chemistry MS in Total Quality Management Senior Manager Quality Assurance Nabiqasim Group of Industries.
© 2001 Change Function Ltd USER ACCEPTANCE TESTING Is user acceptance testing of technology and / or processes a task within the project? If ‘Yes’: Will.
Annex I: Methods & Tools prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 1 ICH Q9 QUALITY.
1 An Update on ICH Guideline Q8 – Pharmaceutical Development FDA Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Science: 5 Oct 2006 Dr John C Berridge Senior Regulatory.
Annex II: Potential Applications prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 1 ICH Q9.
The Value Driven Approach
The FDA Regulatory and Compliance Symposium Preparing for the FDA’s Risk-Based Inspections Presented By: Martin Browning, EduQuest, Inc.
PhRMA Perspective on FDA Final Report FDA Advisory Committee on Pharmaceutical Sciences October 20, 2004 G.P. Migliaccio, Pfizer Inc.
Breakout D Quality Risk Management
10:00 A.M. – Noon 7 June 2004 ICH Quality Plenary Meeting.
Progress in FDA’s Drug Product Quality Initiative Janet Woodcock, M.D. November 13, 2003.
1 Office of Pharmaceutical Science on Jon Clark FDA/CDER/OPS Associate Director for Policy Development.
Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission
Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Subcommittee of the ACPS Ajaz S. Hussain, Ph.D. ACPS Meeting October 22, 2002.
Annex II: Potential Applications prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 1 ICH Q9.
ICH Quality Topics Update
CDER / Office of Compliance ACPS October 5, 2006 Joseph C. Famulare Acting Deputy Director Office of Compliance CDER / FDA.
Drug Quality Regulations for the 21 st Century PhRMA Perspective Manufacturing Subcommittee Meeting – May 21, 2003 Gerry Migliaccio Pfizer Inc.
Examining Drug Quality Regulation Douglas C. Throckmorton, MD Deputy Director Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Public Meeting on 21 CFR February,
FDA Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Science and Clinical Pharmacology July 22-23, 2008 Introduction and Update Helen N. Winkle Director, Office of.
Company LOGO. Company LOGO PE, PMP, PgMP, PME, MCT, PRINCE2 Practitioner.
“Total Quality Management and Quality Risk Management” By: Pratitha Naik Parsekar Quality Assurance VerGo Pharma Research laboratory Pvt Ltd. Date: 16-Mar-2016.
Tallinn, 19 November 2009 Mike Coles Qualifications and Curriculum Authority, London The EQF – a platform for collaboration, integration and reform.
Annex II: Potential Applications prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 1 ICH Q9.
12/05/2018 Industry expectations about European Aviation Safety plan (EASp) and Certification activities G.Garrouste ASD AirWorthiness Committee chairman.
Pharmaceutical Quality in the 21st Century
CDRH 2010 Strategic Priorities
Построение культуры integrity в компании Aнар Каримов партнёр «ЭКВИТА»
Quality Risk Management
Quality System.
ICH Q9: Quality Risk Management
ICH Q9: Quality Risk Management
Quality Risk Management ICH Q9 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Dr Manisha Shridhar Regional Advisor WHO-SEARO
EUnetHTA Assembly May 2018.
Presentation transcript:

Executive summary prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 1 ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT Quality Risk Management ICH Q9 Executive summary for competent authorities and industry Disclaimer:This presentation includes the author’s views on quality risk management theory and practice. The presentation does not represent official guidance or policy of authorities or industry.

Executive summary prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 2 ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT The situation today The situation today for both regulators and industry >Increasing external requirements >Increasing efforts and costs >Growing complexity and scope of risks Empowerment & Flexibility is needed >Master complexity and streamline decision making >Proactive disclosure build trust and understanding >Improve communication through sharing best practice and science based knowledge >Convert data into knowledge

Executive summary prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 3 ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT New Regulatory Paradigm  ICH Regulators: >FDA: New paradigm with the 21 st Century GMP initiative >EMEA: Revised EU directives >MHLW: Revised Japanese law (rPAL)  EU & Japan became involved at ICH GMP Workshop in July 2003: 5 year vision agreed: “ Develop a harmonised pharmaceutical quality system applicable across the life cycle of the product emphasizing an integrated approach to quality risk management and science ”  Consequent ICH Expert Working Groups (EWG): >ICH Q8, on Pharmaceutical Development, doc. approved 2005 >ICH Q9, on Quality Risk Management, doc. approved 2005 >ICH Q10, on Quality Systems, topic accepted 2005

Executive summary prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 4 ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT “risk-based” concepts and principles The new paradigm Q8 Q9 Q10

Executive summary prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 5 ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT Pharmaceutical Development (Q8) Pharmaceutical Development (Q8) Past:Data transfer / Variable output Present:Knowledge transfer / Science based / Consistent output Pharmaceutical Quality Systems (Q10) Pharmaceutical Quality Systems (Q10) Past:GMP checklist Future:Quality Systems across product life cycle Quality Risk Management (Q9) Past:Used, however poorly defined Present:Opportunity to use structured process thinking Incremental steps Changed Paradigm Q8 Q9 Q10

Executive summary prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 6 ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT Continuous Improvement Process Understanding Risk CMC regulatory oversight Company’s Quality system cGMP regulatory oversight Continuous Improvement Process Understanding Risk CMC regulatory oversight Company’s Quality system cGMP regulatory oversight Q8 & Q9 Based on A. Hussain, FDA, September 2004 Q10 & Q9 Process Understanding Risk (P/R) CMC regulatory oversight Company’s Quality system cGMP regulatory oversight Post approval change Process Understanding Risk (perceived & real) CMC regulatory Oversight (Submission) Company’s Quality system cGMP regulatory oversight (Inspection) Post Approval Change (PAC) PAC to Continuous Improvement Process Understanding Risk CMC regulatory oversight Company’s Quality system cGMP regulatory oversight PAC to Continuous Improvement Process Understanding Risk CMC regulatory Oversight (Submission) Company’s Quality system cGMP regulatory oversight (Inspections) CONSIDERATIONS

Executive summary prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 7 ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT The Desired State driven by ICH Q9  Manage risk to patient, based on science: >Product, process and facility >Robustness of Quality System >Relevant controls to assess & mitigate risk  Level of oversight required commensurate with the level of risk to patient for: >Marketing authorisation applications >Post-approval change review >GMP inspections

Executive summary prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 8 ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT The Desired State  Barriers to continuous improvement reduced or removed >Improved manufacturing efficiency >Sustained or improved product quality  Specifications based on parameters that truly impact product quality  Common understanding and language on risk  Both, industry and competent authorities focus on areas of greatest risk and understanding of residual risks

Executive summary prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 9 ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT Pharmaceutical industry and quality risk management  Pharmaceuticals have lagged behind related industries in adopting structured risk management in the quality area; e.g. >Medical devices have ISO >Food industry uses HACCP  We are using quality risk management but >Implementation is patchy >It is often not fully integrated with rest of the Quality System

Executive summary prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 10 ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT Advantages of quality risk management as technique  Improves decision making >Identifies what gives most benefit to the patient  Is scientific & data-driven >Reduces subjectivity  Ranks risk - allows prioritization >Better use of resources  Means of building in Quality  Improves transparency - inside organisation and builds trust with competent authorities >Enables regulatory flexibility  Benefits apply throughout product lifecycle

Executive summary prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 11 ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT Why did we need ICH Q9?  To ensure a common understanding of Quality Risk Management (QRM) among industry and competent authorities  To facilitate moving to the “Desired State” >To facilitate communication and transparency >To move from ‘fire fighting’ to management of risk  ICH Q9 explains >A common language and process >Potential methodologies for QRM >Where QRM can add value

Executive summary prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 12 ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT Quality Risk Management is NOT  Hiding risks  Justifying poor quality of product and / or processes  Excusing industry’s obligation to comply with regulatory requirements HOWEVER  It might bring about the revision or withdrawal of some non risk base guidance

Executive summary prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 13 ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT What does Senior Management need to do?  Ensure organisation is aware of ICH Q9 and the opportunity it affords >Appropriate education and training  Encourage open, risk aware culture >Establish & support “QRM leaders” across organisations  Encourage integration of Quality Risk Management with existing Quality systems >Do NOT set up as a separate department >Coordinate implementation and resource allocation >Prioritise; start small, learn as you go

Executive summary prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 14 ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT Conclusions  ICH Q9, together with “Pharmaceutical development” (ICH Q8) and “Quality systems” (ICH Q10), provides opportunity for a revised, optimised and, less restrictive regulatory paradigm >Based on scientific knowledge >Enable continuous improvement >Greater transparency and efficiency >Focusing on things that add value for patients >Improved relationship between industry and competent authorities based on trust  We must seize this opportunity

Executive summary prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 15 ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT Keep always in mind the Principles of Quality Risk Management The evaluation of the risk to quality should be based on scientific knowledge and ultimately link to the protection of the patient The level of effort, formality and documentation of the quality risk management process should be commensurate with the level of risk ICH Q9

Executive summary prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 16 ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT Focus resources where they matter most to protect the patient