Project: Helping the In-School Facilitator Presented by Ellie Bryan & Eileen Smith.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Roles and Monitoring Best Buddies Canada 2005 National Leadership Conference Be the change you want to see in the world. Gandhi.
Advertisements

St. Louis Public Schools Human Resources Support for District Improvement Initiatives (Note: The bullets beneath each initiative indicate actions taken.
Compliance Monitoring Orientation. Monitoring Components Focus Site Review/Fiscal Monitoring SPAM.
Work-based learning Click on the speaker on each slide to learn more!
Performance Management
RFP AND CONTRACT PHASE Jeff Wassenaar, P.E., HQ Project Development Benjamin Acimovic, P.E., Region 1.
Student Learning Objectives -SLOs Student Growth Measures and OTES
P ROJECT C LOSEOUT. Introduction This purpose of this presentation is to summarize key project closeout information and feedback for purposes of presenting.
Survey Says What are the top 5 things that teachers say about substitutes?
Give Our Library Student Workers a Chance to Voice Their Opinions Zheng Ye (Lan) Yang Director of Direct Services Texas A&M University Library.
Session 2.3: Skills for Supportive Supervision
Performance Management Guide for Supervisors. Objectives  Understand necessity of reviews;  To define a rating standard across the Foundation for an.
Project P.a.C.E. Mentor Training Orientation. Beginning Teachers Want Support Beginning teachers said that they wanted observation and feedback. Beginning.
Learning Communities in Nevada MPAEA 2009 Claudia Bianca-DeBay 1.
Performance Based Teacher Evaluation March 10, 2006.
Department of Continuous Improvement Initiatives School Advisory Council Training Dr. Terrie Mitev, Executive Director Mrs. Jodi Cronin, Coordinator.
WHITE BOOK 2 TASK FORCE Torben Sigsgaard For the FERS meeting Brussels April 2009.
Performance Management Webinar Thursday, March 19, 2015.
Empowering Staff Through Institute Planning (ESTIP) Executive Workshop Institute Name: XXXXXX Presenter: XXXXXX Date: XXXXXX.
Managing Distributed University Courses Sanna-Maria Räisänen Tampere University of Technology Institute of Software Systems.
PGCE School Experience 1 Briefing Gill Woods. Important Dates for SE1 PRELIMINARY VISIT DAYS Wednesday 1st October Wednesday 8 th October 8 WEEK BLOCK.
Preparing for Your Performance Review Prepared by: PUC Human Resources Department.
Officiating Program Presentation Designed by Gary D. Robinson Tulsa, Oklahoma (Revised November 2010)
Please take time to introduce yourself and exchange business cards with others at your table…
Copyright © 2011, 2007, 2004 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Medical Practice Marketing and Customer Service Chapter 26.
(Insert agency name and/or date) Are we prepared?.
Jun 2014 Issue (Secondary). Skills acquired during any activity in life, that can be applied at a later stage in new situations i.e. they can be transferred.
MAP (Migrant ACCESS Programme) EC-UN Joint Migration & Development Initiative A project implemented by.
Literacy Achievement Plans Adams 12 Five Star Schools A Guide to Initiating, Implementing, and Managing LAPS Revised October 2010.
1 Onboarding Basics for Pathways Programs. Onboarding Onboarding is an on-going process which starts before an employee ever comes on board and lasts.
Developmental Management Share Day. College Structure Mini schools – known as Units 120 students & 10 staff per Unit Students stay in the same Unit from.
Project Management Methodology Project Closing. Project closing stage Must be performed for all projects, successfully completed or shut off by management.
Summary of Assessment Reports and Gap Analysis
Direct Math Assessment State Department Training September, 2008 Cindy Johnstone Mathematics Coordinator.
Technical Working Group Kim S. Jacinto-Henares World Bank/ IFC Business Registration (Entry) Reforms.
Documenting Ongoing ELD Progress Using the Secondary ELD Assessment REF Amaris Rivas Coordinator’s Meeting April 10, 2008.
National Commission for Academic Accreditation & Assessment Developmental Reviews at King Saud University and King Faisal University.
INTRODUCTIONS A TIME FOR SHARING Hello and Welcome back !
Office of Faculty Administrative Services (OFAS) Monthly Information Session October 17, 2014.
1 CORE Executive Board Dec. 16, 2009 Next CEB TBD.
VACCINES AND RELATED BIOLOGICAL PRODUCTS ADVISORY COMMITTEE USPHS INFLUENZA VIRUS VACCINE STRAIN SELECTION
Head Start of Greater Dallas Accident Prevention Training Objective Loss Trends Accident Prevention Processes Accident Reporting Accident Investigations.
Mathematics Education Around the World: Bridging Policy and Practice Park City Mathematics Institute International Conference. July 14-18, Jean Michel.
REVIEWING THE COURSE SYLLABUS AND EXPECTATIONS FOR STUDENT TEACHERS ADVICE AND TIPS FOR SUCCESS Student Teaching Orientation.
 Welcome  Grading for the full time field experience  Professionalism  Chalk and Wire  What if I have problems in the field?  Student Teaching Announcements.
BEGINNING EDUCATOR INDUCTION PROGRAM MEETING CCSD Professional Development Mrs. Jackie Miller Dr. Shannon Carroll August 6, 2014.
Curriculum Development Placing Priority on Planning.
PGCE School Experience 1 Briefing Gill Woods. Important Dates for SE1 VISIT DAY Wednesday 7th October WEEK BLOCK SCHOOL EXPERIENCE 1 (SE1) Monday.
Bank FDs Positive’s Capital safety Up to Rs.1 lac per account under Deposit Insurance and Credit Guarantee Corporation of India Returns Guaranteed Different.
Learn Local Quality Preaccredited Teachers Community of Practice Moderation Workshop South East Victoria ACFE Region 5 th August 2015.
Portland State University Hourly Online Timesheet Training -Supervisors.
5/9/2001 AEC – Working Group 3 WHO WE ARE Korea 1 school – 1 group/10 sts Singapore 1 school -1 class Portugal 1 school – 1 class Greece 1 school – 1 group.
Faculty Meeting Review Group Alvan Bregman (convener), Lisa Hinchliffe, Joanne Kaczmarek.
By Sandra Taylor.  Introduction  Phase I  Phase II  Phase III  Phase IV  Conclusion.
Accreditation (AdvancED) Process School Improvement Activities February 2016 Office of Service Quality Veda Hudge, Director Donna Boruch, Coordinator of.
Project Management Methodology Project Closing. Project closing stage Must be performed for all projects, successfully completed or shut off by management.
Module 2 Moving the Team and Process Forward. Team Building Activity.
GLINA ARTS FALL 2016 FORECAST BY: KRISTIAN CUSUMANO, CHRISTOPHER BAUMAN, ERIK DAUSTER & MONAE TOWNES.
CSC Meeting School Leader Selection Process. Welcome Overview of school leader selection process Activities and timeline Roles & responsibilities Q&A.
New Employee Orientation
9 Career Planning and Development 9-1 Career Opportunities
Our Partnership: Who’s Who!
Fundamentals of a Business Impact Analysis
HCS 588 Teaching Effectively-- snaptutorial.com
Multi-Sectoral Nutrition Action Planning Training Module
Professional Review Panel
Cooperating Teacher In-Service
Tasks & Grades for MET4.
Cold War Project Due: March 15, 2012.
CIM Cooperative Work Program (COOP)
Presentation transcript:

Project: Helping the In-School Facilitator Presented by Ellie Bryan & Eileen Smith

Executive Summary *As consultants we met with the contact and determined the issues * Gathered more data, found gaps *Analyzed gaps and causes * Based on the analysis, we have 3 recommendations: >Checklist >Feedback documentation >New training

Project Introduction * Girl Scouts working with United Way *In-School facilitator bridges gap between sponsor organizations and students *Facilitators have issues >Feedback, communication, supplies insufficient

Methodology * “Practices, procedures, and rules” *Phase 1: Determine Desire and Plan *Phase 2: Collect Data, Analyze, Form Recommendations *Phase 3: Implement Chosen Recommendations *Phase 4: Evaluate Implementation

Cause & Gap Analysis Findings *Many gaps and causes >Some are not tied to performance issues *Many of the causes are difficult to treat >Most of them would do little to change the issues *Some are critical, tied to performance, can be treated

Analysis Results: Incomplete Supplies *Directions missing details *Listed supplies not always present *New items inserted without thought

Analysis Results: Lost Teaching Time *Miscommunication *Insufficient Communication *Lack of Consequences for rule-breaking

Recommendation 1: An Inventory Checklist *Carbon-type paper form *Made to List items present *Will have a comments section *To be filled out by the Designer, then the facilitator >After completion, will be sent back to the Designer, and to the Facilitator Coordinator

Checklist Example Date: Inventory Checklist (√) Satisfactory (X) Requires Action Program yearDesignerFacilitator Directions Are the directions present for all lessons? Are the directions complete for all lessons?? Are they understandable? Materials Needed for Project Are all included materials listed for all lessons? Are all needed materials listed for all lessons? Lesson Goals Are lesson goals present for all lessons? Are lesson goals understandable? Are lesson goals measureable? Comments (Be specific, which items are not satisfactory, or are very acceptable? For which lessons? Include advice to make an item better if you have any specific ideas.)

Recommendation 2: Feedback Documentation *Carbon-type paper *Made to increase communication *Can check off specific issues and leave comments *To be filled out by the facilitators >Then sent to the principal for utilization, and the coordinator for filing.

Documentation Example Feedback Documentation for Facilitator Facilitator name: Class Grade Level: Classroom number: Assisting Teacher(s) Name: School Name: (√) Yes/ Satisfactory (X) No/ Requires Action Teacher Did the teacher stay in the classroom for the whole class? If not, (on average) how often per week did the teacher leave? Was the teacher helpful with the lesson? Did the teacher control the students during the lesson? If not, (on average) how many times per class did the students become overly disruptive (and you had to pause your teaching to deal with it, or they could not hear you)? Did the teacher inform you of upcoming events (times when the students would not be in the classroom)? Students Were the students respectful? Did the students listen to you when you gave directions? Comments (Be specific. What problems did you experience when, do you know any of the students' names?)

Recommendation 3: New Training *Teach new paperwork and facilitator responsibilities >usage/ how to fill items out >processing order *To be offered annually >additional offerings dependent on employees hired during the year

Measuring Checklist Success *Short Term >Checklist created and approved >Trial utilization >Checklist improved and re- approved *Long Term >Checklist utilized by all facilitators at least once >Evaluation by coordinator and supervisor two years after initiation >Committee evaluates form when rules and policies dictate change

Measuring Documentation Success *Short Term >Initial documentation created and edited by committee >Initial document approved >Document utilized at least once by the end of the program *Long Term >Feedback consequently utilized to improve relations >At least 90% of facilitators utilize form >

Measuring Job Training Success *Short Term >Training created >Training administered to most facilitators, current and newly hired before new paperwork dispensed *Long Term >Training administered to all facilitators before the end of their first program phase >Evaluation will take place following facilitator training sessions > s sent to coordinator providing feedback

Implementation Timeline Item name & tasks AugAug SepSep OctOct NovNov DecDec JanJan FebFeb MarMar AprApr MayMay JunJun JulJul AugAug SepSep OctOct NovNov DecDec JanJan FebFeb MarMar AprApr MayMay Approve d Utilized & submitte d Consequ ences distribute d New Training Trial checklist presente d for utilizatio n New training for checklist develope d Hired facilitator s trained Ongoing training offered to new employe es:

Implementation Costs *Checklist: 14.5 hours *Documentation: 20 hours *Training: 24 hours *Hours have been approximated. NCR Paper cost for one program season is under $5. One ream with 2,500 sheets of paper is available for

To Summarize... *We found some issues with specific causes *We have suggested some recommendations *We have done both free of charge *If you need help implementing, there will be a fee

Resources Utilized Rummler, G. A. (2007). Serious performance consulting: According to Rummler. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer, an Imprint of Wiley.

Questions? Thank you for your attention!