Grey Literature in Scholarly Communication Current Thinking from Libraries and Publishers James Neal and Kate Wittenberg.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Partnering with Faculty / researchers to Enhance Scholarly Communication Caroline Mutwiri.

Advertisements

Knock, Knock!: Are Institutional Repositories a Home for Grey Literature? By Julia Gelfand University of California, Irvine Paper presented.

The Messy World of Grey Literature in Cyber Security 8 th Grey Literature Conference 4-5 December 2006 New Orleans, Louisiana Patricia Erwin – I3P Senior.

Electronic Books Whats in a Name? Are We Really Talking About Books?

SERACHING SKILLS TRAINING MAY NOT BE ENOUGH Experiences from information Competency course B. Niedźwiedzka, K. Czabanowska Information Studies Department.

The Future of Scholarship in the Digital Age: The Role of Institutional Repositories Ann J. Wolpert Director of Libraries Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Caren Milloy, Head of Projects, JISC Collections OAPEN-NL #oapenuk.

University of Sydney – Academic Forum – 13 April 2005 John Shipp University Librarian THE FUTURE OF THE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY CHANGES IN SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATION.

While You Were Out: How Students are Transforming Information and What it Means for Publishing Kate Wittenberg The Electronic Publishing Initiative at.

The Fiesole Collection Development Retreat Series, Number 7 Professor Neil McLean Saturday 30 April, 2005.

Thinking beyond Digital Libraries. A wrap-up of the 7 th Bielefeld Conference Hans Geleijnse Director of Library and IT Services Tilburg University.

Contents of the program Management in libraries and information centers Management in libraries and information centers Information and communication.

KNOWLEDGE EXCHANGE AND LIBRARIES Fatt-Cheong CHOY University Librarian Nanyang Technological University Singapore.

Scholarship 2.0 Gideon Burton Asst. Prof. of English Assoc. Editor, BYU Studies Presentation to HBLL Faculty Council March 23, 2007.

If We Build It, Will They Come (Eventually)? : Scholarly Communication and Institutional Repositories A Presentation to the NASIG 2005 Conference May 20.

EPIC Online Publishing Use and Costs Evaluation Program.

The Successful Repository: Welcome and Context Keith Webster University Librarian & Director of Learning Services.

Building Publishing Services in the Academic Library Brian Rosenblum University of Kansas Colorado Academic Library Summit Denver, Colorado June 1, 2007.

Institutional Repositories Tools for scholarship Mary Westell University of Calgary AMTEC Conference May 26, 2005.

Broadening the Agenda for Scholarship and Research.

African Librarianship and the Academic Enterprise Prepared By: Kay Raseroka Director: Library Services University of Botswana.

Institutional Perspective on Credit Systems for Research Data MacKenzie Smith Research Director, MIT Libraries.

Daniela Nastasie, PhD BEng(Hons) AALIA Senior Metadata Librarian Repository and Archive Metadata Services UniSA Library Open Access Publishing and UniSA.

WHAT DOES THE ACADEMIC LIBRARY COMMUNITY WANT FROM CROSSREF? James G. Neal CrossRef Annual Member Meeting 25 September 2002.

E-journal Publishing Strategies at Pitt Timothy S. Deliyannides Director, Office of Scholarly Communication and Publishing and Head, Information Technology.

New Crossroads Transitions & Transformations Science Librarians in the 21st Century Mary M. Case University of Illinois at Chicago.

GL14 - Fourteenth International Conference on Grey Literature National Research Council Rome, Italy November 2012 Rosa Di Cesare, Marianna Nobile.

Free e-journal publishing services Timothy S. Deliyannides Director, Office of Scholarly Communication and Publishing and Head, Information Technology.

Libraries and the Communication of Scholarship: Changing Times, Changing Roles David Ruddy.

KNOWLEDGE CREATION AND EXCHANGE: TURNING YOUR PRESENTATION INTO AN ARTICLE OR PAPER Atlanta Sloane-Seale, Lorraine Carter, Heather McRae, Marc Imbeault,

5-7 November 2014 DR Workflow Practical Digital Content Management from Digital Libraries & Archives Perspective.

Presenter Name Host Institution Date ACRL Scholarly Communications Roadshow: From Understanding to Engagement Introduction to the Scholarly Communication.

Responsible Publishing Sustainable Models for Scholarly Communication Kate Wittenberg, Director, EPIC.

Additional New Content to be Purchased Annually Team 2.

California Digital Library eScholarship Publishing Services CDL Users Council Meeting, May 9, 2008 Catherine Mitchell Acting Director, Publishing Group.

Open Access The Lingo, The History, The Basics, and Why Should We Care.

Scholarly Communications Through Open Access Graduate Student Orientation 2012 Presented by Isabel Silver, Academic and Scholarly Outreach George A. Smathers.

Caren Milloy, Ellen Collins & Graham #oapenuk.

Scholarly communications Discussion group Linked Data Workshop May 2010.

Challenges and Opportunities for Academic Libraries Collaborative Imperatives to Support Collections, Digital Initiatives, and New Services for a Changing.

P. Schirmbacher Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin The Changing Process of Scholarly Publishing or the Necessity of a New Culture of Electronic.

The University Library in the Campus Strategic Goals, Initiatives and Metrics Fall 2013.

ORGANIZATIONS AT THE MARGINS: PROSPECTS AND NEW DIRECTIONS Deanna B. Marcum July 20, 2002.

Selection Strategies for Digital Institutional Repositories Kent Woynowski 30 September 2004.

A new breed of publisher: towards open global sharing Timothy S. Deliyannides Director, Office of Scholarly Communication and Publishing and Head, Information.

EBSCO Information Services The Changing Nature of Collection Management in the Digital Environment: From Independence to Interdependence Dan Tonkery VP.

Symposium on Global Scientific Data Infrastructures Panel Two: Stakeholder Communities in the DWF Ann Wolpert, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Board.

Millman—Nov 04—1 An Update on Digital Libraries David Millman Director of Research & Development Academic Information Systems Columbia University

1 WORKSHOP ON SCHOLARLY PUBLISHING 1 June 2004 Columbia University James G. Neal Remarks During Open Session.

Institutional Repositories: the DSpace Experience Ann J. Wolpert Director of Libraries Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Queensland University of Technology CRICOS No J HOW RESEARCHERS FIND INFORMATION IN THE NEW DIGITAL AGE Gaynor Austen Director, Library Services.

CILEA e-Publishing Architectures Susanna Mornati, CILEA Berlin 4, Golm 31st March 2006.

Research and Scholarly Communication in the Humanities New Partnerships Between Librarians and Scholars Presented to the Humanities Research Institute.

Library/Press/University Collaborations The Electronic Publishing Initiative at Columbia.

The Future of Scholarly Communication & the Role of Libraries Roy Tennant eScholarship, The California Digital Library.

The Gutenberg-e Online History Project Changing Roles of players and implications for scholarly communication.

Integrating Library Collections and Services in Learning and Teaching Oya Y. Rieger Cornell University Library Ithaca, NY USA.

Future Directions for Scholarly Publishing at the University of California Catherine H. Candee Director, Publishing and Strategic Initiatives Office of.

EDUCAUSE Seminars in Academic Computing Executive Leadership Seminar Aug. 3-5, 2007 Susan Perry, Senior Advisor The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation Indiana.

Leveraging the Expertise of our Staff and the Information Resources We Manage MIT Libraries Visiting Committee April 13, 2005.

Securing faculty and admin support Monica Hammes University of Pretoria OA&IR Open Access (OA) and Institutional Repository (IR)

SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATION SARAH NORRIS AND LILY FLICK JUNE 16, 2016.

Publishing from the Library: New Roles for Libraries in Scholarly Communications David Ruddy Cornell University Library September, 2004.

Dr. Donald H. Dyal Dean of the Texas Tech University Libraries

Data sharing and exchange: Experiences within the

Emphasize “scholarly” and “universities” to distinguish TDL from other efforts. A digital infrastructure for the scholarly activities of Texas universities.

Digital Repositories (Marilyn Billings)

What Are Institutional Repositories?

Institutional Repositories

Research in Medical Education

Presentation transcript:

Grey Literature in Scholarly Communication Current Thinking from Libraries and Publishers James Neal and Kate Wittenberg

A Library perspective James Neal

What is Scholarly Communication? Creation of Knowledge and evaluation of its Validity Preservation of Information Transmission of Information to Others -Technologies -Economics -Institutions

What is Grey Literature? “…that which is produced on all levels of Government, academics, business, and industry in print and electronic formats, but which is not controlled by commercial publishers” (1997) Key Characteristics: issuing organization document types value/costs nature of presentation level of peer review

What are Key Developments? Author Revolution ATM Revolution New Majority Student Revolution Digital Preservation Revolution Open Revolution Google Revolution

What is the Urge to Publish? Communication Academic Culture Preservation of Ideas Prestige and Recognition Profit

What are Key Characteristics of Electronic Scholarly Communication? (per Cronin) New Economics Vertical Integration New Modes of Discourse Democratization Discipline Diversity Importance of Trust

Key Characteristics (continued) Importance of Credibility Velocity of Communication Expanded Readership Pluralism Plasticity Adaptivity

What are Quality Assessment Systems? Peer Review Peer Review Lite Citation Measurement Open/Community Peer Review Career Review Industry Review

What is the Repository Movement? Discipline Repositories Institutional Repositories Consortium Repositories Departmental/School Repositories Individual Repositories Referatories/Virtual Repositories

What are Core Library Roles? Information Acquisition Information Synthesis Information Navigation Information Dissemination Information Interpretation Information Understanding Information Archiving

A Publisher Perspective Kate Wittenberg

E-Publishing and Grey Literature Scholars’ thinking at its earliest stage Timely, often requires frequent updating Requires different form of peer review Benefits from addition of discipline- appropriate tools and functionality With these tools, can be useful in teaching as well as research Often not easily available to scholars, students, or libraries

Case Study: Columbia International Affairs Online (CIAO) Collaboration involving university press and libraries Aggregates grey literature (working papers, policy briefs, country data) in a sub-discipline Imbeds grey lit within an infrastructure that adds value to the scholarly content (mapping and atlas function, teaching case studies and course packs)

Grey Lit Suggests New Priorities Re-think the categories of traditional print publications (books, journals, grey literature, curriculum materials) Develop content in response to scholars’ research, teaching, and publishing needs Publishers as research centers that create new models and actually lead innovation in a field Authors as collaborators in the creating new kinds of publications within their discipline

Elements Needed for New E- Publishing Models to Emerge Interest and initiative from faculty, librarians/publishers Some form of peer review Copyright/permissions management Web development/design Access management/security/preservation Outreach/marketing/dissemination Sustainability plan (staffing, infrastructure)