1.  How does someone become a judge? What qualifications are necessary? Do some online search on any of the justices of the High Court and find out about.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Unit 3 AoS 3 Revision DP 1: The ability of judges and courts to make law DP 2: The operation of the doctrine of precedent.
Advertisements

Unit 3 AoS 3 Revision DP 5: Strengths and weaknesses of law making through the courts DP 6: The relationship between parliament and the courts in law making.
Unit 3 Legal Studies Revision
Unit 3 AOS 3 The Role of the Courts in law-making
By Vikash kumar, Yashvardhan Singh & group 1 ST YEAR (B.B.A LLb.)
University of Hertfordshire
Outcome 3: SAC Preparation Wednesday 5 June 2013.
Our Precedential Court System
 Judges may not always have to follow a previous precedent and in some cases, may be free to create new precedents. Apart from following a binding precedent,
 Following the development of legal principles through the decisions of judges in earlier cases can be difficult.  Determining which precedent, if any,
The Doctrine of Precedent
Sources of Law Precedent
Overview, Binding and Persuasive predent
UNIT 3 LEGAL STUDIES AO3- THE ROLE OF THE COURTS
Judicial Precedent by Lisa Incledon.
Business Law 1 Case Law The hierarchy of the courts.
Doctrine of Precedent.
Legal Studies Exam Preparation Guide Prepared By Peter Cavouras.
Doctrine Of Precedent Group Members Saumya kaushik Samridhi Sikha Das Sana Jahan Satyam Kharbanda Rumani Dutta.
Precedent Topic 7.
 Parliamentary Counsel drafts laws to cover all sorts of situations and possibilities, therefore the language can be vague and non-specific.  It is.
Judicial Precedent.
The Doctrine of Precedent
Common Law Legal Studies 3C.
A bit of revision.
Evaluation of Law-Making Through Courts. Evaluation The main role of the courts is to resolve disputes. Precedent develops as judges reach decisions in.
Doctrine of Judicial Precedent Produced by Dr Peter Jepson applying ‘The English Legal System’ by J Martin (5th edition). Précis Notes will be checked.
COMMON LAW, CASE LAW AND PRECEDENT
T HE R ELATIONSHIP B ETWEEN C OURTS AND P ARLIAMENTS.
4.2 – Role of Judges in Common Law 1. The main role of courts  decide the facts of the case (that is, what happened)  decide what law applies  apply.
Doctrine of Judicial Precedent Précis Notes will be checked Prior to these lessons you should have read and précised chapter 3 of “The English Legal System”
Chapter 13 Finding and Interpreting Court Opinions.
The Doctrine of Precedent. Common law Common law is also known as judge-made law, case, law or precedent law.
Foundations of Australian Law Fourth Edition Copyright © 2013 Tilde Publishing and Distribution Chapter 4 How courts make laws.
TOPIC 4 UNDERSTANDING CASE LAW Mr. Mahyuddin Daud Department of Laws, CFSIIUM.
Lesson Objective: To revise some, and become familiar with other, necessary terminology for judicial precedent.
VCE Legal Studies: Evaluating the role of the court as a law-maker
YR 12 LEGAL STUDIES How courts make law. Chapter overview This chapter looks at the concepts of Common law Doctrine of precedent Judgments and precedents.
Reasons for a court hierarchy
Copyright  2003 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd. PPTs t/a Fundamentals of Business Law 4e by Barron & Fletcher. Slides prepared by Kay Fanning. Copyright.
Law LA1: Precedent Precedent Unit 2 AS. Law LA1: Precedent Objectives What You Need to Know: What is meant by a system of binding precedent The court.
Judicial Precedent The Doctrine of Precedent: the hierarchy of the courts; stare decisis, ratio decidendi and obiter dicta; law reporting. The operation.
Common Law. * Before the time of Henry II (1154 – 1189) local customs AND local laws varied from place to place * There was no record of what decisions.
Intro to the Appellate Process When a party loses at trial they have the right to appeal the decision. An appeal is always about whether the law was correctly.
Judicial Precedent As Law. Judicial Precedent Judicial precedent refers to sources of law where past decisions of the judges create law for future judges.
THE ABILITY OF JUDGES TO MAKE LAW. INTRODUCTION: COMMON LAW  Common law – founded in England, adopted by Australia  It is law developed through the.
The Role of the Courts. What is Common Law? Common Law is law developed through the courts. Also known as Judge-made law and case law. It is created when.
English for Lawyers 1 Lecturer: Miljen Matijašević
Judicial Precedent.
The court hierarchy:.
Common Law Legal Studies 3C.
The Doctrine of Precedent
Week 6 – How legal rules are created by precedent
Understanding Law making
JUDICIAL PRECEDENT.
Peter F Hughes Legal Studies 2017 Robinvale College
UNIT 8 THE HIERARCHY OF COURTS AND THE DOCTRINE OF PRECEDENT
Common Law: Law making through the courts:
Sources of Law 1 The common law
CHAPTER 12 CASE LAW ANALYSIS
Precedent Key points.
English for Lawyers 2 Lecturer: Miljen Matijašević
What is the “Common Law”
SOURCES OF LAW Constitution -- “Fundamental Law
The Role of the Courts in Law-Making
Evaluation of the courts as law-makers
Precedent.
Precedent….
The Role of the Courts in Law-Making
Chapter 6— Case Law Analysis
Presentation transcript:

1

 How does someone become a judge? What qualifications are necessary? Do some online search on any of the justices of the High Court and find out about that person’s career before joining the High Court. A brief outline of the background of each of the current justices can be found at ices/about-the-justices. ices/about-the-justices  Why would experience as a barrister be of greater value in becoming a judge than experience as a solicitor?

Judges don’t make law all the time, they can only make law when;  A case comes before the court and there is no legislation (parliament made law)  There is no precedent in that area  The judge is required to interpret the words or meaning of a statute law 3

 They analyse previous judgements to determine if there is any binding precedent  Find the ratio decidendi (reason for the decision)  Identify and apply a persuasive precedent that may be used if no binding precedent  Develop a new precedent if required 4

 It may seem that judges have little flexibility to make up their own minds and make their own laws BUT  Judges do have some flexibility which enables them to change common law to ensure it remains relevant and that the law reflects modern views 5

There are 4 techniques available to judges if they are confronted by a precedent that they feel is;  inappropriate  Does not fit the circumstances of the present case  Remember R.O.D.D 6

7

 When a case has gone to a higher court on appeal the judge can change the decision made by the lower court in the same case  Therefore the judge can reverse the precedent set by the last judge and the new decision set by the higher court becomes the precedent 8

 When a superior court decides not to follow an earlier decision of a lower court, it overrules the previous precedent  A case in a higher court is not bound by the decisions/ precedents of lower courts  The decision in the higher court will overrule the precedent established by the lower court  E. g Supreme Court overrules a County Court decision  A new precedent is therefore created 9

 A judge can disapprove an earlier decision and reach a different decision, creating a second precedent for the same set of facts  This can occur in courts at the same level of the hierarchy  If there are a number of binding precedents, lower courts have to decide which is the most appropriate 10

 A judge can identify differences between the present case and therefore create a different precedent  This allows the judge to not to have to follow an existing precedent 11

When a judge Reverses, Overrules Disapproves Distinguishes A new precedent is formed 12

13

ADVANTAGEDISADVANTAGE  When disputes are being resolved parties to a dispute can feel confident that their case will be treated like ones in the past  Outcomes of similar cases are not always the same  The process of R.O.D.D may result in a very different decision as one in the past 14

ADVANTAGEDISADVANTAGE  Parties to a dispute may feel that they can predict the outcome of their case based on a decision of a previous similar case  An outcome is difficult to predict because there is more than one precedent that may apply to the case 15

ADVANTAGESDISADVANTAGES  Precedent can be changed by a superior court when it distinguishes cases of similar facts  Judges are conservative and often prefer to follow earlier decisions made by past judges rather than make a new precedent  This makes the law inflexible, out dated 16

ADVANTAGEDISADVANTAGE  Areas of law can develop and grow over time as judges can elaborate and expand precedents  Growth through the law is expensive, slow.  Cases have to come to court before any development of the law can occur.  Parties to a dispute have to take the risk of taking a case to court 17

ADVANTAGEDISADVANTAGE  Provides guidance in principles for judges to follow  Judges are impartial and can make decisions without fear of political interference  There needs to be a dispute and parties prepared to go to court  This is inefficient  It can also be lengthy and expensive  Legislation through parliament can be quicker and cheaper 18

 Questions 1 – 5 Page 152  Extend and Apply your knowledge Pages 153 – 155 Questions

Extend and apply your knowledge PP. 153 – 155 Answer questions 1 – 6 LQ 20