TRUTH TABLES
Introduction Statements have truth values They are either true or false but not both Statements may be simple or compound Compound statements are made up of substatements.
Statements It is raining. The grass is wet. I did my homework. Roses are red. Violets are blue.
Compound Statements Roses are red and violets are blue. He is very intelligent or he studies at night. My cat is hungry and he is black.
Questions are not statements Questions cannot be true or false. –What time is it? –What color is my cat? –What grade will I get in CS230?
TRUTH VALUE The truth or falsity of a statement is its truth value. Simple statements have a true or false truth value. –It is raining. T if it is raining F if it isn’t The truth value of a compound statement is determined by the truth value of the substatements combined with how they are connected.
STATEMENTS Our book represents statements with the letters –p –q –r –s
COMPOUND STATEMENT We created compound statements using connectives. –Conjunction (And) –Disjunction (Or) –Negation (Not)
Conjunction Joining two statements with AND forms a compound statement called a conjunction. p Λ q Read as “p and q” The truth value is determined by the possible values of ITS substatements. To determine the truth value of a compound statement we create a truth table
CONJUNCTION TRUTH TABLE pqp Λ q TTT TFF FTF FFF
Conjunction Rule The compound statement p Λ q will only be TRUE when p is true and q is true
Disjunction Joining two statements with OR forms a compound statement called a “disjunction. p ν q Read as “p or q” The truth value is determined by the possible values of ITS substatements. To determine the truth value of a compound statement we create a truth table
DISJUNCTION TRUTH TABLE pqp ν q TTT TFT FTT FFF
DISJUNCTION RULE The compound statement p ν q will only be FALSE when p is false and q is false
NEGATION ~p read as not p Negation reverses the truth value of any statement
NEGATION TRUTH TABLE P~P TF FT
PROPOSITIONS AND TRUTH TABLES We can use our connectives to create compound statements that are much more complicated than just 2 substatements. When p and q become variables of a complex statement we call this a proposition. ~(pΛ~q) is an example of a proposition The truth value of a proposition depends upon the truth values of its variables so we create a truth table.
TRUTH TABLE THE PROPOSITION ~(pΛ~q) pq~qpΛ~q~(pΛ~q) TTFFT TFTTF FTFFT FFTFT
PROPOSITIONS AND TRUTH TABLES First Columns are always your initial variables –2 variables requires 4 rows –3 variables requires 8 rows –N variables requires 2 n rows We then create a column for each stage of the proposition and determine the truth value for the stage. The last column is the final truth value for the entire proposition.
Creating a stepwise truth table pq~(p^~q) TTTTFFT TFFTTTF FTTFFFT FFTFFTF Step41321
Step 1 pq~(p^~q) TTTT TFTF FTFT FFFF Step11
Step 2 pq~(p^~q) TTTFT TFTTF FTFFT FFFTF Step121
Step 3 pq~(p^~q) TTTFFT TFTTTF FTFFFT FFFFTF Step1321
Step 4 pq~(p^~q) TTTTFFT TFFTTTF FTTFFFT FFTFFTF Step41321
TAUTOLOGIES AND CONTRADICTIONS Tautology – when a proposition’s truth value (last column) consists of only T’s Contradiction – when a proposition’s truth value (last column) consists of only F’s p~pp V ~p TFT FTT p~pp Λ ~p TFF FTF
Principle of Substitution If P(p,q,…) is a tautology then P(P 1, P 2,…) is a tautology for any propositions P 1 and P 2
Principle of Substitution pqp^q~(p^q)(p^q) V ~(p^q) TTTFT TFFTT FTFTT FFFTT
LOGICAL EQUIVALENCE Two propositions P(p,q,…) and Q(p,q, …) are said to be logically equivalent, or simply equivalent or equal when they have identical truth tables. ~(p Λ q) ≡ ~p V ~q
Logical Equivalence pqp^q~(p^q) TTTF TFFT FTFT FFFT pq~p~q~pV~q TTFFF TFFTT FTTFT FFTTT
Conditional and Biconditional Statements If p then q is a conditional statement –p q read as p implies q or p only if q P if and only if q is a biconditional statement – p q read as p if and only if q
Conditional p q pq TTT TFF FTT FFT
Biconditional p q pq TTT TFF FTF FFT
Conditionals and equivalence ~p V q ≡ p q pq~p~p V q TTFT TFFF FTTT FFTT pqp q TTT TFF FTT FFT
Converse, Inverse and Contrapositive ConditionalConverseInverseContrapositive pqp qq p~p ~q~q ~p TTTTTT TFFTTF FTTFFT FFTTTT
Arguments An argument is a relationship between a set of propositions P 1, P 2, … called premises and another proposition Q called the conclusion. P 1, P 2, …P 8 |- Q An argument is valid if the premises yields the conclusion An argument is called a fallacy when it is not valid.
Logical Implication A proposition P(p,q,…) is said to logically imply a proposition Q(p,q…) written P(p,q…) => Q (p,q…) if Q (p,q…) is true whenever P(p,q…) is true