ANSI-ASQ National Accreditation Board FQS Accreditation for forensic testing agencies Lori Gillespie RMC ~ 18 July 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Module 13 Oversight Assessment of Auditor Authentication Bodies
Advertisements

Company Confidential Registration Management Committee AS9104/1 Impacts to CB’s & Organizations Bob Cruse, ANAB Vince May, ANAB Tim Lee, The Boeing Company.
Accreditation 1. Purpose of the Module - To create knowledge and understanding on accreditation system - To build capacity of National Governments/ focal.
ANSI-ASQ National Accreditation Board. Accredited Certification Bodies (CBs)  37 AS9100  11 AS9110  27 AS9120 Applicant CBs  4 AS9110  1 AS9120 Increased.
ANSI-ASQ National Accreditation Board FQS Accreditation for forensic testing agencies Bob Cruse Program Manager, Aerospace RMC-Savannah, GA September
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) 1 Lessons Learned from Accreditation Assessments - ANAB Perspective Boston, MA July 21, 2011.
IAQG OPMT OP Assessor Training Oversight Assessment of Training Provider Approval Bodies February 2015 Module 14.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) Other Party (OP) Assessor Workshop San Diego, CA January 20, /9110/9120:2009 AQMS.
Registration Management Committee Body of Knowledge (BoK) for Other Party (OP) Assessors David Day GE Aviation.
OASIS User Training for Certification Bodies Part 2 – Applications Section July, 2013.
Registration Management Committee (RMC) Other Party (OP) Assessor Workshop January 16, 2009 – Orlando FL Roles & Responsibilities Pre- and Post- Assessment.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) 1 CB and Auditor Performance Expectations Boston, MA July 22, 2011 R. Darrell Taylor Raytheon.
ANAB AQMS Accreditation Activity 2009
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) 1 AQMS Accreditation Programs ANAB Findings Atlanta, GA July 22, 2010 Steve Holladay ANAB,
ANSI-ASQ National Accreditation Board FQS Accreditation for forensic testing agencies Bob Cruse RMC Denver Co., September
Company Confidential 1 Revisiting CB Use of AS9101 Rev D Tim Lee 12 March 2012.
Michelle Barton – Lead Technical Reviewer/Auditor UL DQS Inc.
IAQG OPMT OP Assessor Training SMS, CBMC and OASIS Oversight Assessment February 2015 Module 16.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) & Auditor Workshop 11 ‘Top Ten’ Things Auditors Should Know About 9104/1 Boston, MA July 22,
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) & Auditor Workshop 11 ‘Top Ten’ Things Auditors Should Know About 9104/1 OP Assessor Workshop.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee 1 Completing Independent Assessments Robert Flaharty & John Horan January 17, 2013 OP Assessor Workshop.
Review and Revision of ISO/IEC 17021
9104/1 Rewrite Team Report / Review to the AAQG-RMC 11 March 2009 Michael C Roberts Boeing, Technical Fellow.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) Other Party Management Team (OPMT) Resolutions San Diego, CA January 19, 2012 Stanley Faust.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) AS9104/2A Presentation San Diego, CA January 17, 2013 Tim Lee The Boeing Company 1 Other Party.
Other Party Management Team (OPMT) Status Briefing Americas Aerospace Quality Group (AAQG) Registration Management Committee (RMC) Tim Lee – Chair The.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee RMC Auditor Workshop Charleston, SC July Supplemental Oversight AS9104/2A & Special.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee 1 Lessons Learned from Accreditation Assessments - ANAB Perspective July 19, 2012 Steve Holladay.
Hosted by AAQG RMC Certification Structures Impacts to Auditors Impacts to Stakeholders Transition.
ANSI-ASQ National Accreditation Board. Accredited Certification Bodies (CBs)  36 AS9100  12 AS9110  27 AS9120 Applicant CBs  4 AS9110 Increased Surveillance.
ANAB AQMS Accreditation Programs 2005
CSOC – Certification Structure Oversight Committee Application Guidance October 2015.
11 User Pays User Committee 14th September Agenda  Minutes & Actions from previous meeting  Agency Charging Statement Update  Change Management.
organization – status 2015 – scheme – integrity program – strategy
Issues RMC Meeting September 14, 2005 Sao Jose dos Campos Mike Roberts.
AAQG Meeting RMC Meeting Sergio Paulo Packer San Diego, CA Inmetro Brazilian Aerospace Accreditation Program.
AAQG RMC Meeting AS9104 Discussion. Purpose The AS9104 document will be reviewed and revised in This is a general discussion and your opportunity.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee 1 July 17, 2014 Bryan Blunt IAQG OASIS Administrator OASIS Tools for Continuous Improvement / Next-Gen.
Company Confidential IAQG Workshop October 21, IAQG Workshop 9100 Certification Scheme Certification status – Changes implemented Tim Lee The Boeing.
ANSI-ASQ National Accreditation Board FQS Accreditation for forensic testing agencies Bob Cruse Program Manager, Aerospace RMC Seattle, WA September
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) Database Committee Report July 2015 Charleston, SC R. Darrell Taylor Raytheon 1.
ANSI-ASQ National Accreditation Board FQS Accreditation for forensic testing agencies Bob Cruse Program Manager, Aerospace RMC Indianapolis, IN. July
ANAB AQMS Accreditation Programs Overall AQMS Accreditations  37 AS9100  6 AS9110  23 AS9120 AQMS Applicants  2 AS9100  8 AS9110  1 AS9120.
ISO 9001:2015/14001:2015 Certification Transition Process
ANSI-ASQ National Accreditation Board. Accredited Certification Bodies (CBs)  36 AS9100  12 AS9110  28 AS9120 Applicant CBs  2 AS9100 (US & Israel)
Registration Management Committee (RMC) January 22-23, 2008 Phoenix, Arizona AAQG RMC Surveillance Team Report 2007 Prepared by: Susie Neal Goodrich Corporation.
ANAB Report to the AAQG RMC September CBs Per Program through 30 June 2006.
July 21, 2016 Susie Neal Director QMS Compliance UTC
Bob Cruse RMC Ft. Lauderdale, FL. March
ANAB AQMS Accreditation Activity
“What your business needs to know”
RMS Overview PRI Registrar.
ISO 9001:2015 Auditor / Registration Decision Lessons Learned
OASIS NextGen (G2) and AQMS:2016 for Auditors
ANAB AQMS Activity 2011 ~ January - March April 2011
July 21, 2016 Susie Neal Director QMS Compliance UTC
Other Party (OP) Assessor Workshop
Highlights of SR003 Rules for AS 9100, 9120 and 9110 Transition
ANAB AQMS Activity 2011 ~ Year so far January 2011
AQMS 2016 Transition Training for AUDITORS and DECISION MAKERS
Inmetro Brazilian Aerospace Accreditation Program
AS Risk Mitigation Plan
AS Risk Mitigation Plan
Americas Aerospace Quality Group Registration Management Committee
Inmetro Brazilian Aerospace Accreditation Program
Inmetro Brazilian Aerospace Accreditation Program
Inmetro Brazilian Aerospace Accreditation Program
ANAB AQMS Activity 2011 ~ to date July 2011
Presentation transcript:

ANSI-ASQ National Accreditation Board FQS Accreditation for forensic testing agencies Lori Gillespie RMC ~ 18 July 2012

 According to the KPI’s that were turned in (due 1 July 2012)  Tracking/Following up on expired and suspended certs  Total of 55 audits not completed by 1 July  Certified by 12 CB’s.  All were suspended  ANAB had a total of 73 ANAB-accredited certificates that had expired on either 30 June or 1 July. The 73 were within 12 CB’s.  10 CB’s withdrew the certs due to varying reasons  6 CB’s changing the status due to varying reasons  As of 16 July down to 59 certificates showing expired on 30 June or 1 July or suspended with expiration 30 June or 1 July.  The true expirations, asking CB’s to change status to withdrawn

 ANAB required Appendix B per SR001 in early June.  ANAB assessed CB’s to their 91XX:2009 transition plans, progress, etc. throughout  Will continue to do so  ANAB may require Appendix B again in August.  CB’s Shall submit the required Appendix C KPIs to the AB per the schedule below:  updated KPIs the 1 st of each month thereafter; until such time as their client 9100/ :2009 transition activity is complete.

 ANAB transitioned by RMC on 22 May 2012  ANAB’s plan was to transition by early 2 nd Quarter  All documentation since implemented.  Key changes that will be a challenge  NCR closures including verification  NCR escalation to suspension (including minor NCRs)  Special audits within given timeframe  # of Witnessed Audits and Office Assessment timing

7  CBs transitioning  1 Transitioned  4 CB applicants  1 Ready for the transition decision  14 CBs downloaded applications  15 CBs have not

8 Projected CB Application Dates 7 in April* 4 in May* 2 in June 5 in July 4 in August 5 in September 4 in October 1 in November 1 in January * *Concerning – just went out 5 Apps Received

ANAB’s Transition Process  Requesting processes/documentation for changes to 9104/1 and SR002 requirements  Not requiring CB to have all clients’ certification schemes identified  Will review the plan for this activity via the risk mitigation plan  CB’s transitioned in 2012:  have to implement “CB mgmt system” requirements upon accreditation to 9104/1,  can implement 9104/1 requirements with clients case by case.  Fully implement 9104/1 Jan 2013

 Your CB CAN’T assign a client a certification structure within 9104/1 (e.g. campus, several sites, complex) until your CB is transitioned to 9104/1 and you are using the 9104/1 requirements with the given client.  The only options you should be selecting right now are single or multisite.  A communication came out the end of January by SAE in regards to this.

Accredited CBs StandardAccredited CBsApplicant CBs AS AS AS Other Accreditation Status’ StandardSuspensionsWithdrawals AS (1 voluntary) Lifted 2 Voluntary AS (1 voluntary) Lifted 1 Voluntary AS (1 voluntary) Lifted 1 Voluntary

IDStatReasonEnteredClosedSubject 7338OPENFeedback About A CB CB Nonconformance Corrective Action Elevation 7290CLOSE Questions About A CB Accreditation Valid certificate removed from OASIS database 7149OPENFeedback About A CB CB Nonconformance Corrective Action Elevation 6958CLOSEFeedback About A CB Courtesy Notification of issued nonconformance to NQA 6922OPENOther Transition Issues 6686CLOSEFeedback About A CB Unaccredited Certificate

 401 (Nov 2011) – A CB certified two organizations to AQMS standards in India and according to the complaint they may not have used the accurate employee count to come to the accurate audit day numbers. Found valid; major NCR issued (late Dec 2011)  Closed with action Complaint in italics was provided previously and has no changes. Complaint in bold is new or was updated since the last meeting.

 410 (Mar 2012) – A CB may not be able to schedule an AS audit due to resources. Onsite office assessment completed.  Closed, with action Complaint in italics was provided previously and has no changes. Complaint in bold is new or was updated since the last meeting.

 412 (Mar 2012) – A CB withdrew a certificate before a transfer was completed by another CB. Complainant did not want identified, we requested to waive this request, as soon as we contact CB they will know “who”.  Open, under investigation Complaint in italics was provided previously and has no changes. Complaint in bold is new or was updated since the last meeting.

 422 (June 2012) – A CB is delayed on issuing the transition certificate to a client.  Closed with action Complaint in italics was provided previously and has no changes. Complaint in bold is new or was updated since the last meeting.

 426 (July 2012) – In regards to ethical issues by an auditor and potentially a CB with handling NCR closures.  Open, investigator assigned  Complaint is addressed to RABQSA, notified the complainant to contact RABQSA also. Complaint in italics was provided previously and has no changes. Complaint in bold is new or was updated since the last meeting.

 A124– Received April 2012– Appeal partially upheld  Appealed one minor NCRs during an AS9120 WA.  Sufficient depth (3 evidence items)  Found two of three evidence items valid, withdrew one. Appeal in italics was provided previously and has no changes. Appeal in bold is new or was updated since the last meeting.

 A128– Received May 2012– Appeal partially upheld,  Appealed the corrective action review by ANAB on a NCR issued during an AS9120 witnessed audit  Client took an unacceptable exclusion.  ANAB was requiring an NCR to be issued to the organization, CB disagreed  Panel required CB to provide evidence that the client took action, without requiring a formal NCR. Appeal in italics was provided previously and has no changes. Appeal in bold is new or was updated since the last meeting.

 A130– Received June 2012– Withdrawn, NCR withdrawn  Appealed an NCR issued during a witnessed audit in regards to information on a PEAR; however, ANAB issued the NCR against AS9100.  AS9100 not a valid accreditation requirement document, withdrew the NCR  ANAB and the CB taking the PEAR detail up with the SDR for Appeal in italics was provided previously and has no changes. Appeal in bold is new or was updated since the last meeting.

Office Assessments StatusAnnual / Re-accrdFollow-up Completed195 Confirmed142 Required337 Witnessed Audits StatusAnnual / Re-accrdOther Completed – Stage 1 Confirmed8 5 – – Stage 1 Unscheduled / Scheduling – Stage 1 Required3318+

 Office Assessments ~ 89 NCRs  15 NCR’s to aerospace requirements during 21 office assessments  3 majors  74 NCR’s to ISO or general requirements during 21 office assessments  12 majors  Witnessed Audits ~ 38 NCRs  12 NCR’s to aerospace requirements during 28 witnessed audits  11 majors  26 NCR’s to ISO or other requirements during 28 witnessed audits  12 majors

 Questions / Comments