McCann Associates Presented by: Michael Childs, Barbara Dyer, Ira Taylor, Bruce Nugyen Chad Warner & Joe Koury, McCann Associates.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATION 8-Feb-141. What Is Professional Certification? A voluntary process through which an individual documents their command of a.
Advertisements

Preparation of the Self-Study and Documentation
Knowledge Dietary Managers Association 1 DMA Certification Exam Blueprint and Curriculum Development.
TWS Aid for Supervisors & Mentor Teachers Background on the TWS.
Educational Specialists Performance Evaluation System
Standards Definition of standards Types of standards Purposes of standards Characteristics of standards How to write a standard Alexandria University Faculty.
Plateau Competency Management and Assessment Overview v 5.8.
1. Set expectations and measure performance ◦ What employees are expected to do for their organization in return for pay and benefits ◦ Allows employees.
Educator Evaluations Education Accountability Summit August 26-28,
IGP Certification: The Next Step in Your Career
Dallas Baptist University College of Education Graduate Programs
Chapter 15 Evaluation.
DEFINING JOB PERFORMANCE AND ITS RELATIONSHIP TO ASSESSMENTS.
Virginia Teacher Performance Evaluation System
Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European
Student Portfolios Documenting Your Past and Present & Planning For Your Future.
What do we mean when we talk about PD?
Quality Improvement Prepeared By Dr: Manal Moussa.
Conducting a Job Analysis to Establish the Examination Content Domain Patricia M. Muenzen Associate Director of Research Programs Professional Examination.
DPW BD&C Employee Performance Evaluation Guideline Discussion
Clinical Teaching/Student Teaching
Orienting Extension Faculty that are Volunteer Administrators.
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT
EAST AFRICAN COMMUNITY REGIONAL HIGHER EDUCATION QUALIFCATIONS FRAMEWORK.
Professional Certificate – Managing Public Accounts Committees Ian “Ren” Rennie.
ACCESS for ELLs® Interpreting the Results Developed by the WIDA Consortium.
Charles Pack Jr. WorkKeys and KeyTrain Help Make The Academy of Careers and Technology A West Virginia Exemplary School.
Florida A&M University Tallahassee, Florida October 22, 2003 Dr. R. E. LeMon Vice Chancellor for Academic and Student Affairs 1 Florida Board of Governors.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Special Education Advisory Committee Virginia Department of Education.
March 26-28, 2013 SINGAPORE CDIO Asian Regional Meeting and Workshop on Engineering Education and Policies for Regional Leaders Programme Evaluation (CDIO.
BSBPMG405A Apply Human Resource Management Approaches Apply Human Resource Management Approaches Unit Guide C ertificate IV in Project Management
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Virginia Association of School Superintendents Annual Conference Patty.
{ Principal Leadership Evaluation. The VAL-ED Vision… The construction of valid, reliable, unbiased, accurate, and useful reporting of results Summative.
TWS Aids for Student Teachers & Interns Overview of TWS.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline LEARNING OBJECTIVES REVIEW TEAM AND COUNTERPARTS Team Composition Qualification PREPARATORY PHASE.
 Advantage of a skill-based plan is that people can be deployed in a way that better matches the flow of work ◦ Avoids bottle necks ◦ Avoids idling.
© 2010 McGraw Hill Ryerson 6-1 COMPENSATION Third Canadian Edition Milkovich, Newman, Cole.
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT ON AREA 1, 2 AND 3 Prepared By: Nor Aizar Abu Bakar Quality Academic Assurance Department.
TEAM Coordinating Committee Training (TCC).  Introductions  Mission of the TEAM Program  Design of the TEAM Program  Overview of the Module Process.
March 15-16, Inquiry and Evidence An introduction to the TEAC system for accrediting educator preparation programs 3/15/12, 9:00-10:00a.m. CAEP.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
Section 1. Introduction Orientation to Virginia’s QRIS.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
SUNY TAACCCT Grant PLA Advisory Board Agenda Review of Charge WordPress Site Policy – Philosophical differences on PLA – What makes a good: Policy?
Evaluate Phase Pertemuan Matakuliah: A0774/Information Technology Capital Budgeting Tahun: 2009.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline LEARNING OBJECTIVES REVIEW TEAM AMD COUNTERPARTS Team Composition Qualification PREPARATORY PHASE.
Elementary School Administration and Management GADS 671 Section 55 and 56.
Assessment of Student Learning: Phase III OSU-Okmulgee’s Evidence of Student Learning.
Search Engine Optimization © HiTech Institute. All rights reserved. Slide 1 Click to edit Master title style What is Business Analysis Body of Knowledge?
Health Management Dr. Sireen Alkhaldi, DrPH Community Medicine Faculty of Medicine, The University of Jordan First Semester 2015 / 2016.
Assessment of the IMIA Educational Accreditation Process J. Mantas, University of Athens A. Hasman, University of Amsterdam E.H. Shortliffe, Columbia and.
Module 4 Presented by Strumpf Associates on Behalf of the WDB February 19, 2016.
Standards of Achievement for Professional Advancement District 2 Career Ladder Training April 29, 2016 Ronda Alexander & Michael Clawson.
- 1 - FINAL_NOScript_JDVerificationTraining pptx Job Titles Examples Used for HISD Nonexempt Jobs Assistant: Using knowledge of a functional area(s),
1 Expanded ADEPT Support and Evaluation System Training Module for Cooperating Teachers and Supervising Faculty.
Oregon Community College Associated Student Government Certification Barbara Delansky, Lane Community College Linda Reisser, Portland Community College.
© PeopleAdvantage 2013 All Rights Reserved We will Show You How to Easily Conduct Effective Performance Appraisals LCSA Conference 2013.
Canberra Chapter July PMI Chapter Meeting July 2007 PMCDF Competence Framework A presentation by Chris Cartwright.
AHIMA’s Commission on Certification for Health Informatics and Information Management (CCHIIM) Test Development Process Jo Santos, RHIA Senior Manager,
Tell Survey May 12, To encourage large response rates, the Kentucky Education Association, Kentucky Association of School Administrators, Kentucky.
Job Titles Examples Used for HISD Nonexempt Jobs
Test Blueprints for Adaptive Assessments
Why Consider Becoming a Teacher?
Controlling Measuring Quality of Patient Care
Presented by Barbara B. Kelley, Chair
The University of Texas System Assessment of
Career Banding Program for North Carolina State Government Employees
Standard Setting for NGSS
Job Analysis CHAPTER FOUR Screen graphics created by:
Certification.
Presentation transcript:

McCann Associates Presented by: Michael Childs, Barbara Dyer, Ira Taylor, Bruce Nugyen Chad Warner & Joe Koury, McCann Associates

McCann Associates Introduction: The Florida Association of College Test Administrators (FACTA) is an organization, at the institutional level, comprised of testing professionals. The mission of FACTA is to enhance professional growth and communication among test administrators employed by regionally accredited postsecondary institutions in the State of Florida. FACTA actively advocates and supports the National College Testing Association's (NCTA) Professional Standards and Guidelines. To that end, the Testing Center Leadership Certification program was devised.

McCann Associates Purpose: The purpose of the Testing Center Leadership Certification is to provide a means whereby individual test center staff can chart a path of professional growth and development. Through the certification process, testing staff can gauge growth and be rightfully recognized for their accomplishments and expertise. Goals: 1. The certification program will create and set documentable standards to measure professional growth of test center staff. 2. Establish benchmarks that will serve as a guide for achievement. 3. To professionally grow test center staff in the testing profession. 4. Offer a mechanism that documents and certifies accomplishments that can be exhibited to superiors.

McCann Associates Level 1 Criteria: FACTA Certified Testing Specialist:  1 to 4 years’ experience in the testing field.  High School Diploma/Associates Degree – include transcripts  Letter of recommendation by your superior indicating your training and work as a testing proctor.  Individualized statement by your superior explaining your role as a testing professional and the importance of following proper testing procedures.  Copy of evaluation and/or job description indicating work as a testing proctor.  Signed documented reading of procedure manual.  Attendance to regional, state, national testing related conference  Level 1 Certification Assessment

McCann Associates Level 2 Criteria: FACTA Certified Testing Professional:  4 to 8 years of experience in the testing field  Associates/Bachelor’s degree – include transcripts  Letter of recommendation from your supervisor  Evaluations and/or job descriptions showing breadth of experience in testing  Attendance to regional, state, national testing related conference  Work as a committee member and/or FACTA meeting attendance and/or other proof of work on a testing related committee/project  Level 2 Certification Assessment

McCann Associates Level 3 Criteria: FACTA Certified Testing Manager:  8+ years of experience in testing and working as a testing supervisor/coordinator/director/manager/trainer/certifier  Bachelor’s Degree or higher – include transcripts  Letter of recommendation from your supervisor  Copy of job description  Proof of work with FACTA/NCTA or other testing professional organization at the committee level or higher.  Level 3 Certification Assessment

Custom Certification Development Process McCann Associates

Task Documentation Review/Stakeholder Interviews Job Task Analysis Meetings, Design the Survey Analysis of Survey and Participant Demographic Data Conclusion Setting and Concrete Task Development Job Task Analysis Translate Concrete Tasks to Blueprint Standards Deliver Survey to Amass Data GOAL: To identify the appropriate job requirements to be measured, and how their appropriateness should be characterized and quantified. The primary elements typically identified are tasks, objectives, knowledge, skills and abilities. McCann Associates

Standard Standard 1 Standard 2 Standard 3 Standard 4 Standard 5 Description for Standard 1 Description for Standard 2 Description for Standard 3 Description for Standard 4 Description for Standard 5 Description Define Standards Standard 6 Standard 7 Standard 8 Description for Standard 6 Description for Standard 7 Description for Standard 8 Standard 3 Standard 6 Standard 7 Description for Standard 3 Description for Standard 6 Description for Standard 7 GOAL: To identify the standards that will be delivered to determine candidate proficiency. McCann Associates

Develop Certification Assessment Pathways GOAL: To design assessment profiles that determine candidate pathways. McCann Associates Certification Assessment Tiered AchievementPass/Fail Score Determined by single score or average score of weighted standards Sample Certification Pathway Decision Maker(s) or Grit Assessment ?Background Questions ?

Standard Determine Test Blueprint Standard 1 Standard 2 Standard 4 Standard 5 Standard Items Delivered 20Total GOAL: To determine the weight of each standard, which will drive the number of test items to deliver against each standard. Often desired test times will drive test length. 20% 15% 25% 20% Weight 100% McCann Associates

Determine Depth of Item Pool N Items Standard Standard 1 Standard 2 Standard 4 Standard 5 Standard Items Delivered 20Total 20% 15% 25% 20% Weight 100% GOAL: McCann Assessment & Content Specialists, with support from the project team, will review item pools to determine the number of items available for each blueprint standard, based on a number of criteria including range of difficulty, cognitive complexity, key variance, and content coverage in accordance with approved exemplar items. McCann Associates

Build Certification Assessment McCann Associates To build an assessment configuration file that controls assessment length, adheres to blueprint specifications, contains test items that measure blueprint competencies, and applies meaningful scoring and reporting characteristics and decision output. GOAL:

Measure and Analyze Certification Assessment Results GOAL: To work with Subject Matter Experts (SMEs) to determine scores that determine candidate’s success based on performance levels. McCann Associates Test Performance Certification 1 (Pilot Testing of 30 Candidates) Certification Requirements Met 100% 70% 0% Performance at 70% or above determines candidate has met Certification Requirements Performance at 69% or below determines candidate has not met Certification Standards 50 0 (Scale)(%) Certification Standards not Achieved

Sample of individual candidate assessment report The diagnostic roster report in College Success™ will provide stakeholders with a detailed report of candidates performance in each strand measured on the assessment. This report will be of great value when reviewing a candidate’s strengths and weaknesses, thereby assisting in the decision making process. Listed below is an example of standard measures for a certification assessment. McCann Associates DescriptionScore Overall Score13/20 (65%) Knowledge of planning and scheduling techniques4/5 (80%) Knowledge of computer-based testing and scoring5/5 (100%) Database management skills4/5 (80%) Knowledge of regulations, policies, and standards0/5 (0%) Percent Correct 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% Knowledge of planning and scheduling techniques Knowledge of computer-based testing and scoring Database management skills Knowledge of regulations, policies, and standards

Post-Certification Performance McCann Associates GOAL: To review candidate performance on pre-determined standards and further to establish benchmarks for success. Standards are pre- established in the development of the blueprints for each certification assessment. Standard # of Candidates Standard Score Standard % Standard % Standard % Standard % Standard % Standard % Standard % Standard % Total 30568%