The European Manuscript & Hand Press Book Heritage The role of the Consortium of European Research Libraries (CERL) Manuscript Collection in the National.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Resource description and access for the digital world Gordon Dunsire Centre for Digital Library Research University of Strathclyde Scotland.
Advertisements

Some outcomes of the CRM/FRBR harmonization: the definition of manifestation and a review of attributes Maja Žumer University of Ljubljana.
Teaching RDA Train-the-trainer course for RDA: Resource Description and Access Presented by the National Library of Australia September – November 2012.
Bibliographic Relationships and Bibliographic Families.
MARC 21, FRBR, RDA Review terminology (especially for non-native English speakers) Conceptual models Elements Attributes Future: Probably not a bib record,
RDA & Serials. RDA Toolkit CONSER RDA Cataloging Checklist for Textual Serials (DRAFT) CONSER RDA Core Elements Where’s that Tool? CONSER RDA Cataloging.
Teaching RDA Train-the-trainer course for RDA: Resource Description and Access Presented by the National Library of Australia September – November 2012.
Teaching RDA Train-the-trainer course for RDA: Resource Description and Access Presented by the National Library of Australia September – November 2012.
Building The Rare book Collection at Rijeka University Library in the Digital Age Ines Cerovac, Senka Tomljanović, Rijeka University Library Seminar The.
FRBR Functional requirements for bibliographic records (IFLA, 1998) Don Thornbury, RBSC Technical Services April 5, 2005.
FRBR: Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records it is the Final Report of the IFLA Study Group on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic.
RDA Test at LC Module 1: Overview What RDA Is; Structure.
Teaching RDA Train-the-trainer course for RDA: Resource Description and Access Presented by the National Library of Australia September – November 2012.
SLIDE 1IS 257 – Fall 2007 Codes and Rules for Description: History 2 University of California, Berkeley School of Information IS 245: Organization.
AACR3: Resource Description and Access Presented by Dr. Barbara Tillett Chief, CPSO Library of Congress 2004.
RDA: Resource Description and Access A New Cataloging Standard for a Digital Future Jennifer Bowen OLAC 2006 Conference October 27, 2006
RDA: Resource Description and Access A New Cataloging Standard for a Digital Future Jennifer Bowen Cornell University May 16, 2006
Descriptive Cataloging of Monographs 1. Introduction DRAFT.
RDA, FRBR & MARC RDA Cataloguing Seminars September 2012.
RDA AND AUTHORITY CONTROL Name: Hester Marais Job Title: Authority Describer Tel: Your institution's logo.
RDA Test “Train the Trainer Module 1: What RDA is and isn’t [Content as of Mar. 31, 2010]
Module C: Identifying expressions User task: identify.
LC Training for RDA: Resource Description & Access Module 6: Authorities II Part 4: FRBR Group One and NARs Cooperative and Instructional Programs Division.
DIGITIZATION OF RARE LIBRARY MATERIALS Metadata Format Access to Digital Documents © Adolf Knoll, National Library of the Czech Republic.
RDA Training FRBR: a brief introduction British Library 2015 (2015 April RDA update)
Mark Sullivan University of Florida Libraries Digital Library of the Caribbean.
Linking resources Praha, June 2001 Ole Husby, BIBSYS
Moving Cataloguing into the 21 st Century Presentation given at the CLA pre-conference Shaping Tomorrow’s Metadata with RDA June 2, 2010 by Tom Delsey.
Conceptual models: museums & libraries towards an object-oriented formulation of FRBR aligned on the CIDOC CRM ontology The title of the present ELAG.
CONSER RDA Bridge Training [date] Presenters : [names] 1.
Jan. 29, 2004OLA SuperConference Changes to AACR2 Problems and Solutions Pat Riva (McGill University) Maureen Killeen (A-G Canada Ltd.)
Archival information system ARHiNET Croatian national archival information system Vlatka Lemić Croatian State Archives, Croatia.
DACS Describing Archives: A Content Standard. The Background  Archives, Personal Papers & Manuscripts, 1980s –New Technologies with Web, XML, EAD –Revision.
National and University Library Zagreb Digitisation Activities.
Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records: FRBR and Millennium
Implementation scenarios, encoding structures and display Rob Walls Director Database Services Libraries Australia.
RDA Toolkit is an integrated, browser-based, online product that allow user to interact with a collection of cataloging-related documents and resources.
The Future of Cataloging Codes and Systems: IME ICC, FRBR, and RDA by Dr. Barbara B. Tillett Chief, Cataloging Policy & Support Office Library of Congress.
1 herbert van de sompel CS 502 Computing Methods for Digital Libraries Cornell University – Computer Science Herbert Van de Sompel
Resource Description and Access Deirdre Kiorgaard Australian Committee on Cataloguing Representative to the Joint Steering Committee for the Development.
APPLYING FRBR TO LIBRARY CATALOGUES A REVIEW OF EXISTING FRBRIZATION PROJECTS Martha M. Yee September 9, 2006 draft.
The Semantic Web and expert metadata: pull apart then bring together Presented at 12.seminar Arhivi, Knjižnice, Muzeji Nov 2008, Pore č, Croatia.
AACR2 Pt. 1, Monographic Description LIS Session 2.
RDA Compared with AACR2 Presentation given at the ALA conference program session Look Before You Leap: taking RDA for a test-drive July 11, 2009 by Tom.
RDA and Special Libraries Chris Todd, Janess Stewart & Jenny McDonald.
RDA DAY 1 – part 2 web version 1. 2 When you catalog a “book” in hand: You are working with a FRBR Group 1 Item The bibliographic record you create will.
Building blocks for RDA Theory behind RDA ALLUNY Annual Meeting September 28-30, 2012.
The physical parts of a computer are called hardware.
Intellectual Works and their Manifestations Representation of Information Objects IR Systems & Information objects Spring January, 2006 Bharat.
Description of Bibliographic Items. Review Encoding = Markup. The library cataloging “markup” language is MARC. Unlike HTML, MARC tags have meaning (i.e.,
Cataloging Unique Collections with RDA and Non-MARC Standards Melanie Wacker Metadata Coordinator Columbia University Libraries Jan. 21, 2012 ALA Midwinter.
FRBR: Cataloging’s New Frontier Emily Dust Nimsakont Nebraska Library Commission NCompass Live December 15, 2010 Photo credit:
Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records The Changing Face of Cataloging William E. Moen Texas Center for Digital Knowledge School of Library.
AACR 2 –Rules for Descriptive Cataloguing
Module 4 Key differences from AACR2 Structure This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia License
Current initiatives in developing library linked data Gordon Dunsire Presented at the Cataloguing and Indexing Group Scotland seminar “Linked data and.
RDA in NACO Module 1.b Background : FRBR/FRAD. 2 FRBR Foundation of RDA If you want a more detailed background, watch this webcast by Barbara Tillett:
Book Cataloging with RDA. RDA Instructions & Guidelines General things: – Core elements (required) – Alternative guidelines and instructions – Optional.
The ___ is a global network of computer networks Internet.
Key differences from AACR2 Structure 1. Learning Outcomes Understand similarities between RDA and AACR2 Understand the structural differences between.
Queensland University of Technology Faculty of Information Technology Michael Middleton 1 CRICOS No J Bibliographic description.
Some basic concepts Week 1 Lecture notes INF 384C: Organizing Information Spring 2016 Karen Wickett UT School of Information.
Information organization Week 2 Lecture notes INF 380E: Perspectives on Information Spring 2015 Karen Wickett UT School of Information.
Introduction to FRBR Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records GACOMO Oct. 16, 2008.
Information organization Week 2 Lecture notes INF 380E: Perspectives on Information Spring 2015 Karen Wickett UT School of Information.
Cataloging Unique Collections with RDA and Non-MARC Standards
From FRBR to FRBROO through CIDOC CRM…
Metadata - Catalogues and Digitised works
The new RDA: resource description in libraries and beyond
FRBR and FRAD as Implemented in RDA
Presentation transcript:

The European Manuscript & Hand Press Book Heritage The role of the Consortium of European Research Libraries (CERL) Manuscript Collection in the National and University Library, Croatia Dubrovnik, 31 st May 2007

IFLA’s standards regarding special collections older monographic publications (antiquarian) - ISBD (A) cartographic material (manuscript as well as printed material) – ISBD (CM) printed music publication – ISBD (PM) non book materials (manuscripts are not mentioned although they are not explicitely excluded) – ISBD (NBM) there is no special and particular standard for manuscript description (ISBD (A) + ISAD (G) within the IFLA’s UBC program

MANUSCRIPT a writing made by hand (including musical scores), typescripts, and inscriptions on clay tablets, stone etc. (AACR) a handwritten document; an unpublished document; an author's draft of a book, article, or other work submitted for publication

ITEM MANIFESTATION EXPRESSION WORK

Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (Explanation of the previous scheme) - work is realized through expression, expression is embodied in manifestation, manifestation is exemplified by item, or (from the reverse direction): expression is a realization of a work, manifestation is the embodiement of an expression, item is a single exemplar of a manifestation - citation: “It should be noted that although the relationship between work, expression, manifestation, and item are depicted in the entity- relationship diagram in a segmented way, they operate logically as a continuous chain. That is to say that the relationship from work to expression carries through to the relationship from expression to manifestation, and those two relationships subsequently carry through to the relationship from manifestation to item.” (page 60)

Further explanation according to FRBR schema manuscript is manifestation of a work, that is to say: “As an entity, manifestation represents all the physical objects that bear the same characteristics, in respect to both intellectual content and physical form” (page 20) placing manuscripts within the schema included in the study Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records determines their status in the MARC format; then the relations between the entities influence the creation of the record(s) and the relationships between single records

UNIMARC, MARC21 MARC 21 in comparison with UNIMARC enables us to code different levels of archival description (collection level, subunit level, even a single piece of item – one letter, e. g.) and to make particular record for every level; connection between hierarchical levels is not necessary

Manuscript cataloguing  elements of description common to all types of manuscripts: heading, title, notes, content description

Manuscript description Elements of description ISBD MARC 21 heading 100 title Title and statement of responsibility area Fields 20x-24x Publication, distribution etc. area Field 260 notes Physical description area + Note area Fields 3xx Fields 5xx

Manuscripts and Rare Books Collection (National and University Library of Zagreb) specific and diversified within itself three scripts of Croatian literacy throughout centuries (Glagolitic, Cyrillic, Latin script) including other scripts such as Arabian and Hebrew languages: Croatian (with its three dialects: čakavian, kajkavian, štokavian), Latin, Hungarian, German etc. includes codices as well as of prominent persons’ legacies and archives of important institutions, whole single manuscripts as well as fragments

How to find out the proper system and unique algorithm for the description? to dispose of different tools for different materials (to describe one single manuscript is not the same as to describe manuscript or archival collection) to develop one specialized and specific system that would be appropriate only for manuscript description (Czech experience with MASTER which is based on XML)

Archival and bibliographic description archival description and bibliographic description  both require the same elements (author (creator), title, dates, extent and contents) but those elements are not organized in the same way; in the archival description as well as in the manuscript description [which is not based on a title page] we are sometimes obliged and forced to supply additional information which can be found outside of the fond or collection being described

MARC and XML MARC: data contents standard: physical description on summary level, there are no fields specialized for manuscript content description XML: data structure standard, capable to distinguish between different data types (datable elements, phrase level elements etc.), it consists of elements; elements contain their attributes - elements can contain other elements; XML enables both: content and physical description of the manuscript

One example of the XML record

Possible solution? - useful direction of thinking: to create MARC records according to the study Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Record  AACR functionalanalysis/source/table1notes.pdf functionalanalysis/source/table1notes.pdf - to prefer XML to MARC format (it is possible to convert MARC to XML)