National Center on Child Care Quality Improvement QRIS Standards Learning Table Session #5 -- Effective Cross-Sector QRIS: Challenges and Opportunities.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Massachusetts Quality Rating and Improvement System (QRIS) Overview of revised standards and initial pilot design.
Advertisements

Core Pre-K Standards Review & Comment
Quality Rating & Improvement Systems Powerful Policy for Improving and Unifying Early Care and Education Anne Mitchell Early Childhood Policy Research.
October 2012 National Quality Framework Assessment & rating overview and authorised officer training Podcast Series: 4.
Performance management guidance
Creating an Early Childhood System Karen Ponder February 9, 2010 Arizona Early Childhood Task Force.
1 New Hampshire’s preK-16 Literacy Action Plan for the 21 st Century Deb Wiswell & Linda Stimson NH Literacy Task Force July 23, 2007.
STANISLAUS COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION/ CENTRAL CALIFORNIA MIGRANT HEAD START CHILD OUTCOMES SYSTEM CHILD OUTCOMES SYSTEMS Training Plan * Outcomes Awareness.
A C OUNT FOR Q UALITY : C HILD C ARE C ENTER D IRECTORS ON R ATING AND I MPROVEMENT S YSTEMS Karen Schulman National Women’s Law Center NARA Licensing.
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION PROCESS TRAINING 2-Day Training for Phase I, II and III *This 2-Day training is to be replicated to meet.
The “Highly Effective” Early Childhood Classroom Environment
National Center on Child Care Quality Improvement QRIS Standards Learning Table Session #3: Efficiency in Monitoring: Streamlining Documentation.
*There will be overlap in activities and outputs across levels. P-3 Alignment Overarching Logic Model ActivitiesOutputsShort-to-Medium Term Outcomes Long-Term.
Departments of Education and Public Welfare Office of Child Development and Early Learning Executive Budget
National Center on Child Care Quality Improvement QRIS Standards Learning Table Session #4: Efficiency: Streamlining QRIS using your State Knowledge and.
Performance management guidance
Beth Rous University of Kentucky Working With Multiple Agencies to Plan And Implement Effective Transitions For Head Start Children Beth Rous University.
A Brief overview of the Standards to support learning and assessment in practice. Nursing and Midwifery Council (2006) Standard to Support Learning and.
Western States Energy & Environment Symposium October 27, 2009.
Office of Child Development & Early Learning Tom Corbett, Governor | Ronald Tomalis, Secretary of Education | Gary D. Alexander, Secretary of Public Welfare.
Promoting Head Start and Preschool Collaboration: The Full Utilization Process Monday, June 16 3:30-5:00pm Bill Buchanan.
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION PROCESS TRAINING 2-Day Training for Phase I, II and III *This 2-Day training is to be replicated to meet.
QRIS Oregon's Quality Rating and Improvement System Overview OREGON’S QUALITY RATING AND IMPROVEMENT SYSTEM The Teaching Research Institute Center on Inclusion.
1 EEC Board Policy and Research Committee October 2, 2013 State Advisory Council (SAC) Sustainability for Early Childhood Systems Building.
CONNECTICUT ACCOUNTABILTY FOR LEARNING INITIATIVE Executive Coaching.
2012 Implementation: A QUALITYstarsNY Recruitment Session.
A Brief overview of the Standards to Support Learning and Assessment in Practice. Nursing and Midwifery Council (2006) Standard to Support Learning and.
Smart Start National Conference May 6, 2015
EEC Board Policy and Research Committee Meeting April 7, 2014 Race to the Top Early Learning Challenge Grant (RTT-ELC)
First, a little background…  The FIT Program is the lead agency for early intervention services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act.
National Center on Child Care Quality Improvement QRIS Standards Learning Table Session #3: Efficiency in Monitoring: Streamlining Documentation.
QRIS Standards Learning Table
Building Capacity for Better Care Behavioural Support Systems Across Canada Dr. J Kenneth LeClair Sarah Clark.
1 QUALITYstarsNY Field Test Community Information Session 2010 WELCOME!
Engaging the Arts and Sciences at the University of Kentucky Working Together to Prepare Quality Educators.
Pacific TA Meeting: Quality Practices in Early Intervention and Preschool Programs Overview to Trends and Issues in Quality Services Jane Nell Luster,
Policy Council and Program Planning. The Head Start Program Planning Cycle National Center on Program Management and Fiscal Operations (PMFO)
Professional Certificate – Managing Public Accounts Committees Ian “Ren” Rennie.
Public School-Operated UPK Information Session. Goals Increase your understanding of QUALITYstarsNY Answer your questions and concerns about participating.
EEC Board Preliminary Recommendations Quality Rating and Improvement System (QRIS) Provisional Standards Study.
OHS Region X TTA Created by ICF International for OHS Region X.
National Center on Child Care Quality Improvement Supporting the Cost of QRIS Administration QRIS Financing Learning Table Session Two July 26, 2012.
TOGETHER WE’RE BETTER Collaborative Approaches to Including Children With and Without Disabilities Camille Catlett & Jennie CoutureNovember 9, 2012.
Aims of Workshop Introduce more effective school/University partnerships for the initial training of teachers through developing mentorship training Encourage.
Page 1 Fall, 2010 Regional Cross Sector Meeting Elements of an Effective Protocol.
1 FY2014 Educator and Provider Support Renewal Grant Application Policy and Research Committee December 3, 2012.
National Center on Child Care Quality Improvement Re-alignment and Re-purposing: How can states maximize existing funding to support cross-sector QRIS?
EEC Board Preliminary Recommendations Quality Rating and Improvement System (QRIS) Provisional Standards Study.
1 Core Pre-K Standards Review & Comment. Common Core Pre-K Standards Mounting evidence supports that a child’s earliest years, from birth to age eight,
TEAM Coordinating Committee Training (TCC).  Introductions  Mission of the TEAM Program  Design of the TEAM Program  Overview of the Module Process.
0 Universal Pre-Kindergarten (UPK) FY13 February 2012.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
Section 1. Introduction Orientation to Virginia’s QRIS.
1 Strategic Plan Review. 2 Process Planning and Evaluation Committee will be discussing 2 directions per meeting. October meeting- Finance and Governance.
National Secondary Transition Technical Assistance Center Connecting TA for Part B Indicators 1, 2, 13, & 14: Working Together to Support States OSEP Project.
Designing Pre-K to Meet Great Expectations: Some Considerations in Governance and Delivery for States Rachel Schumacher Senior Policy Analyst Center for.
Collaboration Between 619 and Delaware Stars Verna Thompson and Rena Hallam.
The Webinar #2: A Conversation with Head Start-State and Regional Leaders & QRIS Administrators June 15, 2011.
EEC Annual Legislative Report January Context Legislative language requires EEC to submit an annual report on Universal Pre- Kindergarten (UPK)
Using Student Assessment Data in Your Teacher Observation and Feedback Process Renee Ringold & Eileen Weber Minnesota Assessment Conference August 5, 2015.
Oregon’s Early Learning Workforce: What is the data telling us? Oregon Association for the Education of Young Children Saturday, April 16, 2016 Megan Irwin,
Trends in Quality Rating and Improvement Systems September 2013.
The Center for IDEA Early Childhood Data Systems Improving Data, Improving Outcomes Conference, September 2014 Digging into “Data Use” Using the DaSy Framework.
1 Alignment of Inclusive Pre-School Learning Environments and Quality Rating Improvement System 391 Grant Funding May 7, 2012.
Yes We Can: New Opportunities for Young Children with Disabilities & their Families Keynote Panel Joan Lombardi, Deputy Assistant Secretary and Inter-Departmental.
Race to the Top—Early Learning Challenge Letters of Support Webinar
Improving Data, Improving Outcomes Conference, September 2014
The Early Childhood Technical Assistance Center
OSEP “Hot Topics in Early Childhood” Meeting
Texas Inclusion Activities Overview
Presentation transcript:

National Center on Child Care Quality Improvement QRIS Standards Learning Table Session #5 -- Effective Cross-Sector QRIS: Challenges and Opportunities

Introductions and Updates Introduce the state team (Name, title, agency) AR DE KY MS NH NM OK TX Tell us one thing – a success, a challenge, a question – your state team has to share about revising your QRIS since our last call. 2

Flow of the conversation Cross-sector QRIS means...which sectors? Successes Challenges Example: New York’s QUALITYstarsNY Discussion

The many sectors… Child care centers (regulated) Family child care homes (regulated) Head Start programs Nationally accredited centers and homes Prekindergarten (state-funded) SEA approved nursery schools/preschools Preschool special education programs Others?

Cross-Sector QRIS Cross-sector QRIS means one that aims for participation by most group early care and education providers, regardless of funding stream or auspice. At a minimum, this includes child care centers and family child care homes, Pre-K and Head Start, i.e., all publically supported and/or licensed settings, but not informal caregivers.

Comparing QRIS & Sector Features Key QRIS elements Accredited CenterHead StartPrekindergarten StandardsEach accrediting body has its own standards, procedures, duration, rigor, reliability HS Program Performance Standards & HS Act, HS Outcomes Framework State Pre-K regulations, reference ELGs, teacher certification Monitoring & Accountability Each has own procedures, duration, rigor, reliability Frequency varies (3-5 years), usually annual report Triennial federal reviews, annual self- assessment, five year re- competition cycle Depends on state Program & Professional Development State PD systems for practitioners, also higher education system T&TA system (regional, state) & grantee funds State higher education system

Relationships Working across sectors is relationship-building. Relationships are built on: Knowledge of the ‘other’ system (what do they do and how do they do it) Communication Respect Trust

Self-Reflection Working across systems requires us to reflect on & acknowledge that there are many pathways to better quality What is the definition of high quality, the approach to promoting CQI, in the various sectors in your state? How can we trust, build on, incorporate these multiple pathways in the QRIS process?

Reciprocity Compliance with another sector’s standards ‘counts’ in your QRIS Documentation from another sector in re certain criteria/standards ‘counts’ in your QRIS Reciprocity rests on TRUST – Trust the monitoring process, e.g., reliability – Trust the compliance decisions – Trust the other system

Reciprocity Reciprocity could go both ways… Achieving/maintaining a certain level in your QRIS counts in the other sector… QRIS level required to receive PreK funds QRIS as the annual self-assessment requirement for Head Start

Challenges: Cross-Sector Standards Regulation-exempt centers – preK programs that are part of public or private elementary schools – part-day preschools (stand-alone) Possible responses – Accept as regulated by another state agency (education) – Create equivalent to regulation – Other?

Challenge: Cross-Sector Support Systems How do you effectively engage the support systems of other sectors to support their programs to participate in QRIS? – Head Start – Prekindergarten – Early Intervention/preschool special education – Other?

Challenge: Cross-Sector Supports How do you get coaches/TA providers in each sector to understand your QRIS standards and sources of evidence and work with programs in their sector to meet them? – Head Start – Public schools How do you extend the expertise of TA in other sectors to share beyond their sector? – Head Start TA is focused on CLASS, how can it be shared? How do you engage the school-based programs that may be resistant to classroom assessment with the ERS? What about special education trainers/TA?

Challenges: Cross-Sector Finance How can we effectively acknowledge the very real differences in resources across sectors? Is there a pathway that helps policy makers and quality improvement leaders more clearly understand the challenges in each sector, envision a new approach and engage in a collaborative change process?

Challenge: Outreach/engagement of cross-sector partners Systems like early intervention, preschool special education, child welfare, and others Help them understand QRIS and how it benefits their system/children/families Consider a range of options, e.g., – Could they prioritize child placements in higher- quality settings? – Could QRIS be part of the monitoring & accountability system for their programs?

Challenges Are there any other challenges anyone wants to identify before we turn to Ola Friday? We can discuss them after we hear from New York…

New York QRIS Cross Sector Standards are inclusive of all types of regulated care – Centers – Family homes – Head Start – UPK – Registered Nursery Schools – Nationally accredited programs and providers – Preschool Special Education programs

New York QRIS Cross Sector Standard indicators draw from and reflect already established indicators of quality – Head Start Performance Standards – National accreditation standards

New York QRIS Cross Sector Crosswalks – NAEYC, NAFCC and Head Start alignments – Respect and trust for the established monitoring process – Clear and justifiable exceptions (ERS and Qualifications)

New York QRIS Cross Sector Other Alignment Activities – NYC Dept. of Education UPK alignment – Overview and detailed alignment reports – Clear, joint messages to field – Regular communication (bi-weekly calls) – Goal: appear aligned, encourage participation, reduce duplication

New York QRIS Cross Sector Cross Sector Support – Pre School Special Education Information sessions; conference calls; information sharing – NYC UPK Coaches Meetings; data verification and sharing

New York QRIS Cross Sector Challenges – Communication – Data – Accountability

New York QRIS Cross Sector Lessons Learned and Next Steps – Additional alignment activities – Financing alignment – On-going communication

Questions, Reflections, Comments?

Homework for Final Session Our final webinar will be held on January 31 st, jointly with the “developing QRIS” states. Look for SurveyMonkey soon. From your experience of this Learning Table, What recommendations would you make to other states crafting a new or revising an existing QRIS to be more efficient and effective? What are the big ideas that you think need further research, discussion, exploration? Please elaborate. As we move forward with QRIS, what do you think are the most pressing challenges for your state as well as for the nation as a whole? As you complete this Learning Table, what questions remain - if any - regarding QRIS standards? If you had one remaining question to ask your partner states in this Learning Table, what would it be? During the course of this Learning Table on QRIS standards, what have been your "Aha!" moments? What are your state’s next steps and how can we help? What more can ACF do to help? Are there specific topics about QRIS design that you'd like to know more about?

Follow up Technical Assistance is available by contacting your state’s Technical Assistance Specialist. Region I - Regions II, III, VIII – Regions IV, X – Regions V – Region VI – Regions VII, IX –

Thank You NCCCQI does not endorse any non-Federal organization, publication, or resource. Follow-up Contacts: National Center on Child Care Quality Improvement