Where Does UMKC Fit in the 2011 Rankings?. Why pay attention to the US News Rankings? Although rankings are imprecise, metrics are important Prospective.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Reputation, Rankings, and Ratings
Advertisements

The US News Rankings: How We Rate Jamie Redwine Jamie Redwine Office of Institutional Research July 2005.
Office of Institutional Research Song Yan, Kristy Maxwell, Mark A. Byrd Associate Director Senior Research Analyst AVP Wayne State University.
Business Administration DSA Seminar February 18, 2010.
EXCELLENCE in Action Kent State is alive with possibilities PSEO Program 217 Schwartz Center
Institutional and Student Characteristics that Predict Graduation and Retention Rates Braden J. Hosch, Ph.D. Director of Institutional Research & Assessment.
NIU – An Historical Snapshot Daniel House Office of Institutional Research Brian Brim Division of Academic and Student Affairs Daniel House Office of Institutional.
Worlds Ahead Strategic Plan Mission high-quality teaching state-of-the-art research and creative activity collaborative local and global.
Campus Based Tuition Increase Proposal for FY Robert N. Shelton Executive Vice Chancellor and Provost The University of North Carolina at Chapel.
2008/2009 Surveys of Indiana University Graduate Students and Chairs/Directors of Graduate Studies 1.
U.S. News & World Report – Tier 1 Nationally Ranked University (1 st time) #110 Public National University #194 overall – Graduation rate (predicted.
Selectivity and Graduation Rates at NJIT Office of Institutional Research and Planning April 25 th, 2012.
Understanding College Rankings Amy VanSurksum, International Officer (USA Midwest & Northeast) University of Glasgow.
Facts about First-Year Students at Central Connecticut State University Presented by Braden J. Hosch, Ph.D. Director of Institutional Research & Assessment.
Using Rankings to Drive Internal Quality Improvements Dr. Kevin Downing City University of Hong Kong & Ms. Mandy Mok QS Asia.
Undergraduate Persistence and Graduation Rates Bernadette Gray-Little Faculty Council September 15, 2006.
0 U S News & World Report Undergraduate College Rankings Ruth Kallio, Associate Director for Institutional Research Office of Budget and Planning November.
1 TRENDS AND BENCHMARKS Summer 2005 Michigan State University.
1 The Correlates of Prestige Across Graduate and Professional Schools Kyle Sweitzer Data Resource Analyst Michigan State University Fred Volkwein Professor.
Where Does UMKC Fit in the 2015 Rankings?. US News Rankings Schools are categorized by mission derived from Carnegie classification National Universities.
Moving to the Top 50 Research Administrators April 2, 2014.
UNLV T IER 1 I NITIATIVE Enhancing Southern Nevada’s Innovation Capacity and Advancing Regional Economic Development for the Long Term.
LEAGUE TABLES AND NEW KPIs VC’s OPEN MEETING Anita Wright Head of Planning November 2013.
How FSU Stacks Up To Its Peers: National Views of FSU THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY.
Welcome to Western Kentucky University! Campus Tour Information Session.
Searching for Globally Feasible Indicators from Domestic Rankings Ya Lan Xie and Ying Cheng Graduate School of Education, Shanghai Jiao Tong University,
TOP 25 A summary of the plan. An update on the progress that’s been made. A challenge for faculty. FEBRUARY 2011.
What Makes a “Competitive” College Competitive? / Lower acceptance rate / High SAT/ACT test scores of the middle 50% of incoming freshmen / Percentage.
Strategic Plan Setting Retention and Graduation Targets Enrollment Management Advisory Council (EMAC) November 19, 2014.
Board of Trustees Budget Update 04/13/ Budget Objectives Building Value for Michigan Build upon status as one of world’s top 100 universities,
 Historical Review of External Impacts On the University - Vision III Funding Plan MHEC Accountability Report Maryland Higher Education.
THE EDGE IN KNOWLEDGE Changes in the Carnegie Classifications: What They Mean for Colleges & Universities Perry Deess Ph.D. Director of Institutional Research.
New Faculty Orientation 2010 Spring Career Fair John F. Carney III August 16, 2011.
WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY Institutional Research WEST VIRGINIA ADVENTURE ASSESSMENT Created by Jessica Michael & Vicky Morris-Dueer.
Board of Trustees Quarterly Data Report Volume 1, Number 2 Graduation and Retention Update January 7, 2014.
A Profile of BGSU Students Jie Wu Office of Institutional Research Summer 2008.
ENROLLMENT MANAGEMENT and NEW STUDENT PROFILE Jay Goff Aug 22, 2002.
Introduction to GREAT for ELs Office of Student Assessment Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction (608)
2012 Edition Based primarily on data from the academic year and fall 2011.
Kevin Eagan, Ph.D. Ellen Bara Stolzenberg, Ph.D. Higher Education Research Institute University of California, Los Angeles.
Starting Points Building on Success Purdue University Calumet’s Strategic Plan Results from past initiatives inform future planning.
Ten Markers of Success (for data collection years: and ) Defining Goals for Schools by Using Data Proxies as “Dashboard Indicators”
Using Entering Student Data to Estimate Campus Retention Rates LINDA J. SAX Associate Professor & Associate Director of HERI University of California,
The University of Memphis Administrative Retreat Image and Reputation Ralph Faudree and Gary Donhardt September 20, 2004.
Kyle Sweitzer Data Analyst Michigan State University Fred Volkwein Director, Institutional Research Program Professor Emeritus of Higher Education Penn.
Advancing graduate education. Enhancing the graduate student experience. GRADUATE EDUCATION THE UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND Presentation to: Finnish Higher.
1 Forward by Design : Strategic Initiatives for the Long-Term Master Plan Mark B. Rosenberg Chancellor September 27, 2007.
RESULTS OF THE 2009 ADMINISTRATION OF THE COMMUNITYCOLLEGE SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT Office of Institutional Effectiveness, April 2010.
SUS Performance Funding Institute for Academic Leadership Joe Glover October 2015.
The Engineering Career Awareness Program (ECAP): A Recruitment to Graduation Program for Underrepresented Students in Engineering.
A Profile of BGSU Students Jie Wu Office of Institutional Research Summer 2008.
Promote a diverse, inclusive learning environment by recruiting and retaining students, faculty and staff who reflect the demographic changes in our society.
THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY State Universities of Academic and Research Excellence and National Preeminence Presentation to Blue Ribbon Panel June, 2012.
Quality assurance and graduate student support Fred L Hall Former Dean of Graduate Studies at University of Calgary, McMaster University,
RESULTS OF THE 2009 ADMINISTRATION OF THE COMMUNITYCOLLEGE SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT Office of Institutional Effectiveness, September 2009.
DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION – 5/26/2010 Advancing the University of Tennessee, Knoxville Towards the Top 25.
Academic Leadership Retreat Susan D. Martin Provost and Senior Vice Chancellor August 26,
Worcester State University POINTS OF PRIDE ACADEMIC EXCELLENCE CAMPUS COMMUNITYCOMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT.
Rosie Drinkwater & Professor Lawrence Young Group Finance Director, Pro Vice-Chancellor (Academic Planning & Resources) League Tables Where are we, why.
Metrics for Differentiation: Research and Graduate Education 1 Research Capacity Total sponsored research Number of research chairs Number of graduate.
Educational Excellence – Phase One Lisa Blazer & Dan Gelo Presenting.
Cost, Value, and Accountability in Higher Education Randy Stiles Analytic Support and Institutional Research Grinnell College April 8, 2016.
AAU Membership Metrics
Carnegie Classifications
Achieving Carnegie Highest Research Activity Classification VPR & COGS
Pace Path to Success: Combining Academic and Real-World Experiences through Purposeful Planning and Mentoring. 9/18/2018.
Performance Funding Model University of North Florida
Advanced Scientometrics Workshop
Presentation to Blue Ribbon Panel June, 2012
Developing Honors College Admissions Rubric to Ensure Student Success
Presentation transcript:

Where Does UMKC Fit in the 2011 Rankings?

Why pay attention to the US News Rankings? Although rankings are imprecise, metrics are important Prospective students pay attention and compare institutions on a number of indicators Schools are categorized by mission derived from Carnegie classification National Universities Offer full range of undergraduate majors, plus master’s and Ph.D. programs, and emphasize faculty research 260 institutions, including UMKC Gather data from each college for up to 16 indicators of academic excellence Each factor is assigned a weight that reflects how much it matters Colleges are ranked against their peers based on their composite weighted score

Changes to the U.S. News Rankings Changed from a three-tier structure to a two-tier structure Tier 1 – top 75% of schools Tier 2 – bottom 25% of schools Graduation rate performance more heavily rated Now accounts for 7.5% (up from 5%) High school counselors’ opinion now included Accounts for 7.5% Weight assigned to peer ratings was reduced Accounts for 15% (down from 25%) New Undergraduate Academic Reputation Index Weighted combined results of both reputation surveys Highest score is an index of 100

US News Tier Structure Tier 1Institutions ranked 1 to 191 Tier 2Institutions ranked 192 to 253 UMKC: Ranked 198 th

US News Rating Factors

2010 U.S. News Methodology Measures and Their Weights

Where Does UMKC Rank? UM-Kansas City 2007 Edition2008 Edition2009 Edition2010 Edition2011 EditionIncrease 1% Overall Rank 175th172nd165th186th198th Overall score Peer assessment score 2.5 Graduation & Retention Rank 192nd206th208th215th214th Avg. freshman retention rate 73%72% 71%72%9 students *Graduation rate: Predicted 65%63%61%62% Actual 47%45%43% 45%8 students Difference -18% -19%-17% Faculty Resources Rank 131st116th90th144th138th *Classes under 20 students 53%56%54%53%56%15 sections *Classes of 50 or more students 7% 6%9%8%14 sections *Student/faculty ratio 11/113/19/112/113/1 *Faculty who are full-time 82%83%84%82%84%21 positions Selectivity Rank 106th98th99th139th115th *ACT 25 th -75 th percentile *Freshman in top 10% of HS class 30%34% 31% 10 students *Acceptance rate 75%71%60%73%62%39 students Financial Resources Rank 131st132nd137th146th151st Alumni Giving Rank 229th233rd223rd211th196th Avg. alumni giving rate 5% 6%7% 446 alumni

UMKC’s Aspirational Peers Univ. ofSUNY atTempleUniv. of UMKCPittsburghBuffaloUniversityIllinois-ChicagoCincinnati Overall Rank Peer Assessment Score High School Counselor Score Undergraduate academic reputation index Graduation & Retention Rank Avg. freshman retention rate72%91%88%87%79%83% Six-year graduation rate45%78%66%67%54%55% Graduation rate performance Predicted62%77%63%57%59%49% Actual45%78%66%67%54%55% Difference-17%1%3%10%-5%6% Faculty Resources Rank Classes under 20 students56%40%38%34%33%39% Classes of 50 or more students8%18%20%9%19%10% Student/faculty ratio13/115/116/1 18/116/1 Faculty who are full-time84%89%87%74%90%99% Full-time faculty with terminal degree75%93%94%74%73%55% Selectivity Rank ACT 25 th -75 th percentile Freshman in top 10% of HS class31%49%28%21%28%22% Acceptance rate72%59%52%61%63%67% Financial Resources Rank Alumni Giving Rank Avg. alumni giving rate7%14%9%8%6%10%

UMKC’s Operational Peers GeorgeUniv. of Virginia UMKCMason Univ.UABLouisvilleSouth FloridaComm. Univ. Overall Rank Peer Assessment Score High School Counselor Score Undergraduate academic reputation index Graduation & Retention Rank Avg. freshman retention rate72%85%78% 84%83% Six-year graduation rate45%63%39%48% 51% Graduation rate performance Predicted62%57%51%57% 53% Actual45%63%39%48% 51% Difference-17%6%-12%-9% -2% Faculty Resources Rank Classes under 20 students56%30%40%24% 38% Classes of 50 or more students8%17%15%13%15%16% Student/faculty ratio13/116/117/118/127/118/1 Faculty who are full-time84%76%97%84%97%84% Full-time faculty with terminal degree75%91%86%89%82%n/a Selectivity Rank ACT 25 th -75 th percentile Freshman in top 10% of HS class31%21%27%25%35%16% Acceptance rate72%63%84%73%48%59% Financial Resources Rank Alumni Giving Rank Avg. alumni giving rate7%5%12%13%14%7%

Summary While our data has remained relatively flat, UMKC has dropped from 165 th in 2009 to 198 th in 2011 This places us in the bottom 25% of the rankings We cannot continue to do business as usual Where can UMKC make the biggest impact? Graduation Rates Our Aspirational Peers are retaining approximately 86% of their students on average Our Aspirational Peers are graduating approximately 64% of their students on average What can we do in these areas?