Common Characteristics of Layer 2 Wholesale Access Products in the EU (Draft Report for public consultation ) Cara Schwarz-Schilling, BNetzA Co-Chair NGN.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
19/02/2006 The NESSI European Technology Platform 2nd Workshop – Shanghai Feb 2006 Stefano De Panfilis R&D Laboratories Engineering Ingegneria.
Advertisements

Update on Transparency Obligations Martin Reisner Junior Adviser, Transparency ENTSOGs Transparency Workshop Brussels – 11 September 2012.
Tools to help the development of Innovative firms Thessaloniki Technology Park 1 Dissemination of Innovation: Clusters, Regional Institutions and Telematics.
RCC meeting Assessing market liquidity within GRI NW TITRE 18/10/2012 RCC meeting First thoughts on project approach for assessing market liquidity within.
Peer Reviews and new Compendium on CSR Presentation to HLG meeting 20 December 2013, Brussels.
Seminar on "IP Cablecom", October 2001 SEMINAR ON “IP CABLECOM” Brussels, 18 October 2001 “ETSI‘s APPROACH TO IP CABLECOM“ Karl Heinz Rosenbrock ETSI Director-General.
Implementing EU 2009 regulatory framework National experiences in the Enlargement countries Budva, Montenegro – 1-2 October 2012.
Broadband to everybody!? Torstein Olsen Director Norwegian Post and Telecommunications Authority LLU Conference, Bucharest, 5 July 2005.
Geolocation databases for spectrum sharing : ECC findings and studies EC DG CONNECT Workshop, 20 March 2015 Bruno Espinosa, Deputy Director, ECO.
Stakeholder meeting on the SHIFT²RAIL Strategic Master Plan Manuel Pereira, IST Lisbon ERRAC Vice Chairman 20 th June 2014, Brussels 1.
Review of BEREC Common Positions Stage 1: high level principles on issues of non-discrimination Lara Stoimenova – Remedies EWG Chair Public workshop Brussels,
Walter Boltz, Vice-President CEER 20 th Madrid Forum September 2011 Gas Target Model State of play.
European Commission Directorate-General for Energy and Transport n° 122/02/ European Directive on Interoperability for Electronic Fee Collection.
Development of BB markets Access markets (M4 & M5) and remedies applied Linda Paršova 10 TH BALTIC ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS AND POSTAL SERVICES REGULATORS’
The E-TRACK project is supported by Summary Slides A European Tracking System for Electricity – Phase II (E-TRACK II) April.
Madrid Forum 15 October 2014 Massimo Ricci Chairman.
Cost sharing models of NGN rollout in rural or remote areas BEREC-EaPeReg-REGULATEL-EMERG Summit Barcelona, 2-3 July 2015.
Broadband Development in the Republic of Moldova July 2015, Spain, Barcelona BEREC-EMERG-REGULATEL-EaPeReg Joint Summit CRISTINA LUCHITA Chief of.
David Halldearn, ERGEG Conference on Implementing the 3 rd Package 11 th December 2008 Implementating the 3rd Package: An ERGEG Consultation paper.
MPLS networking at PSP Co Multi-Protocol Label Switching Presented by: Hamid Sheikhghanbari 1.
“”Capacity and services to road users” Task descriptions Paul van der Kroon, Paris November 2005.
EMACOLEX, May 2011 Recent activities of the HMA/EMA Transparency Group Tina Engraff Legal Adviser, Danish Medicines Agency.
Subject: Analysis of European Mobile Operators Strategies towards Multiple Play Services Provision Dr. Sergio Ramos Universidad Politécnica de Madrid
Broadband Internet Current and future challenges for regulators: a selection Athens – June 1, 2007 Philippe Defraigne Cullen International
Accessing Fixed Networks and Facilities to Speed Up Broadband Rollout Presented by Andrew Gorton CANTO 29th Annual Conference & Trade Exhibition 14 th.
INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION PUBLIC CONSULTATION FIRST OVERVIEW EXPORTIC 27 March 2008 JF SOUPIZET HEAD OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS DG INFSO These view are.
Cities for Active Inclusion: Investing in an Inclusive Society Rotterdam, 29 October 2013 Susana Forjan Project coordinator, EUROCITIES.
Brussels, 4 June 2010 Introduction I. HOTREC – an umbrella II. HOTREC Fire safety Project.
CROATIAN REGULATORY AUTHORITY FOR NETWORK INDUSTRIES (HAKOM) DO WE NEED NET NEUTRALITY REGULATION? Marina Brkljačić, CROATIAN REGULATORY AUTHORITY FOR.
Main outcomes of 21 th ERG Plenary Roberto Viola, ERG Chair Brussels, 15 June 2007.
Broadband for All through Universal Service? 17 June 2010, Lisbon.
Framework & Requirements for an Access Node Control Mechanism in Broadband Multi-Service Networks ANCP WG IETF 71 – Philadelphia draft-ietf-ancp-framework-05.txt.
Consult21 Information is subject to change and is for discussion purposes only. Any dates/timings are the current anticipated timescales and may be subject.
“ BIRD Project“ 1 Broadband Access, Innovation & Regional Development” Broadband Access, Innovation & Regional Development” Project Description Ulrich.
The Notification Procedure of national telecoms markets Pál Belényesi 27 October 2006.
Local Loop Unbundling PRESENTATION TO THE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE 6 th JUNE 2007.
European Commission 1 TSM Regulation: Spectrum Briefing on Telecoms Single Market Package Anthony Whelan Head of Unit – Spectrum Electronic Communications.
CAST Project funded by the European Commission, Directorate-General Energy & Transport, under the 6th RTD Framework Programme.
“Implementing Spectrum Trading” the recent consultation Presentation to SMAG Open Forum December 2002 Geoff Chapman Radiocommunications Agency.
Jaime Afonso ECC Vice-Chairman The 5th TD-LTETechnology and Spectrum Workshop Budapest, October 12th TDD Development in Europe and Future Planning of 3.5GHz.
25/11/2015 ITU-T NGN - Progress and Plans Brian Moore Lucent Technologies Chairman of ITU-T Study Group 13 1GSC-9, Seoul SOURCE:ITU-T TITLE:ITU-T NGN -
Framework & Requirements for an Access Node Control Mechanism in Broadband Multi-Service Networks IETF 66 - ANCP WG July 9-14, 2006 draft-ooghe-ancp-framework-00.txt.
Introduction to TIDE Cluster 3 activities TIDE Final Conference Barcelona, September 2015 Birendra Shrestha Senior Traffic Modeller, Transport for.
Fostering worldwide interoperabilityGeneva, July 2009 Intelligent Transport Systems Presenter: Soeren Hess Chairman TC ITS Global Standards Collaboration.
1 TINF 2010 Tuesday 30 November 2010 Present and Future Regulation of Electronic Communications Vesa Terävä European Commission Information Society & Media.
VoIP Regulation Klaus Nieminen TKK Table of Contents Background EU Regulatory Framework Objectives, PATS and ECS definitions VoIP Classification.
Pamela Taylor, Head of European Strategy, Ofgem Madrid Forum, March 2011 ERGEG’s draft framework guideline for gas balancing.
1FTS-CEER bilateral meeting, St Petersburg, 17 May 2011 Peter Plug Chairman of the electricity working group Use and management of interconnections – The.
Broadband regulation in Denmark 24. September 2009 TRIS workshop Tomas Skov Lauridsen National IT and Telecom Agency, Denmark.
Serving society Stimulating innovation Supporting legislation INSPIRE Monitoring and Reporting 2016 Preliminary analysis 4th Meeting.
Eric Peirano, Ph.D., TECHNOFI, COO
AIOTI Working Group 04 – Policy Group
Study on Environmental Fiscal Reform Potential in 12 Member States: the case of Belgium CCIM Stakeholders Workshop Eco-Fiscality 08 July 2014, Brussels.
NN QoS activities – past and present
Eric Peirano, Ph.D., TECHNOFI, COO
Regulation of NGA networks – the EU experience
ACER’s view on the future role of the Gas Regional Initiative
Pentalateral Energy Forum
Martin Müller InRoad Coordinator InRoad
IP and NGN Projects in ITU-T Jean-Yves Cochennec France Telecom SG13 Vice Chair Workshop on Satellites in IP and Multimedia - Geneva, 9-11 December 2002.
on Priority Substances Strategic Coordination Group
DG Troika – 26 October – Portugal
Didier Chauveau ETSI OCG ECN&S Chairman ETSI Board Vice Chairman
LAMAS Working Group 6-7 December 2017
ACER’s view on the future role of the Gas Regional Initiative
KNOWLEDGE SHARING AND INVESTMENT “GOOD PRACTICES”
Activity on WFD and Agriculture
Integration of 1520/1524 requirements. Progress report.
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Presentation transcript:

Common Characteristics of Layer 2 Wholesale Access Products in the EU (Draft Report for public consultation ) Cara Schwarz-Schilling, BNetzA Co-Chair NGN EWG WIK/TNO Public workshop – Access and interoperability conditions Brussels, 8 July

Introduction  BEREC adopted a draft BEREC Report on “Common Characteristics of Layer 2 Wholesale Access Products in the EU” on 4 June 2015 for public consultation  The public consultation started on 8 June 2015 and ends on 10 July 2015  The draft report and information on the public consultation are available on the BEREC website launch-of-public-consultation-on-the-document-on-common-characteristics-of-layer-2-wholesale-access- products-in-the-eu 2

Background and Goals  Several countries have imposed VULA/enhanced bitstream products (layer 2 wholesale access products - L2 WAP ) in the last years  Regulatory context:  L2 WAP have been imposed on Markets 4/2007 and 5/2007(or 3a/2014 and 3b/2014)  M4/2007: Physical unbundling no longer possible/viable due to NGA rollout  M5/2007: Provide alternative operators with more freedom compared to layer 3 product  This report identifies common characteristics of L2 WAP of 10 countries: AT, BE, DE, DK, ES, FR, GR, IT, NL, UK  For both L2 WAP with local and regional handover  Goals:  Analyse L2 WAP to identify common characteristics and get insight where products differ  Foster the knowledge transfer between NRAs  Contribute to harmonisation  Not: being normative / recommend best practice 3

Findings  NRAs in general have pursued common goals: Giving the alternative operator a high degree of freedom to provide different services (voice, broadband, TV, business services, etc.)  Due to their complexity, L2 WAP have usually been designed in lengthy processes with participation of stakeholders and the NRA  Not all characteristics analysed have led to a common characteristic being defined (e.g. multicast)  Multicast frame replication functionality is only supported by L2 WAP if there is a demand  In order to foster the knowledge transfer a detailed description of the product characteristics is available in the annex of the report  In total, nine common characteristics were identified 4

Common Characteristics (i) Common characteristics of L2 WAP with local handover  1 (Technology): The L2 WAP is based on Ethernet  The L2 WAP analysed are based on the Ethernet protocol and provide an Ethernet service to ANOs  2 (Availability): The L2 WAP is (or will be) available at least in NGA rollout areas  Where physical unbundling is no longer technically possible or economically viable  3 (CPE/Modem): ANOs can use and configure their own CPE/modems at least in case of FTTC/B  This enables ANOs to further differentiate their services and to innovate  The CPE/modems of the ANOs must not harm the network integrity and must interwork with the network of the provider of the L2 WAP 5

Common Characteristics (ii)  4 (Bandwidth): ANOs have the possibility to control the speed of their services within the limit(s) of the bandwidth profile(s) of the subscriber access line.  This enables ANOs to differentiate the down- and upload speed of services from other operators.  In all countries analysed asymmetric bandwidth profiles are available.  5 (Quality of Service): The L2 WAP with local handover provides at least ostensibly uncontended bandwidth or a bandwidth with a defined QoS.  This enable ANOs to choose the quality of their services and to provide services with higher QoS requirements.  6 (Traffic Prioritisation): The L2 WAP supports different traffic priorities  This increases the flexibility of ANOs in the design of their products  It enables ANOs to use the bandwidth of L2 WAP more efficiently 6

Common Characteristics (iii)  7 (Number of VLANs): The L2 WAP with local handover provides several VLANs per end user unless additional wholesale products are available  This may facilitate the provisioning of multiple services and traffic forwarding  8 (Customer Identification): The L2 WAP enables ANOs to identify their end users  This enables ANOs to provide individual services to their subscribers and to authorise for each customer individually which network resources (services) the customer can use  9 (Security): The L2 WAP enables ANOs to apply security measures  ANOs have the possibility to apply any security measure they would like to use at layer 3 and higher layers. Common characteristics of L2 WAP with regional handover  Same as with local PoH except No. 5 (QoS) and Nr. 7 (Number of VLANs) 7

Next Steps  BEREC will publish a consultation report as well as the final version of the report “Common Characteristics of Layer 2 Wholesale Access Products in the EU” in October 2015  The next step is to develop the report on common characteristics into a BEREC Common Position in order to further contribute to the harmonisation of product specifications for those wholesale access products 8

Thank you. 9