© OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU Σ SIGMA Belgrade – 4 May 2011 Consultation for better policy-making.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Civil Society Days Strengthening democratic spaces for civil society in the European public sphere Civil dialogue practices in Europe The example.
Advertisements

From e-Government to e-Governance: The OECD Experience Elizabeth Muller E-Government Project OECD SitExpo February 1004, Casablanca - Morocco.
Evaluating administrative and institutional capacity building
European Social Fund Evaluation in Italy Stefano Volpi Roma, 03 maggio 2011 Isfol Esf Evaluation Unit Human Resources Policies Evaluation Area Rome, Corso.
INTERNATIONAL UNION FOR CONSERVATION OF NATURE. 2 Implemented in 12 countries of Africa, Asia, Latin America and the Middle East, through IUCN regional.
C.H. Montin, Manama 11 Manama, 20 January 2014 Regulatory Impact Assessment for Better Standards International Best Practices from OECD Charles-Henri Montin,
Citizens participation in decision making processes – local context – Technical Assistance for Civil Society Organisations Regional Office This project.
© OECD SIGMA A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU © OECD SIGMA A joint initiative of the OECD and the.
AGENCY FOR PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION AND COORDINATION OF FIGHT AGAINST CORRUPTION mr.sci. Vladica Babić - Assisstent.
Ministère du budget et de la réforme de l’Etat 6/3/2015 OECD MENA 4 May 2007 C.H. MONTIN What is a regulatory reform review and why is it useful ? Experience.
Convergence towards the "Small Business Act" EUROMED Invest Academy Belgrade, March 2015 Christos Kyriatzis, Deputy Head of Unit, International.
PRESENTATION The Structured Dialogue. What? A participative process for young people and decision-makers to discuss and elaborate recommendations jointly.
Beirut – 20 April 2011 Citizens as partners: current issues and challenges Charles-Henri Montin Senior Regulatory Adviser Ministère de l’économie et des.
Adviser, Ministry for State Reform, Lebanon
Critical Role of ICT in Parliament Fulfill legislative, oversight, and representative responsibilities Achieve the goals of transparency, openness, accessibility,
Riga – Latvia, 4 & 5 December 2006
Planning and submitting a shadow report Charlotte Gage Women’s Resource Centre.
CSO engagement in policy process Hille Hinsberg State Chancellery Government Communication Officer
OECD RECOMMENDATION ON DIGITAL GOVERNMENT STRATEGIES From citizen-centric to citizen-driven approaches Barbara Ubaldi Programme Manager– Reform of the.
TEMPUS IV- SIXTH CALL FOR PROPOSALS 1 TEMPUS Modernising Higher Education TEMPUS INFORMATION DAY.
GOVERNMENT OF ROMANIA MINISTRY OF PUBLIC FINANCE MANAGING AUTHORITY FOR COMMUNITY SUPPORT FRAMEWORK Evaluation Central Unit Development of the Evaluation.
© OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU. Quality Assurance José Viegas Ribeiro IGF, Portugal SIGMA.
ESPON Seminar 15 November 2006 in Espoo, Finland Review of the ESPON 2006 and lessons learned for the ESPON 2013 Programme Thiemo W. Eser, ESPON Managing.
Identifying Data Needs: Workshop on Household Surveys and Measurement of Labour Force with Focus on Informal Economy Maseru, Lesotho, April 2008.
Time to act on the Future of Europe …
1 UNI Europa Finance Sales and Advice campaign strategy Fair Advice?! MiFD Project meeting, Brussels, 6 th July 2011.
Towards a European network for digital preservation Ideas for a proposal Mariella Guercio, University of Urbino.
Regulatory Impact Analysis – Lebanon Working Group IV: Focus Group on Public Service Delivery, Public-Private Partnership and Regulatory Reform Amman,
C.H. Montin, Tbilisi 11 Tbilisi, 13 November 2014 Developing Regulatory Impact Assessment In Georgia Public Consultation as an integral part of RIA Charles-Henri.
Stakeholder analysis for project design Ingvild Oia, Programme Specialist,UNDP Photo by: Konomiho/flickr.
Communication Paper on Smart Regulation COM(2010) 543, 8 October 2010 Presentation by Savia Orphanidou 3 rd November 2010.
JOINING UP GOVERNMENTS EUROPEAN COMMISSION Establishing a European Union Location Framework.
RIA: Communication – building credibility Aleš Pecka Department of Regulatory Reform and Public Administration Quality Ministry of Interior, Czech Republic.
POLICY INVOLVEMENT - CANADA International Seminar on Strategies and Agreements Between the Public Sector and the NonProfit Sector Estonia March 2005 Susan.
© OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU THE COORDINATION OF THE DECENTRALIZATION PROCESS Claudia Lung.
C.H. Montin, Hsin Chu, August Hsin Chu, August 2012 Co-ordination of public policies Why and how best coordinate between ministries ? Charles-Henri.
European Public Health Alliance Lobbying, the role of NGOs and communication strategies Tamsin Rose Sofia, 29 October 2005.
© OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU Better Regulation in New EU Member States Public Policy –
Faisal Naru Head of Better Regulation DAI Europe Ltd November 2007 Washington London Johannesburg Ramallah RIA – An Art and not a Science.
SUPPORTED BY THE EUROPEAN UNION’S OBNOVA AND PHARE PROGRAMMES Public Involvement EIA TRAINING RESOURCE MANUAL FOR SOUTH EASTERN EUROPE.
Eurostat/UNSD Conference on International Outreach and Coordination in National Accounts for Sustainable Development and Growth 6-8 May, Luxembourg These.
Introducing Regulatory Impact Analysis into Turkish Legal Framework Improving the Transparency, Consultation and Communication Aspects of RIA’s March.
C.H. Montin, Hsin Chu, August Hsin Chu, August 2012 Policy-making Charles-Henri Montin, Senior Regulatory Expert, Ministry of economy and finance,
LIFELONG GUIDANCE SYSTEMS: COMMON EUROPEAN REFERENCE TOOLS ELGPN PEER LEARNING ACTIVITY WP2 Prague April 2008 Dr John McCarthy, Director International.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission
C.H. Montin, Manama 11 Manama, 20 January 2014 Regulatory Impact Assessment for Better Standards International Best Practices from OECD Charles-Henri Montin,
CALD Inclusion in the Implementation of Aged Care Reform Bruce Shaw Senior Aged Care Policy Officer - Reforms Federation of Ethnic Communities’ Councils.
ESF Networking in the UK and at the Community level James Ritchie Information Officer – England and Gibraltar ESF programme.
EPSIplus: an introduction Brian Green ePSIplus Analyst National Meeting - Slovenia Ljubljana, 7 November 2007 funded by eContentPlus.
Capacity Development Results Framework A strategic and results-oriented approach to learning for capacity development.
Implementation of the European code of conduct on partnership Findings of a survey by ETUC, BUSINESSEUROPE, UEAPME Structured dialogue 12 November 2014.
New approach in EU Accession Negotiations: Rule of Law Brussels, May 2013 Sandra Pernar Government of the Republic of Croatia Office for Cooperation.
Overview of Good Regulatory Practice Kent Shigetomi Office of the U.S. Trade Representative.
This Project is funded by the European Union Project implemented by Human Dynamics Consortium ECRAN process Climate vulnerability needs assessment Rob.
The activities of civil society organisations in the European Year of Volunteering (EYV 2011) & the role of the EYV2011 Alliance.
CNVOS Centre for information service, co-operation and development of NGOs Tina Michieli EU Policy.
C.H. Montin, Tbilisi 11 Tbilisi, 12 November 2014 Developing Regulatory Impact Assessment In Georgia Overview of the RIA process & methodology Charles-Henri.
CARIBBEAN WORKSHOP ON E-GOVERNMENT BEST PRACTICES Port of Spain, Trinidad & Tobago, July 26-28, 2005.
Project: EaP countries cooperation for promoting quality assurance in higher education Maria Stratan European Institute for Political Studies of Moldova.
Regulatory Strategies and Solutions Group, LLC
Understanding DWCPs, tripartite process and role of Trade Unions
Building Coalitions for Change Information, Consultation and Public Participation in Policy-making Experience from OECD countries Directorate for Public.
European social dialogue A new start for social dialogue
Senior Adviser, OECD/SIGMA
Senior Adviser, OECD/SIGMA
The role of the ECCP (1) The involvement of all relevant stakeholders – public authorities, economic and social partners and civil society bodies – at.
Understanding DWCPs, tripartite process and role of Trade Unions
Identifying Data Needs:
Understanding DWCPs, tripartite process and role of Trade Unions
Presentation transcript:

© OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU Σ SIGMA Belgrade – 4 May 2011 Consultation for better policy-making Charles-Henri MONTIN Senior Regulatory expert Ministry of economy and finance France French representative to OECD/RPC

2 © OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU Σ SIGMA 2 Belgrade, 5 May 2011 Contents The three forms of public –private communication What topics? Why consult? Who to consult? When? Channels Developing stakeholder consultation: a step-by- step approach Lessons from experience

3 © OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU Σ SIGMA 3 Belgrade, 5 May 2011 Active Participation Providing information Obtaining information and public views Identifying conflict lines Verifying consistency and acceptance Engaging the public in the formulation One way process: INFORMATION or notification Government Citizens Two-way flow: CONSULTATION Government Citizens Partnership Government Citizens Forms of public-private communication 2 Topics - Policy-making - Rule-making

4 © OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU Σ SIGMA 4 Belgrade, 5 May 2011 Public consultation in the regulatory process Notes: Data for 2005 and 2008 are presented for the 30 OECD member countries and the European Union. Source: OECD Regulatory Management Systems’ Indicators Survey 2005 and public consultation exist in all OECD countries with a growing trend to always consult the public for primary laws… …and subordinate regulations

5 © OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU Σ SIGMA 5 Belgrade, 5 May 2011 Why consult the public? LegitimacyCredibilityConfidenceAdded valueTransparencyAlienation and connectivityRegulatory literacyManaging conflictIncreased complianceSocial cohesion

6 © OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU Σ SIGMA 6 Belgrade, 5 May 2011 Who to consult? Subject/ Regulation Taxpayer Government department/ Regional, Local office Academic experts Charitable, not-for-profit organisation Organised interests (trade unions, employers’ associations) Private sector (companies, employers) Public sector workers (doctors, teachers) Service users / beneficiaries

7 © OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU Σ SIGMA 7 Belgrade, 5 May 2011 When to consult? Policy Cycle & Reform tools Policy Formulation Policy Delivery / Implementation Policy Review / Assessment Ex-Ante Evaluation / Impact Assessment Consultation Communication Ex-Post Evaluation Interim Evaluation

8 © OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU Σ SIGMA 8 Belgrade, 5 May 2011 Adopting the right mix of channels ChannelsBest suited toLimits Advisory groupPermanent contact Part of established process Lack of flexibility Possible capture Public meetingsTwo-way dialogue Easily relayed by media Difficult focus Capture ? Opinion surveys (incl. focus grps) Specific reform projectsLack of objectivity Little interaction WebsiteWide consultation “Open” Representativity Weak feedback

9 © OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU Σ SIGMA 9 Belgrade, 5 May 2011 Notes: Data for 2005 and 2008 are presented for the 30 OECD member countries and the European Union concerning consultation routinely used at central government level for primary laws Source: OECD Regulatory Management Systems’ Indicators Survey 2005 and Channels of public consultation

10 © OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU Σ SIGMA 10 Belgrade, 5 May 2011 Developing consultation with stakeholders (1) OECD Handbook recommendations Build a framework –Legal rights of access to information, legal status of consultation –Policies –Evaluation of activities and capactiies Plan and act strategically –Set realistic objectives supporting government policy at different levels –Define target groups (publics) to match objectives –Assess available resources to fund activities –Set up evaluation tools Choose and use the tools –Clear messages to disseminate on all types of channels –Interactive channels for consultation (process feedback) –Engaging citizens in agenda setting: consensus conference (DK), citizens’ juries (FR)

11 © OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU Σ SIGMA 11 Belgrade, 5 May 2011 Developing consultation with stakeholders (2) Harness the power of ICT –Web.2 and e-government open up new field of opportunities Put principles into practice –Commitment to citizen participation by raising awareness and providing support –Rights to be grounded in law or policy –Clear objectives and precise roles of parties, avoid false expectations –Time: early in the process, and give realistic deadlines fitting into political agenda –Objectivity of information provided, and easily accessible –Coordination across government to manage knowledge, build networks –Accountability: clear timetable, feedback to citizens –Evaluation tools to be developed, data collected. Engage citizens in evaluating events

12 © OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU Σ SIGMA 12 Belgrade, 5 May 2011 Benefits and pitfalls of consultation (UK report 1999) Consultation can – · enhance the quality and effectiveness of policy making by providing additional insights Consultation can – · create delay and administrative overload. · strengthen the legitimacy of final decisions · provide a focus for the mobilisation of resistance, · increase the responsiveness of citizens · raise expectations · produce unrepresentative views

13 © OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU Σ SIGMA 13 Belgrade, 5 May 2011 Lessons of experience Why? Clarify the purpose of consultation at the outset of the process: A code of practice can help to enhance confidence in the consultation process Who? Consultation should be open & participation voluntary Be specific when selecting whom to consult be specific Identify the objectives and resources of stakeholders; their media use, location and pursued interests Revisit the stakeholder analysis throughout the public consultation process Be willing to talk. BUT: Be wary: Sometimes the “beneficiaries” can be the hardest group to deal with When? Set a clear framework and timescale for the consultation process Align purposes with tools of public consultation in different stages of the policy cycle How? Use a flexible approach that combines a range of consultation tools: Reach out to the stakeholders Respond to comments receive and use the input: Establish mechanism ensuring that public comments are adequately taken into account Develop new approaches to better use ICT

14 © OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU Σ SIGMA 14 Belgrade, 5 May 2011 Questions ?

15 © OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU Σ SIGMA 15 Belgrade, 5 May 2011 More on the topic « Engaging citizens in policy-making » (OECD, 2001): “Evaluating Public Participation in Policy Making :” 38_1_1_1_1,00.html 38_1_1_1_1,00.html “Citizens as partners” Handbook (2003) European Commission guidelines on consultation and dialogue (2002): « Public policy and public participation »: aspc.gc.ca/canada/regions/atlantic/pdf/pub_policy_partic_e.pdfhttp:// aspc.gc.ca/canada/regions/atlantic/pdf/pub_policy_partic_e.pdf « Civic participation in policy-making, a literature review: » (independent viewpoint ) « Public participation: »