1 Round Robin Geometric Dimensional and Tolerance Assessment of Additive Manufacturing Technologies Vincent Capobianco MS 21 8-5-2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Calypso Construction Features
Advertisements

QR Code Recognition Based On Image Processing
Codes & Standards.
TAREK A. TUTUNJI Rapid Prototyping. Prototype A prototype can be defined as a model that represents a product or system. This model is usually used for.
Climate Change Committee WG1 QA/QC terminology and requirements from the IPCC Good Practice Guidance and the Guidelines for National Inventory Systems.
Geometric Dimensioning and Tolerancing
CE En 112 Engineering Drawing with CAD Application
CHAPTER 4 Dimensioning.
Design Project MAK112E Computer Aided Technical Drawing Dr C Erdem – 9.30 Project work (meeting) Search in internet, patents and standards.
Technological Systems Unit 1 ~ How They Work Lesson 1 ~ Exploring Technological Systems Technical Sketching.
Intended Audience: This StAIR is intended for advanced second year students (10-12 grade) with a mechanical focus.Objective: Given the Applying GD&T StAIR.
Geometric Morphometrics
Advanced Manufacturing Laboratory Department of Industrial Engineering Sharif University of Technology Session # 14.
GEOMETRICAL DIMENSIONING AND TOLERENCE 1. Geometric dimensioning and tolerancing is an international language used on drawings to accurately describe.
Regionalized Variables take on values according to spatial location. Given: Where: A “structural” coarse scale forcing or trend A random” Local spatial.
Chapter 15 Dimensioning.
Standard Practice for Reporting Data for Test Specimens Prepared by Additive Manufacturing This work is part of a larger project funded by the Advanced.
Basics of Good Documentation Document Control Systems
CHAPTER 16 Engineering Drawings and Symbols
ISOMETRICS Isometric means “equal in measure” and refers to the fact that the three receding axes are tilted at 30°. Isometric drawings are constructed.
5 Form Tolerances.
Surface Area of Prisms Unit 5, Lesson 2. What is a Prism? Definition: –A three dimensional figure with 2 congruent polygon bases and rectangular sides.
General Tolerance and Hole Fit
Design for Engineering Unit 6- Research and Development Rapid Prototyping Systems.
Document Control Basics of Good Documentation and
LASER AND ADVANCES IN METROLOGY
SELECTIVE LASER SINTERING
TECH 104 – Technical Graphics Communication Week 15: Design in Industry & Applications of 3D CAD.
Dimensioning and Tolerancing
Basic Business Statistics
Creating a 7-Circuit Right-Handed Cretan Labyrinth 11 Steps in Designing Your Own Labyrinth.
SolidWorks Teacher Guide Lesson3 School’s Name Teacher’s Name Date.
NCHRP Project Development of Verification and Validation Procedures for Computer Simulation use in Roadside Safety Applications SURVEY OF PRACTITIONERS.
Geometric Dimensioning and Tolerancing GD&T. What is GD & T?  Geometric dimensioning and tolerancing is an international language used on drawings to.
Strategy Using Strategy1. Scan Path / Strategy It is important to visualize the scan path you want for a feature before you begin taking points on your.
Assembly and Coordinate Management with OSD and WM.
1 4. Principles of Dimensioning This week you will learn dimensioning. The steps to follow are: Functional & Non-functional Dimensions Principles of Dimensioning.
Rapid Prototyping Introduction
Rapid Prototyping Details ENGR Objectives  Examples of different methods of Rapid Prototyping  How a 3D printer works  3D Printing in EED  Tools.
Copyright - Planchard 2012 Fundamental ASME Y14.5 Dimensioning Rules Instructors Name Course Name.
CHAPTER TWO : Geometric Tolerances
XBSM Analysis - Dan Peterson Review of the optics elements: Pinhole (“GAP”), FZP, Coded Aperture Extracting information from the GAP what is the GAP width?
 When drawing 3-dimensional objects, you have to pay attention to the length, width, and height or depth of the object you are interested in drawing.
1 JEOPARDY! Version 2005: Review for IED 2 Design Process Sketching Visualization Geometric Relations Modeling $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 Presentations.
Vase Material: Hard plastic (Porcelain) Manufacturer: Shapeways.com Cost: $67.75 Turnaround Time: 20 business days Print Technique: Fused Deposition Modeling.
3D Printing.  What is 3D printing?  General Principles  3D printing Methods  Applications  Challenges  Conclusion  Reference.
Extracting Information
Additive Manufacturing Traditional fabrication Additive manufacturing – What? – Why? – How? Issues Design guidelines Examples The future? Additive ManufacturingIISME.
Prof. David Bourne TEAM F : ADD_IN Astha Prasad Dan Berman Ihsane Debbache Nikhil Baheti 4DOF.
SCHOOL-WIDE POSITIVE BEHAVIORAL INTERVENTIONS AND SUPPORT: ADDRESSING THE BEHAVIOR OF ALL STUDENTS Benchmarks of Quality KENTUCKY CENTER FOR INSTRUCTIONAL.
9 Multiview Drawings Permission granted to reproduce for educational use only. © Goodheart-Willcox Co., Inc. Understand the principles of orthographic.
Rapid Prototyping Details
Chapter 2 Design Tools.
Geometric Dimensioning and Tolerancing (GD&T)
Transformations of Stress and Strain
Pre-clinical evaluation of novel socket materials
Sketching.
Reading Precision Sheet Metal Prints
Exploded View Extracting Drawings
Exploded View Extracting Drawings
2 types of scale factor problems
TOPIC: Computer-Aided Design
Guide for successful completion of First Article Inspection Reports
Guide for successful completion of First Article Inspection Reports
Dennis Harwig and Bill Mohr, EWI
Chapter 7 Isometry & similitude.
Additive Manufacturing: Types, Materials, and Processes
GD&T Overview Class April 24, 2019.
Tyre Industry workplan proposal to IWG Worn tyres
FDM (Fused Deposition Modeling)
Presentation transcript:

1 Round Robin Geometric Dimensional and Tolerance Assessment of Additive Manufacturing Technologies Vincent Capobianco MS

2 Contents Outline (3) Participant Instructions (4) ­Purpose & Objectives (5) ­Artifact Definitions (6-9) ­Build Plate & Artifact Designation (10-15) ­Artifact Size Designation (16-18) ­Part Fill (19) ­Tier Selection & Artifact Orientation (20-26) ­Post Processing (27-29) Summary & Conclusions (30-32) Contact & Shipping (33-34)

3 Outline This proposal requests the printing of the enclosed parts by DoD and industry to aid in the development of an AM evaluation process. Printed parts will be evaluated by NSWC Corona to determine the geometric dimensional and tolerance variations that can occur within an additive manufacturing envelope. Results of the analysis shall be open and be provided to all participants to view the GD&T performance of each machine at each participant’s location. Participation in the round robin test is voluntary. Printing costs are covered by the participant, while analysis cost is covered by NSWC Corona.

4 Participant Instructions 1. Determine Level of Participation ­Artifact Size (Choose 50%, 100% or 150% scale) ­Part Fill (Choose Sparse or Solid Fill) ­Tier Structure (Choose Level I, II, or III) 2. Print Parts According to Prescribed Procedure 3. Follow Recommended Support Material Removal 4. Mark Parts Accordingly 5. Fill Out Survey (Attached Document) ­Provide Artifact Size, Part Fill, Tier Structure ­Machine information 6. Return Parts & Survey to NSWC Corona as Directed

5 Purpose and Objectives Purpose ­To develop an evaluation process of the Geometric Dimensional and Tolerance Variations within the manufacturing envelope of AM Technology. Objectives ­Develop collaboration with industry and DoD in the participation of this study ­Collect the additive manufactured parts across differing technologies and collect test specimens ­Measure specimens and compare GD&T variations between specimens ­Provide participants with results and develop a more mature evaluation process of AM technology

6 Artifact Definitions

7 Round Robin Artifacts GD&T Measurable Artifacts ­Four Artifacts Developed by NSWC Corona ­Challenge the Build Envelope of AM machines All Inclusive AM Technology and Materials ­Direct Metal Laser Sintering (DMLS) ­Electron Beam Melting (EBM) ­Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) ­Select Laser Sintering (SLS) ­Stereolithography (SLA) ­Etc. Designated Manufacturing Placement ­Artifact Coordinate system Designated ­Part Placement and Orientation Defined ­Features Three Tier System for Selection of Parts ­Multiple Size of Parts Available

8 Round Robin Test Artifacts Four different artifacts are proposed for the Round Robin Participation The different geometries focus on the 14 GD&T Variables from ASME Y ­Each part Focuses on certain GD&T variables ­GD&T features measured using CMM AM Evaluation Artifact 1 AM Evaluation Artifact 4 AM Evaluation Artifact 3 AM Evaluation Artifact 2 Concentricity

9 Round Robin Artifact GD&T Parameters

10 Build Plate & Artifact Designation

11 Build Plate Coordinate Designation ­Part Location designated from ISO 841 Industrial automation systems and integration ­Artifacts will be located with coordinates and angles defined

12 Artifact Coordinate Designation Artifact 1 x y z (0,0,0) x z Front View Bottom View x y Origin location designated from A1L, A1W, A1H to describe Article 1 Length, Width, and Height Initial XYZ orientation is shown as the Isometric view on this slide A1W.5A1L A1L A1H.5A1W Isometric View

13 Artifact Coordinate Designation Artifact 2 Origin location designated from A2L, A2W, A2H to describe Article 2 length, width, and height Initial XYZ orientation is shown as the isometric view on this slide x y z (0,0,0) x z A2L y A2H A2W.5A2L.5A2W x Bottom View Front View Isometric View

14 Artifact Coordinate Designation Artifact 3 Origin location designated from A3L, A3W, A3H to describe Article 3 length, width, and height Initial XYZ orientation is shown as the isometric view on this slide x y z (0,0,0) A3L.5A3L Bottom View A3W.5A3W Front View A3H x y z x Isometric View

15 Artifact Coordinate Designation Artifact 4 Origin location designated from A4L, A4W, A4H to describe Article 4 length width and height Due to the diameter of artifact 4, A4L and A4W are equivalent Initial XYZ orientation is shown as the isometric view on this slide x y z (0,0,0) x y A4H A4W x z.5A4W Isometric View

16 Artifact Size Designation

17 Artifact Size Definition Multiple Sizes Available for Selection ­150% Scale ­100% Scale ­50% Scale ­Participant chooses the largest parts they can produce between 150%, 100%, and 50% scale Drawings of Full Scale Parts are Provided Showing GD&T

18 Scaled Artifact Size Envelope

19 Part Fill Recommend solid filled parts for 50% size of artifacts for Artifacts #1, #2, and #3 Recommend solid filled parts for all sizes of artifact #4 100% and 150% size of artifacts #1, #2, and #3 can be sparse filled

20 Tier Selection & Artifact Orientation

21 Participation Tiers 1 Build Envelope of Artifact Participants are allowed to choose the level of parts to produce in builds ­Increasing tiers equates to more parts per build ­Minimum participation into round robin testing is tier one with total of 8 artifacts ­Requesting a total of 4 builds corresponding to the 4 different artifacts Tier One: Blue Total Artifacts Per Build: 2 Total Artifacts: 8 Tier Two: Blue + Orange Total Artifacts Per Build: 4 Total Artifacts: 16 Tier Three: Blue + Orange+ Red Total Artifacts Per Build: 5 Total Artifacts: 20

22 Build Plate Size Definition for Artifact Placement +x +y PW PL 2 x.1PW 2 x.1PL 2 x.1PW 2 x.1PL.5PL.5PW Part envelope will be located at least 10% from width and length at build plate edges Artifacts will be rotated in distinct directions for capturing build plate envelope variation Locations will be declared by build plate size variables plate length (PL) and plate width (PW) The attached build plate location spreadsheet can be used to calculate the location of the artifacts based on the size inputs of the build plate

23 Artifact Build Plate Orientation Artifact 1 Build LocationLocation (X,Y,Z)Reorientation (A,B,C)° Location 1(-[0.4PL-0.5A1L], -[0.4PW-0.5A1W], 0)(0, 0, 0) Location 2([0.4PL-0.5A1L], [0.4PW-0.5A1W], 0)(0, 0, 180) Location 3([0.4PL-0.5A1L], -[0.4PW-0.5A1W], 0)(0, 0, 180) Location 4(-[0.4PL-0.5A1L], [0.4PW-0.5A1W], 0)(0, 0, 0) Location 5(0, 0, 0) +x +y +z

24 Artifact Build Plate Orientation Artifact 2 Build LocationLocation (X,Y,Z)Reorientation (A,B,C)° Location 1(-[0.4PL-0.5A2L], -[0.4PW-0.5A2W], 0)(0, 0, 180) Location 2([0.4PL-0.5A2L], [0.4PW-0.5A2W], 0)(0, 0, 0) Location 3([0.4PL-0.5A2L], -[0.4PW-0.5A2W], 0)(0, 0, 0) Location 4(-[0.4PL-0.5A2L], [0.4PW-0.5A2W], 0)(0, 0, 180) Location 5(0, 0, 0)(0, 0, 180) +x +y +z

25 Artifact Build Plate Orientation Artifact 3 +x +y +z Build LocationLocation (X,Y,Z)Reorientation (A,B,C)° Location 1(-[0.4PL-0.5A3L], -[0.4PW-0.5A3W], 0)(0, 0, 0) Location 2([0.4PL-0.5A3L], [0.4PW-0.5A3W], 0)(0, 0, 180) Location 3([0.4PL-0.5A3L], -[0.4PW-0.5A3W], 0)(0, 0, 0) Location 4(-[0.4PL-0.5A3L], [0.4PW-0.5A3W], 0)(0, 0, 180) Location 5(0, 0, 0)

26 Artifact Build Plate Orientation Artifact 4 +x +y +z Build LocationLocation (X,Y,Z)Reorientation (A,B,C)° Location 1(-[0.4PL-0.5A4W], -[0.4PW-0.5A4W], 0)(0, 0, 0) Location 2([0.4PL-0.5A4W], [0.4PW-0.5A4W], 0)(0, 0, 0) Location 3([0.4PL-0.5A4W], -[0.4PW-0.5A4W], 0)(0, 0, 0) Location 4(-[0.4PL-0.5A4W], [0.4PW-0.5A4W], 0)(0, 0, 0) Location 5(0, 0, 0)

27 Post Processing

28 Support Material Removal Request support material removed from artifacts ­Metallics Minimal machining to remove support material only ­Dissolvable Materials Remove support material through dissolvable support material removal process Please ship parts to the address provided on slide 34 Please complete survey and return to Vincent Capobianco

29 Part Identification For itemization, request that the parts are marked with a sharpie after removing them from the build plate Please mark the numerical location, (1-5) on the bottom of the parts

30 Summary & Conclusions

31 Summary Timeline ­Requesting parts and survey no later than 30 days after release of round robin testing Project call ­Report provided in fourth quarter 2015 of GD&T comparisons ­Results of the analysis shall be open and be provided to all participants to view the GD&T performance of each machine at each participant’s location

32 Conclusion Collection of measurement data and report post analysis will be provided comparing GD&T and variations of individual artifacts across all AM technologies Outline of Inputs that effect GD&T ­User Experience ­Material and Process ­Recorded Temperature ­Recorded Pressure ­Part Size ­Location ­Part Fill

33 Contact For more information please contact Project Lead ­Vincent Capobianco (MS 21) Branch Manager ­Henry Meinders (MS 21)

34 Shipping Address Please Ship Round Robin Artifacts to Naval Surface Warfare Center Corona Attention: Vincent Capobianco (MS 21) 1999 Fourth St Norco, CA 92860