Wood’s Homes celebrated its 100 th anniversary in 2014. Since its early days as an orphanage during World War II in Innisfail, Olds and later Bowness.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Illinois Department of Children and Family Services, Pathways to Strengthening and Supporting Families Program April 15, 2010 Division of Service Support,
Advertisements

SCHOOL COUNSELING Fran Hensley, M.A.Ed. School Counselor
Family Search & Engagement
Shirley Walters Safeguarding & Intervention Officer at RPS.
The Signs of Safety Approach
Parents as Partners A GROUPWORK PROGRAMME WITH A COUPLE APPROACH DFE funded.
Southern Alberta Child and Family Services
The use of Family Group Conferencing in Foster Care and Institutional Care Paper presented at Association of Children’s Welfare Agencies Conference. 18.
Child Welfare Services Family centered services to achieve well- being through ensuring self-sufficiency, support, safety, and permanence. Dual tracks-
Introduction to Outcomes Based Service Delivery in Southern Alberta David O’Brien MSW, RSW Southern Alberta Child and Family Services Authority.
Outcomes Based Service Delivery Alberta Children and Youth Services
Services and Resources Available for Families & Children.
VISITATION 1. Competencies  SW Ability to complete visitation plans that underscore the importance of arranging and maintaining immediate, frequent,
1 Creating a Culture of Interdependence A care team approach to making high needs placements work.
BEST-INTEREST DETERMINATIONS Implementing the Mandate of Fostering Connections Presented by: Rocky Mountain Children’s Law Center, Denver Department of.
Southern Derbyshire Clinical Commissioning Group North Derbyshire Clinical Commissioning Group Erewash Clinical Commissioning Group Hardwick Clinical Commissioning.
Family/Whānau Caregiver Assessment and Approval Engaging with families to achieve better outcomes for children and young people.
1 Child Welfare Improvement Overview House Appropriations Subcommittee Kathryne O’Grady, Deputy Director Michigan Department of Human Services September.
SEN 0 – 25 Years Pat Foster.
©2008 National Association of Social Workers. All Rights Reserved. 1 Child Protection and Family Care Cora Hardy, LCSW Clinical Director Better Life Children.
BRINGING COMMUNITY TOGETHER TO SUPPORT FAMILIES AND THEIR REUNIFICATION FAMILY REUNIFICATION TELECONFERENCE Strong Families Make a Strong Kansas.
Prepared by American Humane Association and the California Administrative Office of the Courts.
Bringing Protective Factors to Life in the Child Welfare System New Hampshire.
Multidisciplinary Approaches to Learning Disabilities Lorraine Petersen.
Being Part of a Core Group Jacqui Westbury – CP Chair/IRO Team Manager Kate Lawson - Safeguarding Nurse Specialist.
Treating the Non-Offending Parent By: Angelé Morgan, M.S.W., L.C.S.W.
The Evolution of Reunification Services at Marist Youth Care.
Family Team Meeting Policy Updates Presented by Mitzie Smith August 10, 2009.
940: Concurrent Planning for Resource Parents. The Pennsylvania Child Welfare Resource Center Learning Objectives Participants will be able to: Define.
CIC Council report to Corporate Parenting Board. Charter for careleavers The Charter for Care Leavers is a set of promises designed to help people understand.
204: Assessing Safety in Out-of-Home Care Updates.
An overview of the O-25 SEN and Disability Service in South Gloucestershire March 2015 Mark Nesden Service Manager 0-25 Disability Service.
Reflecting on a child protection experience: Two parents and a caseworker tell their story.
1 Quality Counts: Helping Improve Outcomes for Pennsylvania’s Children & Families September 22, 2008.
Collaborative Practices: Transition Toolkit 2.0 – Meeting the Educational Needs of Youth Exposed to the Juvenile Justice System Simon Gonsoulin.
Mountains and Plains Child Welfare Implementation Center Maria Scannapieco, Ph.D. Professor & Director Center for Child Welfare UTA SSW National Resource.
SUPERVISION: SIGNS OF SAFETY STYLE Phase 1 The Supervision Contract Phase 2 Case Specific Supervision Phase 3 Performance Booster Phase 4 Review of P.E.
Agency Proposition  This organization intends to protect the rights of children mainly in regards to their safety and security in their home.  If necessary,
Parent-Child Visitation: Could Practice Make a Difference? Washington State CASA Conference October 2015Washington State CASA Conference October 2015.
Parent Satisfaction Surveys What is the Parent Satisfaction Survey?  Each year schools from our district are selected to participate in the.
Permanency Outcomes for Children in Erie County Department of Social Services Brett Loschiavo, Public Administration · Project Advisor – Dr. Suparna Soni.
The inspection of arrangements for the protection of children and young people Ofsted unannounced inspections from May 2012.
English 100 Tuesday, through Friday, Tuesday, Why is education (formal and informal) important? What should every student know and.
Family-Centered Care Collaboration: Practice Components Unit II 1.
The Power of Parents: National Consortium on Deaf-Blindness Family Leadership Training Program It all begins today!
Case Planning Jeopardy! Tick-Tock The Main Course It’s the Law Practice Paradise GO TO FINAL OUTCOMES JEOPARDY!
Safe Families for Children Safe Families for Children
ACWA Conference 2010 Barnardos Find-a-Family Working Together – Promoting Positive Relationships to Enhance Permanency Lisa Velickovich and Laura Ritchie.
Collaboration: A Different Approach Working with Aboriginal Families in Calgary Hazel Bergen, Program Director Mahmawi-atoskiwin Carmen Esch, Associate.
AGENTS AND PROCESSES OF SOCIALIZATION Family, peers, school and the media as agents of socialization Family, peers, school and the media as agents of socialization.
Provincial Permanency Data Results for DFNAs and CFSAs Prepared by Service Analysis Branch May 27, 2009.
Bep van Sloten Independent Consultant, The Netherlands 6 December 2012; Prague.
Mirrinda Huddlestun EDU 650: Teaching, Learning &Leading in the 21 st Century Professor Wendell LaTouche December 05, 2015 The Big Interview.
Child and Family Services Reviews Onsite Review Instrument.
SAFETY ORGANIZED PRACTICE: EMPOWERMENT GROUP FOR PARENTS CHELSEA CORNELL, MSW Handouts for this presentation are available at:
7/6/09Office of Training and Professional Development1 Unit 4E: Working with Caregivers.
Signs of Safety Toni Morkin, Senior Manager
Care Coordination for Children, Young Adults, and Their Families
OBSD Lead Agency-Wood’s Homes
Completing the circle: concurrent planning and the use of Family Finding, Blended perspective meetings, and family group decision making processes.
North East Lincolnshire Council Practice Briefing
Office of Children's Services
SEFTON MASH The Decision Making Process of MASH and how the current restructure will affect MASH.
Creating Danger Statements & Safety Goals in Partnership with Families
2016 Child & Family Annual Report
Overview of Data from the Statewide FGDM Evaluation
Welcome and Introductions
Pathways to Permanency: Safety, Permanency and Well-Being
Introduction to Outcomes Based Service Delivery in Southern Alberta
Private Fostering Arrangements 2005
Presentation transcript:

Wood’s Homes celebrated its 100 th anniversary in Since its early days as an orphanage during World War II in Innisfail, Olds and later Bowness Campus in Calgary we have mostly worked with adolescents. Since opening OBSD 40% of the children we work with now are under the age of 6. We have programs in Calgary, Strathmore, Canmore, Lethbridge, Fort McMurray and Fort Smith, NWT.

 Our OBSD Family Connections program opened in October  Since program inception we have received 457 referrals and work with an average of clients at one time.  We take referrals from all units in Lethbridge including the intake and assessment unit and have worked with 1 Taber file during this time.

 When we first started OBSD we worked strictly with clients from Unit Z.  There was a lot of time spent over the next 2-3 years having joint team meetings with both Wood’s Homes Family Connections and Unit Z. These meetings took place for 3 ½ hours every 2 nd week. We spent a lot of time working on roles and responsibilities, collaboration, Signs of Safety and building our collective teams.  This large time commitment laid the foundation for the work that we do today, the collaboration between agency and CFS. We have tried to carry that learning and experience into the new units as we expand.

 Once Children’s Services makes a referral for services we meet together and do a formal referral.  Caseworker, Wood’s worker and family members meet to complete an intake meeting. During this meeting the 4 Column Form/Safety Map is discussed and developed. The harm and danger statements and current safety are discussed. From there safety goals are written and a plan put in place to meet these goals.  At this time a safety plan is also made to ensure the children will remain safe in the home.  4 column forms and safety plans are developed with family voice evident and written at the parent’s level of understanding.

 Building safety in biological families is our first priority and the work we do is drawing out of families what safety already exists within in themselves. We build off of their existing safety to ensure the children will remain safe and that involved creating in depth safety plans that covers every contingency we can think of as well as calling on the natural supports in the families lives to play a role.

 With OBSD came a change in the working relationship between our agency and Children's Services workers. In the past the relationship was that of a hierarchy with the work being delegated.  With OBSD the work is done collaboratively with workers from both sides working together with the family to create a single case plan and work towards achieving safety for the children.  OBSD is relationship based work where families, caseworkers and agency workers work together to achieve a common goal.

 Collaboration in OBSD continues to mean Children’s Services is the delegated authority, not the agency worker.  How safety is achieved is made in joint work between the caseworker, the agency and the family together. There is a lot of information sharing, joint mappings, case conferences and joint decision making.

 Since October 2010 we have worked with 90 different children in Foster Care and 39 children in Kinship Care.  This breaks down into 20% of children we’ve worked with being in Foster Care and 8% being in Kinship care since October  Currently we have 15 children in Foster Care and 9 children in Kinship Care.

 We would like to reduce the amount of people coming and going out of the foster children’s lives and reduce the amount of upheaval they go through.  When possible we have foster parents drive children to school, activities and visits with the bio-parent.  Family Support Counselors work with the foster family and the biological family to support the use of the same routine, rules and structure in the home.  By bringing consistency to the child between both homes and having parents interact during pick ups and drop offs children see that both sets of parents in their lives can have a relationship and they don’t feel conflicted. Bio and foster parents are more connected about what’s going on in the child’s life and more likely to work through problems together.

 Our goal is to involve foster parents earlier on in working with families and to work more closely as a collaborative group.  We can provide foster parents with in home support in the work they are doing with children and help to provide that connection between foster families and bio families and facilitate natural connections.

 During the previous 6 month reporting period – April –September 2014 on closed files:  Referrals for preservation services (remaining at home)  Results show that 81.25% of children remained in their family homes and 12.5% came into care. 1 child transitioned to independence.  Referrals for reunification services (children returning home)  A total of 14 child files were referred for reunification services. Results show that 28.6% of the children returned home to their families. 50% did not return home with their families and 14.3% transitioned to independence.

 Though we see it as ever changing and evolving, our relationship with Children’s Services has strengthened through the collaborative OBSD process and we work together to provide safety for the children in the families we work with.  We are seeing the difference the work is making in keeping children in their biological families longer in situations when in the past they likely would have been removed.