Map Modernization Management Support Best Practices Project - FEMA State of Idaho Idaho Department of Water Resources Boise, Idaho November 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Channel Migration Hazard Maps for eastern Jefferson County Rivers 2004 Susan Perkins Perkins Geosciences --- Watershed Professionals Network, LLC.
Advertisements

Minnesota Silver Jackets Pilot Project Flood Inundation Map and Warning System for Downtown St. Paul Association of State Flood Plain Managers Conference.
Flood Map Modernization in North Dakota North Dakota State Water Commission FLOOD MAP MODERNIZATION.
Application of the Continuous Slope-Area Method for Determining Stream Discharge and Development of Rating Curves in Ephemeral Channels Navajo Nation Hydroclimate.
Importance of Land use management on the Flood Management in the Chi River Basin, Thailand Kittiwet Kuntiyawichai Bart Schultz Stefan Uhlenbrook F.X. Suryadi.
6-8 May, 2008 Toronto, Canada Developing a Flood Warning System: A Case Study Mohammad Karamouz Professor, School of Civil Engineering, University of Tehran,
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Methods for Determining Maximum Flood Elevations Landward of Failed Levees: An Example from the Great Missouri.
PRESENTATION SUMMARY Introduction Introduction – Overview (M. Ryan) Geography Geography – Living with the Red (M. Clamen) Conclusions and Recommendations.
1 FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map Update FEMA Public Meeting October 22, 2009.
A Simplified Method of Implementing No Rise Analysis in Unnumbered A-Zones Based Upon No Loss of Conveyance Dwayne E. Culp, Ph. D., P.E., CFM Second National.
Towards a Rogue River Estuary Implementation Plan John Gardiner MBE, PhD, PE (Oregon)
Use of GIS Analysis in Historic Preservation Disaster Response.
Floodplain Mapping Using AV-RAS Esteban Azagra and Francisco Olivera, Ph.D. Center for Research in Water Resources University of Texas at Austin.
Floodplain Delineation of Indiana Streams Allison Craddock Tom Gormley Jessica Tempest Erin Wenger.
Oregon Flood Hazard Data Standard v2.0 Summary of Proposed Amendment Collaborative Effort of: Jed Roberts (DOGAMI), Steve Lucker & Christine Shirley (DLCD)
Kansas City Industrial Council Hydrology and Hydraulics
US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center West Bay Diversion Evaluation 1-Dimensional Modeling CWPPRA Technical Committee and.
Idaho Risk MAP Activities Ryan McDaniel, CFM Cooperating Technical Partners Coordinator Idaho Department of Water Resources.
Preliminary Flood Insurance Rate Maps. What is a Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) and how do I use it?* A FIRM is a map created by the NFIP for floodplain.
ASSESSMENT OF FLOOD REMEDIATION WITH MINIMAL HISTORIC HYDROLOGIC DATA: CASE STUDY FOR A SMALL URBAN STREAM Robert R. Holmes, Jr., PhD, P.E., D.WRE U.S.
Creating Depth Grid from a DFIRM FEMA Region VIII Mitigation GIS Team Wednesday, February 13, 2013.
David Knipe Engineering Section Manager Automated Zone A Floodplain Mapping.
Tropical Storm Allison & its impact on Harris County
Greg Jennings, PhD, PE Professor, Biological & Agricultural Engineering North Carolina State University BAE 579: Stream Restoration Lesson.
1D Steady State Hydraulic Modelling Bratton Stream Case Study.
Back Creek Floodplain SEPTEMBER 2, Why are we here Introductions Almost 300 parcels affected by revised flood study of Back Creek Outline ◦History.
MA BF REFERENCE CURVES Objective Develop bankfull regional curves and equations for estimating bankfull width, mean depth, cross-sectional area, and discharge.
ArcHydro – Two Components Hydrologic  Data Model  Toolset Credit – David R. Maidment University of Texas at Austin.
Office for Information Resources GIS Services Flood Map Modernization and the Tennessee Base Mapping Program Dennis Pedersen, Director F&A, OIR – GIS Services.
National Research Council Mapping Science Committee Floodplain Mapping – Sensitivity and Errors Scott K. Edelman, PE Watershed Concepts and Karen Schuckman,
FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY UPDATES City Council Workshop July 7, 2008.
Channel and Habitat Monitoring in the Countyline Reach of the Lower White River Presented by Sarah McCarthy and Terry Butler River and Floodplain Management.
Assessment of Economic Benefits of the North Carolina Floodplain Mapping Program Hydrologic and Hydraulic Case Studies Adapted from a Presentation to NRC.
Flood Map Modernization and North Dakota Julie Prescott, ND Map Modernization Coordinator North Dakota State Water Commission And Brian Fischer, CFM, GIS.
Outline of the training. 6 October 2005, TNMC, Bangkok.
Prepared by: Burnham – Floodplain Study October 23, 2009 Presented by: Marty Spongberg, PhD, PE, PG AMEC Geomatrix, Inc.
Otter Creek Watershed Meeting January 19, 2008 Mike Dreischmeier Agricultural Engineer Natural Resources Conservation Service.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Marie C. Peppler USGS FIM Program Liaison Flood Inundation Mapping Program Project needs overview.
Sensitivity analysis of hydraulic model to morphological changes and changes in flood inundation extent J.S. Wong 1, J. Freer 1, P.D. Bates 1, & D.A. Sear.
Travis Ball, PE USACE Seattle Hydraulic Engineering Section 2 May 2014 HWY 530 Landslide: Hydraulic Modeling in Support of County, State, and Federal Long-Term.
Stream Gages CBRFC Stakeholder Forum July 31, 2012.
Analysis of Slide Impacts on the North Fork Stillaguamish River Floodplain For Snohomish County May 5, 2014.
Development of a Geographic Framework for an Integrated Flood Modeling System Oscar Robayo Tim Whiteaker August 10, 2004 University of Texas at Austin.
1 Integrating Water Resources Engineering and Geographic Information Systems (GIS) National Weather Service NWSRFS International Workshop October 21-23,
FLOOD MAPPING Menaxhimi i rezikut te permbytjeve Objektivat Gjenerale.
1-Day of 2-D How Are The Results Of Hydraulic Models Used To Manage Floodplain Development Under The NFIP? Eric Simmons, FEMA Region IX.
USGS Water Resources Discipline Charleston, WV District office Katherine Paybins GIS data and projects.
1 Partnering to Enhance the Communication of Flood Risk Track #2 – Efforts, Updates, and Experiences from the Field Flood Inundation Maps Linked to Real-time.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Boise River Feasibility Study Ellen Berggren, PMP Outreach Coordinator/ Project Manager Idaho Governor’s Roadless.
National Consultation with TNMC 3 May 2005, Bangkok WUP-FIN Phase II – Model development.
Boise River, Idaho: Many Agencies Working Towards One Version of the Truth Ellen Berggren, USACE Walla Walla District Idaho Silver Jackets USACE Flood.
Harrisburg Flood Inundation Mapping Project – Many Agencies Working Together USACE Flood Risk Management and Silver Jackets Workshop 23 August 2012 Presented.
Flood Inundation Mapping Program
WATERWAYS AND BRIDGES IN TEXAS “Final” Presentation by: Brandon Klenzendorf CE 394K Dr. Maidment.
Week 2. Work plan 2 Week 1 Week 2 Hydrological models Hydraulic models 1D quasi 2D 2D (25x25 m) Flood resilience 2D (5x5 m) Structural measures.
Washtenaw County 2008 LiDAR Project Overview Nate Arnold, GIS Developer Washtenaw County Support Services
Development of a High-Resolution Flood Inundation Model of Charles City, Iowa Nathan Young Associate Research Engineer Larry Weber.
Logan River Floodplain Mapping Kedric Curtis, Josh Hogge, Jordan Jarrett, Jared Justensen 4/25/2015 CEE 6190 Photo credit:
Regional to Engineering Scale HUC8 HUC12 Catchment Engineering Hydrology Engineering Hydraulics Personal – a flooded home.
Week 1.
Spring Flood of 2010 in Nashville, TN
8/11/2016 Mosquito Creek 2D hydraulic analysis:
Map-Based Hydrology and Hydraulics
Some Project Ideas Literature review of particular subjects – what is new since “Applied Hydrology” was originally published? What are the key papers in.
Risk MAP & the Little River Basin
Alex Chan, rukundo gahigiro, ning zhang
Little Bear River 100-Year Storm Flood
FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY UPDATES
HEC-RAS US Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center
Automated Techniques for Hydraulic Modeling Applications
Presentation transcript:

Map Modernization Management Support Best Practices Project - FEMA State of Idaho Idaho Department of Water Resources Boise, Idaho November 2008

Introduction FEMA funded as part of the Map Modernization effort Research associate from Center of Ecohydraulics Research (University of Idaho – Boise) Application of new technologies - Green LiDAR + 1D + 2D floodplain hydraulic modeling.

Project Area: Lower Boise River From Ross Dickinson’s work “Historic Floods and Channels on the Lower Boise River” Glenwood Bridge

Why the Lower Boise River Area? Important changes in the floodplain land use since the last FIRM, such as, increasing population, high developments rates…. Control water discharge from the upstream reservoir system Availability of new data collected by cutting edge remote sensing technologies (Green LiDAR) Interest in the project results from multiple agencies and local governments.

From Ross Dickinson’s work “Historic Floods and Channels on the Lower Boise River” First 2-Dimensional Modeling Area: Eagle Island MMMS Modeling Component

First 2-Dimensional Modeling Area Modeling results in the Eagle Island could be significantly improved by a floodplain 2- dimensional hydraulic model. Wide spread changes to topography from gravel pits, fills, roads, houses, bridges, etc. Historically flooded area

Historic Boise River Channels at Eagle Island From Ross Dickinson’s work “Historic Floods and Channels on the Lower Boise River” MMMS Modeling Component

Historic Boise River Channels at Eagle Island Channel evolution pre and post discharge control (Lucky Peak last dam completed in 1955). The 1867 channel location derived from the first public land survey in Idaho last largest flood before the reservoir was completed (approximately cfs) narrower and confine channel.

Boise River Channels at Eagle Island From Ross Dickinson’s work “Historic Floods and Channels on the Lower Boise River” MMMS Modeling Component North Channel South Channel

Boise River Channels at Eagle Island Wider alluvial channel Little development Mostly agricultural lands No gravel pits Most flow on the North channel Compare downstream end of Island between 1939 and 2004

From Ross Dickinson’s work “Historic Floods and Channels on the Lower Boise River” Boise River Channels at Eagle Island MMMS Modeling Component

Boise River Channels at Eagle Island Mayor changes in the floodplain  Houses  Buildings  Gravel pits  Parks  Roads  Bridges Channel is constrained (it does not have enough room to move freely).

Modeling Efforts in the selected area: Current DFIRM 2003 Floodway 100 Year Flood 500 Year Flood MMMS Modeling Component To download the ADA County DFIRM visit

Current DFIRM 2003 (Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map) Map and study adopted in 2003, based on data collected through Changes in the floodplain since the DFIRM was created. Remember “The DFIRM is a actuarial tool for determining flood insurance rates”. Parcel data, in yellow, has been included in the map from County data current information.

Shawkat Ali, UI PhD Modeling Efforts in the selected area: Shawkat Ali 2004 MMMS Modeling Component FEMA PROJECT IMPACT, City of Boise A hydraulic modeling study for the Boise River and its Floodplain Modeling Systems Used : DHI - MIKE Models Modeled Flows: 10-yr flood: 7,200 cfs 50-yr flood: 11,000 cfs 100-yr flood: 16,600 cfs 500-yr flood: 34,800 cfs

First dynamic flood graphic display. Based on the 1998 USGS surveyed cross sections. Calculations performed on a 1-dimensional model. The model was used to study the consequences of debris blocking a bridge. The superior graphic tool raised awareness of flood risk not depicted on DFIRM. Modeling Efforts in the selected area: Shawkat Ali 2004 Shawkat Ali (2004) PhD Dissertation is available at the Center of Ecohydraulics Research at the University of Idaho - Boise

Line-Area Coupling Q < Q bankfullQ > Q bankfullQ ~ Q bankfull MMMS Modeling Component MIKE FLOOD MIKE FLOOD: 1-Dimensional + 2-Dimensional Hydraulic Model, DHI Water and Environment

1-dimensional tools do not represent floodplain flows that have a strong 2-dimensinal component. MIKE Flood couples 1-dimensional (MIKE 11) in the channel with 2-dimensional (MIKE 21) in the floodplain. MIKE 11 predicts the main channel water levels that are transferred to the floodplain at high flood events (above bankfull) and simulated by MIKE 21. Thus, a more realistic prediction of out of channel flow is obtain by coupling these two tools. MIKE FLOOD MIKE FLOOD: Brief explanation MIKE FLOOD is developed by DHI Water & Environment

Downstream Upstream Boundary Conditions River network and main channel cross sections (USGS 1998) MMMS Modeling Component: Eagle Island Model Setup MMMS Modeling Component Floodplain (Red LiDAR 2004) 2006 Hydrograph at Glenwood Bridge Flow Direction

The USGS gaging station located at the Glenwood Bridge provides the data for the model’s upstream boundary condition (Hydrograph). The Eagle Island Floodplain topography is represented by Red LiDAR. The Boise River cross sections at Eagle Island are represented by USGS 1998 surveyed data. Downstream boundary condition is set far away from the Eagle Island area so results are not significantly sensitive to its value. MMMS Modeling Component: Eagle Island Model Setup

MMMS Modeling Component Water Depth (m) Surface Elevation (m) Preliminary Model Results NAD 1983 Idaho TM

Preliminary Model Results MMMS Modeling Component

Water Depth  10 year event results in shallow yet widespread floodplain flow.  10 year event breach the river bank in several areas and the river flow into exiting excavated ponds.  10 year event captured the 1939 south channel toward the downstream end of the island. Surface Water Elevation  10 year event excided the mapped 100 year base flood elevation (BSF) in some areas. Preliminary Model Results

Apply Green LiDAR data Model the 100 and 500 year flood events Compare results from the modeled areas with the current DFIRMs Working with the local governments to select other critical areas to be modeled Public Outreach  Education  Scenario analysis. Next Steps Boise, November Flood