IRS Collectability Curve Taxpayer Advocate Service Research & Analysis June 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Accounts Receivable Ledger Project (ARL) BCCC CARM Sub-Committee Updates and New Scenarios September 19, 2012 Version 1.1.
Advertisements

Copyright © 2014 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.
Estimating the Impact of Liens on Taxpayer Compliance Behavior and Income Taxpayer Advocate Service Research & Analysis June 2012.
 LDR assess a UET penalty on individual income for underpayment of individual income tax.  The penalty may be imposed if the taxpayer did not pay enough.
There are three classes of persons that are deemed a resident of Louisiana so as to be subjected to a tax on their income from whatever source derived.
Property Tax Levy. Key Tax Levy Components The Board of Education must set the FY tax levy no later than November 1, 2012 The tax.
Arkansas Higher Education Financial Condition Report A Report to the Arkansas Higher Education Coordinating Board October 30, 2009.
Income Tax Fundamentals 2009 Gerald E. Whittenburg & Martha Altus-Buller Student’s Copy 2009 Cengage Learning.
Managing Your Cohort Accounts Presented By: James F. McDonald Director of Sales.
Part Seven Individual Income Tax Accounting. What is Individual Income Tax? The marginal tax rate is the tax rate applied to each additional dollar of.
Financial Review Year Ended June 30, Plante/Moran Audit Results of the Audit Presented to the Finance and Audit Committee on October 6 Unmodified.
How to read a FINANCIAL REPORT
Compliance Service Collection Operation (CSCO)
IPERS Overview & Benefit Options
Ratio Analysis Division A, Division B, Division C, and Consolidated.
Copyright © 2007 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Statement of Cash Flows Chapter 13.
©2007 Thomson South-Western, a part of The Thomson Corporation. Thomson, the Star logo, and South-Western are trademarks used herein under license. Chapter.
Individual Non-Filers and IRS Generated Tax Assessments: Revenue and Compliance Impacts of IRS Substitute Assessment When Taxpayers Don’t File June 18,
Grade 3-8 English. 2 The Bottom Line This is the first year in which students took State tests in Grades 3,4,5,6,7, and 8. With the new individual.
Foreign Tax Credit. U.S. citizens and residents compute their U.S. taxes based on their worldwide income. This sometimes results in U.S. citizens having.
Chapter 12 Tax Administration & Tax Planning Income Tax Fundamentals 2008 Gerald E. Whittenburg & Martha Altus-Buller Student’s Copy.
DMH1 Overview of Mental Health Services Act Funding: Collection to Expenditure Tom Greene, Chair, Mental Health Funding and Policy Committee Mark Heilman,
Module 22 Operations of Flow- Through Entities. Menu (1) 1. Definition of a flow-through entity 2. Reporting the operations of a flow-through entity 3.
1  Prepayment tax of 28% due upon exercise on difference between amount paid (strike price) and current market value on exercise date.  Prepayment becomes.
Taxes. “The art of taxation consists in so plucking the goose as to obtain the largest possible amount of feathers with the least possible amount of hissing.”
Taxes as Transaction Costs
ASSOCIATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATORS OF ALABAMA ANNUAL CONFERENCE MAY , 2015 PERDIDO BEACH RESORT Revisiting the Affordable Care Act.
1 Treasury Offset Program NASC PRESENTATION. 2 What is TOP? TOP = Treasury Offset Program A centralized process that intercepts federal payments of payees.
Annual Conference May 19 – 22, 2015 St. Augustine, FL.
FASB Interpretation No. 48
Native and immigrant fertility patterns in Greece: a comparative study based on aggregated census statistics and IPUMS micro-data Cleon Tsimbos 1, Georgia.
Session 66 ED Forms 2000 for Beginners: Annual Reporting Katrina Turner Nettie Harding.
dp 2007 Farm Financial Survey Highlights dp 2 Publication: E ISBN: Catalogue: A36-1/2-2007E-PDF Project: dp.
INTERMEDIATE ACCOUNTING Chapter 18 Accounting for Income Taxes © 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated,
TOWN OF ORONO FINANCIAL OVERVIEW Presented by: Casey Leonard and Josh Kochis RUNYON KERSTEEN OUELLETTE Recently, the Town of Orono completed the financial.
Unit 9 Federal Payroll and Tax Returns McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Economic Fluctuations Chapter 11. Chapter Focus Learn about aggregate demand and the factors that affect it Analyze aggregate supply and the factors that.
1 TOP TEN NON- COMPLIANCE ISSUES PRESENTED BY APC COMMITTEE.
1 © 2006 Federal Association of Financial Services. All Rights Reserved. AMERICAN FINANCIAL AID Student Loan – The American Borrower Module.
Managed by the International Fuel Tax Association, Inc. Multiple Interest Rate Calculations How it’s done in Canada.
Home sales in Sandy Springs are -21.4% lower year-to-date in 2008 than in 2007 Sales through 3Q 2008 were -42.1% lower than in Q 2008 sales were.
Financial Statement Analysis. Limitations of Financial Statement Analysis Differences in accounting methods between companies sometimes make comparisons.
Unit 6 Seminar Accounting for Postemployment Benefits.
Is College Worth It? A Review of Recent Studies On the Value of a College Education 1.
Chapter 6 Understanding Taxes Philosophies of Taxation –Benefits received Citizens who receive benefits of expenditure should help pay the cost Example:
Accounting & Financial Reporting BUSG 503 Michael Dimond.
Accounting for Merchandising Operations Chapter 4 Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without.
California State Employees Retiree Healthcare Benefits GASB 45 Projections December 13, 2007.
Ratio of Attributable to Institutional Costs and Inframarginal Costs 2007 to 2013 Bob Cohen and John Waller 1.
Home sales in Sandy Springs are -30.4% lower year-to-date in 2008 than in 2007 Sales through 2Q 2008 were -45.8% lower than in 2006, but were significantly.
F6 Taxation (UK). Section A: The UK tax system Section B: Income tax liabilities Section C: Chargeable gains Section D: Corporation tax liabilities Section.
OVERVIEW OF THE TAX GAP 8 June OVERVIEW OF THE TAX GAP | 8 JUNE What the Tax Gap Is  The Gross Tax Gap is the amount of true tax liability.
13-1 PowerPoint Authors: Susan Coomer Galbreath, Ph.D., CPA Jon A. Booker, Ph.D., CPA, CIA Cynthia J. Rooney, Ph.D., CPA Copyright © 2016 by McGraw-Hill.
It is very possible through an IRS offer in compromise but not as easy as the advertisements that tell taxpayers that their tax resolution company can.
Chapter 2-Part A. Filing Requirements, Estimated Tax Statute of Limitations Penalties Edited September 7, 2016 Howard Godfrey, Ph.D., CPA Professor of.
Accounting for Income Taxes
Financial Statement Analysis
Field Collection Operations
Federal Income Tax Debt
Unemployment Insurance
Global Estimates on Child Labour ( )
CLATSOP COUNTY 4th QUARTER REPORT
The Effect of Construction on Local Businesses: Interim Project Update
FAS 109: Accounting for Income Taxes
Paid Preparer Penalties: Are They Effective
Small Cities Organized Risk Effort (SCORE) Target Funding Benchmarks
Small Cities Organized Risk Effort (SCORE) Target Funding Benchmarks
Audit of the Payroll and Personnel Cycle
ABOUT THE NATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOLS
What is a non-compliant event?
Presentation transcript:

IRS Collectability Curve Taxpayer Advocate Service Research & Analysis June 2015

Focus Taxpayer Delinquency Account (TDA) liabilities. Individual Master File Collection statute (generally 10 years)

Background Over 50 percent of the IRS Individual Master File (IMF) TDA inventory has been in the function assigned the delinquency for at least 10 months. Over 70 percent of the IMF TDAs in IRS inventory at the end of 2014 are Tax Year 2010 and prior liabilities. Over 20 percent of the IMF TDAs have less than four years remaining on the collection statute, meaning that the delinquency has existed for over six years.

Objectives Determine dollars collected during each year after TDA assignment. Distinguish between TDA dollars collected from subsequent payments and offsets. Determine how dollars collected vary by categories of TDA balance due.

Objectives Determine how TDA dollars collected vary by type of assessment (self- reported and IRS imposed) Quantify the effect of assessed penalties and interest on the TDA balance due. Determine the percentage of TDA liabilities abated by the IRS and if abatements vary by sources of assessment.

Objectives Determine the percent of TDA cases full paid within 10 years. Determine if TDA dollars collected vary by collection channel.

Methodology Analyzed balance due (from IMF ARDI) at initial TDA assignment. Analyzed cases entering TDA status (by year entered) from calendar year 2003 through Used IMF data to distinguish between subsequent payments, offsets, penalties, interest, and adjustments (classified by transaction code).

Methodology Used ARDI major source of assessment to determine type of IRS assessment (self-assessed or IRS imposed). Used TRCAT code to determine if case was assigned to ACS, collection queue, or CFf.

Limitations Changes in module balances include assessed and accrued penalties and interest; however, the specific finding on penalties and interest only includes assessed amounts. Amounts abated because of accepted offers in compromise are included in the sections on abatements; however, in FY 2014, accepted offers in compromise only accounted for about one percent of the initial TDA balance.

Findings Dollars collected generally decreased by more than 50 percent from the first year to the second year. In the third year, collections decrease by about a third from the amount collected in the second year.

Findings – Percent of Payments Collected per Year

Findings - Dollars collected also decline as a percent of the available balance.

Findings – Dollars Collected by Subsequent Payment Have Decreased In the earlier years, dollars collected by subsequent payment are nearly triple dollars collected through offset however, in more recent years, this margin has decreased to only double. Overall, dollars collected on TDAs by subsequent payment appear to be decreasing from 2003 to 2012.

Findings – Percent of Dollars Collected vary by TDA Balance Nearly Three-quarters of TDAs have balances of $5,000 or less. However, over 80 percent of the balance owed is contained in TDAs with balances above $5,000. The IRS Collects a Higher Percentage of dollars when the TDA Balance is Smaller.

Findings – Percent of Dollars Collected vary by TDA Balance The IRS offsets the highest percent of dollars to TDAs under $5,000. As time progresses, the percent of TDAs with initial balances of $5,000 or less are decreasing, while the percent of the total initial TDA balance above $5,000 is increasing.

Findings – Source of Assessment On a percentage basis … The IRS Collects twice as much from TDAs resulting from self-assessments than from audit assessments. In recent years, the IRS also collects about twice as much from TDAs resulting from self-assessments than AUR assessments (the difference was not quite as large in earlier years).

Findings – Source of Assessment The IRS generally collects the least on SFR assessments. The IRS collects the highest percentage from offsets on TDAs from AUR assessments. The IRS generally offsets a slightly higher percentage on TDAs from audit assessments than self-reported assessments.

Findings – Source of Assessment Subsequent Payments Year Self-Reported Assessments Substitute for Return Audit Assessments AUR Assessments Trust Fund Recovery Penalties %14%23%33%16% %13%28%31%17% %10%24%25%12% %9%21%24%9% %7%15%21%8% Offsets Year Self-Reported Assessments Substitute for Return Audit Assessments AUR Assessments Trust Fund Recovery Penalties %4%12%34%6% %5%20%32%6% %5%25%36%6% %4%20%28%6% %2%12%25%4%

Findings – Assessed Penalties and Interest Over equivalent three year periods, assessed penalties and interest have remained relatively constant; however, when sufficient time has elapsed, penalties and interest are increasing.

Findings - Abatements Generally, the IRS abates from a quarter to a third of TDA assessments. YearInitial TDA Balance$ Abated% Abated 2003$15,326,191,192$2,985,977,27019% 2005$25,996,084,845$8,066,761,34131% 2007$40,678,451,308$13,086,103,48032% 2009$41,987,700,518$10,716,623,48526% 2011$42,926,217,917$11,990,870,52528%

Findings - Abatements SFR assessments have the highest abatement rate (nearly 50 percent in some years). Abatements attributable to AUR assessments are growing, while self-reported assessments are the least likely to be abated.

Findings – Abatements by Source of Assessment Year Self-Reported Assessments Substitute for Return Audit Assessments AUR Assessments Trust Fund Recovery Penalties 20036%49%15% 39% 20056%47%12%29%40% %43%14%28%35% 20099%36%13%27%28% %40%19%18%29%

Findings – Full Payments and Collection Channel The full payment rate has been decreasing for TDAs issued in more recent years, while a higher percentage of the initial TDA liability remains due. ACS collects a higher percent of TDA dollars by both subsequent payment and offset than CFf (may be a reflection of inventory composition). Often, over a third of TDA dollars assigned to CFf are abated.

Conclusions Dollars collected in aggregate and as a percent of the balance due decrease significantly during the first three years after the IRS assigns a liability to TDA status. When continuing to look at the collection of liabilities after the third year of the initial TDA assignment, collections continue to dwindle and the reduction in the module balance declines almost completely. Overall, dollars collected through the offsets of other overpayments are much less than dollars collected through subsequent payments.

Conclusions Delinquent modules with balances due not in excess of $5,000 comprise the vast majority of TDAs. However, over 80 percent of the total amount due resides with TDAs with balances greater than $5,000. The IRS collects both a higher percentage of subsequent payments and offsets in the lowest balance due categories. The percent of the TDA balance collected is significantly greater for self- reported liabilities than when the IRS makes additional assessments. Penalty and interest significantly increase the balance owed by taxpayers, particularly when the underlying balance remains unresolved for several years.

Conclusions The IRS abates between a quarter and a third of TDA liabilities. The IRS abates about 40 to 50 percent of its substitute for return (SFR) assessments. The IRS completely resolves most of its TDA modules within the 10 year collection statute, with a resolution rate of about 80 percent for TDAs assigned in 2003 and Unfortunately, the percent of TDAs resolved appears to be declining for TDAs initiated in later years. Additionally, the balance owed on these delinquencies has only been reduced by less than 50 percent. ACS realizes the largest percent of TDA balances collected by subsequent payment and offset. While the percent of dollars abated is high in all TDA collection channels, the abatement rates are significantly higher in the queue and CFf than in ACS.