NSR-RTM as an ACCSEAS legacy for Europe

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Belarus Denmark Estonia Finland Germany Latvia Lithuania Norway Poland Russia Sweden Summary remarks and final conclusions Thematic workshop on transport.
Advertisements

The Impact of Interreg on Norwegian Regional Development Policy Einar Leknes International Research Institute of Stavanger.
Source: Swedish Road Administration, Vägverket. Artist: Anders Suneson.
Joint Programming Initiative Healthy and Productive Seas and Oceans Christina Abildgaard Ph.D., Deputy Director General Ministry of Fisheries and Coastal.
INTERREG IIIB North Sea Northern Periphery Northern Maritime Corridor – The Motorway of the Northern Seas NMC Achievements Februar 2006 Olav Hauge, Project.
North Sea Commission Transport group In-depth report at Executive Committee, Brussels 21 October Chair Preben Friis-Hauge Region South Dennmark and Adviser.
Freight transport policy and measures in Norway Presentation at PIARC meeting in Ouagadougou June 2005 Senior Adviser Hans Silborn.
| 1 Transeuropean Networks Energy & Transport PAN-EUROPEAN CORRIDOR X SC Meeting Belgrade, January 22, 2010 TEN-T POLICY REVIEW WORKSHOP REPORT (ACTUAL.
INTERREG IIIB North Sea Northern Periphery. INTERREG IIIB North Sea Northern Periphery Vision The Northern Maritime Corridor - a means of efficient, safe.
Trans-European Transport Network and the Connecting Europe Facility
European Seas and Territorial Development Opportunities and Risks (ESaTDOR) Dave Shaw and Lynne McGowan Liverpool University, UK.
Rail Freight Noise Abatement in Europe A consensus building workshop for all relevant stakeholders Conclusions and next steps Luc Aliadière, UIC UIC, Paris.
Route Topology Model – 1. Introduction Jan-Hendrik Oltmann Federal Waterways and Shipping Administration, Germany.
Part-financed by the European Union Priority 2 of the BSR Programme External and internal accessibility of the BSR Ryszard Toczek, City of Gdynia.
“”Capacity and services to road users” Task descriptions Paul van der Kroon, Paris November 2005.
Business Processes of Harbours and Port Terminals Expert Group for Business Processes of Harbours and Port Terminals BUSINESS PROCESSES OF HARBOURS AND.
IT Strategy for Waterborne Transport Director John Erik Hagen Norwegian National Coastal Administration.
Title: Report on the status of “ Management of Security, Safety and Emerging Technology in Global Intermodal Transportation and Supply Chain Systems” Project.
Norwegian Ministry of Fisheries and Coastal Affairs Oil Spill Contingency in a Future Perspective The Norwegian Minister of Fisheries and Coastal Affairs.
DG RTDEuropean Commission SIXTH FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME FOR RESEARCH, TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT AND DEMONSTRATION ACTIVITIES (FP6) SPECIFIC PROGRAMME.
Freight flows and infrastructure in the Baltic Sea Region Presentation by Magnus Sundström, Swedish Maritime Administration Workshop on Strategy for sustainability.
Central Baltic Area in the EU Baltic Sea Strategy
Österbottens förbund  Pohjanmaan liitto  Regional Council of Ostrobothnia Proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE.
The Fully Networked Car Geneva, 4-5 March Ubiquitous connectivity to improve urban mobility Hermann Meyer ERTICO.
MSDI OPEN FORUM MSDI in the Baltic London, Tuesday 3rd March 2015 Jens Peter Hartmann Chair BSMSDIWG Denmark.
Lesley Rickards MEDIN Core Team European initiatives and how MEDIN and the data in the framework relates to them.
THE NEW TRANS-EUROPEAN TRANSPORT NETWORK A CORE NETWORK: BLUEPRINT FOR 2030.
European Commission Directorate-General for Energy and Transport Unit G3 – Motorways of the Sea & Intermodality EURO-MEDITERRANEAN TRANSPORT FORUM MARITIME.
Fargis User Conference 2000 Fargis status R&D Director SVEIN ORDING Norwegian Coast Directorate.
Maritime Navigation and Information Services (MarNavIS) Proposal for FP6.
1 LIFE+ COUNCIL WORKING GROUP 4 OCTOBER Discussion Points 1. LIFE+ in Context: Environment funding under the Financial Perspectives.
ASEM SYMPOSIUM on Eurasia Transport and Logistics Network Seoul th September 2015 Hon.Joe Mizzi, Minister for Transport and Infrastructure - Malta.
Working Group of Transports Inter Mediterranean Commission. CPMR Working Group of Transports Declaration on the transport policy in the Mediterranean Genoa,
International Hydrographic Organization MSDI OPEN FORUM IHO MSDIWG Vision and Deliverables to the IHO London, Tuesday 3rd March 2015 Jens Peter Hartmann.
Intermodal transport between Germany, Poland and the Czech Republic – Intelligent TEN-T planning Ing. Jindřich Kušnír Department of Railway and Combined.
Transport The new TEN-T guidelines Results of the legislative procedure Philippe Chantraine (MOVE B1), 24 June 2013.
This Project is co- founded by the European Union, Instrument for Pre- Accession Assistance Cinzia LIBERATORE FB2 ABRUZZO REGION On behalf of Lead Beneficiary.
Southeast Michigan Council of Governments. SEMCOG Region St. Clair Macomb Oakland Livingston Washtenaw Wayne Monroe.
BMT Transport Solutions GmbH 1 Third BSR INTERREG III B partner search forum in Gdansk Actors perspective on pan-Baltic transport development Lars Källström.
HARMONISATION OF TURKEY’S LEGISLATION WITH THE EU TRANSPORT POLICY Umut DEMİRCİ, EU Expert DG of Foreign Relations and EU Affairs Ministry of Transport,
Risto Kulmala News from EasyWay. EasyWay CEDR O1 Stockholm 12 Feb EasyWay Deployment of European ITS Services on TERN 21+3 countries (EU+oth) Road.
Towards an integrated transport system in the Baltic Sea Region
Conclusions of the National Stakeholders Meeting The Secretariat, RRCAP.
The National Strategy of Slovak Republic
Directorate general for Energy and Transport European Commission 4rth working group on maritime policy, ports and SSS 19 December 2006-Brussels Euro-Mediterranean.
Kinds of Maps.
Conference organized by: Union for the Mediterranean High Level Conference on the financing of the future Trans-Mediterranean Transport Network (TMN-T)
Transport Integration of cross-border transport infrastructure TEN-T strategy on large cross- border cooperation projects Gudrun Schulze, Team leader,
Key factors in the transport policy to encourage better integration Sixty-Third Session of UNECE, Geneva, 30th March 2009 "Economic Integration in the.
FARGIS Konferansen ITS and Multimodal Services - Ivar Christiansen - ITS Norway 1 ITS and Multimodal Information Services Ivar Christiansen ITS.
Route Topology Model – 3. Support of Traffic Flow Jan-Hendrik Oltmann Federal Waterways and Shipping Administration, Germany.
OECD Seminar in Kirkenes Infrastructure and regional development With a macro perspective of the NSPA Presentation.
An ESS strategy towards better integration of statistics and geography
BLAST Bringing Land and Sea Together 1 Hirtshals, 16 September 2010 Evert Flier, Director of the Norwegian Hydrographic Service.
1 StratMoS Activity C-4 Presentation by Work Package Coordinator Michael Stie Laugesen FDT – Association of Danish Transport and Logistics Centres Copenhagen.
StratMoS Strategic Demonstration Project for Motorways of the Sea StratMoS - An arena for cooperation.
Norwegian Ministry of Fisheries Oil Spill Contingency in a Future Perspective Interspill 2004 Norwegian Minister of Fisheries Svein Ludvigsen.
1 MARITIME TRANSPORT WORKING GROUP Maritime Policy, Ports and Short-Sea Shipping MEDA Motorways of the Sea Sub-Group 4 th Meeting Brussels, 19 December.
Presentation Concerted Action On Logistics, Supply & Demand Chain Management In Europe 4th Framework Programme – DG TREN Starting date: 01/01/1999, duration:
TRT Trasporti e territorio
Feasibility study on infrastructural interventions in Port of Split
18th Annual World Bank Conference 2017, Land and Poverty :
Eva Royo Gelabert Project Manager Marine assessments
S-127 and S-101 Data Model and digital route service
Eva Royo Gelabert Project Manager Marine assessments
Hans Dufourmont Eurostat Unit E4 – Structural Funds
Eva Royo Gelabert Project Manager Marine assessments
Working Group on Estuaries Working Group on Rivers
Hans Dufourmont Eurostat Unit E4 – Structural Funds
Maritime Visit to the Port of Barcelona
Presentation transcript:

NSR-RTM as an ACCSEAS legacy for Europe A Route Topology Model to promote sea transport: INSPIRE, ITS, Intermodal transport and Maritime Spatial Planning John Morten Klingsheim Norwegian Coastal Administration Maritime Spatial Planning / GIS spesialist Good afternoon Introduce myself. Stephan have started this part by giving details on the steps to get to an instance of RTM for the North Sea, and the mariners possible use of a Route network for the North Sea. Jan-Hendrik have introduced the connection between Maritime Service Portfolio and the routes of the North Sea, giving the users a good access to which maritime services are provided for the different routes, and giving major reasons for establishing a common RTM for the North Sea. I will address the idaeae on ACCSEAS RTM as a good example of a Transport Network needed for European Legacy with The North Sea as example The Route Topology, which is a Transport Network. (give reasons for the name Topology…). 3) NSR-RTM as an ACCSEAS legacy for Europe Represent the four topics, and they all need a route Topology model Its, or intelligent transport systems are systems to make the road or the car intelligent. To make the car understand its surrondings and pick the smartest choices. This could be the car putting on the brake for a child in the road or the road lights adapt to traffic density and give green light for longer periods for the roads with the highest traffic density. Its, on the seaside: - ENC and radar can give options for the vessel on itself to choose to slow down because of max 8 knot regulations or coming into high risk area. On the intermodal part there seems to be great opportunities on establishing smarter logistics where information on possible routes for transport from A to B: - Which alternative routes can be taken? - How much time will transport take using the different routes? -What are the possible eta's for given transport jobs? - What are the environmental impacts of possible routes? This can also increase the knowledge of the value of the sea routes. for example in evaluation of maritime areas for windparks or aquaculture in maritime spatial planning.

The Core and comprehensive Transport Network (TEN-T) The EU Legecy refers to the TEN-T Transport network with a given number of Core European Ports, and Comprehensive ports. In the same way roads and railways are included. However the sea routes are not included. To show the full transport network , routes at sea should obviously be included. The ACCSEAS project have tried to fill this empty room in the european TEN-T transport network. Its not only visually a drawback that sea routes are not included. It also gives us, as ambassadors for sea transport, one less tool to present the benefits of sea transport. Ref: http://ec.europa.eu/transport/infrastructure/tentec/tentec-portal/main.jsp http://ec.europa.eu/transport/infrastructure/tentec/tentec-portal/site/en/maps.html

INSPIRE INSPIRE: The first step to establish an intermodal transport network The INSPIRE directive came into force on 15 May 2007 (Directive 2007/2/EC) with the requirement that all member states must have an infrastructure for spatial data, both "standard" map data as elevation data, lakes and roads, and more thematic data such as a transport network (land, air and at sea). The 34 topics are given in the directive: http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/index.cfm/pageid/2/list/7 INSPIRE: The first step to establish an intermodal transport network The INSPIRE directive came into force on 15 May 2007 (Directive 2007/2/EC) with the requirement that all member states must have an infrastructure for spatial data, both "standard" map data as elevation data, lakes and roads, and more thematic data such as a transport network (land, air and at sea). It is required that each nation must submit data. The 34 topics are given in the directive: http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/index.cfm/pageid/2/list/7. First delivery includes data from Annex I, including transport networks which is of high relevance to e-Navigation as potential e-Navigation services will be referring to different areas and routes. For the topic “transport network”, given in the Annex I, Metadata should be delivered within December 2013, search and view services should be established within November 2014, and download and transformation services should be established within December 2015. The deliveries from individual countries is basis for values​​ of a seamless common infrastructure for spatial data. For Transport Network seamless data are of the highest value to support pan-European activity. The RTM with sea routes, Motorways, Roads at sea and small craft lanes, for the north sea and other european sea areas, must comply with the specifications in INSPIRE Transport Network Here comes in the same ideas as Stephan refered to with the traffic shown as legs and nodes to present an RTM. INSPIRE: Directive given However other user requirements raise the needs of other common information elements not given in INSPIRE. The Water Transport Network model given in INSPIRE

Council conclusions on transport infrastructure The European Council has also in December 2014 given a number of conclusions on Transport Infrastructure, especially refering to Intermodal transport and ITS (Intelligent Transport Systems). Many relevant issues set here, among them conclusion 15 on intermodal transport and ITS, and 16 on cross border cooperation to give a transeuropoean network.

TN-ITS, a framework for transport Network Information (ITS + INSPIRE) TN-ITS based on project results in ROSATTE shall establish a complete organizational framework for information on the Transport Network (a convergence between INSPIRE and ITS Legacy) The RTM in ACCSEAS can also bring these two together for sea transport. ITS. Its, or intelligent transport systems are systems to make the vessel and its route intelligent, or say the road and the car intelligent. To make the car understand its surrondings and pick the smartest choices. This could be the car putting on the brake for a child in the road or the road lights adapt to traffic density and give green light for longer periods for the roads with the highest traffic density. Its, on the seaside: - ENC, AIS and radar can all give information to the vessel to support the vessels decission on itself, for example to choose to slow down because of max 8 knots in regulations or vessel coming into a high risk area. To support ITS a information infrastructure must be available. The vessel or the fairway must have access to the relevant information about the sea route or about the ship sailing the route, and understand what it should be used for. A figure of the system to populate the road infrastructure. Adapt it better to the maritime domain. To harmonize information to confirm with both legacies. ITS must include all transport modes to establish smart green transport. Joint (videolink) meeting of ITS Europe (Helsinki) and INSPIRE (Aalborg) 16th – 20th June 2014 on Transport Networks technology for better update of road information. Developments on ITS for information systems on road infrastructure can show the way for ITS for Sea Transport! A important parallel to the establishing of a maritime Route Topology Model is the work on ITS and INSPIRE’s Transport Network which today have mainly focus on land-based transport. A report (ITS ACTION PLAN, by Algoé - Rapp Trans Grouping for DG MOVE, final version 9.3.2011) presenting the way forward to establish European (and international) framework for transport information based on project results from ROSATTE among others (ROad Safety ATTributes exchange infrastructure in Europe. Specification of data exchange methods. Ver. 16 released 31.8.2009), have set grounds for the TN-ITS financed by DG MOVE. TN-ITS hosted by ERTICO shall establish a complete organizational framework for information on the Transport Network, also being developed in the working groups for ISO EC 204 Intelligent Transport Systems (Link). TN-ITS was started 6.6.2013 to further develop the frame­work, including both static transport data and the dynamic (+predictive) transport data. Models and requirements established for ITS and especially TN-ITS, should be taken into account when looking for data exchange methods also for Water Transport Networks. The Transport Networks model developed in INSPIRE already set grounds for establishing an intermodal Transport Network. A prosess for establishing the organisational framework for road transport network information might show the way for maritime routes?

The routes must connect at sea, and in ports The routes must connect at sea, and in ports. (Picture of routes not connectiong showing the alternative development. Example with possible wind park areas for assessment in Norway?). However other user requirements raise the needs of other common information elements not given in INSPIRE. (Lars Inge Arnevik, Kartverket)

National sea routes of Norway National sea routes do not connect the North Sea ports! The routes must connect at sea, and in ports. (Picture of routes not connectiong showing the alternative development. Example with possible wind park areas for assessment in Norway?). However other user requirements raise the needs of other common information elements not given in INSPIRE. (Lars Inge Arnevik, Kartverket)

Intelligent transport = Intermodal Transport = Green transport (set grounds for competition interfaces) Options for transport of goods from A to B A common instance of A North Sea RTM can set grounds for more intermodal green transport! Transport information on routes includes: … Speed ferry 4 times a day (Company C, Company D) Container vessels twice a day (Company A, company B) (a) time of travel from delivery in port going out of the next port). A 20 hours travel, going once a day, or a 25 hours travel going once a week. Price of transport (Short Sea Shipping example). The authorities should probably not be responsible for the details of such information, but a common information infrastructure for the transport network in the North sea Countries + in the North Sea is a must to extend the «competition» between possible transport choices. (competition interfaces). (b) Risk assesments. To connect risk assesments to traffic routes can raise the usability of risk assesments. (PICTURE OF RISK Connected to large coastal segments, and to . The decrease in risk will then also be an incitament to use the transport routes with less risk. (c) Green transport: Can these be connected to the routes as well as the emissions «luftutslippene». This set much better grounds for a policy of green transport. The ports can in this way also present them selves as green ports. However the national transport authorities must establish a common information infrasttructure to open up for this green transport future. And even though transport in the future could be non-emission, the cost of transport imply environmentral impact in many other ways than the emissions (traffic jam, accidents, vulnerable ecosystems,), hence green transport must be effective and efficient transport! Green taxes in ports (NCA, Oslo, Kristiansand, Stavanger, all have tax rates giving incentives to green transport. Like tax discounts, based on the world wide Environmental Ship Index, are given in ports around the North Sea, and also by the Norwegian Coastal Administration to promote green sea transport. The same instrument is made available by the Route Topology Model for the Sea. Can Environmental Indexes be put on Sea routes? Logistic companies will build up (and have built up) their own information systems supporting their services. Can a common system for the north sea play together with their systems? PICTURE OF GREEN PORTS and GREEN VESSELS (LNG from Nor Lines). Green routes!

Marine/Maritime Spatial Planning Directive on Maritime Spatial Planning (2014/89/EU) establishing a framework for maritime spatial planning. Can sea routes be safe- guarded in spatial planning without having common routes in the national and regional processes? Directive on Maritime Spatial Planning (2014/89/EU) establishing a framework for maritime spatial planning. Information on motorays and roads on sea is of major importance to be able to safeguard the sea routes in planning processes where all interests should have their saying. We must have qualified information on why the route is important, if the route has no importance the sea area can be utilized for many other purposes. Which routes to let go for other activity, like windparks and fishfarming – The use could be temporary or more permanent installations. In Norway oastal zone planning have confronted many of these issues for now 30 years, becuase of the extensive number of inshore fairways with other intersts present, especially fish farming, and it is continuasly fights about sea space in the inshore sea areas. The Planning Act went into sea in 1985, which representet now 30 years ago The North Sea has now an increased value as it can be utilized to many other purposes than sea routes. And to safegurd the motorways of the seas, the roads ofthe seas and also the …. Sea routes for smaller vessels, we must have harmonized information on the relevant traffic in routes if the spacerepresenting major sea routes shall not be utilized for other purposes.

The Core and comprehensive Transport Network (TEN-T) with RTM So here

Outlook – RTM Workshop Route Topology Modelling (RTM) appears to be an abstract but promising method to assist in solving several issues identified for a vessel’s voyage and for vessel traffic flow. The Workshop will elaborate on ideas and topics presented in the preceding presentations by discussion and gather views of stakeholders present.