1/6/2003ESA Ecological Vision Committee Building the scientific foundation for sound environmental decisions U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EMAP Efforts in SF Bay Overview of EMAP Western Pilot Overview of Coastal component Activities in SF Bay (FY 2000) Relationship to other SF Bay efforts.
Advertisements

DRAFT Wildlife Program Amendments Joint Technical Committees and Members Advisory Group Amendment Strategy Workshop July 23, 2007.
1 Watershed Planning: A Key to Integrated Planning FHWA Environmental Conference Ann Campbell Wetlands Division.
Safe and Sustainable Water Resources Research Integrate the existing Drinking Water and Water Quality research programs into one holistic program that.
Alberta’s Strategy for Sustainability presented to Prairie Water Policy Symposium Beverly Yee, Assistant Deputy Minister Alberta Environment September.
Briefing to the Caribbean Fisheries Management Council April 23, 2014.
Oregon Sea Grant OSU Faculty Senate Executive Committee October 20, 2014.
Montana’s 2007 Nonpoint Source Management Plan Robert Ray MT Dept Environmental Quality.
Role of Natural and Beneficial Functions in Community Sustainability EPA Programs Supporting Flood Risk Management and Community Sustainability Association.
Britta Bierwagen 1, Roxanne Thomas 2, Kathryn Mengerink 2 & Austin Kane 2 1 Global Change Research Program National Center for Environmental Assessment.
1 Preparing Washington for a Changing Climate An Integrated Climate Change Response Strategy Department of Ecology Hedia Adelsman, Executive Policy Advisor.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Tom Armstrong Senior Advisor for Global Change Programs U.S. Geological Survey
Moving to Horizontal Connections: Design Concept 2 Impacts: 1. What are the critical interactions among resources (and resource management) that will.
1 Issue: Society Depends on Ecosystem Modeling to Predict Threats and Minimize Risk.
NCCOS Centers Center for Coastal Monitoring and Assessment, Silver Spring, MD CCEHBR - Cooperative Oxford Laboratory Branch, Oxford, MD Center for Sponsored.
Future Research NeedsWorld Heritage and Climate Change World Heritage and Climate Change - Future Research Needs Bastian Bomhard World Heritage Officer.
Information Needs National Forest System Update 2011 FIA User Group Meeting – Sacramento, CA March 9, 2011 Greg Kujawa NFS, Washington Office.
Watershed Management Framework Mission of watershed management –Coordinate and integrate the programs, tools, and resources of multiple stakeholder groups.
Integrated Ecosystem Assessment for the Gulf of Mexico Becky Allee Gulf Coast Services Center.
EPA Office of Water Source Water Protection Initiative Elizabeth Corr, Associate Director Drinking Water Protection Div. Office of Ground Water and Drinking.
The Marine Strategy Framework Directive 17th March 2010, Newcastle North Sea Stakeholders Conference Leo de Vrees European Commission (DG Environment,
Problem Definition Exercise. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service General Summary Responses from ½ of those surveyed (n=14/31) Broad and narrow in scope Narrow.
Convention on Biological Diversity AOSIS Workshop on Trade and Environment Montego Bay, December 2001 The sustainable planning and management of.
Wetland Monitoring and Assessment National Water Quality Monitoring Council Meeting August 20, 2003.
Carolinas Integrated Sciences & Assessments (CISA) Work to Support NIDIS July 31 st – August 1 st, 2012 Wilmington, NC.
ORD’s Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program (EMAP) Sound Science for Measuring Ecological Condition
© 2009 UNDP. All Rights Reserved Worldwide. Proprietary and Confidential. Not For Distribution Without Prior Written Permission. Overview of GEF’s STRATEGIC.
Region III Activities to Implement National Vision to Improve Water Quality Monitoring National Water Quality Monitoring Council August 20, 2003.
USGS Global Change Science National Climate Change & Wildlife Science Center and SE Regional Hub Sonya Jones USGS Southeast Area NIDIS Planning Meeting.
Gulf of Mexico Alliance SIMOR Briefing June 9, 2009.
Watershed Assessment and Planning. Review Watershed Hydrology Watershed Hydrology Watershed Characteristics and Processes Watershed Characteristics and.
Strengthening Coastal Decision- making in Nova Scotia and New Brunswick Making coastal development geospatial data available and delivering tools needed.
Extended Council Context for the NMN Design Management Questions Objectives Environments Resources of Primary Concern Stressors affecting resources Core.
The National Water Quality Monitoring Network for U.S. Coastal Waters and their Tributaries Presentation for _______ August 28, 2007.
Support of the Framework for Monitoring Office of Management and Budget March 26, 2003.
North American Commission For Environmental Cooperation Chemicals Management in Mexico Chemicals Management in Mexico M AURICIO LIMÓN AGUIRRE Under Secretary.
The Science Requirements for Coastal and Marine Spatial Planning Dr. Robert B. Gagosian President and CEO Ocean Studies Board November 10, 2009.
Water Quality Program Financial Assistance Progress and Plans for Meeting RCW Requirements (Joint Legislative Audit and Review Committee)
Gerry Pratt State AOC Coordinator, Division of Water New York State Department of Environmental Conservation 625 Broadway, Albany, NY P: 518.
USGS Global Change Science National Climate Change & Wildlife Science Center Council for Data Integration Meeting Sept 16, 2009 U.S. Department of the.
Environmental Studies?
1 EPA Regulatory Authority and PPCPs Octavia Conerly Health and Ecological Criteria Division Office of Water Office of Water October 26, 2005 October 26,
EPA and Ecosystem-Based Management: Success of the Watershed Approach Michael H. Shapiro Deputy Assistant Administrator for Water, US EPA Capitol Hill.
Benefits of the Redesigned RMP to Regional Board Decision Making Karen Taberski Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Bay Region.
Objectives: 1.Enhance the data archive for these estuaries with remotely sensed and time-series information 2.Exploit detailed knowledge of ecosystem structure.
Why Does NOAA Need a Climate & Ecosystem Demonstration Project in the California Current System? Capabilities and Drivers La Jolla, CA 6 June, 2005.
Environmental Legislation & Regulations Ecology and the Environment Mr. Corsini - NWHS.
A Pivotal Moment for Leaders Across the Gulf Coast States and Connected Communities Throughout the Country.
1 NOAA Priorities for an Ecosystem Approach to Management A Presentation to the NOAA Science Advisory Board John H. Dunnigan NOAA Ecosystem Goal Team Lead.
The Science Requirements for Coastal and Marine Spatial Planning Dr. Robert B. Gagosian President and CEO September 24, 2009.
ICZM PROTOCOL INDICATORS THE MEDITERRANEAN PROTOCOL ON INTEGRATED COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT: What indicators are needed? Marko PREM Director a.i.
Setting Goals for Stream “Health:” The Next Generation of Watershed Plans? The Waterlands Group San Francisco Estuary Institute Aquatic Science Center.
Managing Through Partnerships Ralph Cantral NOAA’s Ocean Service September 5, 2003.
1 Integrating Biodiversity Conservation Into Impact Assessment: The Experience of Uganda BERINA UWIMBABAZI.
Stream Health Outcome Biennial Workplan Neely L. Law, PhD Center for Watershed Protection Chesapeake Bay Program Sediment & Stream Coordinator Habitat.
SUSTAINING ENVIRONMENTAL CAPITAL (SEC) INITIATIVE Providing resources for applying ecosystem services in public land & water management.
California Sediment Quality Advisory Committee Meeting SWRCB Program to Develop Sediment Quality Objectives for Enclosed Bays and Estuaries of California.
HAMPTON ROADS REGIONAL WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Presentation John M. Carlock, AICP Deputy Executive Director, Physical Planning Hampton Roads.
Strategic Plan Development Status Technical Analysis Forum meeting October 11, 2007.
EPA Global Change Research Program A TEN YEAR PLAN Presentation to 13 th Symposium on Global Change Studies Janet L. Gamble, Ph.D. National Center for.
April 4, 2011 Princesa VanBuren Hansen Environmental Quality Board.
CONTEXT FOR THE REVIEW Gary Matlock, Ph.D. Deputy Assistant Administrator for Programs and Administration (A) Office of Oceanic & Atmospheric Research.
Inventory & Monitoring Program U.S. National Wildlife Refuge System Natural Resources Program Center National Office USFWS U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service.
New Ecological Science Advice for Ecosystem Protection The EPA Science Advisory Board (SAB) Staff Office supports three external scientific advisory committees.
K. Bruce Jones EPA Office of Research and Development U.S. EPA Science Advisory Board Regional Vulnerability Assessment Advisory Panel Meeting October,
Provide impartial information on the health of our ecosystems and environment, the natural hazards that threaten us, the natural resources we rely on,
ReVA Regional Vulnerability Assessment Moving from monitoring status and trends to targeting risk management activities.
Mission: To protect human health and safeguard the environment
Puget Sound Watershed Characterization Project
Department of the Interior Northeast Climate Science Center
Presentation transcript:

1/6/2003ESA Ecological Vision Committee Building the scientific foundation for sound environmental decisions U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development Presentation to the Office of Management and Budget September 24, 2002 FY 2004 OMB Submission DRAFT Building the scientific foundation for sound environmental decisions U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development Presentation to the Office of Management and Budget September 24, 2002 FY 2004 OMB Submission DRAFT Building the scientific foundation for sound environmental decisions U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development Presentation to the Ecological Vision Committee Peter W. Preuss, National Center for Environmental Research January 6, 2003 Ecological Society of America

1/6/2003ESA Ecological Vision Committee Condition of Streams, Estuaries and Landscapes Restoration Assessment DESIRED ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITION Assessment FRAMEWORK FOR ECOLOGICAL RESEARCH AT EPA Forecasting Diagnosis

1/6/2003ESA Ecological Vision Committee EPA’s Goal for Ecosystem Protection Research To provide the scientific understanding to measure, model, maintain, and/or restore, at multiple scales, the integrity and sustainability of highly valued ecosystems now and in the future

1/6/2003ESA Ecological Vision Committee Factors Influencing Research Directions Nature of environmental assessment has changed –Interdisciplinary Focus has changed –Decreased emphasis on chemical contaminants Nutrients and contaminants of special concern (Hg, POPs, PBTs, EDCs, etc.) Diffuse and transboundary sources of pollutants a concern Effects of landuse change Regulatory climate is changing –Greater attention to socioeconomic drivers

1/6/2003ESA Ecological Vision Committee Priorities Primary emphasis on Aquatic Resources –Strongest EPA mandates with associated legislative requirements –Terrestrial systems investigated as they impact aquatic resources –Wildlife endpoints for aquatic exposures (contaminants) Non-target impacts of pesticides Economic impacts and benefits

1/6/2003ESA Ecological Vision Committee Key Research Questions Condition - What is the current ecosystem condition, what are the trends in condition, and what stressors appear to have been responsible for harm or deterioration? Diagnosis and Forecasting - How do biological, chemical, and physical processes affect the condition of ecosystems, and how can we most accurately diagnose problems facing ecosystems and forecast future effects?

1/6/2003ESA Ecological Vision Committee Assessment - What are the relative risks posed to ecosystems by stressors alone, and in combination, now and in the future? Protection and Restoration - How can we most effectively reduce risks to protect ecosystems and restore them once they have become degraded? Key Research Questions

1/6/2003ESA Ecological Vision Committee Emphasis of Ecological Protection Research Monitoring for ecosystem condition that truly reflects the need for action and the scale of the problem, the causes of harm, and the success of mitigation and restoration efforts; Models and protocols that help diagnosis causes of degradation to ecosystems and forecast future condition, and that are appropriate to the scale of the problem; Scientifically defensible risk assessment techniques that can accurately quantify and compare current and future risks to ecosystems; and Restoration and protection strategies that are cost- effective and stakeholder-driven.

1/6/2003ESA Ecological Vision Committee Emerging Issues Environmental Indicators Total Maximum Daily Loads Restoration Invasive Species Valuation of Ecosystems

1/6/2003ESA Ecological Vision Committee Emerging Issues Environmental indicators –National Research Council –EPA Science Advisory Board –Heinz Center Report –EPA’s Report on the Environment TMDLs –National Research Council –Waterbody Assessment: Listing and Delisting –Modeling to Support the TMDL Process –Adaptive Implementation for Impaired Waters

1/6/2003ESA Ecological Vision Committee Emerging Issues Restoration –National Research Council –Urban Riparian Ecosystems –Wetlands Invasive Species –Impact Assessment –Identify likely sites for invasives –Methods and tools for detecting, preventing, controlling, and eradicating aquatic invasives

1/6/2003ESA Ecological Vision Committee Emerging Issues Socioeconomics –Socially relevant assessment endpoints –Involvement of stakeholders in decisions –Interdisciplinary Coordination Economic Valuation of Ecosystem Benefits –Benefits difficult to quantify –Baseline difficult to define –Time frame of ecological recovery long

1/6/2003ESA Ecological Vision Committee Extramural Research STAR Grants Solicitations ( –Watershed Classification –Hazardous Algal Blooms (with NOAA, NASA, Navy, NSF) –Valuation for Environmental Policy –Computational Toxicology for EDCs –Exploratory -- Ecological Thresholds –Genomic-Based Indicators of Water Quality –Landscape Indicators of Water Quality

1/6/2003ESA Ecological Vision Committee SO… We want to include the academic research community much more in EPA research efforts Our research needs far exceed our capacity, both intramurally and extramurally Need to demonstrate to decision-makers that ecological research that we do, or sponsor, will directly help EPA carry out its mission Your help is very important

1/6/2003ESA Ecological Vision Committee THANK YOU

1/6/2003ESA Ecological Vision Committee Ecological Research $73M Extramural Resources –$23M STAR Grants 565 FTE ~30% of FY 03 ORD Budget

1/6/2003ESA Ecological Vision Committee Factors Influencing Research Directions Nature of environmental assessment is changing –Single investigator  Multiple investigators –Single disciplines  Multi-disciplinary –Single stressors  Multiple stressors –Single receptors  Multiple receptors –Site specific  Regional/watershed scope Need for documentation of economic benefits

1/6/2003ESA Ecological Vision Committee Outreach and Education Post-Doc Program –150 Term FTE Fellowships –Minority Institutions –STAR Fellowships (?) –AAAS Fellows –NAS Associates

1/6/2003ESA Ecological Vision Committee Ecological Condition National Coastal Assessment Western Pilot Midwest/Large Rivers EMAP Bioassessment Program REMAP

1/6/2003ESA Ecological Vision Committee Diagnosis and Forecasting Exposure Indicators Landscape Sciences Processes and Modeling Ecological forecasting in watersheds Multimedia Integrated Modeling

1/6/2003ESA Ecological Vision Committee Assessment Regional Vulnerability Assessment (ReVA) Project Watershed risk assessments Ecological risk assessment guidance

1/6/2003ESA Ecological Vision Committee Restoration Riparian zone restoration in urban ecosystems Minebank Run Study Area Well Transects