Critical Design Review Presentation Jan. 20, 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
University of Florida PDR Presentation. Vehicle Design Diameter: 5.86 Length: 135 Static Stability Margin: 1.4 Total Weight: 23.6 lbs.
Advertisements

Preliminary Design Review. Rocket & Payload Schematic.
Preliminary Design Review University of Colorado Boulder NASA Student Launch
P RELIMINARY D ESIGN R EVIEW University of North Dakota Frozen Fury Rockety Team.
Critical Design Review ….. Royal Ordnance,Summerfield 17 th February 2001 National Rocketry Competition 2001 Open Rocketry Association Slide 1/14.
Critical Design Review NASA University Student Launch Initiative University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Student Launch Project Preliminary Design Review January 10, 2014.
Illinois Space Society Tech Team USLI CDR Presentation.
Our Mission Statement  Launch a high-power rocket to an altitude of one mile carrying the Operation: Epic Beep payload package. At lift off, the rocket’s.
NASA SLI 2010 Mulberry Grove High School Critical Design Review Measurement of UVB Radiation Absorption by Cloth Material at Different Altitudes and Measurement.
RezRiders. Mission statement Through the USLI program the Northwest Indian College Space Center’s RezRiders Team enhances its involvement in science,
St. Vincent – St. Mary FRR Presentation NASA Student Launch Initiative.
UAA Rocketry Critical Design Review Presentation.
NASA SLI 2010 Mulberry Grove High School Flight Readiness Review Measurement of UVB Radiation Absorption by Cloth Material at Different Altitudes and Measurement.
Windward Community College University of Hawaii
Student Launch Project Critical Design Review February 28, 2014.
Flight Readiness Review. Intimidator 5: 5” diameter, 10’ length, 47 lbs  Motor: Aerotech L1300R 4556 N-Sec of impulse  Predicted altitude 5203’- RockSim.
Critical Design Review. Intimidator 5: 5” diameter, 10’ length, 45 lbs  Motor: Aerotech L1300R 4556 N-Sec of impulse  Predicted altitude RockSim.
Flight Readiness Review Atomic Aggies. Final Launch Vehicle Dimensions Diameter 5.5” Overall length: inches Approximate Loaded Weight: lb.
Critical Design Review of “Mach Shock Reduction” Phase II January 2008 Statesville, NC.
Launch Vehicle  Launch Vehicle Summary  The length of the rocked is inches, and the mass is ounces.  We have a dual Deployment Recovery.
Illinois Space Society Tech Team USLI FRR Presentation.
CDR Clear Lake's Team Rocket 2929 Bay Area Blvd. Houston, TX
Rocket Based Deployable Data Network University of New Hampshire Rocket Cats Collin Huston, Brian Gray, Joe Paulo, Shane Hedlund, Sheldon McKinley, Fred.
Rocket Based Deployable Data Network University of New Hampshire Rocket Cats Collin Huston, Brian Gray, Joe Paulo, Shane Hedlund, Sheldon McKinley, Fred.
Preliminary Design Review “Analysis of Atmospheric Cosmic Radiation Distribution as a Function of Altitude” Steven Schroeder-Program Manager Damon Emerson-Rocket.
Student Launch Project Flight Readiness Review April 21, 2014.
 Vehicle dimensions, materials, and justifications  Static stability margin  Plan for vehicle safety verification and testing  Baseline motor selection.
Safety ► The safety officer for the entire team is Maia Madrid. ► During launch we will follow NAR safety rules and regulations. ► We will follow standard.
Flight Readiness Review Team Hawaii. Vehicle Properties Diameter (in)6 inches Length (in)127 inches Gross Liftoff Weight (lb)50.25 lb Launch Lug/button.
3/19/09. Animal Motor Works (AMW) K475WW High Power Rocket Motor. 54 mm casing, 40.3 cm long, 2.9 seconds burn time, 1394 N-sec total impulse, and
The Rocket Men Project One Giant Leap. Final Launch Vehicle Dimensions Rocket Length in. Rocket Mass- 171 oz. Top Body Tube Length in. Bottom.
STUDENT LAUNCH PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW PROJECT ADVANCE.
The Comparative Analysis of Airflow Around a Rocket.
FRR Presentation IF AT FIRST YOU DON’T SUCCEED, TRY AGAIN… AND AGAIN AND AGAIN AND AGAIN.
Flight Readiness Review Student Launch Initiative SCS Rocket Team Statesville Christian School April 2, 2008.
University of Florida Rocket Team Critical Design Review Presentation.
Critical Design Review Presentation Jan. 20, 2011.
Critical Design Review- UCF Jeremy Young Anthony Liauppa Erica Terry, Emily Sachs Kristen Brightwell Gillian Smith 1.
WINDWARD COMMUNITY COLLEGE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII
Atomic Aggies CDR. Final Launch Vehicle Dimensions Diameter 5.5” Overall length: inches Approximate Loaded Weight: lb.
USLI Flight Readiness Review Harding University Flying Bison 2010 USLI Rocket Team.
Project Ares University of Central Florida NASA Student Launch 1/28/2015.
Preliminary Design Review “The Distribution of Ionizing Radiation with Altitude” Left to Right: Tom L.- Payload James Z.-Construction Izzy S.- Audio Visual.
The Rocket Men Project One Giant Leap. Dimensions Rocket Length in. Rocket Mass- 171 oz. Top Body Tube Length in. Bottom Body Tube Length-
Hemodynamics Star Splitters 4-H Club Two Rivers, WI Hemodynamics.
HARDING UNIVERSITY FLYING BISONS A Study of Atmospheric Properties as a Function of Altitude Flight Readiness Review.
University Student Launch Initiative Preliminary Design Review University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Team Rocket.
NUSTA RS NASA Student Launch MAV Challenge 2016 Preliminary Design Review 6 November 2015 Northwestern University | 2145 Sheridan Road | Evanston, IL
NUSTA RS NASA Student Launch MAV Challenge 2016 Critical Design Review 15 Janurary2015 Northwestern University | 2145 Sheridan Road | Evanston, IL
January 14,  Length: inches  Diameter: 6 inches  Mass: oz. / lbs.  Span: 22 inches  Center of Gravity: inches 
FAMU PDR Presentation. Table of Contents Vehicle dimensions, materials, and justifications Static stability margin Plan for vehicle safety verification.
Critical Design Review Presentation Project Nova.
Critical Design Review Presentation Alabama Rocket Engineering Systems (ARES) Team The University of Alabama.
Flight Readiness Review UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH ALABAMA CONNER DENTON, JOHN FAULK, NGHIA HUYNH, KENT LINO, PHILLIP RUSCHMYER, & ANDREW TINDELL MENTOR : RICHARD.
UCF_USLI Preliminary Design Review David Cousin Freya Ford Md Arif Drew Dieckmann Stephen Hirst Mitra Mossaddad University of Central Florida.
Planetary Lander PDR Team Name
Project Aegis Preliminary Design Review Team Members:
Preliminary Design Review Presentation
College of Engineering
Critical Design Review Presentation
2018 First Nation Launch - Flight Readiness Review
Sounding Rocket CDR Team Name
Final Readiness Review
Mars Rover CDR Team Name
Plantation High SL team 1
Target Altitude Safety Document
University of Iowa USLI
2019 First Nation Launch – Oral Presentation
Presentation transcript:

Critical Design Review Presentation Jan. 20, 2011

Outline Report Rocket Body and Structure Flight Simulations Payload and Electronics Bay Educational Outreach & Budget

Major Changes For greater stability the rocket was made shorter (2.8m instead of 3.12m) Acrylic window for the payload bay Mini-camera

Rocket Body Specs Dimensions: –Length: 2.8m –Diameter: 102mm –Empty Mass: 7.72kg –CG Location: 168cm –CP Location: 238cm Motor Specifications: –Motor: Aerotech K828FJ-6 –Length: 579 mm –Diameter: 54 mm –Impulse: 2157 Ns –Max Altitude: 1613 m –Max Velocity: 222 m/s

Rocket Body and Structure Body Recovery (Vehicle) Engine housing system Payload housing system

Static margin CG at 172cm CP at 238 cm Static margin: 66cm

CG on the launch pad Established using vendor information 13.6kg launch pad, 40cm tall CG with rocket mounted 65cm above ground (25cm above blast shield) “Gun turret” launch pad to be used

Payload integration feasibility Payload encapsulated in a removable easy-to- access body tube we call the payload bay o Can attach in different components directly to it Bulkheads located on both sides of the payload bay o Provide protection from the ejection blasts o Each has 2 M6 holes to allow more components to also be attached Before the bulkhead slides in, the coupler will first be put in place around the it. Then the coupler and bulkhead together slide into the payload bay and are screwed into place via 12 M4’s To make this process easier the bulkheads may be glued into place on the couplers.

Outline Report Rocket Body and Structure Flight Simulations Payload and Electronics Bay Educational Outreach & Budget

Flight Simulations Simulation Results: Maximum acceleration: 132 m/s 2 Maximum velocity: 216 m/s Apogee: 1627 m Total flight time: 155 s

Rail exit velocity 16 m/s at 1m altitude (53 ft/s at 3.3 ft)

Thrust to Weight Ratio Initial mass: 9.0 kg Initial thrust: 1100 N Thrust to weight ratio: 12.5 (safe)

Parachute sizes and descent rates Drogue Chute SkyAngle 20 nylon d = 72.2 cm c D = 0.8 deployed at apogee (1627m / 1mi) descend at 20 m/s (65.6 ft/s) Main Chute SkyAngle 44 nylon d = cm c D = 1.87 deployed at 245m (800ft) descend at 5.5 m/s (18 ft/s)

Ejection charge amount test Ejection charge tests currently scheduled for February 12 The test is composed of two stages: In the first stage we determine the size of the charge to be used o Initial size based on our previous rocket In the second stage we will test the interaction between the two independent sets of charges

Test plans and procedures Each component of rocket will be tested, individually where applicable Electronics bay subassembly will be tested as a whole

Safety Plan Review of planned test procedure before each test Review of MSDS safety information applicable to each test Check each other’s work (theoretical and in the field)

Outline Report Rocket Body and Structure Flight Simulations Payload and Electronics Bay Educational Outreach & Budget

Payload Overview Processing - Arduino micro controllers Atmospheric Sensors - UV, irradiance, temperature, pressure, humidity Photo Sensors - camera feedback Imaging – CHDK camera, mini cam, orientation system Recovery (Electronics) - GPS transceiver, TeleMetrum and PerfectFlight

Payload Connection Diagram

Data storage from the Arduino to a SD Card Description The storage shield allows for data to be stored and read from a standard SD card. Advantages -An SD card allows for more memory storage, which is useful for more advanced projects. From a design standpoint, it is also easier to work with a memory card rather than using the on-board memory. -It uses a minimal number of pins on the Arduino so that they can be used to connect to sensors and other equipment. -Availability of sample code and libraries for interfacing with the SD card. Disadvantage -The only disadvantage is the task of having to assemble and interface with the software. Communication Ports 54 Digital I/O Ports 16 Analog Inputs 128k Flash Memory SD card shield for the Arduino Arduino UNO

Data Storage USB -Interfacing with USB can cause the disk to become unreadable if program is not written properly. -Also, information can be lost if the data is written too quickly. SD Card -A SD card shield is more desirable for saving sensor data. -It is simpler to interface with the SD memory card than the USB. -The SD card shield uses fewer pins on the Arduino and other shields can be added on. USB shield SD card shield

Humidity/Temp/Solar Sensor We will monitor humidity, temperature, and solar radiation with this device It will be the second device in our one-wire “MicroLAN” Will be powered by parasitic power from our Arduino Humidity is measured from 0%-100% with 2% accuracy Temperature is measured from-55 to 125 degrees Celsius with a.5 degree accuracy Solar detector detects light in the visible to infrared portion of the spectrum, with peak detection at 850nm and an acceptance angle of 150 degrees

Pressure Sensor Multiple sensors for detecting cabin pressure Redundant system for altimeters

UV Index Meter We will monitor UV light with this sensor One-wire device that we are able to interface with our Arduino by creating a “MicroLAN” The device reports a UV index from 0-16 with a precision to one decimal place This device will be powered through its RJ45 connection using parasitic power drawn from the Arduino

CHDK Canon A480 Canon Hacker Software Development Kit Automated scripts for time lapse imaging Autofocus parameters and extended exposure times Data save as raw Uses AA batteries High resolution Document our trip and experience with pictures and videos

Mini Cam Highlights: Multiple mini cams in various orientations Continuous video capture Inexpensive and lightweight

Camera Orientation Gimble Mount for Gravity- based orientation Servo feedback state diagram Photodiode Sensor Array

Perfectflite miniAlt/WD Testing

Dual deployment avionics test Primary altimeter will be Perfectflite MAWD with Altus Metrum Telemetrum as a backup Ground tests will be conducted for both altimeters by emulating pressure decreases on the ground that will be expected during flight LEDs will be placed at ejection charge terminals in place of ejection charges for preliminary testing. Lighting of LEDs will indicate success. Afterwards, actual ejection charges will be tested. Perfectflite MAWDAltus Metrum Telemetrum

Telemetrum GPS Tests Time taken until GPS lock will be measured GPS accuracy will be verified with known coordinates across campus Ability to maintain connection to ground computer at expected altitude will be observed Battery life will be measured AltOS interface

Scale model flight test Due to the delays with parts delivery we decided to upgrade our scale model flight test to a full scale flight test Full-scale flight tests planned for Feb 19-20, Mar 12-13, Mar 26-27

Outline Report Rocket Body and Structure Flight Simulations Payload and Electronics Bay Educational Outreach & Budget

Activity Plan Engineering Open House o University of Illinois Engineering College sponsored event o Open to elementary through college students and the general public o Team Rocket will be discussing Moltres, past rockets built by ISS and model rocket basics o Also demonstrating the heat resistivity of a Space Shuttle tile and relate it to rocket reentry along with other exhibits Illinois Space Day o Illinois Space Society sponsored event o Open to junior and high school students throughout Illinois o Dedicated to getting students excited about math, science, and more specifically, space o Team Rocket will also be going over model rocket basics along with helping students build their own small rocket to launch later that day

Intended Schedule

Budget Incoming Funds SourceAmount NASA SMD$5,000 UIUC Design Council$2,145 Illinois Space Society$500 SORF$933* Total:$7,767 *UIUC Engineering Council (SORF) will pay for 75% of specific items totaling $933. The additional 25% ($311) will come from Illinois Space Society funds Current budget estimates predict $1,900 for team travel. Combined with an expected rocket cost of about $5,000, around $800 is left for testing, shipping, ground support and other expenses.

Questions?