April 5, 2010 1. The President’s Nuclear Security Agenda First articulated in Prague in April 2009 –Reduce nuclear dangers and pursue the long-term goal.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 EM Update and Perspective David Huizenga Senior Advisor for Environmental Management 2012 DOE Project Management Workshop April 3, 2012.
Advertisements

N A T I O N A L N U C L E A R S E C U R I T Y A D M I N I S T R A T I O N O F F I C E O F D E F E N S E P R O G R A M S Fusion Ignition and Stockpile Stewardship.
April 6, NPR in Context Third comprehensive review of U.S. nuclear policies and posture –Previous reviews in 1994 and 2001 Conducted by DoD.
Wait…Nukes Cost HOW Much? Featuring: Laicie Heeley Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation.
Challenge of Nuclear Weapons
Why are physicists silent? The Dangers of New US Nuclear Weapons Policies *Nuclear Posture Review: delivered to Congress December 2001 Represents a radical.
START Follow-on Update November 30, 2009 Steven Pifer Center on the United States and Europe Foreign Policy Studies The Brookings Institution
An Enduring Nuclear Stockpile: New Bomb Plants New Bomb Plans Big Bucks Jay Coghlan Executive Director, Nuclear Watch New Mexico July 3, 2010 Please visit.
13 January 2005 Slide 1 National Defense University – Institute for National Strategic Studies China’s Strategic Force Modernization Dr. Phillip Saunders.
Lesson – Disarmament.  Review goals of NPT treaty.  Compare different types of weapons.  Identify key treaties regulating nuclear arsenals.
A Dubious Bargain How Nuclear Stockpile Reductions Are Being Held Hostage By Jay Coghlan Executive Director, Nuclear Watch New Mexico July 3, 2010 Visit.
Department of Energy FY 2012 Budget Overview 14 February,
A Nuclear Weapon-Free World?: Evaluating Obama’s Nuclear Agenda Scott D. Sagan November 30, 2011 Canberra Lowy Institute.
Lesson 2 – Disarmament.  Review goals of NPT treaty.  Compare different types of weapons.  Identify key treaties regulating nuclear arsenals.  Describe.
Nuclear Treaties Dennis Silverman, U C Irvine Source:
Principal Director, Countering Weapons of Mass Destruction, Department of Defense Represents Department of Defense on counter-proliferation and non- proliferation.
Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov John Shonder, Director DOE Sustainability Performance Office May 21, 2015 Sustainability at the Department.
The Department of the Navy
Ministry for Foreign Affairs Sweden Government Offices of Sweden Sweden and the Nuclear Security Summit Process Jan A. Lodding Deputy Director Disarmament.
Future nuclear weapon policies James M. Acton
United States Foreign Military Fund Execution in Bulgaria Defense Security Cooperation Agency.
Steven Pifer Senior Fellow Center on the United States and Europe Foreign Policy Studies The Brookings Institution New START: Treaty.
Organization Theory and Nuclear Proliferation History 5N: The Challenge of Nuclear Weapons.
Safety Analysis Working Group FY2010 EFCOG Semi-Annual Meeting Brad Evans, Chair Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Rob McKeehan, Vice-Chair Oak Ridge.
Numbers of weapons Total number of nuclear missiles built, 1951-present: 67,500 Peak number of nuclear warheads and bombs in the stockpile: 32,193 in 1966.
Nuclear Arsenals. Table 1. Estimated global nuclear weapons inventories, Hans M. Kristensen, and Robert S. Norris Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists.
Ohio Transportation Planning Conference July 16, 2014.
US Dependence on Strategic Nuclear Weapons Does shifting to “zero” make sense? Keith Hansen June 15, 2012.
March 13—Write an identification for the Brezhnev Doctrine.
Y-12 National Security Complex Protecting America’s Future.
Nuclear Arsenals. Status of World Nuclear Forces, 2015.
Path to a World Without Nuclear Weapons Presentation by H.E. Mr. Libran N. Cabactulan Permanent Representative of the Philippines to the United Nations.
( Is Iran in violation of the NPT? Is Iran pursuing nuclear weapons? Feb. 27, 2006: Report by the IAEA Director General:
Independent Task Force Report on U.S. Nuclear Weapons Policy: Presentation to Oak Ridge National Laboratory Dr. Charles D. Ferguson Philip D. Reed Senior.
Deterrence and Countering WMD Threats Mr. Andy Weber ATSD(NCB) 20 Jan 2010.
First Nuclear Age, s Bipolarity – balance Deterrence – vulnerability Arms Control – Managing rivalry Rationality Second.
AFRL Nuclear S&T Investment Strategy Dr. David Hardy SES Associate Director for Space Technology Air Force Research Laboratory 27 August 2010.
Air Force Strategy to Resources
US-RUSSIA ARMS CONTROL: PROSPECTS AND CHALLENGES Steven Pifer Director, Arms Control Initiative March 25, 2013.
EM Budget--- Past/Present/Future Mark W. Frei U.S. Department of Energy October 14, 2005.
1 Goals and Targets to Direct FY2010 Budget and Stimulus.
DOE PM Workshop Owen F Barwell Deputy CFO April 2012.
NUCLEAR ARMS CONTROL: CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES IN 2013 Steven Pifer Senior Fellow Director, Arms Control Initiative October 10, 2012.
By: Tyler Callese. Thesis America’s aging nuclear deterrent must be either modernized or have a life extension program enacted because of the imminent.
Russia’s Arctic security strategy: post Ukraine reassessment
Lesson 2 – Disarmament.  Review goals of NPT treaty.  Compare different types of weapons.  Identify key treaties regulating nuclear arsenals.  Describe.
U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Science Dr. Raymond L. Orbach Director, Office of Science April 29, 2004 PRESENTATION FOR THE BIOLOGICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL.
1 EM Update Presented to the National Governors Association Federal Facilities Task Force Dr. Inés Triay Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Environmental.
PPBS Planning Programming Budgeting Systems. PPBS The Department of Defense is the only Agency to use this type of budget.budget.
IS ARMS CONTROL THE ANSWER? What makes WMDs different? Chem, bio, & nuke vs. conventional weapons They seem.
IS ARMS CONTROL THE ANSWER? What makes WMDs different? Chem, bio, & nuke vs. conventional weapons They seem.
Summary of Scientific Studies The environmental consequences of a “regional” nuclear war would cause massive global famineThe environmental consequences.
Day 8.  Review goals of NPT treaty.  Review current threats to global nuclear security.  Reflect on content & skill learning.
Technical Division Overview: Nonproliferation & Arms Control Mission To promote and advance the research, development and application of effective technologies.
WHAT HAPPENS TO DETERRENCE AS NUCLEAR WEAPONS DECREASE TOWARD ZERO? INVITED TALK AMERICAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA SIDNEY DRELL STANFORD UNIVERSITY.
Bipolarity Deterrence Arms Control Rationality Multipolarity
International Security and Peace
The Future of US-Russia Nuclear Arms Control
U.S. Nuclear Strategy toward China
“Existing world order is being redefined.” Henry Kissinger Jan 2015
Goals and Targets to Direct FY2010 Budget and Stimulus
Cuban Missile Crisis.
The Development of Strategy
The Anti-Nuclear Movement and Efforts at Disarmament
CSIS – PONI Winter Conference December 10, 2015 Making the Case for Preserving the INF Treaty A European Perspective Anna Péczeli, PhD Research Fellow,
Impact of Hypersonic Glide Technologies on Nuclear Deterrence
Getting What You Pay For
Getting What You Pay For
Missile Madness.
The National Environmental Policy Act and the SRS Plutonium Bomb Plant
Presentation transcript:

April 5,

The President’s Nuclear Security Agenda First articulated in Prague in April 2009 –Reduce nuclear dangers and pursue the long-term goal of a world without nuclear weapons –Sustain a safe, secure, and effective nuclear arsenal as long as nuclear weapons exist Key events in the President’s nuclear security agenda –Nuclear Posture Review –New START Treaty –Nuclear Security Summit –NPT Review Conference 2

Congressional Direction DoD-led review in consultation with Departments of State and Energy Review nuclear posture for the next 5 to 10 years Serves as basis for establishing U.S. arms control objectives 7 elements of the review: -Role of nuclear forces in U.S. military strategy, planning, and programming; -Objectives for U.S. to maintain a safe, reliable, and credible nuclear deterrence posture; -Relationship among U.S. nuclear deterrence policy, targeting strategy, and arms control objectives; -Role missile defenses & conventional strike play in determining roles and size of nuclear forces; -Levels and composition of the nuclear delivery systems; -Nuclear weapons complex we require, including plans to modernize or modify the complex; -The nuclear stockpile that will be required for implementing U.S. strategy. 3

NPR Scope, Conduct, and Product Scope: –President’s nuclear agenda Conduct: –Interagency –Consultative –Senior Leader engagement Product: –Unclassified report to Congress 4

Key Objectives 1.Prevent nuclear proliferation and nuclear terrorism 2.Reduce the role of nuclear weapons 3.Maintain effective strategic deterrence and stability at lower nuclear force levels 4.Strengthen regional deterrence and reassurance of U.S. allies and partners 5.Sustain a safe, secure and effective nuclear arsenal as long as nuclear weapons remain 5

The NPR and the New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty Early priority to analytically derive negotiating positions for the New START negotiations. –Considered a range of solutions to maintain strategic stability while reducing operationally deployed strategic nuclear force levels. The NPR determined that the United States should maintain a nuclear Triad of ICBMs, SSBNs, and heavy bombers. New START: –1,550 accountable warheads –Combined limit of 800 deployed and non-deployed ICBM launchers, SLBM launchers, and nuclear-capable heavy bombers –Separate limit of 700 deployed ICBMs, deployed SLBMs, and deployed nuclear-capable heavy bombers –Does not constrain U.S. programs or plans for missile defense or conventional systems. 6

The NPR and the FY 2011 Budget Request The United States will sustain a safe, secure, and effective nuclear deterrent as long as nuclear weapons exist. President’s fiscal year 2011 budget request includes a 13 percent increase for stockpile modernization efforts. –Supports the W76 and B61 LEPs –Follow-on study of the W78 –Funds the Chemistry and Metallurgy Research Replacement nuclear facility at Los Alamos National Laboratory –Builds a new Uranium Processing Facility at Y-12 Plant in Oak Ridge –Funds science, technology, and engineering The NPR will outline this Administration guidelines for managing the U.S. nuclear stockpile. 7