E-Poster ALC Canedo, MD 2010 Rio de Janeiro CornealTomograhyandBiomechanics Study Group Study Group The impact of reference body selection for calculating.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Asymmetric Keratoconus Study: Novel Tomographic Parameters to enhance sensitivity to detect abnormalities in eyes with normal axial curvature maps from.

Advertisements

TOPOGRAPHY ORBSCAN S.A.A. Mortazavi MD.

Familial corneal patterns in pellucid marginal degeneration: uncovering a possible etiology Hajirah N. Saeed, MD.

Statement of Commercial Interest: RDJ: None DRH: honoraria from Reichert for educational lectures on corneal biomechanics Multiple studies have shown ex.

Corneal topography orbscan

Corneal biomechanical properties and their association with intraocular pressure (IOP) and central corneal thickness (CCT) Dimitrios P. Bessinis 1, Pandelis.

Swept Source Optical Coherence Tomography for Evaluation of Posterior Corneal Changes after Refractive Surgery Dr. Tommy Chung Yan Chan Dr. Vishal Jhanji.

Comparison of corneal astigmatism measured with 3 devices Mariko Shirayama, M.D, Li Wang, M.D, PhD, Mitchell P. Weikert, M.D, Douglas D. Koch, M.D. Cullen.

A simple and accurate method of alignment for toric intraocular lens implantation using anterior segment optical coherence tomography (OCT). Kazuno Negishi,

Correlation Of Corneal Contour With Higher Order Ocular Aberrations (HOA) In Indian Eyes Manish Chaudhary MS Amit Gupta MS Advanced Eye Centre, Postgraduate.

Influence of Keratoplasty Technique on Corneal Biomechanical Properties in Keratoconus Hans R Vellara, Noor Q Ali, Charles NJ McGhee, Dipika V Patel Department.

Agreement Between Corneal Topography with the Dual-Scheimpflug Placido Corneal Topographer, Scheimpflug Corneal Topographer, and Scanning-Slit Topography.

Biomechanical Properties of Healthy and Keratoconic Corneas Evaluated Using an Ultra-High-Speed Scheimpflug Camera nznec Department of Ophthalmology University.

Corneal Biomechanics, Pachymetric Progression Profile and Corneal Volume: Indices for Detecting Ectasia and Screening Refractive Candidates Renato Ambrósio.

© R. Ambrósio Jr, MD, PhD R. Ambrósio Jr & Rio de Janeiro Corneal Tomography and Biomechanics Study Group Corneal Biomechanical Assessment using.

E-Poster ALC Canedo, MD 2010 Rio de Janeiro CornealTomograhyandBiomechanics Study Group Study Group Comparative Study of Corneal Biomechanical Properties.

Purpose We studied the interdevice agreement of three systems in the different measurements of the corneal and anterior segment biometric parameters. The.

Correlation between Preoperative cataract grading by Scheimpflug imaging and phaco time and power US in phacoemulsification. Bruno Valbon; Ana Canedo;

CORNEAL TOPOGRAPHY Wide acceptance as a clinical examination procedure with the advent of modern laser refractive surgery Measure a greater area of the.

Advances for Characterizing and Understanding the Irregular Cornea

David Zadok MD, Isaac Avni MD

Outcome of refractive surgery in keratoconus suspect eyes

Dr. Amin Hossein Rahgozar

Repeatability of Anterior and Posterior Corneal Higher- Order Aberrations in 4 mm, 6 mm and 8 mm diameters measured by Pentacam System Jadwiga Wojtowicz.

Variations in corneal biomechanical parameters and central corneal thickness during the menstrual cycle. David Zadok, MD, Yakov Goldich, MD, Yaniv Barkana,

Dept. of Ophthalmology, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany. Outcome after big-bubble deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty.

Evaluation of Corneal Parameters and Spherical Aberration After DSAEK Measured with Pentacam System Orkun Muftuoglu, Pawan Prasher, R. Wayne Bowman, Steven.

Evaluation of Interface Reflectivity and Corneal Aberrations following DSAEK Hamid Khakshoor, MD Professor of Ophthalmology Mashhad University of Medical.

Evaluation of Zonal Equivalent Keratometry Readings After LASIK Timmy Kovoor, MD Orkun Muftuoglu, MD V.Vinod Mootha, MD Steven Verity, MD R. Wayne Bowman,

Relationship between Pachymetry and Ocular Response Analyzer Measurements Alejandro Rivera MD.

Corneal Topography using Orbscan : Basics and interpretation

ROTATING SCHEIMPFLUG TOPOGRAPHIC PARAMETERS IMPORTANT IN DISTINGUISHING NORMAL FROM KERATOCONIC CORNEAL MORPHOLOGICAL FEATURES Clayton Falknor, MD, Orkun.

Evaluation of Long-Term Keratoconus Progression Using Scanning-Slit Topography First Author: David Galarreta, MD Contributing Authors: Nestor Cortes, MD,

Khairidzan Mohd Kamal MD

Variations in corneal biomechanical parameters and central corneal thickness during the menstrual cycle. Yakov Goldich, MD, David Zadok MD, Yaniv Barkana,

Rio de Janeiro Corneal Tomography and Biomechanics Study Group Dr. Ambrósio is consultant for Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH (Wetzlar, Germany) Agreement of Artificial.

ELEVATION AND PACHYMETRY VALUES IN NORMAL CORNEAS OBTAINED BY GALILEI ASCRS Boston April Vision Sana Research Group Vision Sana Research Group.

Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness and Peripheral Corneal Thickness using Sheimpflug system, Optical Coherence Tomography and Ultrasound Pachymetry.

The Effect of Corneal Anterior Surface Eccentricity on Astigmatism after Cataract Surgery Choul Yong Park MD 1 Sung Jun Lee MD 1 Prabjot Channa MD 2 Roy.

*Kagithane State Hospital,Department of Ophthalmology,Istanbul, Turkey DR.GÖKHAN KAYA *Kagithane State Hospital,Department of Ophthalmology, No author.

1 P.O. dei Pellegrini; A.S.L. Napoli 1Centro 2 Dipartimento di Oftalmologia, Seconda Università degli Studi Napoli Scheimpflug topography, Scanning-Slit.

E-Poster Rio de Janeiro Corneal Tomography and Biomechanics Study Group The study of the correlations of the optic disc size with Cornal Geometry and Biomechanical.

Rio de Janeiro Corneal Tomography and Biomechanics Study Group CORNEAL TOMOGRAPHY AND BIOMECHANICAL FINDINGS OF CONCOMITANT KERATOCONUS AND CORNEAL GUTTATA.

E-Poster Rio de Janeiro Corneal Tomography and Biomechanics Study Group e-Poster Rio de Janeiro Corneal Tomography and Biomechanics Study Group Clinical.

Evaluation of Corneal Tomography in Primary Pterygium Sahil Goel, MD (Presenting Author), Murugesan Vanathi MD *The authors have no financial interests.

Escaf M; Izquierdo Jr L; Mendoza J; Miranda M Instituto de Ojos Oftalmo Salud Lima, Peru THERE IS NO FINANCIAL INTEREST IN THIS POSTER.

M. Escaf, J. Mendoza, L. Izquierdo jr., M. Henriquez Instituto de Ojos Oftalmo Salud Lima, Peru There is no financial interest in this poster.

Jae Lim Chung MD, MBA 1,3 ; Jin Pyo Hong MD 2,3 ; Kyoung Yul Seo MD, PhD 3 ; Eung Kweon Kim MD, PhD 3 ; Tae-im Kim MD, PhD Noo Ne Eye Hospital, Seoul,

Ocular Response Analyzer Waveform Analysis in the Ectatic Corneas: Correlation of the New Corneal Biomechanics Parameters and Severity of Keratoconus Kristin.

Financial Disclosure: Medical Director–Galilei R&D Consultant, Ziemer Group AG, Port, Switzerland Consultant & Territory Manager for.

Familial corneal patterns in pellucid marginal degeneration: uncovering a possible etiology Hajirah N. Saeed, M.D., Amy B. Rosenfeld Ph.D., Xiaowu Gai,

Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness, Anterior Chamber Depth, and Central Corneal Power Measurements between Two Scheimpflug Imaging Systems Yuichi.

Authors: Leonidas Traipe Magdalena Rios Edison Villagra Allister Gibbons Marcelo Hidalgo Claudia Goya Authors have no financial interest.

Rio de Janeiro Corneal Tomography and Biomechanics Study Group CONCOMITANT KERATOCONUS AND FUCHS DYSTROPHY: TWO DISEASES IS BETTER THAN JUST ONE? Dr. Ambrósio.

Mathematical Description of the Ocular Response Analyzer Applanation Signal in Post-LASIK Ectasia Mujtaba A. Qazi, M.D. 1,2 David A. Luce, Ph.D. 3 Jay.

Corneal Biomechanical Changes Following Surface Keratorefractive Surgery Teeravee Hongyok, MD, Christopher J. Rapuano, MD, Ajoy Virdi, MBBS, Elisabeth.

CORNEAL ENDOTHELIAL PROFILE AFTER FERRARA RING IMPLANTATION Leonardo Torquetti, MD, PhD Paulo Ferrara, MD, PhD Paulo Ferrara Eye Clinic Belo Horizonte.

CORNEAL EPITHELIAL IMAGING

Influence of UVA-Riboflavin corneal collagen cross-linking on biomechanical properties of keratoconic eyes David Zadok MD, Yakov Goldich MD, Yaniv Barkana.

Toric Topographically Customized Transepithelial, Pulsed, Very High-Fluence, Higher Energy and Higher Riboflavin Concentration Collagen Cross-Linking in.

Comparison of Single-Scheimpflug and Dual-Scheimpflug Pachymetry Measurements and Effect of Decentration World Cornea Congress VI April 7-9, 2010.

LASIK vs ASA Case Studies

MP Weikert, M Shirayama, L Wang, DD Koch

Mehdi Ghajarnia, MD Mark Mifflin, MD John A. Moran Eye Center

Vicente J. Correa-Gomez MD, Guillermo Tapia MD, Oscar Macias Manuel MD, Alejandro Navas Perez MD, Gilberto Islas MD, Tito Ramírez-Luquin MD, Enrique O.

Bruno Valbon, Ana Caiado, Ricardo Louzada, Renato Ambrosio Jr *.

Corneal Biomechanical Assessment using Dynamic Ultra High-Speed (UHS)

Sun Woong Kim, M.D.1, Hae Jung Sun, M.D.1,

Dr Ciara Bergin, PhD Dr Ivo Guber, Dr Kate Hashemi, Dr Francois Majo

Retrospective Study of 4 Cases That Developed Ectasia After LASIK (Intralase flaps) with Low-Risk Based on Ectasia Risk Score System Allan Luz, MD Colin.

Presentation transcript:

e-Poster ALC Canedo, MD 2010 Rio de Janeiro CornealTomograhyandBiomechanics Study Group Study Group The impact of reference body selection for calculating Posterior Corneal Elevation for Diagnosing Keratoconus: BFS x BFTE Ana Laura C. Canedo, MD Purpose: To compare the sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing keratoconus using elevation maps calculated from the floated Best Fit Sphere (BFS) and Best Fit Toric Ellipsoid (BFTE) for the 8mm area. e-Poster Ambrósio et al. Renato Ambrósio Jr, MD, PhD; Ricardo Lousada, MD; Marcella Salomão, MD; Bruno Valbon, MD; Frederico P. Guerra, MD; Michael W. Belin, MD, FACS

e-Poster ALC Canedo, MD 2010 Rio de Janeiro CornealTomograhyandBiomechanics Study Group Study Group e-Poster Retrospective observational case-control study 98 normal corneas from 49 patients and 56 keratoconic corneas from 28 patients Pentacam HR rotating Scheimpflug camera (Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany). Diagnosis of keratoconus or normal was based on a comprehensive ophthalmological examination, including corneal topography (Placido) and Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA, Reichert, New York) biomechanical analysis. Anterior (f-front) and Posterior (b-back) corneal elevation maps were calculated using two different reference surfaces that best fit to the 8mm corneal area: best fit sphere (BFS) and best fit toric ellipsoid (BFTE). The following measurements were obtained: Apex: A “true” thinnest: TT (from the Pentacam software) “displayed value closest to” thinnest”:TC (from JPEG image) “true” more elevated within 4mm: TME (from the Pentacam software) “displayed value closest to” more elevated within 4mm ”: ME (from JPEG image) Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to determine the test’s overall predictive accuracy (area under the curve) and to identify optimal cutoff points to maximize sensitivity and specificity in discriminating keratoconus from normals. Mann-Whitney test was used for assessing whether each variable had the same distribution in normals and keratoconic corneas. Methods

e-Poster ALC Canedo, MD 2010 Rio de Janeiro CornealTomograhyandBiomechanics Study Group Study Group BFS – Best Fit Sphere for Front and Back Elevation TME TME – True More Elevated within 4mm ; ME - More Elevation Closest from JPEG TC – Thinnest Closest from JPEG ; TT – True Thinnest A -- Apex +44 ME TC APEX

e-Poster ALC Canedo, MD 2010 Rio de Janeiro CornealTomograhyandBiomechanics Study Group Study Group BFTE – Best Fit Toric Ellipsoid TME ME +18 TME +43 ME TME – True More Elevated within 4mm ; ME - More Elevation Closest from JPEG TC – Thinnest Closest from JPEG ; TT – True Thinnest RF – r flat RS – r steep APEX TT RFRS

e-Poster ALC Canedo, MD 2010 Rio de Janeiro CornealTomograhyandBiomechanics Study Group Study Group Results There was a statistical significant difference for all elevation values from normal and keratoconus, considering anterior and posterior corneal data, referencing to BFS and BFTE (Mann-Whitney Test, p<0.05). Best cut off for the posterior elevation at the thinnest and apex for BFS were 21 and 9 microns, with respective AUROC of 0.98 and Best cut off for the posterior elevation at the thinnest and apex for BFTE were 13 and 6 microns, with AUROC of 0.97 and 0.86 respectively SensitivitySpecificityCriterionAUROC Standard Error BFS b TME 100 >2310 BFS b TT 100 >1910 BFS b TC 10096,9>170,9990,0007 BFTE b TT ,9990, BFS f TC 10095,9>50,9980,00138 BFTE b TC 94,6100>160,9980,00166 BFS f TT 96,499>60,9970,00218 BFTE b ME 96,496,9>200,9940,00398 BFTE f TT 92,998>60,9920,00497

e-Poster ALC Canedo, MD 2010 Rio de Janeiro CornealTomograhyandBiomechanics Study Group Study Group Elevation Reference Body Front SensitivitySpecificityCriterionAUC Standard Error BFS f91,184,7<=7.720,9230,0227 r flat f80,486,7<=7.510,8880,029 r steep f82,199<=7.180,9690,0111 ave r-s f96,485,7<=7.540,9530,0161 BFS fr flat fr steep fave r-s f BFS f10,0140,0080,001 r flat f10,0020,01 r steep f10,165 ave r-s f1 P-value for ROC Comparisons

e-Poster ALC Canedo, MD 2010 Rio de Janeiro CornealTomograhyandBiomechanics Study Group Study Group Elevation Reference Body Back SensitivitySpecificityCriterionAUC Standard Error BFS b83,983,7<=6.360,9070,0259 r flat b73,289,8<=6.250,8810,03 r steep b83,995,9<=5.940,9510,0194 ave r-s b83,993,9<=6.150,9420,0191 BFS br flat br steep bave r-s b BFS b10,1640,0240,003 r flat b10,0230,003 r steep b10,502 ave r-s b1 P-value

e-Poster ALC Canedo, MD 2010 Rio de Janeiro CornealTomograhyandBiomechanics Study Group Study Group Corneal Elevation Front: More Elevated within 4mm SensitivitySpecificityCriterionAUC Standard Error BFS f ME 98,284,7>130,9640,0132 BFS f TME 96,4100>140,09870,0106 BFTE f ME 96,490,8>70,960,0222 BFTE f TME 96,499>80,970,0202 BFS f MEBFS f TMEBFTE f MEBFTE f TME BFS f ME10,030,8230,713 BFS f TME10,0560,172 BFTE f ME10,03 BFTE f TME1 P-value

e-Poster ALC Canedo, MD 2010 Rio de Janeiro CornealTomograhyandBiomechanics Study Group Study Group SensitivitySpecificityCriterionAUC Standard Error BFS b ME 96,492,9>300,9820,00805 BFS b TME 100 >2310 BFTE b ME 96,496,9>200,9940,00398 BFTE b TME 98,299>180,990,00139 BFS b MEBFS b TMEBFTE b ME BFTE b TME BFS b ME10,0250,1390,04 BFS b TME10,1560,294 BFTE b ME10,144 BFTE b TME1 P-value Corneal Elevation Back: More Elevated within 4mm

e-Poster ALC Canedo, MD 2010 Rio de Janeiro CornealTomograhyandBiomechanics Study Group Study Group Corneal Elevation Front: Thinnest SensitivitySpecificityCriterionAUC Standard Error BFS f TC10095,9>50,9980,00138 BFS f TT96,499>60,9970,00218 BFTE f TC92,996,9>50,9830,00985 BFTE f TT92,998>60,9920,00497 BFS f TCBFS f TTBFTE f TCBFTE f TT BFS f TC10,4360,0940,145 BFS f TT10,0870,131 BFTE f TC10,093 BFTE f TT1 P-value

e-Poster ALC Canedo, MD 2010 Rio de Janeiro CornealTomograhyandBiomechanics Study Group Study Group Corneal Elevation Back : Thinnest SensitivitySpecificityCriterionAUC Standard Error BFS b TC10096,9>170,9990,0007 BFS b TT100 >1910 BFTE b TC94,6100>160,9980,00166 BFTE b TT ,9990, BFS b TCBFS b TTBFTE b TCBFTE b TT BFS b TC10,4360,0940,145 BFS b TT10,0870,131 BFTE b TC10,093 BFTE b TT1 P-value

e-Poster ALC Canedo, MD 2010 Rio de Janeiro CornealTomograhyandBiomechanics Study Group Study Group Discussion and Conclusions All elevation parameters studied had statistically significant differences among keratoconus and normal (Mann Whitney Test). There were statistically significant ROC curves for some parameters, favoring BFS to BFTE to diagnose keratoconus but both BFS and BFTE served as good reference bodies for elevation maps and had excellent performances to discriminate keratoconus from normal corneas. The elevation values at the thinnest point were more consistent and had better ROC curves than the values at the apex. The posterior elevation at thinnest point using BFS provided the best performance in this study with the sensitivity of 96.7% and specificity of 99%. This study did not address very early forms of ectasia, such as sub- clinical keratoconus and forme-fruste keratoconus Future studies to correlate elevation and pachymetric distribution data, along with biomechanical parameters are need to determine Ectasia Susceptibility