Group-Based Interventions for Tier 2 An Overview of Research Supported Practices Deb Childs, Ph.D. MO SWPBS Tier 2/3 Consultant.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Integrated Implementation of Initiatives: SEL, PBIS, RTI Marla Dewhirst, Technical Assistance Director, PBIS Network
Advertisements

Response to Intervention (RtI) in Primary Grades
Keeping Tiered Instruction Vital Russell Johnston, PhD West Springfield Public Schools None of Us is as Smart as All of Us --Japanese Proverb.
Targeted & Individual Systems of Support Lori Newcomer, Ph.D. Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri – Columbia OSEP Center for Positive Behavior Interventions.
School-wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports & Students with Autism Jointly developed by the above organizations with funding from the U.S.
RtI and High School A Comprehensive Student Engagement Intervention Model.
Mike W. Olson RTI. RTI is… 2 the practice of providing high-quality instruction/intervention matched to student needs and using learning rate over time.
School-wide PBIS Universal Systems Year 3 Chris Borgmeier, PhD Portland State University
SWPBS Tier 2 Meets Tennessee’s RtI2 School-Based Teams
Kirksville Public Schools Early Childhood Learning Center “Whatever it takes, our children are worth it!”
Parent Introduction to School-wide Positive Behavior Supports (SW-PBS)
Wednesday, 9:15-10:30, Salon C. Group-Based Interventions for Tier 2 An Overview of Research Supported Practices Barbara Mitchell, Ph.D. MO SWPBS Tier.
Building a Tier II/III School Wide PBS System Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri OSEP Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports pbis.org.
Check In – Connect – Check Out Dr. Zaf Khan PBSI Project Director October 25, 2007.
TIER TWO INTERVENTIONS Jim Artesani, Ed.D. 304 Shibles Hall Orono, ME 04469
Response to Intervention in The Social Domain. Response to Intervention (RTI) Response to evidence-based interventions (Elliott, Witt, Kratchowill, &
The Changing Role of the Pupil Services Personnel Ami Flammini, LCSW Technical Assistance Director IL PBIS Network.
Social Skill Instruction as Tier II Intervention Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri OSEP Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports.
Leanne S. Hawken, University of Utah Danielle Starkey, Missouri, SWPBS Ericka Dixon, Winfield Primary Illinois PBIS Forum, 2012.
Progress Monitoring for Tier 2
9/15/20151 Scaling Up Presentation: SIG/SPDG Regional Meeting October 2009 Marick Tedesco, Ph.D. State Transformation Specialist for Scaling Up.
Year 3 Day 2. Critical Elements PBIS TEAM Staff COMMITMENT EFFECTIVE PROCEDURES FOR DEALING WITH DISCIPLINE DATA ENTRY AND ANALYSIS PLAN ESTABLISHED GUIDELINES.
Response to Intervention
PBIS Targeted Level Orientation Webinar Presented By VTPBiS State Team January 21, 2015.
ESMS New Teacher Orientation Our Mission is to maximize student learning and personal responsibility through a rigorous standards-based curriculum, a safe.
Establishing Training Capacity for Classroom Management Heather Peshak George, Ph.D. Kim Herrmann, S.S.P. University of South Florida Marla Dewhirst Illinois.
Building A Tier Two System In An Elementary School: Lessons Learned Tina Windett & Julie Arment Columbia Public Schools, Missouri Tim Lewis & Linda Bradley.
Tier 2 PBIS: Check-In / Check-out
PBIS Year 2, Day 4 Tier 2 Supports for Selected Students.
Intro to Positive Behavior Supports (PBiS) Vermont Family Network March 2010.
Tier 2 Support The Behavior Education Plan. 2 Objectives Identify the BEP and its place in SWPBS Identify daily, weekly, and quarterly features of the.
New Coaches Training. Michael Lombardo Director Interagency Facilitation Rainbow Crane Behavior RtI Coordinator
Check In – Connect – Check Out A Systematic Approach to Behavior Management for At- Risk Students Dr. Zaf Khan PBSI Project Director MTSU.
Introduction to Coaching School-Wide PBS:RtIB. 2 Agenda PBS:RtIB Brief Overview Coaching Tier 1 Coaching Skills and Activities Resources and Barriers.
The Behavior Education Program: A Check-In, Check-Out Intervention Jennifer Wright Cottonwood Elementary June 12, 2008.
Connecting PBIS & SST to Address Student Needs
Tier Two and an Evidence-Based Practice: Check-In/Check-Out Janice Morris, Barbara Mitchell and Nicole Reifesel Columbia Public Schools.
Checking in on Check In/Check Out DEBORA LINTNER MO SW-PBS TIER 2/3 CONSULTANT SUSAN LONG ASSISTANT PRINCIPAL SIKESTON 5-6 GRADE CENTER.
Supporting Students At- risk by Implementing a SW Targeted Intervention Teri Lewis-Palmer July 10, 2008.
Positive Peer Reporting & Tootling to Promote Generalization & Maintenance of Social-Behavioral Skills Patti Pazdera - School Counselor Nicki Poindexter.
Strategies to Support Yellow-zone students Specialized Group-based Approach.
Secondary Interventions Function-based Strategies to Support At-Risk Students.
PBIS Secondary Team.  The team that targets the Yellow: 5-10% of those students who are still struggling despite Universal Level training.  Supporters.
Victoria White, PhD Ann George, EdD Associate Professor Assistant Professor Director of KC Metro Center SSLS.
Preparing for Advanced Tiers using CICO Calvert County Returning Team Summer Institute Cathy Shwaery, PBIS Maryland Overview.
Check-in/Check-out koi-education.com. Students who are not successful with Tier 1 interventions alone, need additional behavioral supports.
Washington PBIS Conference Northwest PBIS Network Spokane, WA November 2013.
Secondary Interventions Applying Function-based Support Adapted from Crone, Horner, & Hawken, 2004 Responding to Problem Behavior in Schools The Behavior.
Introduction to School-wide Positive Behavior Support.
Check-In / Check-Out (CI/CO): Overview for Staff.
Planning for Tier 2. TIER 1, 2, or 3? Are there ANY schools that aren’t motivated to support the difficult, at-risk kids? Answer = NO So, why don’t we.
Effective Behavior & Instructional Support. Implementing RTI through Effective Behavior & Instructional Support.
Sustaining Change: RtI & SWPBS George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education and Research University of Connecticut May 9,
© 2005 by The Guilford Press Check In, Check Out (CICO) Piloting A Tier 2 Intervention.
Secondary Interventions: Check-in/ Check-out as an Example Rob Horner, Anne Todd, Amy Kauffman-Campbell, Jessica Swain-Bradway University of Oregon
The Behavior Education Program (BEP): An additional intervention to complement school and classroom managment The Behavior Education Program (BEP): An.
Response to Intervention Presented by Valerie Mendez-Farinas.
Introduction to School-wide Positive Behavior Support.
HIGH SCHOOL BEHAVIOR EDUCATION PROGRAM Amy Campbell.
Tier II/III Supports within SW-PBS Tim Lewis, Ph.D. & Barbara Mitchell, Ph.D. University of Missouri OSEP Center on Positive Behavioral Intervention &
Behavior Education Program (BEP): Overview for Staff Leanne S. Hawken, Ph.D. University of Utah.
5.0 Tier Two Practice: Check-In Check-Out
Insert School Picture Elementary. Acknowledgments Staff PBIS Team Principal Etc..
SCHOOL-WIDE POSITIVE BEHAVIORAL INTERVENTIONS AND SUPPORT: ADDRESSING THE BEHAVIOR OF ALL STUDENTS Session B4: Expanding Your Tier 2 Behavior Intervention.
RTI Response to Intervention Connecting the Pieces.
SCHOOL-WIDE POSITIVE BEHAVIORAL INTERVENTIONS AND SUPPORTS: ADDRESSING THE BEHAVIOR OF ALL STUDENTS Behavior Education Program/ Check and Connect KENTUCKY.
RTI: Linking Academic and Behavior Support Wesley Temple Dawn Davis.
Tier 1 Positive Behavior Support Response to Intervention for Behavior Faculty Overview.
Keeping Tiered Instruction Vital
Check & Connect Intervention Model Check & Connect is a structured mentoring intervention to promote student success and engagement at school and.
Presentation transcript:

Group-Based Interventions for Tier 2 An Overview of Research Supported Practices Deb Childs, Ph.D. MO SWPBS Tier 2/3 Consultant

Outcome By the end of this session you will be able to… Identify and select interventions that fit the needs and context of students and staff. – Check-In/Check-Out – Social Skills Intervention Groups – Check & Connect MO SW-PBS

Three Levels of Implementation A Continuum of Support for All Tier One All students Preventive, proactiv e Tier One All settings, all students Preventive, proactive Tier Two Some students (at-risk) High efficiency Rapid response Tier Two Some students (at-risk) High efficiency Rapid response Tier Three Individual Students Assessment-based High Intensity Tier Three Individual Students Assessment-based Intense, durable procedures Academic SystemsBehavioral Systems MO SW-PBS

Purpose of Tier 2 Provide interventions to support approximately 15% of the student population who are at risk, but not currently engaging in severe problem behavior Walker & Horner, 1996; Crone, Hawken & Horner, 2010, p. 7 MO SW-PBS

Purpose of Tier 2 Not all students require an intensive, individualized intervention Research-based interventions can be effective in preventing severe problem behavior Group-based interventions allow use of fewer resources while still providing positive effect MO SW-PBS

Tier 2 Systems Systematic Identification of students at risk Information gathering to match student need with available interventions Method to monitor student progress in the intervention Using individual student data to make decisions Check fidelity of implementation MO SW-PBS

Tier 2 Systems Systematic identification of students at risk Using data – Office discipline referral – Minor discipline records – Attendance – Grades Create a teacher nomination form Universal Screening MO SW-PBS

Tier 2 Systems Information gathering to match student need with available interventions Discipline data Function of behavior/motivation MO SW-PBS

Tier 2 Systems Method to monitor student progress in the intervention Create a data base to keep track of individual student data – Advanced Tier Spreadsheet – SWIS MO SW-PBS

Tier 2 Systems Using individual student data to make decisions Determine when to – Fade – Graduate – Modify – Intensify MO SW-PBS

Tier 2 Systems Check fidelity of implementation Simple methods to make sure each intervention has been implemented as designed MO SW-PBS

The Behavior Education Program (BEP): A Daily Check-in/Check-out Intervention (CICO) Crone, Hawken, & Horner, 2010 The Guilford Press

Crone, D. A., Hawken, L. S. & Horner, R. H. (2010). Responding to Problem Behavior in Schools: The Behavior Education Program. New York: Guilford Press. MO SW-PBS

Student Recommended for CICO CICO Implemented Parent Feedback Regular Teacher Feedback Afternoon Check-out Morning Check-in CICO Coordinator Summarizes Data For Decision Making Bi-weekly CICO Meeting to Assess Student Progress Exit Program Revise Program

Example Check In For all video examples, see website pbismissouri.org

Example Check Out

Example Positive Feedback

Example Corrective Feedback

What Resources Are Needed? CICO Coordinator Facilitator AStudent 1Student 2Facilitator BStudent 3Student 4 MO SW-PBS

Check-In/Check-Out Research supported practice – Decreases problem behavior – Effective for 60-75% of second tier, at-risk students – Schools can successfully implement – Use of Functional Behavior Assessment can enhance success (Crone, Hawken & Horner, 2010, p. 11) MO SW-PBS

Turn to a Partner Discuss potential benefits and barriers of developing a Check-in/Check-out intervention for your setting. MO SW-PBS

Social Skills Intervention Group Definitions & Best Practice

Example Manuals

Reasons for Social Skill Deficits Lack of knowledge Lack of practice Lack of cues Lack of reinforcement Presence of competing problem behaviors (Elliott and Gresham, 2008) MO SW-PBS

Who Will Benefit? Students who demonstrate deficits & non- responsive to school-wide instruction – Acquisition deficit* A student does not know the skill or how to use it appropriately. – Performance or Fluency deficit A student can perform the skill but does so infrequently. MO SW-PBS

Instructional Approach Tell = Coaching Show = Modeling Do = Role Play Practice = Rehearsal Reinforce = Feedback MO SW-PBS

What Happens After the Sessions? Generalization – Promote use of skills across settings Daily Progress Report (DPR) Maintenance – Promote use of skills over time Positive Peer Reporting (PPR) Tootling CW-FIT MO SW-PBS

Turn to a Partner Discuss potential benefits and barriers of developing a Social Skills Intervention for your setting. MO SW-PBS

Check & Connect A Student Engagement Intervention University of Minnesota Institute on Community Integration MO SW-PBS

Intervention Manual MO SW-PBS

What is Check & Connect? Four components = 1.A mentor who works with students and families for a minimum of 2 years, 1.Regular “checks” using school data 1.Timely and individualized intervention - “connect” 1.Engagement with families MO SW-PBS

What is Check & Connect? Three Core Elements (fundamental principles) – Relationships Focus on alterable variables Personalized, data-based intervention Long-term commitment Participation in and affiliation with school – Problem solving & capacity building – Persistence-Plus MO SW-PBS

All Students Get “Check” Systematic Data Collection & Recording All Students Get “Connect” Basic Share “check” data Provide feedback Discuss Importance of school Teach Problem solving Intensive Basic + Individualized, additional supports determined by need. MO SW-PBS

Resources Needed CoordinatorMentor 1Student AStudent BMentor 2Student CStudent DMentor 3Student EStudent F MO SW-PBS

Resources *U.S. Department of Education Institute of Education Sciences What Works Clearinghouse Web = MO SW-PBS

Resources *Institute on Community Integration University of Minnesota Web = Publications = Check & Connect: A comprehensive student engagement intervention (manual; cost is $50) MO SW-PBS

Turn to a Partner Discuss potential benefits and barriers of developing a Check & Connect program for your setting. MO SW-PBS

Contact Information & Resources RPDC Regional SWPBS Consultant and/or Tier 2/3 Consultant Intervention Manuals Web Sites – – – MO SW-PBS