Copyright © 2009 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Injury Assessment Chapter 5.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CHAPTER 13: OFF-THE-FIELD EVALUATION
Advertisements

UNIT 7- INJURY MANAGEMENT
Principles of Examination
HOPS. HOPS Systematic and standardized procedure used to evaluate injuries. Why? –Reduces risk of “missing something” –Allows easy communication of findings.
Chapter 5 Quiz Questions.
Copyright © 2002 Career Publishing, Inc. Visual 9-1 Plan for Emergency Action When it is time to contact the EMS system, STAY CALM! The EMS authority.
Musculoskeletal Assessment. History This is the information gathering and recording phase of the assessment. The history should give a clear idea of what.
WILLIAM E. PRENTICE THE EVALUATION PROCESS IN REHABILITATION.
Emergency care for Musculoskeletal system. The Skeletal System The Musculoskeletal system consists of: - Bones (skeleton) - Joints - Cartilages - Ligaments.
Injury Evaluation Process
Spinal Trauma. Anatomy and Physiology  Vertebral Column  Spinal Cord.
Assessment and Evaluation of Sports Injuries
Chapter 12: On-the-Field Acute Care and Emergency Procedures.
Off-Field Injury Evaluation. Evaluation vs. Diagnosis O By law, ATC’s cannot diagnose O Education and training allow them to make quick and accurate judgment.
Off-the-Field Evaluation Athletic Medicine I. Objectives ● Know: o The organs located in each abdominopelvic quadrant. o Difference between clinical and.
Copyright © 2013 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Injury Assessment Chapter 5.
© 2011 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved. Chapter 13: Off-the-Field Injury Evaluation.
Sports Injury Assessment Procedures Primary and Secondary Surveys It is important to perform a Primary and Secondary survey. Primary Survey (make sure.
Injury Assessment & Evaluation. Today’s topics...  Principles of range of motion testing, neurological testing, and special tests  Functional testing.
Examination of Orthopedic and Athletic Injuries, 3rd Edition Copyright © F.A. Davis Company The Injury Examination Process Chapter 1.
Injury Assessment & Evaluation Procedures
Copyright © 2010 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Timby/Smith: Introductory Medical-Surgical Nursing, 10/e Chapter 62: Caring for.
Injury Assessment & Evaluation 10/8/20151
ORTHOPEDIC PHYSICAL ASSESSMENT BY Dr:Osama Ragaa Assistant prof. of physical therapy Batterjee college for medical sciences&technology.
© 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved 38-1 Purpose of General Physical Examination  To confirm an overall state of health Baseline.
1 Classification of Injuries. Sign: a finding that is observed or that can be objectively measured (swelling, discoloration, deformity, crepitus) Sign.
Choose the correct question that matches up with the answer that you see on the screen. Please check/record the correct answers!!
4 Evaluation and Assessment. The means by which one seeks information on severity, irritability, nature, and stage of injury Evaluation Subjective elements.
Copyright © 2011 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 7 Injury Assessment.
 Introduction  Approach to patient evaluation and program development (SOAP)  Posture.
Examination and Management of Acute Pathologies ATHT 305.
12 Thorax and Abdomen. Observe surroundings and athlete. On-Field Assessment: Primary Survey Establish consciousness. Assess vitals early (pulse, respirations,
CLINICAL EXAMINATION. Diagnostic approach depends upon assessment of function.
Purpose of General Physical Examination
Assessment of Injuries Lecture 6. Assessment with a sports related injury the athletic therapist is expected to evaluate the situation, assess the extent.
Chapter 11: Assessment and Evaluation of Sports Injuries.
Examination and Management of Acute Pathologies ATHT 305.
2 Principles of Assessment. Rule out life-threatening and serious injuries. On-Field Assessment: Goals Determine the nature and severity of the injury.
 Student will be able to describe the step by step process of evaluating injuries.
Sports Injury Assessment
Care and Prevention of Athletic Injuries Ms.Herrera ATC/L
Assessment vs. Diagnosis  Assessment is the orderly collection of objective and subject data on the athlete’s health status  Diagnosis: using information.
First Aid for Colleges and Universities 10 Edition Chapter 11 © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Musculoskeletal Injuries Slide Presentation prepared by Randall.
Chapter 7 Emergency Plan and Initial Injury Evaluation.
Chapter 1 The Injury Evaluation Process. Introduction  Accurate initial assessment is essential for successful management and rehabilitation of an injury.
Off-the-Field Injury Evaluation Detailed evaluation on sideline or in clinic setting May be the evaluation of an acute injury or one several days later.
Injury Evaluation Process Color of the Day Why have a process for evaluation?
Copyright © 2014 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Timby/Smith: Introductory Medical-Surgical Nursing, 11/e Chapter 62: Caring for.
Chapter 4 Emergency Preparedness and Assessment. The Importance of Observational Skills During an Emergency Look Listen Touch Smell 2.
Systematic Evaluation Process. What need to know for successful evaluation and impression? –ANATOMY –Pathomechanics –Biomechanics of Sport –Pathologies.
Basic Athletic Training Chapter 6 Foot, Ankle, and Lower Leg
Neurological Assessment
Emergency Preparedness and Assessment
IN THE NAME OF GOD FARAJI.Z.MD.
Documentation SOAP Notes.
Injury Evaluation Process
UNIT 7- INJURY MANAGEMENT
Neurological Assessment
Unit 1: Evaluation.
HOPS.
UNIT 7- INJURY MANAGEMENT
HOPS.
Sports Med ½ Gonzalez Donovan
Evaluation Procedures for Athletic Injuries
HOPS.
Assessment and Evaluation of Sport Injuries
Assessment and Evaluation of Sport Injuries
Assessment and Evaluation of Injuries
Presentation transcript:

Copyright © 2009 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Injury Assessment Chapter 5

Copyright © 2009 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Injury Evaluation Process symptom –information provided by the injured person regarding their perception of the problem sign –objective, measurable physical finding

Copyright © 2009 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Injury Evaluation Process (Cont’d) establish a reference point by assessing the opposite, non- injured body part methods –HOPS subjective – history objective – observation, palpation, special tests –SOAP subjective & objective – same as HOPS additional – assessment and planning

Copyright © 2009 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins History of Injury can be most important step in assessment involves not only asking questions, but establishing a professional & comfortable atmosphere information provided is subjective, but should be gathered & recorded as quantitatively as possible document HX in writing includes: –primary complaint –mechanism of injury –characteristics of symptoms –related medical Hx

Copyright © 2009 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins History of Injury (Cont’d) primary complaint –what the individual believes is the current injury –questions mechanism of injury –attempt to visualize injury to identify possible injured structures –questions

Copyright © 2009 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins History of Injury (Cont’d) characteristics of symptoms –location; onset; severity; frequency; duration; limitations due to pain –questions –pain somatic deep diffuse or nagging; w/ possible stabbing pain; longer lasting injury to bone, internal joint structures, or muscles superficial sharp, prickly; brief duration injury to skin visceral deep, nagging, and pressing; often accompanied by nausea & vomiting injury to internal organ referred pain

Copyright © 2009 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins History of Injury (Cont’d) F5.1 Visceral organs can refer pain to specific cutaneous areas

Copyright © 2009 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins History of Injury (Cont’d) disability resulting from injury –determine limitations due to pain, weakness, or disability –questions related medical history –information regarding other problems/ conditions potentially affecting this injury –use of preseason physical exam

Copyright © 2009 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Observation & Inspection observation –assess state of consciousness & body language that may indicate pain, disability, or other conditions –note posture, willingness/ ability to move, overall attitude –symmetry & appearance congenital & functional problems gait –motor function assess general motor function rule out injury to other joints

Copyright © 2009 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Observation & Inspection (Cont’d) inspection –factors seen at the actual injury site e.g., deformity, discoloration, swelling, signs of infection, scars

Copyright © 2009 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Palpation prior to contact, permission much be granted to the AT to touch the patient bilateral palpation –temperature –swelling –point tenderness –crepitus –deformity –muscle spasm –cutaneous sensation –pulse gentle, circular pressure followed by gradual, deeper pressure begin away from inj. site and move toward inj.

Copyright © 2009 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Palpation (Cont’d) determining a possible fracture F5.2

Copyright © 2009 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Physical Examination Tests functional testing –objectively measure using goniometer –age & gender may influence ROM –AROM joint motion performed voluntarily by the individual through muscular contraction perform before PROM indicates willingness & ability to move body part determines possible damage to contractile tissue; measures muscle strength and movement coordination measurement of all motions, except rotation, starts with the body in anatomical position

Copyright © 2009 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Physical Examination Tests (Cont’d) –PROM the injured body part is moved through the ROM with no assistance from the injured individual distinguishes injury to contractile tissues from noncontractile or inert tissues end of the range, gentle overpressure to determine end feel differences in ROM between AROM & PROM accessory movements loose packed position close packed position

Copyright © 2009 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Physical Examination Tests (Cont’d) –RROM can assess muscle strength and detect injury to the nervous system break test or entire ROM F 5.6

Copyright © 2009 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Physical Examination Tests (Cont’d) ligamentous & capsular testing –assess joint function & integrity of joint structures –laxity vs. instability –test at proper angle F5.7

Copyright © 2009 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Physical Examination Tests (Cont’d) neurologic testing –nerve root somatic visceral –CNS - assess using dermatomes, myotomes, & reflexes dermatome – area of skin supplied by a single nerve root assess sensation abnormal: hypoesthesia; hyperesthesia; paresthesia

Copyright © 2009 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Physical Examination Tests (Cont’d) The cutaneous sensation patterns of the spinal nerves dermatomes differ from the patterns innervated by the peripheral nerves. F5.8

Copyright © 2009 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Physical Examination Tests (Cont’d) neurologic testing (cont’d) myotome – group of muscles primarily innervated by a single nerve root assess muscle contraction (hold at least 5 seconds) abnormal: paresis; paralysis

Copyright © 2009 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Physical Examination Tests (Cont’d) neurologic testing (cont’d) reflexes DTRs abnormal: diminished; exaggerated or distorted; absent superficial reflexes pathological F5.9

Copyright © 2009 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Physical Examination Tests (Cont’d) peripheral nerve testing manual muscle testing cutaneous sensation testing special compression tests activity-specific functional testing –typical, active movements performed during activity participation –movements should assess: strength, agility, flexibility, joint stability, endurance, coordination, balance, and sport-specific skill performance

Copyright © 2009 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Emergency Medical Services System process that activates the emergency health care services of the athletic training facility & community to provide immediate health care to an injured individual the team physician, athletic trainer, and coach have a legal duty to develop and implement an emergency plan to provide health care for participants

Copyright © 2009 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Emergency Medical Services System (Cont’d) preseason preparation –meet with representatives from local EMS agencies to discuss, develop, and evaluate plan –written plan for each activity site –practice the emergency plan responsibilities of medical personnel –team physician prior to season, delineate responsibilities of all personnel on-the-field –athletic trainer event set-up home vs. away presence or absence of physician

Copyright © 2009 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Emergency Injury Assessment primary survey –determines level of responsiveness –identifies immediate life-threatening situations (ABCs) –dictates necessary actions triage –rapid assessment of all injured individuals followed by return to the most seriously injured for treatment –charge person versus call person “red flags” on-site assessment; ascertain presence of serious or moderate injury

Copyright © 2009 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Emergency Injury Assessment (Cont’d) on-site history –obtained from the individual or bystanders who witnessed the injury –relatively brief as compared to a comprehensive clinical evaluation –critical areas (refer to Field Strategy 5.6) location of pain presence of abnormal neurologic signs mechanism of injury associated sounds history of the injury

Copyright © 2009 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Emergency Injury Assessment (Cont’d) on-site observation & inspection –begin en route to individual –critical areas surrounding area body position movement of the athlete level of responsiveness primary survey inspection for head trauma inspection of injured body part

Copyright © 2009 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Emergency Injury Assessment (Cont’d) body posturing F5.10

Copyright © 2009 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Emergency Injury Assessment (Cont’d) on-site palpation –general head-to-toe assessment –determine abnormal joint angulation bony palpation soft tissue palpation skin temperature

Copyright © 2009 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Emergency Injury Assessment (Cont’d) on-site functional testing –when not contraindicated, the individual’s willingness to move the injured body part –AROM;PROM;RROM –weight bearing on-site stress testing –performed prior to any muscle guarding or swelling to prevent obscuring the extent of injury

Copyright © 2009 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Emergency Injury Assessment (Cont’d) on-site neurologic testing –critical to prevent a catastrophic injury –areas cutaneous sensation motor function vital signs –pulse variety of factors influence pulse count carotid for 30 seconds (and double it) normal ranges adults children

Copyright © 2009 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Emergency Injury Assessment (Cont’d) –respiratory rate varies with gender and age count for 30 seconds (and double it) normal ranges adults children –blood pressure pressure or tension of the blood within the systemic arteries changes in BP are very significant –temperature normal 98.6, but can fluctuate considerably methods

Copyright © 2009 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Emergency Injury Assessment (Cont’d) –skin color can indicate abnormal blood flow & low blood oxygen concentration in a particular body part lightly pigmented individuals red, white, and blue dark-skinned individuals skin pigments mask cyanosis –pupils sensitive to situations affecting the CNS pupillary light reflex eye movement tracking ability depth perception –disposition can the situation be handled on-site or should the individual be referred to a physician?

Copyright © 2009 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Emergency Injury Assessment (Cont’d) equipment considerations –removal of any athletic helmet should be avoided unless individual circumstances dictate otherwise –face mask removal should be removed prior to transportation, regardless of the current respiratory status –helmet removal requires two trained individuals –shoulder pad removal should not be removed unless life is in danger, and the threat outweighs the risk of a possible spinal cord injury from moving the athlete

Copyright © 2009 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Moving the Injured Participant ambulatory assistance –aid an injured ind. able to walk manual conveyance –ind. unable to walk or distance is too great to walk transport by spine board –safest method

Copyright © 2009 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Diagnostic Testing the team physician or medical specialist orders tests and interprets the results…. the athletic trainer should have a basic understanding of the purpose of the tests

Copyright © 2009 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Diagnostic Testing (Cont’d) laboratory tests –blood test; urinalysis radiographs (X-rays) –can rule out fractures, infections, & neoplasms –use of radio-opaque dyes myelogram arthrogram F5.11

Copyright © 2009 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Diagnostic Testing (Cont’d) computed tomography (CT scan) –can reveal abnormalities in bone, fat, and soft tissue –can detect tendon & ligament inj. in varying jt. positions F5.12

Copyright © 2009 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Diagnostic Testing (Cont’d) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) –can reveal soft tissue differentiation –can demonstrate space- occupying lesions in the brain –can demonstrate joint damage –can view blood vessels & blood flow w/out use of a contrast medium F5.13

Copyright © 2009 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Diagnostic Testing (Cont’d) radionuclide scintigraph (bone scan) –can detect stress fractures of the long bones and vertebrae, degenerative diseases, infections, or tumors of the bone F15.4

Copyright © 2009 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Diagnostic Testing (Cont’d) ultrasonic imaging –used to view tendon and other soft-tissue imaging electromyography –used to detect denervated muscles, nerve root compression injuries, and other muscle diseases