Focus Area 23: Public Health Infrastructure Progress Review May 19, 2004.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
APPENDIX. Economic Stability: SDOH-1 Proportion of children aged 0-17 years living with at least one parent employed year round, full time SDOH-3.1 Proportion.
Advertisements

Focus Area 16: Maternal, Infant, and Child Health Progress Review October 22, 2003.
Healthy People 2010 Focus Area 3 Cancer Progress Review October 16, 2002.
Healthy People 2010 Focus Area 12: Heart Disease and Stroke
Healthy People 2020: A Methodological Approach 2010 National Conference on Health Statistics Leda Gurley, MPH NCHS/ Office of Analysis and Epidemiology.
Accessing Aggregated Population Health Data from Select Tools of the NCHS A presentation at the Knowledge 4 Equity Conference James M. Craver November.
Focus Area 18: Mental Health and Mental Disorders Progress Review December 17, 2003.
Midcourse Assessment of Healthy People 2010 Goal II Suzanne P. Hallquist, MSPH Kenneth G. Keppel, PhD National Center for Health Statistics Centers for.
Healthy People 2010 Focus Area 1 Access to Quality Health Services Progress Review June 4, 2002.
Focus Area 23: Public Health Infrastructure Progress Review Richard J. Klein National Center for Health Statistics April 16, 2008.
Healthy People 2010 Focus Area 6: Disability and Secondary Conditions Progress Review November 16, 2006.
Focus Area 24 Respiratory Diseases Progress Review June 29, 2004.
Focus Area 21: Oral Health Progress Review Richard J. Klein National Center for Health Statistics February 7, 2008.
June 24, 2003 Health Communications Progress Review Focus Area 11.
Healthy People 2010 Focus Area 6: Disability and Secondary Conditions Progress Review – January 15, 2003.
Healthy People 2010 Mid-Decade Assessment of Progress: Methods and Results Richard J. Klein, MPH Erin B. Reidy, MA Suzanne P. Hallquist, MSPH Asel Ryskulova,
Healthy People 2010 Focus Area 2 Arthritis, Osteoporosis, and Chronic Back Conditions Progress Review September 18, 2002.
F ocus Area 22 Physical Activity and Fitness Progress Review April 14, 2004.
Healthy People 2010 Focus Area 3 Cancer Progress Review October 16, 2002.
Focus Area 7: Educational and Community- Based Programs Progress Review September 15th, 2004.
Healthy People 2010 Focus Area 16: Maternal, Infant, and Child Health Progress Review September 20, 2007.
Focus Area 25 Sexually Transmitted Diseases Progress Review July 21, 2004.
Healthy People 2010 Focus Area 1: Access to Quality Health Services Progress Review June 15, 2006.
Healthy People 2010 Focus Area 3: Cancer Progress Review August 17, 2006.
Healthy People 2010 Focus Area 4: Chronic Kidney Disease Progress Review September 21, 2006.
Healthy People 2010 Focus Area 5: Diabetes Progress Review October 20, 2006.
1-1. Health insurance: < 65 years (1997, 2004) 1-3f. Provider counseling about unintended pregnancy: females years (1995, 2002) 1-4. Source of ongoing.
Healthy People 2010 Focus Area 2 Arthritis, Osteoporosis, and Chronic Back Conditions Progress Review July 20, 2006.
Buckeye Central Local Schools
How Closely Do California’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity? This chart compares the racial and ethnic composition of California’s general population.
How Closely Do Illinois’ RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity?
How Closely Do Ohio’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity?
How Closely Do Ohio’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity?
How Closely Do Georgia’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity?
How Closely Do Washington’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity? This chart compares the racial and ethnic composition of Washington’s general.
How Closely Do Washington’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity? This chart compares the racial and ethnic composition of Washington’s general population.
How Closely Do Massachusetts’ RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity? This chart compares the racial and ethnic composition of Massachusetts’ general.
How Closely Do New Mexico’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity? This chart compares the racial and ethnic composition of New Mexico’s general population.
How Closely Do New Mexico’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity? This chart compares the racial and ethnic composition of New Mexico’s general.
Engagement Survey Results: Demographics
How Closely Do California’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity? This chart compares the racial and ethnic composition of California’s general.
How Closely Do Oregon’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity?
How Closely Do Pennsylvania’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity? This chart compares the racial and ethnic composition of Pennsylvania’s general.
How Closely Do New York’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity?
How Closely Do Virginia’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity?
How Closely Do Colorado’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity?
How Closely Do Colorado’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity?
How Closely Do Massachusetts’ RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity? This chart compares the racial and ethnic composition of Massachusetts’ general.
How Closely Do Illinois’ RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity?
How Closely Do Massachusetts’ RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity? This chart compares the racial and ethnic composition of Massachusetts’ general.
How Closely Do New York’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity?
How Closely Do Alaska’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity?
How Closely Do Florida’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity?
How Closely Do Pennsylvania’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity? This chart compares the racial and ethnic composition of Pennsylvania’s general.
How Closely Do Ohio’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity?
How Closely Do Michigan’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity?
How Closely Do Michigan’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity?
How Closely Do Georgia’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity?
How Closely Do Georgia’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity?
How Closely Do Washington’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity? This chart compares the racial and ethnic composition of Washington’s general population.
How Closely Do Oregon’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity?
How Closely Do Florida’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity?
How Closely Do Virginia’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity?
How Closely Do Alaska’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity?
How Closely Do California’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity? This chart compares the racial and ethnic composition of California’s general population.
How Closely Do New Mexico’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity? This chart compares the racial and ethnic composition of New Mexico’s general population.
How Closely Do Maine’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity?
How Closely Do Alaska’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity?
How Closely Do Florida’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity?
How Closely Do New York’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity?
Presentation transcript:

Focus Area 23: Public Health Infrastructure Progress Review May 19, 2004

Data and Information Systems 23-1 Employee access to internet 23-2 Access to information on health indicators 23-3 Use of geocoding 23-4 Data for all population groups 23-5 Collection of health indicator data 23-6 Periodicity of data collection 23-7 Timely release of data Workforce 23-8 Competencies for public health workers 23-9 Essential public health services in public health school curricula Continuing education and training Public Health Infrastructure Objectives ImprovingGetting worseLittle or no changeCannot assess (limited data)

Public Health Infrastructure Objectives Public Health Organizations Performance standards for essential public health services Health Improvement plans Access to laboratory services Access to epidemiology services Model statutes for the essential public health services Resources Data on public health expenditures Prevention Research Population-based prevention research ImprovingGetting worseLittle or no changeCannot assess (limited data)

Geocoding in Major Health Data Systems, 2004 Able to Geocode MEPS NAMCS NHAMCS NHANES (combined with CSFII in 2002) NHDS NHIS NSDUH (formerly NHSDA) NSFG USRDS Unable to Geocode BRFSS HIV/AIDS MTF NCVS NNDSS NVSS – Mortality NVSS – Natality STDSS YRBSS Note: A major health data system is a data system responsible for tracking five or more Healthy People 2010 objectives. Excludes non-population-based major health data systems. Obj Target: 90%

Minimum Template for Population-Based Objectives Race: Socioeconomic Status: American Indian or Alaska Native Family Income Level Asian or Pacific Islander Poor Asian Near Poor Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander Middle/high income Black or African American White or Hispanic origin and race: Education Level Hispanic or Latino Not Hispanic or Latino Less than high school Black or African American High school graduate White At least some college Gender: Female Male

Additional Template Selections Geographic location Disability status Sexual orientation Select population (by age) Health insurance status Persons with chronic conditions Marital Status

Completeness of Population Template Obj Note: Includes population-based objectives and subobjectives. Source: CDC, National Center for Health Statistics. Percent of Objectives Target Full template Minimum population template

Objectives Tracked Regularly Note: Includes objectives and subobjectives. Source: CDC, National Center for Health Statistics. Obj Percent of objectives 2000 (expected) 2004 (actual) 2010 Target Tracked annually Tracked at least every three years

Data Released within 1 Year Note: Includes objectives and subobjectives tracked by a major health data system that releases the most recent data within 1 year of data collection. Source: CDC, National Center for Health Statistics. Obj Percent of objectives Target

Epidemiology Capacity Obj (proposed) Note: Formal training in epidemiology includes either academic coursework or other training in epidemiology. Source: Council of State & Territorial Epidemiologists. Number of State and Territorial Epidemiologists No formal training Formal training

Essential Public Health Services Source: Public Health Functions Steering Committee, July 1995

Use of Performance Measures for the Essential Public Health Services, April 2004 Obj (proposed) Source: National Public Health Performance Standards Program, CDC, PHPPO Fully or Substantially Met the Model Standard Use of National Performance Standards State Public Health Systems (Total: 50) Local Public Health Systems (Total: 2,315) Number of Systems

Filling the Infrastructure Data Gaps Infrastructure Survey of State and Local Health Officers ASTHO, NACCHO Tribal Infrastructure Taskforce and Survey IHS, CDC, HRSA, NACCHO, NIHB, CSTE Laboratory SurveyAssociation of Public Health Laboratories Public Health School Curricula Assessment Council on Linkages, ASPH, ATPM, CAMPHP and the Quad Council SponsorSurvey

Infrastructure Survey of State and Local Health Officers, 2004 Will measure: 23-1 Employee access to internet 23-2 Access to information on health indicators 23-3 Use of geocoding 23-5 Collection of health indicator data 23-8 Competencies for public health workers Continuing education and training Health improvement plans Model statutes for the essential public health services Data on public health expenditures Population-based prevention research Collaborative survey - ASTHO, NACCHO

Tribal Infrastructure Taskforce, Survey TBD The Taskforce was created to: Develop a model to assess and compare public health benchmarks Document the diverse population of tribal public health organizations Conduct a statistically valid survey to assess tribal public health infrastructure Collaboration between IHS, CDC, HRSA, NACCHO, National Indian Health Board (NIHB), CSTE

Laboratory Survey, 2004 Will measure: Comprehensive laboratory services to support the Essential Public Health Services Sponsored by the Association of Public Health Laboratories Proposed subobjectives a.Disease prevention, control, and surveillance b.Reference and specialized testing c.Emergency response d.Partnerships and communication e.Environmental health and protection f. Food safety g.Integrated data management h.Laboratory improvement and regulation i.Policy development j.Public Health related research k.Training and education

School Curricula Assessment, 2004 Will measure: 23-9 Proportion of schools that integrate core competencies in the Essential Public Health Services into the curricula: Schools of Public Health* Graduate public health programs* Academic nursing degree programs in public health and community health Sponsored by the Council on Linkages, in collaboration with the Association of Schools of Public Health, the Association of Teachers of Preventive Medicine, Council of Accredited Masters of Public Health Programs, and the Quad Council *Council on Education for Public Health (CEPH) accredited schools

Progress review data and slides can be found on the web at: