By: P. Brinkman, Senior Technical Advisor, FAA Date: August 15, 2011 Federal Aviation Administration Federal Aviation Administration Federal Aviation Administration.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Role of the IRB An Institutional Review Board (IRB) is a review committee established to help protect the rights and welfare of human research subjects.
Advertisements

Module N° 7 – SSP training programme
Module N° 4 – ICAO SSP framework
A Joint Code of Practice Objectives and Summary Presentation
Experimental Permits for Reusable Suborbital Rockets Guidelines Randy Repcheck May 25, 2005 Federal Aviation Administration.
Gregory S. Winton, Esq. The Aviation Law Firm
Unified Carrier Registration (UCR) Update August 24, 2006.
1 OSHA FEDERAL OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ACT (OSHA) OF 1970 George Mason University College of Nursing and Health Science Regulatory Requirements.
Training for Commercial Spaceflight. OCP Building training center –Classroom –Simulation –Actual flight time.
Federal Aviation Administration On-Orbit Debris Mitigation Methods for Upper Stages COMSTAC: Space Transportation Operations Working Group and Risk Management.
AIR ACCIDENT PREVENTION Presented by Rex Hamza Aviation Safety Inspector-Guyana Civil Aviation Authority.
School for drafting regulations Nuclear Safety Decommissioning Vienna, 2-7 December 2012 Tea Bilic Zabric.
Georgia Airports Association Spring Workshop February 25, 2015 Georgia Department of Transportation FAA Policy and Procedures Concerning the Use of Airport.
By Prof. Dr. Ram S. Jakhu, Panel Chair 8 TH ANNUAL MCGILL CONFERENCE ON INTERNATIONAL AVIATION LIABILITY & INSURANCE Montreal: 18 April 2015 INTRODUCTION.
Regulatory Body MODIFIED Day 8 – Lecture 3.
Office of Business Development Training
Safety and Health Programs
Presented to: HAI FIRC By: Hooper Harris, Manager, AFS-250 Date:February 2006 Federal Aviation Administration Operational Control Operations Specification.
Outline Overview of AST Statutory Authority Regulations
Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement Experimental Permits COMSTAC Stacey M. Zee October 25, 2006 Federal Aviation Administration.
EPCRA1 The Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA) The Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA)
International Strategy FAA Office of Commercial Space Transportation
Effects of Minimal Regulations on Commercial Human Spaceflight and Public Risk Acceptance Results of Nov 2011 Public Opinion Poll Presented to COMSTAC.
Engaging Contractors in the Environmental Management System (EMS) Department of Energy EMS Workshop: Implementation, Lessons Learned, and Best Practices.
Michael C. Mineiro Institute of Air and Space Law at McGill University April 15 th 2009.
Construction and Demolition Inert Processing Operations Compliance First: Evaluation of Solid Waste Facilities’ State Standards Training Provided By: California.
Presented to: 2012 Pacific Aviation Director’s Workshop, Guam By: Juan S.A. Reyes, A.C.E., ACSI Date: March 13-15, 2012 Federal Aviation Administration.
Presented to: 2012 Pacific Aviation Director’s Workshop, Guam By: Juan S.A. Reyes, A.C.E., ACSI Date: March 13-15, 2012 Federal Aviation Administration.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Office of Commercial Space Transportation Orbital Debris 10 June, 2015 Symposium for the Small.
9 SEPTEMBER 2015 – KATHERINE MORRIS AND LUCY BOCHENEK Is it possible to comply with the safety aspects of the Petroleum & Gas (Production & Safety) Act.
Regulatory Reform Program Proposed Design Approval Rules CASR Parts 21 and 146 Ian Kearsley Manager Engineering Support Section This presentation is.
Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level Concept of Operations for Commercial.
Federal Aviation Administration By: Sherman Council Date: 15 August 2011 Office of Commercial Space Transportation Experimental Permit Program.
Process for Airspace Integration of Space Launch and Reentry Operations 24 May 2013 Federal Aviation Administration 0 0 Overview of Current FAA Process.
Introduction to the FAA Office of Commercial Space Transportation AST Pre-Workshop to the Center of Excellence for Commercial Space Transportation Research.
Commercial Space: A New Frontier Dr. George C. Nield Deputy Associate Administrator for Commercial Space Transportation January 9, 2007 Federal Aviation.
Office of Commercial Space Transportation FAA/AST NASA Insurance Task Report Pam Underwood Technical Advisor Kennedy Space Center Operations Office May.
Main Requirements on Different Stages of the Licensing Process for New Nuclear Facilities Module 4.1 Steps in the Licensing Process Geoff Vaughan University.
1 ADVANCED SPACEPORT TECHNOLOGY WORKING GROUP May 15, 2001 Stewart W. Jackson Commercial Space Transportation Federal Aviation Administration FAA/AST LICENSING.
1 COMSTAC Briefing: Human Spaceflight Legislation in Virginia and Florida James E. Dunstan Garvey Schubert Barer May 16, 2007.
Relating ICAO Annex 14 to AERODROME OPERATIONS
FleetBoston Financial HIPAA Privacy Compliance Agnes Bundy Scanlan Managing Director and Chief Privacy Officer FleetBoston Financial.
Presented to: COMSTAC RLV Working Group By: Ken Wong, Licensing and Safety Division Manager Date: May 15, 2008 Federal Aviation Administration Federal.
Presented to: Risk Management Working Group, COMSTAC By: Laura Montgomery, Senior Attorney for Commercial Space Transportation, FAA Date: October 13, 2011.
03/11/021 Spaceport Vision Team Members. 03/11/022 Systems Definition Spaceport System Spaceport Stakeholder Needs High-Level Trade Study Performance.
Presented to: COMSTAC RLV Working Group By: Ken Wong, Licensing and Safety Division Deputy Manager Date: October 10, 2007 Federal Aviation Administration.
Federal Aviation Administration 1 FAA AST Overview Presentation Federal Aviation Administration Overview of the Federal Aviation Administration.
SPACE Act of 2015 Dr. Sarah J. Nilsson, Esq. A 3 ir Conference January 2016.
Florida Space Transportation Infrastructure Planning Mark Bontrager Vice President, Spaceport Operations.
Reusable Launch Vehicle Working Group Commercial Space Transportation Advisory Committee Presented to COMSTAC Meeting George Whitesides, RLVWG Chairman.
Office of Space Flight Spaceport and Range Technology Development Initiative Al Sofge NASA Headquarters May 15, 2001.
Erman Taşkın. Information security aspects of business continuity management Objective: To counteract interruptions to business activities and to protect.
Milestones for Nuclear Power Infrastructure Development Establishment of A Regulatory Framework Gustavo Caruso, Section Head, Regulatory Activities Section.
Practice of HOF regulatory oversight E.G. Kudryavtsev Department of Safety Regulation of Nuclear Fuel Cycle Facilities, Marine Nuclear Power Installations.
Federal Aviation Administration Federal Aviation Administration The Regulatory Role of the Federal Aviation Administration in Space Transportation With.
Safety & Health Considerations in Accommodating Commercial Activties David Loyd, JSC Safety & Test Operations 2013 NASA Safety Directors & Occupational.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Oil Spill Response Plans A History Lesson PHMSA Review and Approval.
Federal Aviation Administration 1 FAA AST Presentation at ESIL-1 October 26, 2011 List of Recent Papers 2011 Overview of the FAA Center of Excellence for.
Revision N° 11ICAO Safety Management Systems (SMS) Course01/01/08 Module N° 9 – SMS operation.
03/20/021 Spaceport Vision Team Members Organizations that contributed: Air Force NASA NCSS FAA Industry University Etc.
Environmental Justice The “Not In My Backyard” problem and how to solve it.
1 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT Risk Management and Insurance Program Doug Hefley Director of Safety, Risk and Emergency Management June.
Information day on EUROCONTROL Guidance Material on the application of Common Requirements for Service Provision LIABILITY AND INSURANCE ISSUES Nathalie.
Preventing Legal Liability Related to Independent Contractors.
Environmental Management Division 1 NASA Headquarters Environmental Management System (EMS) Michael J. Green, PE NASA EMS Lead NASA Headquarters Washington,
Commercial Space Transportation
AIRLINE TRANSPORTATION AERO 4100 / 5100
Briefing for Oklahoma Airport Operators Association
Voluntary Safety Programs Presentation
Presentation transcript:

By: P. Brinkman, Senior Technical Advisor, FAA Date: August 15, 2011 Federal Aviation Administration Federal Aviation Administration Federal Aviation Administration Licensing and Evaluation

2 Federal Aviation Administration March 3, Types of Launch and Reentry Licenses Types of licenses Expendable launch vehicles –Launch specific (good for specified launches) –Launch operators (Good for a defined range of activities for 5 years) Reusable launch or reentry vehicles –Reusable launch vehicle launch or reentry specific –Reusable launch vehicle launch or reentry operator license( Good for a defined range of activities for 2 years)

3 Federal Aviation Administration March 3, Licensing Launch or Reentry Elements of a license review for launch and reentry –Policy –Payload review –Environmental –Safety review –Financial responsibility 180 days and tolling

4 Federal Aviation Administration March 3, 2009 Licensing Flow ApplicationLicense Policy Review Payload Review Environmental Determination Safety Review MPL Determination

5 Federal Aviation Administration March 3, Licensing Consultation before application –Pre-application consultation is mandatory [§ 413.5] –Allows a prospective applicant to familiarize the FAA with its proposal –Allows the prospective applicant to become familiar with the application process and type of information required –Provides an opportunity to discuss issues and identify unique aspects of the proposal and develop a schedule for submitting an application

6 Federal Aviation Administration March 3, Licensing—Policy review A policy review –determines whether a proposed launch would jeopardize U.S. national security or foreign policy interests, or international obligations of the United States. An interagency review is part of the policy review  Department of Defense  Department of State  NASA  Department of Commerce (NOAA)  Federal Commissions Commission  Other Government agencies, as appropriate

7 Federal Aviation Administration March 3, Licensing—Payload review A payload review includes –Payload safety issues –Classes of payloads –Interagency review Relationship to jurisdiction of other agencies –The FAA does not review payloads that are subject to regulation by FCC or NOAA, or that are owned and operated by USG Except for issues relating to safety of launch itself

8 Federal Aviation Administration March 3, Licensing – Maximum Probable Loss 14 C.F.R. part 440 defines maximum probable loss as the greatest dollar amount of loss for bodily injury or property damage Determines insurance requirements for –Government property –Third parties

9 Federal Aviation Administration March 3, Licensing – Maximum Probable Loss Specifies threshold values of for third party liability and for U.S. Government property. Sets $500 million maximum financial responsibility for third party liability and $100 million for U.S. Government property. Indemnification for third party liability in excess of specified insurance.

10 Federal Aviation Administration March 3, Licensing--Environmental Review An applicant must provide enough information for the FAA to analyze the environmental impacts associated with proposed reusable suborbital rocket launches or reentries. The information must enable the FAA to follow: –The requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), 42 U.S.C et seq., and –The Council on Environmental Quality Regulations for Implementing the Procedural Provisions of NEPA, 40 C.F.R. parts 1500–1508.

11 Federal Aviation Administration March 3, Licensing--Safety Review 14 C.F.R. part 415 for launches from federal launch ranges –For launches from a federal launch range, the federal launch range operator provides many of the safety services necessary to meet our regulatory requirements. –Certain requirements reference part 417. –Launch site safety assessment.

12 Federal Aviation Administration March 3, Licensing--Safety Review 14 C.F.R. part 417 for launches from non-federal launch sites –For launches from a non-federal launch site, all launch safety services are obtained by or performed by launch operator. 14 C.F.R. part 431 for RLVs and 437 for reentry

13 Federal Aviation Administration March 3, Safety Review Key elements of safety review Launch description, including trajectory and staging events Safety organization including an identified safety official Flight safety Ground safety Launch plans Launch schedule including generic processing schedule Computer systems and software

14 Federal Aviation Administration March 3, Safety Review Key elements of safety review (continued) Unique safety policies, requirements, and practices Flight safety system design and operational data Flight safety system test data Flight safety system crew data Safety at the end of launch Accident investigation plan including agreements for notification with appropriate Air Traffic and Marine authorities.

15 Federal Aviation Administration March 3, Safety Review Acceptable flight risk for each of the following Impacting inert and explosive debris 30 X expected casualties Toxic release 30 X expected casualties Far field blast overpressure 30 X expected casualties

16 Federal Aviation Administration March 3, Safety Review Safety at end of launch No unplanned physical contact. Debris generation does not result from conversion of energy sources into energy that fragments the vehicle or components. Stored energy removed by depleting residual fuel and leaving fuel line vales open, venting any pressurized system, leaving batteries in discharge state, and removing any remaining source of stored energy.

17 Federal Aviation Administration March 3, U.S. Spaceports  Kodiak Launch Complex   Vandenberg AFB  California Spaceport  Mojave Airport  Edwards AFB  White Sands Missile Range Spaceport America Oklahoma Spaceport  Wallops Flight Facility  Spaceport Florida -Kennedy Space Center -Cape Canaveral Air Force Station Mid-Atlantic Regional Spaceport    Key U.S. Federal Launch Site Non-Federal FAA-Licensed Launch Site Proposed Non-Federal Launch Site   Cecil Field Spaceport  

18 Federal Aviation Administration March 3, Licensing Launch Operator Elements of a license review for launch or reentry site operator –Policy –Launch site location review –Agreements –Explosive site plan –Environmental 180 days and tolling

19 Federal Aviation Administration March 3, Launch Site Location Review Launch site boundary - Maximum distance from a launch point that debris could travel given a worst-case launch vehicle failure in the launch area Flight corridor - Area that contains nearly all of the hazardous debris from a nominal and non-nominal flight of the launch vehicle Risk analysis - Demonstrate that the collective risk to populations within flight corridor does not exceed Ec  30 x 10-6 Unproven vehicles - Requires a clear and convincing demonstration of an equivalent level of safety for unproven vehicles

20 Federal Aviation Administration March 3, Explosive Site Plan Provides safe distances to the public.

21 Federal Aviation Administration March 3, Other Responsibilities of Site Operator Security and Access Control Plan –Both for public safety and security Scheduling of Launch Site Operations –Carried out by customer Agreements –Airspace –Marine

22 Federal Aviation Administration March 3, Hazardous Materials A scaled map that shows the location of all proposed explosive hazard facilities A listing of the maximum quantities of liquid and solid propellants and other explosives to be located at each explosive hazard facility A description of each activity to be conducted in each explosive hazard facility Assurance that the public is not exposed to hazards due to the initiation of explosives by lightning

23 Federal Aviation Administration March 3, Accident Investigation Plan The launch site accident investigation plan must provides for: Procedures for reporting, responding to, and investigating accidents Immediate notification to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Washington Operations Center A written report to the FAA within five days of any accident A Response Plan that ensures the consequences of a launch site accident are contained and minimized Cooperation with FAA or National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) investigations Identification of preventive measures for avoiding recurrence

24 Federal Aviation Administration March 3, Permits Commercial Space Launch Amendments Act of 2004 established an experimental permit regime for reusable suborbital rockets flown for: –Research and development; –Showing compliance with requirements for a license; or –Crew training prior to obtaining a license. –Compensation or hire is not allowed. CSLAA legislative history suggested that an experimental permit should be granted: –More quickly and with fewer requirements than a license, and be more like an aircraft special airworthiness certificate in the experimental category.

25 Federal Aviation Administration March 3, Permits Differences between permits and licenses –120 days vs 180 days –No compensation or hire –For reusable suborbital rockets only –No “indemnification” –No quantifiable risk requirements

26 Federal Aviation Administration March 3, Safety approvals A safety approval allows the use of an approved launch vehicle, reentry vehicle, safety system, process, service, or personnel without requiring re- examination of its suitability for a particular launch or reentry proposal for FAA licensed activities. The decision to apply for a safety approval is a voluntary one on the part of an eligible applicant.

27 Federal Aviation Administration March 3, Commercial Space Launch Amendments Act of 2004 On December 23, 2004, President Bush signed into law the CSLAA, which: –Promotes the development of emerging human space flight industry and –Makes the FAA responsible for regulating commercial human space flight Establishes an “informed consent” regime for space flight participants

28 Federal Aviation Administration March 3, Definitions Suborbital Rocket – a vehicle, rocket propelled in whole or in part, intended for flight on a suborbital trajectory, and the thrust of which is greater than its lift for the majority of the rocket-powered portion of its ascent. Crew - employee of a licensee, or of a contractor or subcontractor of a licensee, who performs activities in the course of that employment directly relating to the launch, reentry or other operation of or in a launch vehicle or reentry vehicle that carries human beings. Space flight participant - an individual, who is not crew, carried within a launch vehicle or reentry vehicle.

29 Federal Aviation Administration March 3, CSLAA (cont’d) Provides FAA responsibility for crew and space flight participant safety –Limits that responsibility for eight years –Unless there has been a death, serious injury or close call –Prevents even individualized license conditions to protect passengers or crew absent regulations Leaves unchanged the FAA’s ability to protect the public on the ground

30 Federal Aviation Administration March 3, CSLAA (cont’d) Under section 70105, a holder of a license or permit must inform any crew and space flight participants that the U.S. Government has not certified the launch vehicle as safe. An RLV operator must inform a space flight participant in writing about –the risks of the launch and reentry –the safety record of the vehicle type, including government launches