“Walking Through the Steps and Standards” Presented by: Tom Chapel Focus On…

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Using the CDC Evaluation Fwork to Avoid Minefields on the Road to Good Evaluation Presented to: 2002 National Asthma Conference October 24, 2002 By: Thomas.
Advertisements

The Design and Problem Solving Process. What is the point? A proven method and process Can be utilized for any problem Helps you to produce quality work.
Engaging Your Community in Practical Program Evaluation Stephanie Welch, MS-MPH, RD, LDN Knox County Health Department Phone (865)
“Mixed Methods in Program Evaluation” Presented by Tom Chapel
Describing Your Program and Choosing an Evaluation Focus
Presented by: Tom Chapel Focus On…Thinking About Design.
Program Evaluation Webinar Series Part 2:
Measuring Value: Using Program Evaluation to Understand What’s Working -- Or Isn’t Juliana M. Blome, Ph.D. , MPH Office of Program Analysis and Evaluation.
What You Will Learn From These Sessions
Project Stages. Stages Planning Initial Data Collection Situation Evaluation Solution Definition Implementation of Solution Conclusion.
Designing an Effective Evaluation Strategy
Program Evaluation and Measurement Janet Myers. Objectives for today… To define and explain concepts and terms used in program evaluation. To understand.
وزارت جهاد کشاورزی مرکز آموزش عالی امام خمینی(ره) کرج- بهمن ماه 1386 دوره آموزش ضمن خدمت ارزشیابی برنامه محمد حسن محقق معین نحوه تخصیص امتیاز ارزیابی فراگیران.
Everyday Program Evaluation Sheena Cretella MSPH SC DHEC Diabetes Division Program Evaluator 1.
Social Science Research and
Action Logic Modelling Logic Models communicate a vision for an intervention as a solution to a public health nutrition (PHN) problem to:  funding agencies,
Introduction to the User’s Guide for Evaluating Learning Outcomes from Citizen Science Tina Phillips, Cornell Lab of Ornithology Marion Ferguson, Cornell.
Evaluation. Practical Evaluation Michael Quinn Patton.
CDC Evaluation Process Harlen Hays, MPH Office of Health Promotion, KDHE.
School Development Planning Initiative “An initiative for schools by schools” Self-Evaluation of Learning and Teaching Self-Evaluation of Learning and.
1 © 2009 University of Wisconsin-Extension, Cooperative Extension, Program Development and Evaluation Getting started with evaluation.
University of Wisconsin - Extension, Cooperative Extension, Program Development and Evaluation Unit 2: Developing an evaluation plan.
Marketing Research  Def. - Formal communication link with the environment to provide accurate and useful information for better decision making.  Systematic.
Measuring Outcomes: Potential Approaches in Evaluating Public Health William M. Sappenfield, MD, MPH MCH EPI Program Team Leader Division of Reproductive.
Performance Measures AmeriCorps Project Director Training Saratoga, NY October 7 th – 9 th, 2013.
Evaluation Basics Principles of Evaluation Keeping in mind the basic principles for program and evaluation success, leaders of youth programs can begin.
Too expensive Too complicated Too time consuming.
Strategic Planning Session David Rudder, Ph.D. Rudder Consultants, LLC. May 17, 2006.
Monitoring and Evaluation in MCH Programs and Projects MCH in Developing Countries Feb 10, 2011.
Military Family Services Program Participant Survey Training Presentation.
Elizabeth Godfrey 1.  Periodic assessment of results Appropriateness, effectiveness, efficiency, impact, sustainability  Identifies intended and unintended.
Evaluation Research and Engineering Education Lesley Jolly For AaeE ERM wiki at
Managing Marketing Information Chapter Learning Goals 1.Explain the importance of information to the company 2.Define the marketing information.
Neal D. Kohatsu, MD, MPH Medical Director May 17, 2012 Evaluation and Quality Improvement.
Evaluating Title IIID Programs. November 8, :00-2:00 PM Webinar conference line toll free number (888) Code Login information
HMP Evaluation Overview and Tools UNE-CCPH June 22, 2011 Presenters: Kira Rodriguez Michelle Mitchell Patrick Madden Pamela Bruno-MacDonald.
The Major Steps of a Public Health Evaluation 1. Engage Stakeholders 2. Describe the program 3. Focus on the evaluation design 4. Gather credible evidence.
Practical Evaluation: CDC’s Framework for Program Evaluation in Public Health Thomas J. Chapel, MA, MBA Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Office.
Developing a Logic Model or Theory of Change. What is a Logic Model? A logic model presents a picture of how your effort or initiative is supposed to.
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas A Framework for Program Evaluation.
Evaluation Approaches, Frameworks & Designs HSC 489 – Chapter 14.
Introduction to the Framework: Unit 1, Getting Readyhttp://facultyinitiative.wested.org/1.
Monitoring and Evaluation in MCH Programs and Projects MCH in Developing Countries Feb 24, 2009.
 2007 Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Introduction to Program Evaluation Frances Stillman, EdD Institute for Global Tobacco Control Johns.
Evaluation Revisiting what it is... Who are Stakeholders and why do they matter? Dissemination – when, where and how?
Evaluation design and implementation Puja Myles
1 © 2009 University of Wisconsin-Extension, Cooperative Extension, Program Development and Evaluation Planning your evaluation This presentation provides.
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Data Collection: Designing an Observational System.
Program Evaluation Planning Taylor-Powell, E., Steele, S., & Douglah, M. (1996). Planning a program evaluation. Retrieved from University of Wisconsin-Extension-Cooperative.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 15: Getting Started on the Assessment Path Essential Issues to Consider.
Session VI Evaluation & Wrap Up. Evaluation Activities directed at collecting, analyzing, interpreting, and communicating information about the effectiveness.
Data Driven Planning and Decision-making for Continuous School Improvement: Developing a Program Evaluation Plan Leadership for Innovative Omani Schools.
Erik Augustson, PhD, National Cancer Institute Susan Zbikowski, PhD, Alere Wellbeing Evaluation.
Evaluation and Implementation 21 October 2015 PUBH 535.
Unit 9: Evaluating a Public Health Surveillance System #1-9-1.
The population in a statistical study is the entire group of individuals about which we want information The population is the group we want to study.
SCOTT MARION, CENTER FOR ASSESSMENT PRESENTATION AT CCSSO NCSA AS PART OF THE SYMPOSIUM ON: STUDENT GROWTH IN THE NON-TESTED SUBJECTS AND GRADES: OPTIONS.
Demonstrating the Value of Stakeholder Input for Evaluation Design, Implementation and Dissemination Yvonne Abel, MS Abt Associates Inc. AEA Annual Conference,
Yvonne Abel, Abt Associates Inc. November 2010, San Antonio, TX Enhancing the Quality of Evaluation Through Collaboration Among Funders, Programs, and.
Demonstrating Institutional Effectiveness Documenting Using SPOL.
Evaluating the Quality and Impact of Community Benefit Programs
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS Organisations in Papua New Guinea Day 3. Session 9. Periodic data collection methods.
Community program evaluation school
MaryCatherine Jones, MPH, Public Health Consultant, CVH Team
Data is your friend: how to incorporate evaluation into your research
FRAMEWORK OF EVALUATION QUESTIONS
Business Retention and Expansion
A Framework for Program Evaluation
TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT
Making Ethical Decisions at Work
Presentation transcript:

“Walking Through the Steps and Standards” Presented by: Tom Chapel Focus On…

Planning Performance Measurement Evaluation Continuous Quality Improvement Cycle

Utilization Focused Evaluation We want to not only PROVE something; we also want to IMPROVE something.

Ensure use and share lessons learned Gather credible evidence Engage stakeholders Describe the program Focus the evaluation design Justify conclusions STEPS StandardsUtilityFeasibilityProprietyAccuracy CDC’s Evaluation Framework Utilization focused evaluation

Ensure use and share lessons learned Gather credible evidence Engage stakeholders Describe the program Focus the evaluation design Justify conclusions STEP 1 StandardsUtilityFeasibilityProprietyAccuracy Engage stakeholders CDC’s Framework Step 1 Step 1: Engage stakeholders Decide who needs to be part of the design and implementation of the evaluation for it to make a difference.

Ensure use and share lessons learned Gather credible evidence Engage stakeholders Describe the program Focus the evaluation design Justify conclusions STEP 1 StandardsUtilityFeasibilityProprietyAccuracy Describe the program CDC’s Framework Step 2 Step 2: Describe the program Draw a "soup to nuts" picture of the program's activities and all intended outcomes.

Ensure use and share lessons learned Gather credible evidence Engage stakeholders Describe the program Focus the evaluation design Justify conclusions STEP 1 StandardsUtilityFeasibilityProprietyAccuracy Focus the evaluation design CDC’s Framework Step 3 Step 3: Focus the evaluation Decide which evaluation questions are the key ones.

Engage stakeholders Describe the program Focus the evaluation design The Early Steps Are Iterative Key points: You can start with any one of the 3 early steps. Insights at any of the 3 steps may cause you to cycle back to revisit the other 2. You must complete all 3 steps before moving on to data collection.

Ensure use and share lessons learned Gather credible evidence Engage stakeholders Describe the program Focus the evaluation design Justify conclusions STEP 1 StandardsUtilityFeasibilityProprietyAccuracy Gather credible evidence CDC’s Framework Step 4 Step 4: Gather credible evidence Write indicators and choose and implement data collection sources and methods.

Ensure use and share lessons learned Gather credible evidence Engage stakeholders Describe the program Focus the evaluation design Justify conclusions STEP 1 StandardsUtilityFeasibilityProprietyAccuracy Justify conclusions CDC’s Framework Step 5 Step 5: Justify conclusions Review and interpret data/evidence to determine success or failure and how to improve it.

Ensure use and share lessons learned Gather credible evidence Engage stakeholders Describe the program Focus the evaluation design Justify conclusions STEP 1 StandardsUtilityFeasibilityProprietyAccuracy Ensure use and share lessons learned CDC’s Framework Step 6 Step 6: Use lessons learned Use evaluation results in a meaningful way.

Early Steps Guide and Influence Choices Throughout the Evaluation The three early steps of the Framework Model provide guidance for the entire evaluation process.

Harvesting the Fruits in Step 4 Step 4 Is NOT called “Collect data” but “Gather credible evidence”. Why? If you did steps 1-3 correctly you already know… what type of evidence your stakeholders will regard as credible.

Harvesting the Fruits in Step 5 Step 5 is NOT called “Analyze data” but “Justify conclusions”. Why? If you did steps 1-3 correctly you already know… the values and preferences of your stakeholders.

Harvesting the Fruits in Step 6 Step 6 is NOT called “Report findings” but “Use lessons learned”. Why? If you did steps 1-3 correctly you already know… who will use the results and why.

The Evaluation Standards Standards inform good choices at EVERY step of the evaluation process. Ensure use and share lessons learned Gather credible evidence Engage stakeholders Describe the program Focus the evaluation design Justify conclusions STEPS StandardsUtilityFeasibilityProprietyAccuracy

The Evaluation Standards There is no such thing as “the right evaluation design”. The best evaluation approach depends on how these standards play out in a given situation. Ensure use and share lessons learned Gather credible evidence Engage stakeholders Describe the program Focus the evaluation design Justify conclusions STEPS StandardsUtilityFeasibilityProprietyAccuracy

The Utility Standard Who needs the information from this evaluation and what information do they need? Standards Utility Feasibility Propriety Accuracy

The Utility Standard This will influence: key stakeholders data collection methods Standards Utility Feasibility Propriety Accuracy

The Feasibility Standard How much money, time, and effort can we put into this evaluation? Standards Utility Feasibility Propriety Accuracy

The Feasibility Standard Feasibility must be used to balance the other evaluation standards. Standards Utility Feasibility Propriety Accuracy

The Propriety Standard Is there something I have to do to be ethical? Standards Utility Feasibility Propriety Accuracy

The Propriety Standard This influences: who needs to be involved in the evaluation evaluation choices evaluation questions Standards Utility Feasibility Propriety Accuracy

The Accuracy Standard What design will lead to accurate information? Standards Utility Feasibility Propriety Accuracy

The Accuracy Standard How accurate do these results need to be for the intended purposes? Accuracy must be balanced against feasibility and utility. Standards Utility Feasibility Propriety Accuracy

In Short The 6 Steps and 4 Standards help ensure use of findings. The Steps are systematic but ALSO dynamic. The Steps interact with each other and they are iterative. The early steps (1-3) ensure good choices in later steps (4-6). The Standards help at each step; either broadening our view and/or homing in on best options.

End “Overview of the Steps and Standards” Continue to Webinar 2: “Getting Started and Engaging Your Stakeholders” Return to Evaluation Webinars home page.