NYC Teacher Effectiveness A Preview of the NYC Teacher Effectiveness Framework for 2013-14 Created by The Center for the Professional Education of Teachers,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introducing Instructional Expectations
Advertisements

Chad Allison May 2013  1-2 Formal Classroom Evaluations  Drop-in Visits.
The Rubric Reality Cobb Keys Classroom Teacher Evaluation System.
PORTFOLIO.
Charlotte Danielson’s The Four Domains of Teaching Responsibility
© 2010 Learning Sciences International Bering Strait School District Demographic Information  Covers 88,000 square miles.
Teacher Evaluation New Teacher Orientation August 15, 2013.
Marzano Causal Model: A Framework for Teaching and Learning
Teacher Excellence and Support System
Explicit Instruction: when, where, and how?
Activity: Introducing Staff to Danielson’s Framework for Teaching
The “Highly Effective” Early Childhood Classroom Environment
PD Plan on the Danielson Framework ADSUP 731 Kelli McDaniel May, 2013
Georgia School Standards District Strategic Plan School Strategic Plan (SSP) Heavy focus on CRCT, ITBS, Perceptual Surveys Teacher Evaluation Instrument.
LMST Meeting February 2013 COMMON CORE, FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING, AND LIBRARY MEDIA.
PRIDE Professional Rubrics Investing & Developing Educator Excellence
Evaluating Teacher Performance: Getting it Right CPRE Annual Conference November 21-23, 2002 Charlotte Danielson
What should be the basis of
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
Differentiated Supervision
Teacher Evaluation Ashley Greene 10/29/13.
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
Silas Deane Middle School Steven J. Cook, Principal Cynthia Fries, Assistant Principal October 22, 2013 Wethersfield Board of Education.
Tools for Instruction and Assessment for the Maryland College- and Career-Ready Standards Time to Revisit Tools that will Inform Instruction.
The Framework for Teaching and the Student-Led Classroom
EngageNY.org Overview of the 3-8 ELA Curriculum Modules Session 1A, November 2013 NTI.
Expeditionary Learning Elementary School Meeting June 10,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.
Citywide Instructional Expectations, Teacher Teams and the QR—Implications for Mary Barton SATIF CFN 204 May 17, 2013.
An Effective Teacher Evaluation System – Our Journey to a Teaching Framework Corvallis School District.
THE DANIELSON FRAMEWORK. LEARNING TARGET I will be be able to identify to others the value of the classroom teacher, the Domains of the Danielson framework.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Teachers Training Module 2 The Delaware Framework Review and Components 1-5 Training for Teachers.
The Danielson Framework Emmanuel Andre Owings Mills High School Fall 2013.
Intro to TPEP. A new evaluation system should be a model for professional growth, supporting collaboration between teachers and principals in pursuit.
Expeditionary Learning Queens Middle School Meeting May 29,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.
1 Introducing Danielson’s Framework for Teaching NYCDOE | November
Standards Aligned System What is SAS? A collaborative product of research and good practice Six distinct elements Clear Standards Fair.
In-Service September 19, 2012 Teacher Evaluation System.
BY COURTNEY N. SPEER TECHNOLOGY AS A TOOL SPRING Professional Growth & Self- Reflection.
The Framework for Teaching Charlotte Danielson Danielson’s Framework for Teaching Domain 3: Instruction Communicating Clearly and Accurately Using Questioning.
Day 7 Domain 3: Instruction Year 2 Induction Pennsbury School District Maureen Gradel.
NYC DOE – Office of Teacher Effectiveness B. Examining the Framework
DPASII Criterion Rubrics for Teachers. Component 1: Planning and Preparation Criterion 1a: Selecting Instructional Goals ELEMENT Value, sequence and alignment.
NYC DOE – Office of Teacher Effectiveness A. Reflecting on Good Teaching 1.
Lori Cameron from the WI RtI Center/ PBIS Network TALK.
The Institute for Learning. l Established 1995 l Lauren B. Resnick l University of Pittsburg’s Learning Research and Development Center Background.
Citywide Expectations for
FOUR DOMAINS Domain 4: Domain 1: Professional Planning & Responsibilities Preparation Domain 3: Domain 2: Instruction Classroom Environment.
Module 1 Peer Coaching on Paper Peer Coach Training.
Curriculum and Instruction: Management of the Learning Environment
October 10, Start/end on time All technology is on-task Hold each other accountable Dive in to make this your own: no acting Stop and ask your burning.
CFN 609 Principals’ Meeting December 6, 2012 Providing Effective Feedback Domain 1: Planning and Preparation Component 1e: Designing Coherent Instruction.
Classroom Discourse and Classroom Practice Pandora Bedford Rosann Hollinger Bernard Rahming Hank Kepner Connie Laughlin October 12 & 14, 2010 MTL Meeting.
Teacher Evaluation University of New England - EDU 704 Dr. William Doughty Submitted By: Teri Gaston.
DANIELSON MODEL SAI 2016 Mentor Meeting. Danielson Model  Framework with rubrics  Define specific types of behaviors expected to be observed  A common.
A Deep Dive into the Mathematics Curriculum District Learning Day August 5, 2015.
TEAM TRAINING.  Two announced  Two unannounced NUMBER OF OBSERVATIONS.
Using Student Assessment Data in Your Teacher Observation and Feedback Process Renee Ringold & Eileen Weber Minnesota Assessment Conference August 5, 2015.
1 OBSERVATION CYCLE: CONNECTING DOMAINS 1, 2, AND 3.
Laura Maly Bernard Rahming Cynthia Cuellar Rodriguez Explore Explore Explore Math Teacher Leaders October 18, 2011.
Implementing the Professional Growth Process Session 3 Observing Teaching and Professional Conversations American International School-Riyadh Saturday,
NM Teacher Evaluation Planning & Preparation Creating an Environment of Learning Professionalism Teaching for Learning Evaluation.
Welcome Learning Targets for Today I will build schema for Danielson’s Framework for Teaching. I will connect Framework principles to powerful planning.
In-Service September 19, 2012 Teacher Evaluation System.
Outcome: Participants will be able to identify and apply teacher behaviors that support a learner-centered environment. Indicator: Participants will explore.
Framework For Teaching (FFT)
An Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Changes to the Educator Evaluation System
Teacher Evaluation Process School Year
Presentation transcript:

NYC Teacher Effectiveness A Preview of the NYC Teacher Effectiveness Framework for Created by The Center for the Professional Education of Teachers, Teachers College, Columbia University

Teacher Evaluation is Changing. 85 years The current rating system has been in place for 85 years. Teacher evaluation is shifting across the country. NY State law has established that 60% of a teacher’s rating will be based on the evaluation of teacher performance from a “researched based framework”. The framework selected by New York City is Danielson. Created by The Center for the Professional Education of Teachers, Teachers College, Columbia University

Reciprocal Accountability Administrators Concrete expectations Low Inference Observations Feedback to teachers Support for teachers Adjustment in Practice Teachers Concrete expectations Clear links between ratings and observations Reflection on practice Opportunities for support Adjustment in Practice Created by The Center for the Professional Education of Teachers, Teachers College, Columbia University

SHIFTING EXPECTATIONS FOR ALL From teachers talking To students doing Instruction From Regents Only To Common Core Curriculum From Drill and Kill To Deep Dives Assessments Created by The Center for the Professional Education of Teachers, Teachers College, Columbia University

The Danielson Framework Domain 1: Planning and Preparation Domain 2: Classroom Environment Domain 3: Instruction Domain 4: Professional Responsibilities 4 Domains Created by The Center for the Professional Education of Teachers, Teachers College, Columbia University

6 NYC Priority Areas 1e: Designing Coherent Instruction 2b: Establishing a Culture for Learning 2d: Managing Student Behavior 3b: Using Questioning and Discussion Techniques 3c: Engaging Students in Learning 3d: Using Assessments in Instruction Created by The Center for the Professional Education of Teachers, Teachers College, Columbia University

Dig In! Step 1 Review the Elements of each Priority Indicator Step 2 “Stop and Jot” a few ideas, reactions, impressions of the indicator Step 3 “Turn & Talk” to a partner about the indictor & your thoughts Step 4 Share out ideas with the whole group Created by The Center for the Professional Education of Teachers, Teachers College, Columbia University

Key Elements Learning Activities Instructional Materials & Resources Instructional Groups Lesson & Unit Structure 1e: Instruction Designing Coherent Created by The Center for the Professional Education of Teachers, Teachers College, Columbia University

Key Elements Importance of the content and of learning Expectations for learning and achievement Student pride in work 2b: Establishing a Culture for Learning Created by The Center for the Professional Education of Teachers, Teachers College, Columbia University

Key Elements Expectations Monitoring Student Behavior Response to student misbehavior 2d: Managing Student Behavior Created by The Center for the Professional Education of Teachers, Teachers College, Columbia University

Key Elements Quality of questions/prompts Discussion Techniques Student Participation 3b: Using Questions and Discussion Techniques Created by The Center for the Professional Education of Teachers, Teachers College, Columbia University

Key Elements Activities and assignments Grouping of Students Instructional Materials & resources Structure & pacing 3c: Engaging Students in Learning Created by The Center for the Professional Education of Teachers, Teachers College, Columbia University

Key Elements Assessment Criteria Monitoring of Student Learning Feedback to Students Student self- assessment & monitoring of progress 3d: Using Assessment in Instruction Created by The Center for the Professional Education of Teachers, Teachers College, Columbia University

Final Reflections What are you contemplating/pondering? What are you questioning? What make sense? Created by The Center for the Professional Education of Teachers, Teachers College, Columbia University

For more information: NYC DOE Teacher Effectiveness Resources: ssionalLearning/TeacherEffectiveness/default.htm The Danielson Group Engage NY engageny.org The Center for the Professional Education of Teachers Created by The Center for the Professional Education of Teachers, Teachers College, Columbia University

NYC Teacher Effectiveness A Preview of the NYC Teacher Effectiveness Framework for Created by The Center for the Professional Education of Teachers, Teachers College, Columbia University