Keck Observatory and The System: Astro2010 Activities Mike Bolte, Shri Kulkarni, Taft Armandroff Keck Strategic Planning Discussions September 18, 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Restructuring of the Materials Research Science and Engineering Center (MRSEC) Program Creating New Opportunities for Collaborations and Partnerships in.
Advertisements

Flow-down of Strategic Priorities to Annual and 5-year WMKO Plan Taft Armandroff Hilton Lewis September 18, 2009 Taft Armandroff Hilton Lewis September.
Highly Efficient Operations Keck Scientific Strategic Planning 2009 Hilton Lewis T. Armandroff, S. Adkins, R. Goodrich J. Johnson, K. Kinoshita, R. Matsuda.
1 Performance Assessment An NSF Perspective MJ Suiter Budget, Finance and Awards NSF.
Conversation with ACCORD on GSMT 21 January 2005 Michael S. Turner, Assistant Director Directorate for Mathematical & Physics Sciences National Science.
AST Portfolio Review Tom Statler, NSF/AST AAAC Meeting 13 Oct 2011.
SUGGESTIONS From White Papers received as of 10/06/14.
Kickoff Meeting for NYAC Telescope Proposal. Agenda Define the Process for Going Forward –This process to be ratified by the NYAC board of directors Discuss.
Mathematics and Science Teaching Programs Grant Proposal Workshop Panel Discussion: Writing Successful STEM Education Proposals - Principal Investigator.
NGAO System Design Review Response Peter Wizinowich, Rich Dekany, Don Gavel, Claire Max for NGAO Team SSC Meeting June 18, 2008.
WMKO Next Generation Adaptive Optics: Build to Cost Concept Review Peter Wizinowich et al. ~ March 20, 2009 February 5, 2009 DRAFT.
NGAO Report February 18, 2009 Waimea NGAO Report February 18, 2009 Waimea P. Wizinowich for the NGAO Team.
1 Briefing to the CAA on the Terrestrial Planet Finder (TPF): Finding and Characterizing Earth-like Planets Zlatan Tsvetanov, NASA Program Scientist Charles.
The Path to NGAO Core Science Requirements Claire Max and Liz McGrath NGAO Team Meeting September 11-12, 2008.
Science Operations Replan NGAO - Meeting 6 D. Le Mignant W. M. Keck Observatory 04/25/2007.
The Future of AO at Keck Sept 2004 Mike Brown, for the AOWG and Keck AO team.
WMKO Next Generation Adaptive Optics: Build to Cost Concept Review Peter Wizinowich et al. December 2, 2008 DRAFT.
Providing Access for US Astronomers to the Next Generation of Large Ground Based OIR Telescopes 1.Scientific Potential 2.Current Design Efforts 3.Complementarity.
Instrumentation on OIR Large Telescopes – A Case Study S. R. Kulkarni Caltech Optical Observatories.
1 The Thirty-Meter Telescope (TMT) Richard Ellis, Steele Professor and California Institute of Technology TMT Board member Michael Bolte, Director, University.
The KPNO 4m “Mayall” Telescope Arjun Dey (NOAO). National Optical Astronomy Observatory Mission: provide the best ground-based astronomical capabilities.
OIR C OMMITTEE S TATUS R EPORT 2 nd face-to-face meeting Oct , 2014 Beckman Center of the National Academies Irvine, CA.
Enabling a GSMT for the US Community: AURA’s Proposal to the NSF Stephen E. Strom 04 June, 2004 Tucson, AZ National Optical Astronomy Observatory Tucson.
W. M. Keck Observatory Subaru Users’ Meeting
1 TMT Project Update 29 November 2006 UCSC Astronomy Faculty Some of this information is sensitive or confidential.
Nuclear Science User Facilities (NSUF) DOE Headquarters Perspective Michael Worley Director, Office of Innovative Nuclear Research Office of Nuclear Energy.
Office of High Energy Physics View on Dark Energy Collaborations Kathleen Turner Office of High Energy Physics (HEP) Office of Science (SC), U.S. Department.
AAAC Meeting February, New GSMT Role NSF has asked that AURA/NOAO act as NSF’s "Program Manager" for the GSMT Technology development effort at a.
Fred H. Cate Vice President for Research September 18, 2015 Grand Challenges.
Advancing GSMT SWG Recommendations: AURA’s Proposal to the NSF Stephen E. Strom AURA New Initiatives Office Presented to the GSMT SWG 12 February, 2004.
A Roadmap forNationalOIRFacilities AAAC May 2005 OIR Long Range Planning Committee Document for submission to NSF AST and CAA May 2005.
Dr. Chas Beichman, Executive Director Dr. Rachel Akeson, Deputy Director Dr. Dawn Gelino, Science Community Affairs 25 April 2012.
Harvey Tananbaum Director Chandra X-ray Center Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics 13th HEAD Meeting April 8, 2013 Building International Space.
Exo-Planet Task Force (ExoPTF) Jonathan Lunine (LPL) Stephen Ridgway (NASA)
1 What we are: Two 8m telescopes, capable of forefront imaging and spectroscopy at optical and IR wavelengths. A young Observatory designed to enable and.
Report from Subaru Advisory Committee The main issues of the current SAC: ・ Extensive (strategic) program of Subaru telescope ・ International collaborations.
AST Supported Programs for Astronomical Instrumentation Division of Astronomical Sciences Program Officers: Andrew Clegg, Jeff Pier, Gary Schmidt.
TMT.PMO.PRE REL011 Thirty Meter Telescope Background and Status.
John Peoples for the DES Collaboration BIRP Review August 12, 2004 Tucson1 DES Management  Survey Organization  Survey Deliverables  Proposed funding.
1 Large Synoptic Survey Telescope Status Update for AAAC October 13, 2011 Nigel Sharp Division of Astronomical Sciences, NSF Kathy Turner Office of High.
“From the Ground Up: Balancing the NSF Astronomy Program” Senior Review Major Recommendations November 2006 Implications for GSMT.
Scientific Strategic Plan The Process Fall 2008: SSC and Observatory Management began activities to revise the SSP Previous SSP from 2003, last.
The Role and Contribution of Independent Illinois Colleges & Universities Illinois Board of Higher Education June 3, 2008 St. John’s College, Springfield,
Strategic Vision for NRAO from the EVLA-II Proposal Review Exercise Bruce Balick, University of Washington Abstract: The NSF panel's review of the EVLA-II.
LIGO-G M Summary Remarks: Management of LIGO Gary Sanders California Institute of Technology NRC Committee on Organization and Management of Research.
6/6/08NASA/USRA Management review- SETI TLR - 1 A New SOFIA Science Vision Charter, Progress, and Plans Tom Roellig.
AST Update Astronomy and Astrophysics Advisory Committee 10 May 2007.
BERAC Subcommittee Report Follow-on Management and Operations Review of EMSL May 31 - June 1, 2006 EMSL, Richland, WA.
ALTAIR: Access to Large Telescopes for Instruction and Research Chair: Larry Ramsey (14 members, 8.5L, 2S, 3.5U) Report: Submitted Mar 9, 2009
NSF Program Update Astronomy and Astrophysics Advisory Committee Oct 11, 2005.
W. M. Keck Observatory Community Scientific Strategic Planning Meeting September 18, 2009.
Keck Observatory Overview Peter Wizinowich W. M. Keck Observatory AOSC May 31, 2004.
Department of Energy Office of Science  FY 2007 Request for Office of Science is 14% above FY 2006 Appropriation  FY 2007 Request for HEP is 8% above.
Telescope Access Metrics Presentation to Program Review Panel September 16, 2004.
1 LSST Town Hall 227 th meeting of the AAS 1/7/2016 Pat Eliason, LSSTC Executive Office Pat Osmer, LSSTC Senior Advisor.
Senior Review of NSF Facilities NOAO Users Committee October 4, 2005.
Giant Magellan Telescope Project Status and Relationship with the NSF Astronomy and Astrophysics Advisory Committee February 8, 2007 Patrick McCarthy -
The Role of an Access Programme: Lessons for FP7 Birgitta Nordström Niels Bohr Institute, Copenhagen University Denmark.
Theme 2 AO for Extremely Large Telescopes Center for Adaptive Optics.
GSMT SWG Meeting November, New GSMT Role NSF has asked that AURA/NOAO act as NSF’s "Program Manager" for the GSMT Technology development effort.
Sample expanded template for one theme: Physics of Galaxy Evolution Mark Dickinson.
Public / Private Partnership at the Mason Community Center.
LSST CORPORATION Patricia Eliason LSSTC Executive Officer Belgrade, Serbia 2016.
Telescope Access Metrics
Community Science Updates
Theme 2 AO for Extremely Large Telescopes
Letizia Stanghellini NOAO 16 June 2008 – Science with Giant Telescopes
Scientific Potential Current Design Efforts Complementarity with JWST
Theme 2 AO for Extremely Large Telescopes
Theme 2 AO for Extremely Large Telescopes
Presentation transcript:

Keck Observatory and The System: Astro2010 Activities Mike Bolte, Shri Kulkarni, Taft Armandroff Keck Strategic Planning Discussions September 18, 2009 Mike Bolte, Shri Kulkarni, Taft Armandroff Keck Strategic Planning Discussions September 18, 2009

WMKO White Papers Submitted to Astro2010 State of the Profession White Papers –The Role of the W. M. Keck Observatory in U.S. Astronomy –The Value of the Keck Observatory to NASA and Its Scientific Community Activity White Papers –The W. M. Keck Observatory: A Private/Public Partnership Enabling Frontier Astrophysical Advances in the Coming Decade –W. M. Keck Observatory’s Next Generation Adaptive Optics Facility Collaborative State of the Profession White Paper –Operational Funding for Optical & Infrared Interferometers

WMKO White Papers Submitted to Astro2010 Astro2010 input based on Keck Scientific Strategic Plan, which included significant community involvement Keck Science Steering Committee reviewed all of the 334 white papers submitted to the Science Frontier Panels for applicability of WMKO –143 of the papers discuss science that would benefit from capabilities available now or planned at Keck

Key WMKO Messages (1) Keck Observatory is an essential element of U.S. OIR observing system –Significant fraction of U.S. peer-reviewed public access to large telescopes is achieved through Keck NASA: 1/6 (~100 nights/year) TSIP: 24 nights/year UC, Caltech, UH, Yale + collaborators Keck is a successful public-private partnership in which limited federal funding is highly leveraged by state and private funding –Private: Keck Foundation, other Foundations, individuals –State: California provides 5/6 operations –Federal: NASA, NSF, NOAO/TSIP 8 to 10 meter OIR telescopes, properly instrumented, are key to the scientific productivity of the OIR community in coming decade

Key WMKO Messages (2) Modest investments in instrumentation will enable Keck Observatory’s continuing role as a key contributor to frontier U.S. astronomical research –Efficient optical IFU spectroscopy (KCWI) –Multi-object optical spectroscopy –Near-infrared high-resolution spectroscopy (NIRSPEC upgrade) –Optical high-resolution spectroscopy –Time domain astronomy –Advanced interferometry (ASTRA operations)

Key WMKO Messages (3) Keck Next Generation Adaptive Optics –NGAO will provide a unique capability in U.S. OIR system Near Diffraction-Limited in Near-IR (K-Strehl ~80%) AO correction at Red Wavelengths (  m) Increased Angular Resolution, Sensitivity and Contrast Improved Photometric and Astrometric Accuracy, and Sky Coverage –Cutting-edge science will result from NGAO Dramatically improved from existing AO –NGAO is a pathfinder for adaptive optics on ELTs Key AO technologies demonstrated on-sky with NGAO Comparing current Keck AO and NGAO at the Galactic Center

Key WMKO Messages (4) Enhancements to federal grant programs that would benefit science at non-federal observatories –Increase TSIP funding –Make TSIP funding stable –Modify the financial limits in the ATI and MRI programs to enable proposals for developing transformational instrumentation for 8-10 meter telescopes –Enable operations funding for U.S. interferometry facilities

Post-Submission Interactions with Astro2010 Provided detailed budget information to Study Group on Facilities, Funding, and Programs for the Astro2010 State of the Profession Subcommittee following request Provided detailed telescope and instrument information to Study Group on Facilities, Funding, and Programs for the Astro2010 State of the Profession Subcommittee following request Invited presentations to Astro2010 Panel on Optical and Infrared Astronomy from the Ground in Pasadena on June 9 –ACCORD (AURA Coordinating Council of Observatory Research Directors) –MOSAIC (consortium of interferometry facilities)

Thanks to all who contributed to WMKO’s Astro2010 and scientific strategic planning initiatives!

Excerpts from the ACCORD Presentation to the ASTRO2010 O/IR Panel ACCORD members: Bolte, Kulkarni

ACCORD Association of Directors of US O/IR Observatories with telescopes of aperture >3m Goal is to optimize astronomy research capabilities for US ground-based O/IR facilities

The US O/IR System* Building an “efficient” US O/IR system of facilities is growing increasingly important for maintaining the US strong competitive position in astronomy research –Federal funding for the independent observatories provides a greatly-needed ability to add to their capabilities –The demand for community access to the independent observatories is great and accessing it via this federal funding is a highly-leveraged arrangement for the NSF A next step would be close enough coordination to have a more coherent set of complementary capabilities within the system * Note the lack of quotation marks around “System”

The System in 2009 The system of US astronomy facilities is currently built primarily around TSIP –Initiated in 2002 –Two levels of “incentive factor” –No call in 2003 or 2008 (continued funding of previous commitments) –$24.53M committed with 354 nights allocated at Keck, MMT, Magellan, WIYN and LBT, HET –~$3M/year –2009 call $2.5M new funds

TSIP Time is Popular ALTAIR Report “ To develop and expand the large telescope system, we recommend that NSF increase the funding, to $10M per year, for an NOAO-led TSIP or TSIP-like program in order to increase the open access time available on non- federal facilities.” Oversubscription of public access time for >6.5m US telescopes, 2004B A

ACCORD Issue #1 TSIP has been unexpectedly successful from all points of view, but the program has not been a priority for NSF astronomy Independent Observatories would be able to support ALTAIR recommended $10M/year Recommendation: Increase the funding available via TSIP and have the priority of the program be high enough that it becomes stable

National Treasure Programs In an expansion of the US telescope system concept, funding for large programs, e.g. WFMOS and GPI instruments should be competed. The most ambitious and forward-looking projects at major observatories, federally-funded or independent, exceed the funding available through MRI, ATI or TSIP yet represent an important part of the future of A&A research Put in place a process that identifies the best programs and best “home” for those programs that considers federal and independent facilities

Doing Business a Different Way Merging of public-private interests is more than exchanging money for nights –Providing broad access to data obtained at Independent Observatories is a part of the system future –Providing tools for observing preparation, observing support and data analysis is important for maximizing value of public access time –For any large program undertaken partially or completely with public funds, the program design will need to include community input and the program carried out to appropriate levels of planning and oversight The ACCORD community recognizes these changes in how the Independent Observatories will be run

The System Going Forward The size of the investment in forefront telescopes/instruments/programs has grown to the point that efficient private-public partnerships are a necessity The ACCORD community is ready to engage in a serious and mutually-beneficial relationship with the federal agencies to build a System Although progress has been made in the last decade, a more serious federal investment is required for the System to work in the next decade