NAEGA. Biotechnology In Grain Trade Practical Issues for Global Trade December 5, 2003 North American Export Grain Association.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SCIENCE,SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT IN THE E.U.
Advertisements

Ian Wooton University of Strathclyde and CEPR Trade and competition policy anti-dumping and anti-trust policies in RTAs.
Commercial Research, Biodiversity and Benefit Sharing: Exploring Best Practices for Biotrade and ABS – Windhoek, Namibia, 18 th to 20 th June 2007 The.
Singapore February 2001 Promoting Fair and Transparent Regulation in Securities Markets A Presentation to the APEC-OECD Co-operative Initiative on Regulatory.
Workshop on Good Agricultural Practices, Rome October 2004 Good Agricultural Practices in Codex Jeronimas Maskeliunas MD, PhD Food Standards Officer.
Evolving Comparative Advantage of NAFTA Countries in Livestock: Hogs NAAMIC May 21-23, 2008 Martin Rice Canadian Pork Council.
International Trade Policy: Tariff and Non-tariff Barriers
Chapter 4 global analysis Section 4.1 International Trade Section 4.2
Unit 13 International Marketing
Technical Requirements, WTO Rules and Trade
Beyond the Farm Gate: Channeling & Identity Preservation Indiana Ag Summit Indianapolis, Indiana 13. September 2002 Dirk E. Maier Extension Agricultural.
OPPORTUNITIES AND THREATS FOR STARCH EUROPE
CPMA Repacking and Wholesale Food Safety Program August 14 th, 2006 Calgary, AB.
Presentation 4.2 CODEX STANDARDS ON SAFETY Section IV Food Quality and Standards Service (ESNS) Food and Nutrition Division. FAO.
TRANSGENIC:HOW THEY AFFECT ORGANIC AGRICULTURE IN NORTH DAKOTA Brad Brummond NDSU Extension Service/ Walsh County 2002.
CME Group and Informa Economics May 16, 2013 Pan American Grain and Oilseed Conference.
European Policy for Food Safety Research and Horizon 2020
Facilitating Efficient Agricultural Markets in India An Assessment of Competition and Regulatory Reform Requirements Funded by the Australian Centre for.
FAO/WHO CODEX TRAINING PACKAGE
United States-Canada Regulatory Cooperation Council United States-Canada Regulatory Cooperation Council January 30, 2012 Washington D.C
permissible Halal food sector has become an area of opportunity across the global food trade. 70% of Muslims or 1.33 billion of the 1.9 billion Muslims.
MT 219 Marketing Unit Nine The Global Marketplace Social Responsibility and Ethics Note: This seminar will be recorded by the instructor.
Traceability and Labeling: A Global Perspective Bobby Richey Foreign Agricultural Service/USDA December 5, 2003.
Standards and Standardization. Standard Levels Standards preside according to the level. Their effect, image and their scope of work change from one level.
1 ANSI Conference on U.S. Leadership in ISO and IEC Presented by Mr. Steven P. Cornish Director, International Policy American National Standards Institute.
Exploring Coexistence PIFB-NASDA Workshop 2006 Michael Rodemeyer University of Virginia Presentation to AC-21 December 6, 2011 Washington, D.C.
September 22, 2015 NOAA’s Seafood Safety and Quality Programs: Meeting the Challenges of a Global Seafood Supply.
Canadian Food Safety Standards May 2008 Austin, Texas.
APEC PTIN Food Safety Activities January 27, 2011.
The Draft SADC Annex on Trade in Services UNCTAD Secretariat Sub-regional Conference on Improving Industrial Performance and Promoting Employment in SADC.
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education 7-1 Part Three Theories and Institutions: Trade and Investment International Business Environments and Operations, 13/e.
1 UPDATE ON THE EPA NEGOTIATIONS CUTS/WTO Regional Outreach Workshop Nairobi. By: Ambassador Nathan Irumba SEATINI (Uganda )
Module 2 Slide 1 NATIONAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION REGULATORY PRACTICES WORKSHOP MODULE: 2 A The Independent Regulator.
Compliance with IOSCO requirements AMEDA Leadership Forum Alexandria Egypt Monday 27 th April 2009 by Dr. Ashraf EL Sharkawy Senior Advisor to the CMA.
Chapter foundations of Chapter M A R K E T I N G Global Marketing 20.
Purpose of the USDA  Established in 1862 by President Abraham Lincoln  Back then, more than half of the Nation’s population lived and worked on farms.
Halifax, 31 Oct – 3 Nov 2011ICT Accessibility For All SMART GRID ICT: SECURITY, INTEROPERABILITY & NEXT STEPS John O’Neill, Senior Project Manager CSA.
The New Science of Food: Facing Up to Our Biotechnology Choices Prepared by Mark Edelman, Iowa State University David Patton, Ohio State University A Farm.
THE BIOSAFETY BILL, 2007 JACARANDA HOTEL, 26 TH JULY 2007.
North Dakota Wheat Commission State Meeting December 2010.
Challenges and Impact of Private Standards Delilah A. Cabb Ayala B.Sc. M.Sc. Belize Agricultural Health Authority 19 October 2009.
International Standards and the TBT Agreement Ludivine Tamiotti WTO, Trade and Environment Division Legal Affairs Officer
1. Main types: 1. Formal International and Supranational Organizations -WTO: the world trade agreements provide for binding obligations of the Member.
Reclaimed Wastewater Quality Criteria, Standards, and Guidelines
Slide No. 1 Pradeep S Mehta Secretary General CUTS International Jaipur, India International Trade Concerns Effects of International.
GMO amendment Bill and biotech policy W. De Greef, Consultant to AfricaBio.
Guatemala: An evaluation of Biosafety Regulations Drew L. Kershen Earl Sneed Centennial Professor Univ. of Oklahoma, College of Law Copyright 2007, all.
Food Safety – An Issue of Public Health Concern
Supply Chain Management Purchasing/Inventory/Materials.
United States-Canada Regulatory Cooperation Council TBWG Fall Plenary November,
1 CHAPTER VI BUSINESS- GOVERNMENT TRADE RELATIONS INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS.
● Lack of accessible usable information that is open to all communities ● Poor information dissemination and access ● A mismatch between available.
Company LOGO. Company LOGO PE, PMP, PgMP, PME, MCT, PRINCE2 Practitioner.
Tracy McCracken SPS Technical Advisor East Africa Region United States Agency for International Development (USAID) Kenya and East Aferica/Office of Regional.
Trade Compliance Considerations April 13, © 2016 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network.
ITCILO/ACTRAV COURSE A Capacity Building for Members of Youth Committees on the Youth Employment Crisis in Africa 26 to 30 August 2013 Macro Economic.
INFORMATION SESSION ON PHYTOSANITARY REGULATIONS IN GRAIN IMPORTS.
© 2011 Underwriters Laboratories Inc. Conformity Assessment Best Practices and Advancing GRP in EAC: The Value of Public-Private Partnerships EAC Workshop.
Evolving Best Practice in Governance Policy Developing Consumer Confidence in Risk Analysis Applied to Emerging Technologies Department of food science.
TRAINING WORKSHOP ON SUCCESSFUL MODELS OF FARMER BASED ORGANIZATIONS Izmir – Menemen, Republic of Turkey Country Presentation : Morocco Jannary 2016.
Governance and Institutional Arrangements What they have to do with Regional Water Planning (RWP)
NEED FOR ACTION Large sections of the populations in many developing countries still suffer from the ravages of unsafe, unhygienic or adulterated food,
ISO Global Relevance Case ISO/TC 23/SC 3 & ISO
International Legal Framework
Our company takes pride in its membership in the National Fisheries Institute (NFI) and the Better Seafood Board (BSB).
The WTO-TBT-Agreement
EUROGAS LNG TASK FORCE Bilbao, 13 March 2009 Presentation by
SRO APPROACH TO REGULATION
Position of the European Farmers on the changes and news within the new CAP François GUERIN | Second National Farmers meeting in Bulgaria 6 February.
Presentation transcript:

NAEGA

Biotechnology In Grain Trade Practical Issues for Global Trade December 5, 2003 North American Export Grain Association

NAEGA North American Export Grain Association Membership : Cooperative, Public and Private grain exporters and supporting companies Mission : Promote and sustain the development of commercial export of grain and oilseed trade from the United States. The National Grain and Feed Association and NAEGA coordinate policy and government representation on trade- related issues that affect the economic prospects of the US grain handling industry.

NAEGA PRINCIPLES With regard to all NAEGA policy the following principles apply: 1. Commercial solutions are the most effective and preferable means to meet customer needs for the agricultural commodities traded internationally by our members. 2. US grain export industry should participate as appropriate in relevant national and international proceedings where policies and regulatory action affecting the industry will be promulgated, negotiated or discussed.

NAEGA NAEGA Policy Priorities  Integrity and Reliability of Supply  Neutral, Balanced Approach to Biotech, Quality and Product Safety  Competitive and Open Markets, International Rules and Discipline  Customer Driven Markets

NAEGA PRECEPTS to address biotechnology: I. NAEGA believes that US Government regulatory procedures and statutory authority need to be thoroughly reviewed and updated on an ongoing basis to ensure that regulatory decisions reflect sound science, foster increased consumer confidence, and support a competitive commercial response to changing market conditions.

NAEGA Biotech Precepts II Best way to overcome global controversy and trade disruption in bulk commodity shipments due to products derived from modern biotechnology is the adoption of comprehensive, harmonized, global 1. Regulatory approval process; 2.Standards for testing methodology.

NAEGA Biotech Precepts – III&IV Prior to any exposure to food crops all modifications to crops commercially used for food or feed must have a completed regulatory approval for use as food and feed. The US Government should provide leadership in appropriate national and international fora in the development of workable threshold levels that address the many complex issues related to the adventitious presence of products derived from modern biotechnology.

NAEGA Biotech Precepts V The global trading system, foreign governments and international organizations must recognize the reality that any and all bulk commodity shipments “may contain” some coincidental amounts of commodities derived from modern biotechnology

NAEGA Biotech Precepts - VI Support the a regulatory philosophy that labeling of products should provide useful information and be credible and only mandatory when health and safety concerns warrant such information. Mandatory process based labeling is not appropriate. In no case should governments impose mandatory traceability requirements on the production and marketing process simply to gather information that may, or may not, be used for labeling purposes.

NAEGA Biotech Precepts - VII Mandatory sampling and testing of commercial grains and oilseeds for genetic content most often unnecessarily increases costs, decreases competitiveness, and restricts liquidity of US origin production in global commodity markets and should be avoided. If foreign governments dictate that such testing occur, then the US government role is to use Federally appropriated funding to develop and gain international acceptance for sampling and testing procedures that do not impede commercial grain and oilseed export operations.

NAEGA Biotech Precepts - VIII It is the primary responsibility of the life science industry to undertake a comprehensive educational effort to inform the public of the benefits and risks, if any, of modern biotechnology. NAEGA will continue to provide fair and balanced information to domestic and foreign audiences.  

NAEGA Traceability / Identity Preservation  EU seeking impossible farm to fork tracking of commodities derived from modern biotechnology. (Adventitious Presence recognized but approach is not feasible.) Classic Example of a regulatory mandate that could restrict and impede commercial response. ? May discriminate against certain origins?

NAEGA Traceability / Identity Preservation  US Export industry serving “Identity Preserved” commodity requests on commercial terms. Customer must find adequate value to cover the additional costs for extraordinary handling and opportunity losses. (Under IP terms, no agreement to meet a zero tolerance is implied or expressed.)

NAEGA Traceability / Identity Preservation Identity preservation costs vary significantly depending upon the level of purity desired, crop, growing conditions, production environment, sampling and testing regime and logistics system. Private Canadian Study for shipment to Mexico: One crop shows a range of $3.00/ ton for 95% purity to $40.00/ton for 98% purity.

NAEGA Traceability / Identity Preservation Competitive advantages can be inadvertently created by inappropriate regulatory measures. Agricultural commodities are produced and handled in different ways, under different laws, in different countries – such variability easily leads to important commercial advantages.

NAEGA Summary Observations 1.Crop Biotechnology is vulnerable to additional sensational contamination stories, which must be avoided at all cost. 2.Appropriate international standards – necessary prerequisite for adequate consumer acceptance of Biotechnology. 3.Consumer acceptance is absolutely necessary prior to introduction of Biotech Wheat. 4.Inappropriate Government intervention in the food chain may preempt the development of commercial systems to handle crops derived from modern Biotechnology.

NAEGA Conclusion While the entire supply and demand chain must cooperate, the success of any introduction of Biotechnology will ultimately depend on Consumer acceptance. Trade has much at stake in the innovation of Biotechnology - as the primary customers of the grain trade, THE WORLD’S CONSUMERS’ acceptance is the paramount criteria.

NAEGA Working together to keep trade moving. Thank You

NAEGA