Adolescent Romantic Relationships: The Impact of Rejection Sensitivity and the Moderating Role of Attachment Security By: Emily Marston, Amanda Hare, Erin.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

The Self-Fulfilling Prophecy of Adolescent Social Expectations. Emily L. Loeb, Elenda T. Hessel, Megan M. Schad, & Joseph P. Allen University of Virginia.

Advertisements

Marital Satisfaction and the Development of Autonomy and Close Friendships in Early Adolescence Jessica R. Meyer L. Wrenn Thompson Kathleen Boykin McElhaney.

Intrapsychic and Attachment Influences on Adolescent Romantic Jealousy Erin M. Miga, Joseph P. Allen, Amanda Hare University of Virginia This study was.

Adolescent Attachment to Parents: Predicting Later Adolescent Rejection Sensitivity I would like to thank the William T. Grant Foundation, Spencer Foundation,

Direct and Moderated Predictions to Late Adolescent Internalizing Symptoms from Emotionally Stressful Family Contexts Joanna M. Chango Ann Spilker Joseph.

Late Adolescent Adverse Social Environments Contribute to Young Adult Physical Health and Functioning. Elenda T. Hessel, Emily L. Loeb, Jospeh S. Tan,

The Need for Attachment: Demonstrations through Teens’ Photos on MySpace and Facebook Introduction SOCIAL NETWORKING WEBSITES: - Allow users to share information.

Parents' Marital Conflict Tactics as Predictors of Adolescents' Subsequent Romantic Conflict: A 6-Year Longitudinal Study Amanda L. Hare, Joseph P. Allen,

Unique Contributions of Attachment Security and Emotional Awareness for Predicting Adolescent Romantic Relationship Functioning Introduction Attachment.

Rejection Sensitivity as a Moderator of the Link between Adolescent Close Relationships and Depressive Symptoms over Time Joanna M. Chango Joseph P. Allen.

I Think I’m OK, Why Don’t You?: The Saga of Disagreeable Youth Christopher A. Hafen, Megan M. Schad, Elendra T. Hessel, Joseph P. Allen University of Virginia.

Joseph Tan Elenda Hessel Emily Loeb Megan Schad Joanna Chango Joseph Allen Long-Term Relational Sequelae of Adolescent Attachment State of Mind.

Gender, Power and Attachment Processes: Multiple Contextual Considerations in the Study of Couple Power Dynamics over Time Erin M. Miga, M.A., Joanna Chango,

Similarly, rejection sensitivity tends to be negatively associated with being a perpetrator of relational aggression in romantic relationships for young.

Adolescent romantic relationships and substance abuse: The benefits of thinking it will last forever J. Claire Stephenson, David E. Szwedo, Joseph P. Allen.

Adolescent Romantic Relationships and Depressive Symptoms: The Moderating Effect of Emotional Intelligence Introduction David E. Szwedo

Printed by Parent-Adolescent Relationship Quality and the Development of Romantic Values Jessica K. Winkles, Joseph P. Allen University.

  Friendships are central to adolescent development: negative peer relations predict risk for interpersonal incompetence and mental health problems well.

Romantic Partner Selection and Relationship Quality in Adolescence: Do Parent or Early Peer Relationships Matter More? Joanna M. Chango, David E. Szwedo,

Experiences with Parents, Peers, and Romantic Partners During Adolescence as Predictors of Youths’ Emotion Regulation Strategies David E. Szwedo, M.A.

Loneliness-Mediated Long-term Associations Between Preoccupied Attachment and General Health Joseph S. Tan, Jessica Kansky, Elenda T. Hessel, Megan M.

Can Peer Pressure Be A Good Thing? Megan M. Schad, Meredyth A. Evans, David E. Szwedo, Joseph P. Allen University of Virginia We would like to thank the.

Farah Williams & Melinda Schmidt University of Virginia We would like to thank the William T. Grant foundation, Spencer Foundation, and National Institute.

Dads Do Matter: Adolescents’ Relationships With Dads Predicting Later Rejection Sensitivity I would like to thank the William T. Grant Foundation, Spencer.

Adolescent Romantic Relationships and Depressive Symptoms: The Importance of Emotion Regulation and Close Friendships Introduction David E. Szwedo

Rejection Sensitivity In Adolescent Girls: The Role of Social Acceptance and Externalizing Behaviors Authors: Emily Marston, Joseph P. Allen, Jill A.

The Broader Context of Relational Aggression in Adolescent Romantic Relationships Megan M. Schad, David E. Szwedo, Amanda Hare, Jill Antonishak, Joseph.

Expecting the worst often leads to poor outcomes. This process is particularly true in close relationships, as those who are most sensitive to rejection.

Against the Grain: Adolescent Help-Seeking as a Path to Adult Functional Independence Introduction David E. Szwedo David E. Szwedo 1,2,

Early Adolescent Behaviors in Disagreement with Best Friend Predictive of Later Emotional Repair Abilities Lauren Cannavo, Elenda T. Hessel, Joseph S.

Implicit Vs. Explicit Peer Rejection Megan M. Schad, Amori Yee Mikami, Joseph P. Allen University of Virginia We would like to thank the National Institute.

Negative Psychosocial Outcomes of Engaging in Sexual Intercourse Before the Age of 16 Introduction Mary K. Higgins Mary K. Higgins,

Parents' Marital Functioning and the Development of Adolescent Romantic Relationships Amanda L. Hare, F. Christy McFarland, & Joseph P. Allen University.

Dismissing Adolescents and the Evolution of their Close Relationships J. Claire Stephenson Joseph P. Allen Jill M. Antonishak University of Virginia Copies.

Results Time 2 (Age 18-20) Target teen and their romantic partner engaged in an 8 minute hypothetical disagreement task interaction. Hostile, relationship-undermining.

Adolescent attachment state-of-mind and parent-adolescent relationship quality: Joint longitudinal predictors of social and emotional functioning Kathleen.

Adolescent Peer and Romantic Predictors of Youths’ Emotion Regulation in Early Adulthood Introduction David E. Szwedo David E. Szwedo,

Elenda T. Hessel, David E. Szwedo, & Joseph P. Allen University of Virginia Copies of this and related research are available at:

Adolescent Emotional Repair Predicting Abusive Behavior in Adolescent and Young Adult Romantic Relationships. Elenda T. Hessel, Megan M. Schad, Barbara.

Marital Satisfaction and Consensus: Links to the Development of Behavioral Social Functioning in Early Adolescence L. Wrenn Thompson Jessica Meyer Joseph.

From Managing Emotions to Improving Relationships: Higher Quality Best Friendships Predicted from Earlier Emotion Regulation. Elenda T. Hessel, Megan M.

The Benefits of Regulating Emotions: Predictions from Adolescent Emotional Repair to Multiple Domains of Young Adult Adjustment. Elenda T. Hessel, Megan.

Externalizing Behaviors in Adolescence as a Stepping Stone on the Trajectory to Young Adult Poor Physical Health. Elenda T. Hessel, Joseph S. Tan, Emily.

Romantic Partners Promotion of Autonomy and Relatedness in Adolescence as a Predictor of Young Adult Emotion Regulation. Elenda T. Hessel, Emily L. Loeb,

Can Pretty People Have Their Cake and Eat it Too? Positive and Negative Effects of Physical Attractiveness. Megan M. Schad, David E. Szwedo, Joanna M.

Does Preoccupied Attachment in Adolescence Have Long-term Implications for Physical Health in Adulthood – and How? Leah Grande, Joseph S. Tan, Joseph P.

Deep Dyadic Friendships vs. Broad Peer Preference During Adolescence as Predictors of Adolescent and Adult Internalizing Symptoms Rachel K. Narr & Joseph.

Introduction Results Method Conclusions

Introduction Results Method Conclusions

Adaptive Social Regulation of Emotion and Adolescent Romantic Relationship Power: A Developmental Perspective Erin M. Miga, Joanna Chango, Meredyth Evans,

Introduction Results Hypotheses Discussion Method

Introduction Results Method Conclusions

The Role of Adolescent Relationships in Predicting Withdrawal in Emerging Adulthood J. Claire Stephenson, Amanda L. Hare, Nell N. Manning & Joseph P.

Parents & Peers: Providing Teens with Different Tools to Develop Social Competence Meghan Costello1, Laura Sylke2, David Szwedo2, & Joseph Allen1 University.

Introduction Results Method Conclusions

Introduction Results Methods Conclusions

Introduction Results Methods Conclusions

Negotiating Adolescence: The Importance of Close Relationships for Dismissing Adolescents J. Claire Stephenson, Nell N. Manning, Dave E. Szwedo & Joseph.

Introduction Results Conclusions Method

Introduction Results Method Conclusions

Introduction Results Conclusions Method

Introduction Results Conclusions Method

University of Virginia1 & James Madison University2

Introduction Results Conclusions Hypotheses Method

Does Preoccupied Attachment in Adolescence Have Long-term Implications for Physical Health in Adulthood – and How? Leah Grande, Joseph S. Tan, Joseph P.

Lauren A. Barlotta & David E. Szwedo James Madison University

The Effects of Childhood Emotional Abuse on Later Romantic Relationship Outcomes: The Moderating Role of Self-Worth, Alcohol, and Jealousy Madeline M.

Aashna A. Dhayagude & David E. Szwedo James Madison University

Emotional Neglect from Parents Inability to Psychologically Separate

Attachment Insecurity and Abuse in Adolescent Romantic Relationships Erin Miga, Joseph P. Allen & Nell Manning University of Virginia This study was.

Presentation transcript:

Adolescent Romantic Relationships: The Impact of Rejection Sensitivity and the Moderating Role of Attachment Security By: Emily Marston, Amanda Hare, Erin Miga, Meredyth Evans and Joseph P. Allen We would like to thank the National Institute of Mental Health for funding awarded to Joseph P Allen, Principal Investigator, (Grants #R01-MH58066) for the conduct and write-up of this study.

Abstract Research indicates that rejection sensitivity and attachment security play important roles in romantic relationship functioning. This study utilizes multi-informant data to examine the longitudinal associations between rejection sensitivity and romantic relationship quality as well as the moderating impact of attachment security. Data were collected from a diverse sample of 184 adolescents. Regression analyses indicated that rejection sensitivity was related to higher levels of anxious romantic attachment styles. While rejection sensitivity negatively impacted future romantic relationship quality, attachment security appeared to buffer teens from these negative outcomes. Findings suggest that rejection sensitivity is an important cognitive-affective mechanism in the development of adolescent romantic relationships.

Rejection Sensitivity and Attachment What is Rejection Sensitivity? The disposition to anxiously expect, readily perceive, and intensely react to social rejection (Downey & Feldman, 1996) How does Rejection Sensitivity relate to Attachment Security? Rejection sensitivity research draws upon attachment theory and views behavior patterns as reflections of internal working models of relationships that incorporate expectations about rejection (Bowlby, 1969; Sroufe, 1990).

Research on Romantic Relationships How does rejection sensitivity concurrently relate to functioning in romantic relationships? ↑ Rejection Sensitivity → ↓ Overall satisfaction ↓ Emotionally Supportive Behaviors ↑ Break-ups How does attachment security relate to functioning in romantic relationships? ↑ Attachment Security → ↑ Commitment, Trust and Satisfaction ↑ Conflict Resolution ↑ Overall Competence in Romantic Relationships (Downey & Feldman, 1996; Downey, Freitas, Michaelis & Khouri, 1998 ) (Duemmler, 2001; Engels, 2001, Simpson, 1990; Simpson, Collins & Tran, 2007; Williams & Risking, 2004)

Research Questions 1) Is rejection sensitivity related to adolescent attachment style in romantic relationships? 2) How does adolescent rejection sensitivity impact future romantic relationship functioning? 3) Do secure states of mind regarding attachment prospectively moderate the relationship between adolescent rejection sensitivity and romantic relationship functioning?

Participants o Multi-method, multi-reporter data were collected from a 184 adolescents (48% Male) o Community-based sample from Small Urban Area o Socio-Economically Diverse (Median Family Income = $40,000-$60,000 range) o 43% African-American; 57% European American o Time 1: Teen’s Mean age = 14 (SD=.77) o Time 2: Teen’s Mean age = 16 (SD=.90) o Time 3: Teen’s Mean age = 18 (SD=1.30) o Time 3: Romantic Partner’s Mean age = 19 (SD=3.08)

Measures Attachment Security (Time 1: Age=14) Adult Attachment Interview: (AAI: George, Kaplan & Main, 1995). I hour semi-structured interview 3 scales: Secure, Preoccupied and Dismissing Attachment oRejection Sensitivity (Time 2: Age = 16) Rejection Sensitivity Questionnaire: (RSQ: Downey & Feldman, 1996). o 18-item self-report measure assessing adolescent’s level of rejection sensitivity. o Scenarios are rated on two dimensions: the degree of anxiety or concern about the outcome the expectations of acceptance or rejection.

Measures Teen Romantic Attachment Style (Time 3: Age=18) Experiences in Close Relationships: (Brennan, Clark & Shaver, 1998) Self-report of teen’s emotional and behavioral style in romantic relationships Anxious Attachment: “I want to get very close to my partner, and this sometimes scares people away.” Avoidant Attachment: “I am nervous when anyone gets too close, and often, others want me to be more intimate than I feel comfortable being.”

Measures Teen and Romantic Partner’s Romantic Relationship Functioning (Time 3: Age=18) Relationship Experiences Questionnaire: (Levesque, 1993) Passion ex: “I get romantically excited just thinking about him/her.” Support ex: “I help my partner through difficult times.” Togetherness ex: “I am happiest when we’re together.” Network of Relationship Inventory: (Furman, 1996) Affection ex: “How much does this person like or love you?”

Higher levels of teen’s rejection sensitivity (16) predicted higher levels of ANXIOUS ATTACHMENT STYLE in romantic relationships (18). *** p <.001. ** p <.01. * p <.05. Note: Target adolescent age at time of assessment is in parentheses. Beta weights are presented covarying for gender and minority (not depicted Teen’s Rejection Sensitivity Attachment Security AGE 14AGE 16 AGE 18 Anxious Romantic Attachment Style *** Total R² = 23***

Teen’s with higher levels of rejection sensitivity at 16 had Romantic Partners who reported experiencing less AFFECTION in their romantic relationship at 18. *** p <.001. ** p <.01. * p <.05. Note: Target adolescent age at time of assessment is in parentheses. Beta weights are presented covarying for gender and minority (not depicted Teen’s Rejection Sensitivity Attachment Security AGE 14AGE 16 AGE 18 Romantic Partner’s Report of Affection ** Total R² = 12**

Teen’s with higher levels of rejection sensitivity at 16 had Romantic Partners who reported experiencing less TOGETHERNESS in their romantic relationship at 18. *** p <.001. ** p <.01. * p <.05. Note: Target adolescent age at time of assessment is in parentheses. Beta weights are presented covarying for gender and minority (not depicted Teen’s Rejection Sensitivity Attachment Security AGE 14AGE 16 AGE 18 Romantic Partner Report of Togetherness * Total R² = 12**

Teen’s attachment security (14) appears to buffer the negative effects of Teen’s rejection sensitivity (16) on their reports of PASSION in romantic relationships (18).

Teen’s attachment security (14) appears to buffer the negative effects of Teen’s Rejection Sensitivity (16) on their reports of SUPPORT in romantic relationships (18).

Conclusions Teen’s high in rejection sensitivity at 16 are more likely to have an anxious attachment styles in romantic relationships at 18. Teen’s rejection sensitivity at 16 appears to negatively impact future romantic relationships. Romantic Partners reported experiencing less affection and togetherness in their relationships with Teen’s high in rejection sensitivity. Teens high in rejection sensitivity also reported experiencing less passion and support in their relationships. Secure states of mind regarding attachment at 14 buffered the negative effects of teen’s rejection sensitivity at 16 on their reports of romantic relationship quality at 18. For teens with a secure state of mind regarding attachment, rejection sensitivity has a diminished to negligible effect on future romantic relationships.

For More Info Go to for all posters and publications from the KLIFF Labwww.teenresearch.org

Descriptives and Intercorrelations Note: Target adolescent age at time of assessment is in parentheses. *** p <.001. ** p <.01. * p <.05.