Module 4: Getting Ready: Scoping the RI/FS. 2 Module Objectives  Explain the purpose of the scoping phase of the RI/FS  Identify existing data which.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lesson 3 Responding to Emergency Events. For additional information or questions please contact Toledo-Lucas County Health Department APC:
Advertisements

WATER QUALITY ANALYSIS for ANTIDEGRADATION
Site Characterization Instructional Goal: Upon completion of this topic the participant will better understand the need to identify and evaluate various.
Supporting documents Implement Work Plan Sub-Area CSM Sub-Area DQOs Sub-Area Work Plan (contains Sub-Area CSM and Sub-Area DQOs) BRC Decision 1. BRC Common.
ORDER ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROGRAM WORKSHOP The Uniform Federal Policy for Implementing Environmental Quality Systems (UFP-QS) Emile I. Boulos.
Sampling: Your data is only as good as your field technicians.
REDUCING BURDEN WHILE INCREASING QUALITY AT A GOVERNMENT AGENCY David A. Marker (Westat), Mary K. Dingwall (Westat), and Marla D. Smith (U.S. EPA) Presented.
Vapor Intrusion. What is Vapor Intrusion? The migration of volatile chemical vapors from the subsurface to overlying buildings.
BoRit Superfund Site Timeline
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Authorizes EPA to identify hazardous wastes and regulate their generation, transportation, treatment, storage and.
PA One Cleanup and Land Use Controls The “Business of Brownfields” Conference April 17, 2008 Terri Smith Environmental Liability Management, Inc.
INTRODUCTION TO THE USE OF CERCLA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP PROJECTS USDA FOREST SERVICE Grants and Agreements Workshop February 28, 2002 Great Falls,
Institutional Controls Pamela Elkow and Richard Fil.
Overview of New EPA Superfund Groundwater Guidance and Tools
Strengthening the Medical Device Clinical Trial Enterprise
CE 510 Hazardous Waste Engineering
Great Lakes Monitoring Inventory and Gap Analysis: Recommendations for Addressing Shortfalls and Improving Monitoring Coordination in the Great Lakes Basin.
Who’s Monitoring Land Use Controls on Brownfield Sites? Terri Smith Environmental Liability Management, Inc.
DoD Information Technology Security Certification and Accreditation Process (DITSCAP) Phase III – Validation Thomas Howard Chris Pierce.
Module 8: Risk Assessment. 2 Module Objectives  Define the purpose of Superfund risk assessment  Define the four components of the human health risk.
Introduction to the State-Level Mitigation 20/20 TM Software for Management of State-Level Hazard Mitigation Planning and Programming A software program.
EnviroSense, Inc. An Overview of Environmental Factors in Developing Brownfields Sites in Massachusetts Presented By: Eric S. Wood, P.Hg., PG, LSP President.
1 Risk Assessment Develop Objectives And Goals Develop and Screen Cleanup Alternatives Select Final Cleanup Alternative Communicate Decisions to the Public.
PART IX: EMERGENCY EXPOSURE SITUATIONS Module IX.1: Generic requirements for emergency exposure situations Lesson IX.1-2: General Requirements Lecture.
Tritium: Fleet-Wide Assessment Program Zigmund A. Karpa Director Environmental and Regulatory Affairs.
Internal Auditing and Outsourcing
1 of 25 The EPA 7-Step DQO Process Step 5 - Define Decision Rules 15 minutes Presenter: Sebastian Tindall DQO Training Course Day 2 Module 14.
New Ag Waiver for the San Diego Region (including Temecula Valley) Water Quality Workshop Rancho California Water District November 6, 2008 Presented by.
NEI Issues & Current Events George Oliver June 22, th Annual RETS – REMP Workshop South Bend, Indiana.
HOMELAND SECURITY ADVISORY SYSTEM. Established after the terrorist attacks on America September 11, 2001.
Regulatory Controls PBT Strategy Team Great Lakes Regional Collaboration February 22, 2005.
Former Monsanto Chemical Tip Wrexham County Borough Council.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Reviewing Management System and the Interface with Nuclear Security (IRRS Modules 4 and 12) BASIC IRRS TRAINING.
” Particulates „ Characterisation of Exhaust Particulate Emissions from Road Vehicles Key Action KA2:Sustainable Mobility and Intermodality Task 2.2:Infrastructures.
Triad Approach / Best Management Practices. Triad Approach and BMPs Systematic Planning – Conceptual Site Model (CSM) Dynamic Work Strategies Real-Time.
CHAPTER 3 SCOPING AND AGENCY COORDINATION. Scoping - the procedure for determining the appropriate level of study of a proposed project/activity - process.
An Overview of Environmental Investigations January 22, 2002 Presented by: DuPont Corporate Remediation Group.
Multimedia Assessment for New Fuels: Stakeholders’ Meeting September 13, 2005 Sacramento, CA Dean Simeroth, California Air Resources Board Dave Rice, Lawrence.
Module 1: Introduction to the Superfund Program. 2 Module Objectives q Explain the legislative history of Superfund q Describe the relationship between.
1 of 21 Introduction to the EPA 7-Step DQO Process DQO Training Course Day 1 Module 7 (30 minutes) Steps Presenter: Sebastian Tindall.
Public participation of EIA in R.O.C. Hsiao-Tien Wu, Wei-Chein Sun & Tung-Wang Chang Environmental Protection Administration Executive Yuan R.O.C.
1 The Use of Institutional Controls Under the RCRA Corrective Action Program.
| Data Validity and Usability in the RI/FS Process CHRISTINA MOTT FRANS, JOSH HOPP, CHRISTINE RANSOM.
APPLICATIONS OF WATER QUALITY REGULATIONS Module 22, part c – Applications.
Preventive Emergency Planning Emergency Plans should focus not just on response but on reducing risk Emergency Planning that focuses on risk should consider.
Module 6: Alternatives. 2  Module 6 contains three sections: – 6.1 Development and Screening of Alternatives – 6.2 Detailed Analysis of Alternatives.
CALIFORNIA proposed SAFER CONSUMER PRODUCT REGULATIONS Marjorie MartzEmerson October 24, 2012.
Potential Addition of Vapor Intrusion to the Hazard Ranking System U.S. EPA Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response February 24, 2011 Listening Session.
Area I Burn Pit Santa Susana Field Laboratory RCRA Facility Investigation Work Plan February 19, 2008 Laura Rainey, P.G. Senior Engineering Geologist California.
Public Health Assessment Process Jack Hanley, M.P.H. Environmental Health Scientist Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.
1 of 27 The EPA 7-Step DQO Process Step 5 - Define Decision Rules (15 minutes) Presenter: Sebastian Tindall Day 2 DQO Training Course Module 5.
Greener Cleanups in the Region 10 PCB Program Michelle, Mullin R10 PCB Coordinator Clu-In Webinar November 17, 2015.
DOE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROGRAM WORKSHOP BIOTA PROTECTION Stephen L. Domotor (202)
NRC Environmental Reviews for Uranium Recovery Applicants and Licensees James Park (301)
Think safe. Act safe. Be safe. LEHR Site Annual Soil Management Plan Training Sue Fields, Environmental Health & Safety Sept,
Evaluating the Practicality of LNAPL Recovery Jeff Lane, P.G. November 17, 2015 International Petroleum Environmental Conference (IPEC) IPEC 22 Contact.
Coeur d’Alene Basin TLG Repository PFT meeting December 9, 2003.
Checking and Corrective Action EPA Regions 9 & 10 and The Federal Network for Sustainability 2005.
RER/9/111: Establishing a Sustainable National Regulatory Infrastructure for Nuclear and Radiation Safety TCEU School of Drafting Regulations November.
ORDER ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROGRAM WORKSHOP OVERVIEW OF ORDER Larry Stirling
Forging Partnerships on Emerging Contaminants November 2, 2005 Elizabeth Southerland Director of Assessment & Remediation Division Office of Superfund.
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey Recommendations From the New Jersey Climate Adaptation Alliance Marjorie B. Kaplan, Associate Director Rutgers.
Long-Term Management of Contaminated Soil and Groundwater – Iwilei District, Honolulu April 16, 2015.
Organization and Implementation of a National Regulatory Program for the Control of Radiation Sources Program Performance Criteria.
These materials have been developed based on applicable federal laws and regulations in place at the time the materials were created. The program is being.
Bellwork List 3 chemicals that you have at home? What would you do if a younger relative ingested them?
Anniston PCB Site Review of Risk Assessments for OU-1/OU-2
THE SUPERFUND PROCESS Assessment and Listing
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) Purpose To address the hazards to human health and the environment presented.
Introduction EPA is overseeing the RI/FS for the Rolling Knolls Landfill being conducted by several companies under a 2005 administrative order on consent.
Presentation transcript:

Module 4: Getting Ready: Scoping the RI/FS

2 Module Objectives  Explain the purpose of the scoping phase of the RI/FS  Identify existing data which can support RI/FS scoping, and evaluate its usefulness  Given sources, release mechanisms, pathways, and receptor data for the site, develop a basic conceptual site model  List when limited field investigation would be appropriate to support RI/FS scoping  Explain how EPA Superfund program expectations impact DOE RI/FS projects  Define data quality objectives and explain their importance to data collection planning  List the typical contents of an RI/FS project plan  List EPA recommendations for improved RI/FS planning Getting Ready: Scoping the RI/FS

3 Scoping Activities  Initial process of RI/FS –Repeated as needed throughout (for other operable units)  Establish site objectives  Implement site management strategy –Site boundaries –Sequence –Operable units  Implement any OU strategies, such as use of a phased approach Getting Ready: Scoping the RI/FS

4 Scoping Activities (cont'd)  Evaluate existing data –Use previous surveys, documents  Involve federal, state regulators  Develop conceptual site model  Identify management strategy, likely response scenarios, and remedial action objectives  Initiate potential state/federal ARARS identification  Identify initial data quality objectives (DQOs)  Prepare project plans Getting Ready: Scoping the RI/FS

5 Evaluate Existing Data  Identify types of existing data  Identify sources of existing data  Use of existing data helps to: –Establish physical characteristics of the site –Develop conceptual site model –Determine additional data needs –Avoid duplication of previous efforts –Focus RI/FS –Worker health and safety planning Getting Ready: Scoping the RI/FS

6 Develop Conceptual Site Model Drums and Tanks Lagoon Structures, Drums, Tanks, Lagoon Dust and/ or Volatile Emissions Wind Spills Infiltration/ Percolation Overtopping Dike Soil Storm- Water Runoff Surface Water and Sediments Infiltration/ Percolation Ground Water EXPOSURE ROUTE Area Residents Site Visitors Terrestrial Aquatic HUMANBIOTA RECEPTOR Ingestion Inhalation Dermal Contact Ingestion Dermal Contact Ingestion Inhalation Dermal Contact Ingestion Inhalation Dermal Contact Dermal Contact PATHWAY RELEASE MECHANISM -2 SOURCES -2 RELEASE MECHANISM SOURCES T Getting Ready: Scoping the RI/FS

7 Limited Investigations  Conduct if available data are not sufficient to scope the project adequately  Limited to easily obtainable data where results can be gathered in a short time –Geophysical survey –Sampling and analysis of existing wells –Well-water level measurements –Air monitoring –Site mapping Getting Ready: Scoping the RI/FS

8 Site Management Planning Based on Existing Information and Conceptual Site Model:  Identify initial remediation priorities and appropriate implementation sequence to address site problems –Operable units –Early/interim actions  Identify appropriate scope and detail of studies needed to define site problem  Identify potential remedial technologies and need for treatability studies Getting Ready: Scoping the RI/FS

9 Program Expectations  Focus on the protection of human health and the environment through a variety of methods  Are to be considered and utilized during scoping and will influence the establishment of remedial action objectives and potential remedial alternatives Getting Ready: Scoping the RI/FS

10 Program Expectations (cont'd)  Treatment of principal threats will be used, wherever practicable; principal threats may include liquids and highly mobile or highly toxic materials  Engineering controls may be used for waste that poses a low long-term threat, or where treatment is impracticable  Institutional controls, such as deed restrictions, will be used to mitigate short-term impacts or to supplement engineering controls; they will not serve as a sole remedy unless active response measures are impracticable Getting Ready: Scoping the RI/FS

11 Program Expectations (cont'd)  Remedies will often combine treatment of principal threats with engineering and institutional controls for treatment residuals and untreated waste  Innovative technologies should be considered if they offer the potential for comparable or superior treatment performance, fewer/lesser adverse impacts, or lower costs for a similar level of performance than demonstrated technologies  Ground water will be returned to its beneficial uses within a timeframe that is reasonable, where practicable Getting Ready: Scoping the RI/FS

12 Initiate ARAR Identification  DOE should work with lead and support agencies to initiate identification process early in process  Initial focus on chemical- and location-specific requirements and presence of RCRA-regulated waste Getting Ready: Scoping the RI/FS

13 Develop Data Quality Objectives (DQOs)  Assure all data needs are identified in project scoping  Type and quality of data needed based on intended use of data  7-step DQO process developed by EPA’s Quality Assurance Management Staff Getting Ready: Scoping the RI/FS

14 Prepare Project Plans Typical Project Planning Deliverables Include:  Work plan (WP) –Should also address management of investigation-derived waste  Sampling and analysis plan (SAP) –Field Sampling Plan (FSP) –Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP)  Health and safety plan (HASP)  Community relations plan (CRP) Getting Ready: Scoping the RI/FS

15 Communication During Scoping  DOE, EPA, and the state meet to discuss site management strategy  DOE initiates discussion of ARARs with EPA and the state  DOE prepares work plan, working closely with EPA and the state  DOE and EPA begin dialogue with community to develop community relations plan and notifies community of completed project plans Getting Ready: Scoping the RI/FS

16 Improved Project Planning EPA Recommendations:  Increase use of existing data, particularly site inspection data  Conduct limited investigation, when appropriate  Incorporate technical advisory committee review into project planning phase  Integrate DQOs into planning process Getting Ready: Scoping the RI/FS

17 Improved Project Planning EPA Recommendations (cont'd)  Use RI/FS 14 standardized tasks - listed in Appendix B of guidance  Consolidate planning documents/incorporate standard procedures by reference  Communicate on regular basis with all involved parties to reach early consensus on project approach Getting Ready: Scoping the RI/FS

18 Module Summary  The purpose of scoping is to plan for data collection and review, site planning and other initial steps of the RI/FS process  Scoping activities include – Evaluating existing data – Involve federal, state regulators – Develop conceptual site model – Identify management strategy, likely response scenarios, and remedial action objectives – Initiate potential state/federal ARARs identification – Identify initial data quality objectives (DQOs) – Prepare project plans Getting Ready: Scoping the RI/FS

19 Module Summary (con’t)  Scoping activities must focus on meeting program expectations as these activities will influence the establishment of remedial action objectives and potential remedial actions  DQOs are data maps that assure all data needs are identified during project scoping Getting Ready: Scoping the RI/FS