Autonomous Vehicles in California Bernard Soriano and Stephanie Dougherty.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
“Automated driving – What comes first: cars or standards?”
Advertisements

© Ricardo plc 2012 Eric Chan, Ricardo UK Ltd 21 st October 2012 SARTRE Demonstration System The research leading to these results.
1 IntelliDrive SM IntelliDrive SM for Transit 101 ITS America Annual Meeting May 4, 2010 Jeffrey L. Spencer FTA.
Autonomous Vehicles in California Stephanie Dougherty Chief of Strategic Planning, California DMV.
DRAFT.  Its Mandated for funding › Strategy, activity or project  It is a Guide › How to  It is a story › History (where we were) › Possible look.
IntelliDrive Safety Workshop July 20, 2010 Alrik L. Svenson US Department of Transportation National Highway Traffic Safety Administration IntelliDrive.
Automated Highway System (AHS) Intelligent Vehicle Initiative (IVI) Vehicle Infrastructure Integration (VII)
1. Overview Background Introduction to IntelliDrive SM Preliminary Research/Proof of Concept Potential Applications –Safety –Mobility –Commercial The.
AUTOMOBILES Dimitris Milakis, Transport Institute, Delft University of Technology Envisioning Automated Vehicles within the Built Environment: 2020, 2035,
Autonomous Vehicles in California Stephanie Dougherty California DMV
1 Development of California Regulations for the Testing and Operation of Automated Vehicles on Public Roads Steven E. Shladover, Sc.D.Ching-Yao Chan, Ph.D.
Michigan VII: Technology Improving Lives ITS Midwest Annual Meeting February 7, 2006 Gregory D. Krueger, P.E. Statewide ITS Program Manager Michigan Department.
Autonomous Vehicle Regulations Development New Motor Vehicle Board 10 th Industry Roundtable March 14,
Ian Fraser Highways Agency Co-operative Vehicle - Highway Systems Research.
2007 NHTSA ASSESSMENT WHAT IT CAN DO FOR YOU!. What is NHTSA? What is NHTSA? National Highway Transportation Safety Administration National Highway Transportation.
IntelliDrive Policy and Institutional Issues Research Valerie Briggs Team Lead, Knowledge Transfer and Policy, ITS Joint Program Office, RITA May 4, 2010.
Human Interaction with Intelligent Transportation Systems Committee Meeting 3 – August 24, 2011.
1. NV DMV FollowupProprietary and Confidential 2 Peloton Technology Founded 2011, Menlo Park CA To dramatically improve highway safety and the efficiency.
National VII Architecture – Data Perspective Michael Schagrin ITS Joint Program Office US Department of Transportation TRB 2008 Annual Meeting Session.
VII Initiative for Improved Roadway Safety and Mobility Ralph Robinson ITS Georgia Annual Meeting and ITS Tennessee Sept 26, 2006.
AHS – The Vision. The Automated Highway System (AHS) and The Intelligent Vehicle Initiative (IVI)
Meeting of State Pooled Fund Partners April 20, 2005 "Reducing Crashes at Rural Intersections: Toward a Multi-State Consensus on Rural Intersection Decision.
Roadway Safety Panel How can ITS assist in bridging vehicle technology with roadway design and function?
Autonomous Vehicles in California Stephanie Dougherty Chief, Enterprise Planning & Performance California Department of Motor Vehicles July 22, 2015.
V ehicle I nfrastructure I ntegration Jeffrey F. Paniati Associate Administrator for Operations and Acting Program Manager for ITS Joint Program Office.
Vehicle Infrastructure Integration (VII) FDOT’s Annual ITS Working Group Meeting March 20, 2008 George Gilhooley.
1 TRB Workshop on Road Vehicle Automation Steven E. Shladover, Sc.D. California PATH Program University of California, Berkeley Jane Lappin Volpe National.
Winnable Battles: Data for Action Graphs and State Rates – Motor Vehicle Injuries U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Centers for Disease Control.
1 EDR User Perspectives on Parameters & Data Accessibility: Independent Investigator/Consultant Accident Reconstruction Robert C. McElroy, Ph.D. Forensic.
Mike Schagrin US Department of Transportation ITS Joint Program Office IntelliDrive Safety Program Overview.
IVBSS Program Overview and Accomplishments Presented by: Jim Sayer UMTRI ITS America 2007 Annual Meeting & Exposition Palm Springs, CA June 6, 2007.
Vehicle Infrastructure Integration Briefing to OFCM CEISC James Pol USDOT Intelligent Transportation Systems Joint Program Office May 17, 2005.
Human Factors Challenges for Automated Vehicles Peter Campbell Burns Chief, Ergonomics and Crash Avoidance Motor Vehicle Safety ​​​​​ ITU-UNECE Symposium.
IntelliDrive Safety Workshop July 20, 2010 Stephanie C. Binder National Highway Traffic Safety Administration US Department of Transportation Human Factors.
A Vehicle Manufacturer’s Perspective on VII Christopher Wilson ITS Oregon- Feb 1, 2005 Christopher Wilson.
Director Malcolm Dougherty California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) October 28, 2015 Caltrans’ Highway Safety Improvement Program.
Autonomous Trucks & Platooning The Future of Trucking or Not
Self-driving cars Connelly Barnes CS 6501 – Large-scale data-driven graphics and vision.
1 National Highway Traffic Safety Administration An Overview of NHTSAs Vehicle Safety Research Priorities Nathaniel Beuse Associate Administrator, Vehicle.
An Update on Automated Vehicle Legislation and Regulation Marc Scribner Research Fellow Competitive Enterprise Institute
1 IntelliDrive SM Vehicle to Infrastructure Connectivity for Safety Applications Greg Davis FHWA Office of Safety RD&T U.S. Department of Transportation.
Self Driving Car Service By: Tyler Lederman, Timothy Cao, and Ezra White.
Federal Acquisition Service U.S. General Services Administration 1 GSA Automotive Changing the Way We Drive our Future An Alternative: Low Speed Vehicles.
U.S. DOT Automated Vehicle Policy Activities ITS PCB T3 Webinar The National Transportation Systems Center U.S. Department of Transportation Office of.
A Look into Autonomous Vehicles
INTRODUCTION SELF-DRIVING CARS FUTURE OF AUTOMOBILES HYDROGEN POWERED CARS 1 GROUP 10 1)G.V.S.ABHISHEK 2)MOHIT AGARWAL 3)T.R.GOKUL.
1 Autonomous Vehicles. 2 One of our top priorities is preparing our members for the impact of automation in vehicles.
© 2016 Global Market Insights, Inc. USA. All Rights Reserved Fuel Cell Market size worth $25.5bn by 2024 Autonomous Car Market Size.
Challenge: Numerous Governmental Layers
Automation & Enhanced Safety
Autonomous Vehicles in California
Vehicle to Vehicle Communication
Bernard C. Soriano, Ph.D. Deputy Director
Autonomous Vehicles The Implications on Urban Transportation
Data Impacts of Transportation Reauthorization: Data Community’s Plans and Strategies Pat Hu Chair, TRB National Transportation Data Requirements and Programs.
Transportation, Distribution, and Logistics
The Audi A8 The Most Advanced Self-Driving Technology The technological revolution has started with Audi’s autonomous driving technology. This is the first.
Automated and connected vehicles
SAE DSRC Technical Committee work and outlook
Hur klarar infrastrukturen?
Accelerating the Introduction of
California’s Autonomous Vehicles Program
Self Driving Car Market Self Driving Car Market.
Self Driving Car Market Self Driving Car Market.
Transport Portfolio Committee
Autonomous Vehicles: Perspectives, Regulations & Insurance
Tomorrow’s Mobility…Is Here Today!
AV Regulation in Florida
ENabling SafE Multi-Brand Platooning for Europe
© 2016 Global Market Insights, Inc. USA. All Rights Reserved Fuel Cell Market size worth $25.5bn by 2024 Trailer Assist System Market.
Presentation transcript:

Autonomous Vehicles in California Bernard Soriano and Stephanie Dougherty

California Legislation – Senate Bill 1298 As soon as practicable, but no later than Jan. 1, 2015, DMV must adopt regulations setting forth requirements for: Manufacturers’ testing of autonomous vehicles on public roadways Operation of autonomous vehicles on public roadways

Public workshops and meetings Nissan Volvo VW Group Chrysler GM Toyota Honda Google Bosch Autonomous vehicle technology advancing quickly Adoption by the public will not be dependent on technology –Human factors (HMI) Potential traffic safety improvements are immense –Over 30,000 traffic fatalities per year –Almost all (95%) of traffic fatalities were the result of human error –In over 35% of traffic fatalities, the brakes were not applied Government and industry need to work collaboratively

NHTSA defines 4 levels of autonomous vehicles Level 0 – No automation Level 1 – Function specific automation Level 2 – Combined function automation Level 3 – Limited self-driving automation Level 4 – Full self-driving automation Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) has similar definitions, although 5 levels

Philosophical differences Driver is essential to vehicle operations Design systems to maintain situational awareness Adequate notification time Human is the backup system Vehicle operations fully autonomous No need for steering or braking controls Redundancy and fail-safe built into system Technological differences –Self-contained processing –Map dependency and cloud computing –Vehicle to vehicle communication (v2v) NHTSA decision on DSRC capability –Vehicle to infrastructure communication (v2i) Other forms of autonomous vehicles Road train concept Low speed shuttles

NHTSA Level 2 autonomous vehicles available now now _ –2014 Mercedes S class –2014 BMW i3, 5-Series –2014 Cadillac XTS NHTSA Level 3 autonomous vehicles being tested now –Private test tracks –Human reaction testing –Situational awareness No industry agreement on NHTSA Level 4 timetable –Dependence on DSRC? –Self-parking

Volvo No fatalities in a Volvo vehicle by the year 2020 –Collision avoidance systems –Commercial trucking industry –Road train or platooning –Gothenburg, Sweden Nissan Autonomous car will be available for sale before 2020 Price will be $1,000 - $2,000 above current prices Audi A-7 demo at the 2013 CES

Challenges Definition Usage Safety Vehicle Code Liability Visibility Privacy Standardization Security Insurance Licensing Technical constraints Reliability Messaging Infrastructure Public perception

Senate Bill 1298 Statewide Steering Committee –California State Transportation Agency –California Department of Insurance –California Highway Patrol –California Office of Traffic Safety –California Department of Transportation –California Department of Motor Vehicles –National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

Regulatory Package 1 Submission of evidence of insurance Data collection requirements Operator training and qualifications Currently in final review Regulatory Package 2 Testing requirements Safety standards Operator license requirements Vehicle registration requirements Other feasible regulations Target date of December 2014