Rhonda Facile Project Leader, CDISC

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Project Quality Plans Gillian Sandilands Director of Quality
Advertisements

CDASH Initiative: Status Update
2006 European Interchange: RCRIM Meeting RCRIM Vocab & CDISC CT Initiative: Overview and Update Bron Kisler, CDISC Terminology Team Lead.
Participation Requirements for a Guideline Panel Co-Chair.
1 PhUSE CDASH2RFD TC May 31, 2013 Gary Walker, Quintiles Rhonda Facile, CDISC.
The Importance of CDASH
Elke Sennewald Berlin, 28 September 2010 CDASH Tutorial.
Kendle Implementation of Clinical Data Acquisition Standards Harmonization Dr Elke Sennewald Kendle 9th German CDISC User Group Meeting Berlin, 28 September.
An Introduction to Clinical Data Acquisition Standards Harmonization (CDASH) Loryn Thorburn © 2010 PAREXEL International | Confidential.
Cuyahoga County Transition Brecksville Kiwanis Cuyahoga County Transition Brecksville Kiwanis Thursday, July 15, 2010.
BRIDG Update Project Description/Scope As a catalyst for productive collaboration, CDISC brings together individuals spanning the healthcare continuum.
© CDISC: Global Approach To Accelerating Medical Research.
CMDR Plan of Action Version 3 9 th October Note This slide set is designed to facilitate discussion on the project logistics and not discuss technical.
CDASH Initiative Rhonda Facile Project Director, CDISC CDASH Project Update Atlantic User Group 21 February 2008.
WUSS 2009 CDISC for the Medical Device and Diagnostic Industry: An Update Carey Smoak Team Leader CDISC Device SDTM Sub-team.
Bay Area CDISC Implmentation Network – July 13, 2009 How a New CDISC Domain is Made Carey Smoak Team Leader CDISC SDTM Device Team.
April 2, 2013 Longitudinal Data system Governance: Status Report Alan Phillips Deputy Director, Fiscal Affairs, Budgeting and IT Illinois Board of Higher.
ISO 9001:2015 Revision overview - General users
23 August 2015Michael Knoessl1 PhUSE 2008 Manchester / Michael Knoessl Implementing CDISC at Boehringer Ingelheim.
May Agenda  PeopleSoft History at Emory  Program Governance  Why Upgrade Now?  Program Guiding Principles  High-Level Roadmap  What Does This.
Enterprise IT Decision Making
Copyright © 2011 by The Hartford. Confidential. All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced, published or posted without the permission.
Atlanta Public Schools Project Management Framework Proposed to the Atlanta Board of Education to Complete AdvancED/SACS “Required Actions” January 24,
November 12, 2014 St. Louis, Missouri OPTN Strategic Planning Feedback Board of Directors.
NCI Review of the Clinical Trials Process 6 th Annual National Forum on Biomedical Imaging in Oncology James H. Doroshow M.D. April 7, 2005 Bethesda, Maryland.
CDASh : A Primer and Guide to Implementation
Project Initiation Document (PID) Strategic Plan PID Committee Meeting - November 5, 2012.
1CDISC 2002 RCRIM – Standard Domains Agenda NCI Presentation Standard Domains Working Group Goals Introduction to FDA Information Model (FIM) Discussion:
MODULE B: Case Report Forms Jane Fendl & Denise Thwing April 7, Version: Final 07-Apr-2010.
Second Annual Japan CDISC Group (JCG) Meeting 28 January 2004 Julie Evans Director, Technical Services.
HL7 RCRIM Meeting: 9 January 2007 CDISC-RCRIM Vocab Update: Related CDISC Terminology Projects Bron Kisler, CDISC Terminology Program Director
1 RCRIM Vocab-BRIDG Session Wednesday, Session Q2 19 September 2007.
15th Informal US MedDRA User Group Meeting, October 28, 2011 Slide 1 Double the Impact with Half the Work: Linking MedDRA and WHO Drug Indication coding.
© 2013 OSLC Steering Committee1 Proposal to Create OSLC Affiliated Technical Committees OSLC Steering Committee Meeting: 1 PM EDT, 8 July 2013 Open Services.
Progress on Coordinating CBP and Federal Leadership Goals, Outcomes, and Actions Principals’ Staff Committee Meeting 2/16/12 Carin Bisland, Associate Director.
EvergreenEcon.com ESA 2011 Impact Evaluation Research Plan Public Workshop #1 February 20, 2013 Presented By: Steve Grover, President.
RCRIM Projects: Protocol Representation and CDISC Message(s) January 2007.
GOVERNOR’S EARLY CHILDHOOD ADVISORY COUNCIL (ECAC) September 9, 2014.
Progress update on developing Health Sector Strategic Plan (HSSP IV) Joint Annual Health Sector Review Technical Review Meeting Wednesday 5 th.
WG4: Standards Implementation Issues with CDISC Data Models Data Guide Subteam Summary of Review of Proposed Templates and Next Steps July 23, 2012.
CDISC©2009 February CDISC INTRAchange Carey Smoak Device Team Leader Li Zheng Submission Data Standards Team Member Thurday, April 2, 2009.
CDISC Update December 2007 / January 2008 Pierre-Yves Lastic, PhD CDISC Board of Directors & E3C February 5, Paris.
School Accreditation School Improvement Planning.
U.S. Department of Agriculture eGovernment Program eDeployment Kickoff August 26, 2003.
NSDI Strategic Plan Update January 14, NSDI Strategic Plan High-level Timeline 2 Timeframe Activity Dec - Feb Project Start-up – COMPLETED Feb -
CDISC – 17/12/2012 Carine Javierre Nathalie SABIN.
1 Community-Based Care Readiness Assessment and Peer Review Overview Department of Children and Families And Florida Mental Health Institute.
Middle Fork Project Relicensing Process Plan April 25, 2006.
Updates on CDISC Activities
Section 4.9 Work Group Members Kris Hafner, Chair, Board Member Rob Kondziolka, MAC Chair Maury Galbraith, WIRAB Shelley Longmuir, Governance Committee.
1. © CDISC 2014 Stetson Line, Team Lead CDISC Intrachange SDTM Rules Sub-team Update.
How Good is Your SDTM Data? Perspectives from JumpStart Mary Doi, M.D., M.S. Office of Computational Science Office of Translational Sciences Center for.
A lens to ensure each student successfully completes their educational program in Prince Rupert with a sense of hope, purpose, and control.
Project Delivery Working Group FY2016 EFCOG Annual Meeting Robert P. Miklos Idaho National Laboratory Battelle Energy Alliance Working Group Chair June.
Submission Standards: The Big Picture Gary G. Walker Associate Director, Programming Standards, Global Data Solutions, Global Data Management.
Dave Iberson-Hurst CDISC VP Technical Strategy
Facilitating Data Integration For Regulatory Submissions
CDM SIAC All Hands Call Rhonda Facile Director, CDASH Project CDISC
Secondary Uses Primary Use EHR and other Auhortities Clinical Trial
MRC kick-off meeting Bess LeRoy and Erin Muhlbradt, MRC co-leads.
Accenture Accelerated R&D Standards Metadata Management – version control and its governance Kevin Lee CDISC NJ Meeting at 01/28/2015 We help our Clients.
CPT and Disclosure: Connecting Critical Processes
Introduction to TransCelerate
In-Depth Report from Optimizing Data Standards Working Group
CAC Meeting Tuesday, 21 June, CAC Meeting Tuesday, 21 June, 2017.
CPT and Disclosure: Connecting Critical Processes
Introduction to TransCelerate
Portfolio, Programme and Project
Towards International Harmonized Nomenclature for Medical Devices
Safety Analytics Workshop – Computational Science Symposium 2019
Presentation transcript:

Rhonda Facile Project Leader, CDISC CDASH Initiative CDASH Project Description & Status Rhonda Facile Project Leader, CDISC

CDASH Project Process Outline Background and Charter CDISC COP 001 Project Organization Project Process SDTM Review of Progress Next Steps Activities & Project Notes Accomplishments to Date Future Core Team Contact

CDASH Project Process C-path opportunity #45 Continues ACRO’s CRF Standardization Initiative Project Charter To develop a set of ‘content standards’ (element name, definition, metadata) for a basic set of global data collection fields that will support clinical research studies. The initial scope will be the ‘safety data domains’ to support clinical trials. These safety domains cut across all therapeutic areas, beginning with 12-14 domains. CDISC COP (COP-001) Follow the CDISC COP Standards Process (COP-001)

CDISC Standards Development Process (COP-001) Primary Stages Stage I: Standard Definition/Approval Multidisciplinary Team Initiation; Working Plan Development Stage II: Standards Development-Consensus Model; Reviews by External Focused Group and Open Public; Harmonization and Testing throughout; V1.0 Release Stage III: Education & Support Stage IV: Standards Update & Maintenance

Standards Development Process for CDISC (COP-001) Current Status Stage I: Standard Definition/Team Initiation Need for Specific Standard(s) Identified (any stakeholder) Proposal to Board of Directors (via OIS) Review per strategy, budget priorities Team Leader ID And Team Formation (multidisciplinary) (OIS) Working Plan (timelines, deliverables communication mech., resources req’d) (Team ) Approved Not Approved Stage II: Standards Development/Review/V 1.0 Release Consensus (Initial) Version Harmon- ized Version Testing Review Version Released (Production) Version 1.0 Comments addressed OK PSCC Review Ex Focused Review Public Review OK Comments to address by team Stage III: Education & Support Respond To Comments And Questions Educational Programs (EDU, OIS) Stage IV: Standards Update & Maintenance SPCC Review New Released (Production) Version Annual Review of Released Version (comments, chg reqsts, tests, plans) (Team) Working Plan (timelines, deliverables, communication mech., resources req’d) (Team) Consensus (Revised) Version Harmon- ized Version Public Review as needed Optional Ex Focused Review Note: Occasional bug fix releases may be issued as needed with team review only.

Achieving Global Consensus Project Organization Collaborative Group CDISC TAC Core Team (n=9) Stream Members

Achieving Global Consensus Project Organization Streams must ensure input from all relevant functions: Statisticians Data Managers Clinical Study Coordinators Clinical Research Associates Investigators Clinical Program Managers Both US and EX-US Volunteers affiliated with global organizations are asked to include ex-US input into their stream’s standards development process. Need more representation from these functions Need more ex-US Representation.

Achieving Global Consensus Participants in the CDASH Initiative Other = Academic Research Organizations (1), Government (NIH, NCI (2)), Hospitals (2), Universities (14), Military (1)

CDASH Project Process Process (1) SDTM Variable Tables Start with SDTM Data Variable Tables Use mandatory SDTM variables as a basis for the CDASH review process. Refer to ACRO CRF Samples when available Focus on CRF Content, not CRF Layout SDTM Variable Tables

CDASH Project Process Process (2) Collect CRF samples Evaluate commonalities/differences of CRF samples and SDTM Document data points included/excluded with justifications Guiding principles: variables should – Start with the current SDTM Implementation guide & tables Make sure all SDTM required elements are included either directly or indirectly Be “standard” but flexible to allow customization within defined limits Limit variables to required and necessary Comply with regulatory requirements Reduce redundancies; Not duplicate information found elsewhere in CRFs Increase collection of meaningful data Facilitate use of standards by all users Be appropriate for use both pre and post approval studies Allow consistent and efficient data collection/storage/transmission and analysis

CDASH Project Process Technical Leadership Committee (TLC) Process Deliverables (3) Reach agreement on BASIC (mandatory) CRF Data Elements Map to SDTM using SDTM variable names (leveraged from the SDS Team) Add Controlled Terminology (leveraged from the Terminology Team) Add definitions Write completion guidelines/instructions Proceed to the next step in the Consensus Process as specified in COP-001 Technical Leadership Committee (TLC)

Achieving Global Consensus Detailed Consensus process Stage II: Standards Development/Review/V 1.0 Release Per Domain Consensus (Initial) Version Harmon- ized Version Testing Review Version Released (Production) Version 1.0 Comments addressed OK TLC Review Collaborative Group Review Public Review OK Comments to address by team ~3 months ~1 week ~1 month ~1 month Ask Collaborative Group if they can serve as the External Focused Review Group. ~1 month ~1 month ~1 month Entire process takes ~ 8 months

CDASH Process DM CO CM SU EX AE MH DS DV DA IE PE SC VS Process (4) SDTM Domains DM CO CM SU EX AE MH DS DV DA IE PE SC VS SDTM Basic CRF Elements CDASH Process Subsets Vetted by “Front End” Stakeholders (Streams comprised of Invs, CRAs, Data Managers, Statisticians, etc.) DM CO CM SU EX AE MH DS DV DA IE PE SC VS 2) Add SDTM Variable Names 3) Add CT Subset of 1)Basic Data Collection Elements from SDTM Domains 1) ”Basic Data Collection (CRF) Elements” = data elements that cut across all therapeutic areas and apply to most clinical trials. Leveraged from work done by the SDS team, collection of CRFs samples etc. 2) SDTM Variable Names; leveraged from work done by the SDS team. 3) CT = Controlled Terminology; leveraged from the work done by the Terminology Team.

The AE, CM, DM and SC Streams have delivered CDASH Project Process Progress The AE, CM, DM and SC Streams have delivered their Initial Consensus Versions (ICV). The following slides show the basic (mandatory) CRF data collection elements identified by the streams. Note: Conditional and optional data elements were also identified and included in the ICVs, however the initial remit is to focus on the basic data elements.

Collection (CRF) Elements AE – Basic Data Collection Elements SDTM Data Variables CDASH *Basic Data Collection (CRF) Elements AEPTT AEOUT AESCAN AESCONG AESDISAB AESDTH AESHOSP AESLIFE AESOD AESMIE AECONTRT AETOXGR AESTDTC AEENDTC AESTDY AEENDY AEDUR AEENRF AESEQ AEGRPID AERIFID AESPID AETERM AEMODIFY AEDECODE AECAT AESCAT AEOCCUR AEBODSYS AELOC AESEV AESER AEACN AEACNOTH AEREL AERELNST AETERM AESTDTC AEENDTC AESER AESDTH AESHOSP AESLIFE AESOD AESMIE AESEV AETOXGR AEREL AEACN AEOUT (n=36) (n=14) *Basic = Mandatory

Collection (CRF) Elements CM – Basic Data Collection Elements SDTM Data Variables CDASH *Basic Data Collection (CRF) Elements CMSEQ CMGRPID CMSPID CMTRT CMODIFY CMDECODE CMCAT CMSCAT CMOCCUR CMSTAT CMREASND CMINDC CMCLAS CMCLASCD CMDOSE CMDOSTXT CMDOSU CMDOSFRM CMDOSFRQ CMDOSTOT CMDOSRGM CMROUTE CMSTDTC CMENDTC CMSTDY CMENDY CMDUR CMSTRF CMENRF CMTRT CMSTDTC CMSTRF CMENDTC CMENRF (n=29) (n=5) *Basic = Mandatory

Collection (CRF) Elements DM & SC – Basic Data Collection Elements SDTM Data Variables CDASH *Basic Data Collection (CRF) Elements BRTHDTC AGE AGEU SEX RACE ETHNIC ARMCD ARM COUNTRY DMDTC DMDY BRTHDTC Year of Birth Month of Birth SEX RACE (n=11) (n=3) *Basic = Mandatory

Collaborative Group Review CDASH Project Process 1st set of domains Started work during the Project Kick-off meeting, 18 October 2006 at SAS Institute, Cary, NC. Deliverables to complete TLC review by ~middle of March. Collaborative Group review to start ~end of March/beginning of April. ICV TLC Review Harmonized Version Collaborative Group Review Reviewed Version Public Review Released Version 1.0 AE Dec. 2006 March 2007 March – April 2007 April 2007 Q108 Q2 2008 CM Jan 2007 DM & SC Jan. 2007

Initial Consensus Version Collaborative Group Review CDASH Project Process 2nd set of domains Started in December 2006. Delivered ICVs end of February 2007. TLC review to start beginning of March. Initial Consensus Version TLC Review Harmonized Version Collaborative Group Review Reviewed Version Public Review Released Version 1.0 INC/EX February 2007 March – April 2007 April 2007 May – June 2007 June 2007 Q108 Q2 2008 MH & SU February 2007 PE & VS

Initial Consensus Version Collaborative Group Review CDASH Project Process Initial Consensus Version TLC Review Harmonized Version Collaborative Group Review Reviewed Version Public Review Released Version 1.0 Adverse Events December 2006 March 2007 March – April 2007 April 2007 Q108 Q2 2008 Prior & Concomitant Medication January 2007 Demographics & Subject Characteristics Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria February 2007 May – June 2007 June 2007 Medical History and Substance Use Physical Exam & Vital Signs End of Study/ Disposition May 2007 June – July 2007 July 2007 August – Sept. 2007 September 2007 Drug Accountability/ Exposure Protocol Deviations/ Comments Lab & ECG August 2007 September-October 2007 October 2007 November- December 2007 January 2008

CDASH Project Process The 3rd set of domains (DA& EX, CM & DV, End of Study/DS) will be initiated at the beginning of March. 4th set of domains (Lab & ECG) to start beginning of June.

CDASH Project Status - March 2007

Achieving Global Consensus CDASH Activities & Project Notes Webinar - Held 22 January. Press Release – soon! Teleconferencing – continues q2 weeks Core Team contacts – frequent, TCs q 2 weeks. CDASH web portal - up and used. To expand access to new streams. CDISC web site – a valuable source of info. Will facilitate public review phase of project.

Achieving Global Consensus Accomplishments to Date: Successful Kick-off meeting (October 2006) List of over 260 volunteers (varying degrees of participation) Initiation of 1st set of domains Delivery of ICVs for 1st set of domains Initiation of 2nd set of domains CDASH web portal – up Successful CDASH Webinar held (333 Attendees – 53 International) Delivery of ICVs for 2nd set of domains Initiation of 3rd set of domains

CDASH Project Process Future? Standardize layout Standardize edit language Standardize basic therapeutic area standards? Support CDISC Forum/Help Desk New Domains to be “CDASHed” Update of CDASH developed domains SLs and Stream Members to support TLC in future reviews of new standards

Achieving Global Consensus CDASH Core Team Contact Information Rhonda Facile rfacile@cdisc.org Gary Walker gary.walker@quintiles.com Dorothy Dorotheo DDorotheo@intermune.com David E. Tatum TATUM_DAVID_E@LILLY.COM Paul Bukowiec Paul.Bukowiec@mpi.com Trisha Simpson Trisha.Simpson@schwarzbiosciences.com Shannon Labout shannon.labout@charter.net Liz Nulton-Bodiford liz.m.nulton-bodiford@gsk.com Jay Leeka Jay.Leeka@astrazeneca.com Alec Vardy Alec.Vardy@cvt.com

Achieving Global Consensus Thanks to all the CDASH project volunteers for their time and commitment to the CDASH Project.