MINIDRFIT BEAM TEST APPLY IN-LAB UNIVERSAL CORRECTION EIC Tracking Meeting Oct. 27, 2013 B.Azmoun, M.Phipps, BNL.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2 Oct 2003 UCL 2nd Year Talk 1 Crosstalk Removal to Improve Muon dE/dX Measurements Leo Jenner, UCL.
Advertisements

MWPC Commissioning: A Status Report What the MWPC’s do and how Data taking Jan-Feb 2000 Results from the Analysis.
Test Beam 2003 Some Preliminary Results CMS Week Sep-2003.
Status of Tracking at DESY Paul Dauncey, Michele Faucci Giannelli, Mike Green, Hakan Yilmaz, Anne Marie Magnan, George Mavromanolakis, Fabrizio Salvatore.
CMS Physics Meeting, Dec. 6, Analysis Note on the Validation of the ORCA Simulation of the Endcap Muon CSC Front-end Electronics S. Durkin -- Ohio.
1Calice-UK Cambridge 9/9/05D.R. Ward David Ward Compare Feb’05 DESY data with Geant4 and Geant3 Monte Carlos. Work in progress – no definitive conclusions.
Calculating the Beam Position at the Ecal for DESY Run (Independent of Tracking) Hakan Yilmaz.
RPC Update José Repond Argonne National Laboratory American Working Group On Linear Collider Calorimetry 16 September 2003 What’s new since Cornell…
M. Ellis - 11th February 2004 Sci Fi Cosmic Light Yield 2 views 3 views.
Y. Karadzhov MICE Video Conference Thu April 9 Slide 1 Absolute Time Calibration Method General description of the TOF DAQ setup For the TOF Data Acquisition.
1 (Student’s) T Distribution. 2 Z vs. T Many applications involve making conclusions about an unknown mean . Because a second unknown, , is present,
Timing Jitter and Cross Talk in the SRS + Xray scan of FIT zigzag board Michael Phipps, Bob Azmoun, and Craig Woody 1.
PERFORMANCE OF THE MACRO LIMITED STREAMER TUBES IN DRIFT MODE FOR MEASUREMENTS OF MUON ENERGY - Use of the MACRO limited streamer tubes in drift mode -Use.
15 Dec 2010 CERN Sept 2010 beam test: Sensor response study Chris Walmsley and Sam Leveridge (presented by Paul Dauncey) 1Paul Dauncey.
25/07/2002G.Unal, ICHEP02 Amsterdam1 Final measurement of  ’/  by NA48 Direct CP violation in neutral kaon decays History of the  ’/  measurement by.
Test-beam Results for the CMS Forward Pixel Detector Carsten Rott Daniela Bortoletto, Gino Bolla, Amitava Roy Purdue University 28 April 2001.
TOF Meeting, 9 December 2009, CERN Chiara Zampolli for the ALICE-TOF.
Chevron / Zigzag Pad Designs for Gas Trackers
GEM MINIDRIFT DETECTOR WITH CHEVRON READOUT EIC Tracking Meeting 10/6/14 B.Azmoun, BNL.
Moon shadow analysis -- Using ARGO experiment Wang Bo, Zhang Yi, Zhang Jianli, Guo Yiqing, Hu Hongbo Apri for NanJing Meeting
Response of AMANDA-II to Cosmic Ray Muons and study of Systematics Newt,Paolo and Teresa.
Probabilistic Forecasting. pdfs and Histograms Probability density functions (pdfs) are unobservable. They can only be estimated. They tell us the density,
Point Source Search with 2007 & 2008 data Claudio Bogazzi AWG videconference 03 / 09 / 2010.
GEM-TPC Resolution Studies ECFA/DESY LC Workshop Prague, November 2002 Dean Karlen University of Victoria / TRIUMF.
Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Calibration of the COSY-TOF STT & pp Elastic Analysis Sedigheh Jowzaee IKP Group Talk 11 July 2013.
Background Subtraction and Likelihood Method of Analysis: First Attempt Jose Benitez 6/26/2006.
21 Jun 2010Paul Dauncey1 First look at FNAL tracking chamber alignment Paul Dauncey, with lots of help from Daniel and Angela.
Effective drift velocity and initiation times of interplanetary type-III radio bursts Dennis K. Haggerty and Edmond C. Roelof The Johns Hopkins University.
© Imperial College LondonPage 1 Tracking & Ecal Positional/Angular Resolution Hakan Yilmaz.
A. Meneguzzo Padova University & INFN Validation and Performance of the CMS Barrel Muon Drift Chambers with Cosmic Rays A. Meneguzzo Padova University.
RPC Timing Results with Final Splitters Gianpaolo Carlino INFN Napoli The Napoli RPC Group: M.Alviggi, V. Canale, M. Caprio, G.C., R. de Asmundis, M. Della.
Jyly 8, 2009, 3rd open meeting of Belle II collaboration, KEK1 Charles University Prague Zdeněk Doležal for the DEPFET beam test group 3rd Open Meeting.
Wenxin Wang 105/04/2013. L: 4.7m  : 3.6m Design for an ILD TPC in progress: Each endplate: 80 modules with 8000 pads Spatial Resolution (in a B=3.5T.
 The zigzag readout board is divided into eight η-sectors; each sector has a length of ~12 cm and comprises 128 zigzag strips; zigzag strips run in radial.
Min-DHCAL: Measurements with Pions Benjamin Freund and José Repond Argonne National Laboratory CALICE Collaboration Meeting Max-Planck-Institute, Munich.
A. SarratTPC jamboree, Aachen, 14/03/07 1 Full Monte Carlo of a TPC equipped with Micromegas Antony Sarrat CEA Saclay, Dapnia Motivation Simulation content.
January 10, 2008MiPGD TPC resolution and gas1 Micromegas TPC addendum on measurements P. Colas, Saclay Lectures at the TPC school, Tsinghua University,
 Measurement of  x E  (Fig. 4) Assorted correlations between a fixed high-p T trigger hadron (  p Ttrig  =4.7GeV/c) and lower p T associated hadrons.
1 Oct 2009Paul Dauncey1 Status of 2D efficiency study Paul Dauncey.
Six modules Micromegas TPC beam test & Test bench 12/4/2012W.Wang_RD51 mini week1 D. Attié, P. Colas, M. Dixit, P. Hayman, W. Wang.
1 M2-M5 Efficiency and Timing checks on 7TeV beam data Alessia, Roberta R.Santacesaria, April 23 rd, Muon Operation
DN/d  and dN/dp T analysis status Gabor Veres for the working group QCD meeting, Jan 12, 2010.
David Silvermyr Lund University for the PHENIX Collaboration Early global event results using the PHENIX Pad Chambers at RHIC.
Development of a pad interpolation algorithm using charge-sharing.
STAR SVT Self Alignment V. Perevoztchikov Brookhaven National Laboratory,USA.
 Elastic e- e- scattering has very well-known kinematics with a highly correlated energy and angle between the electrons  MC follows these models extremely.
Study of Charged Hadrons in Au-Au Collisions at with the PHENIX Time Expansion Chamber Dmitri Kotchetkov for the PHENIX Collaboration Department of Physics,
Paolo Massarotti Kaon meeting March 2007  ±  X    X  Time measurement use neutral vertex only in order to obtain a completely independent.
Plots of RPC performance G. Cattani, University of Rome “Tor Vergata” & INFN Roma 2 on behalf of ATLAS Muon Collaboration.
FEE studies of Carbon and CH2 using Ecal only Sebouh Paul 10/27/15.
Mark Dorman UCL/RAL MINOS WITW June 05 An Update on Using QE Events to Estimate the Neutrino Flux and Some Preliminary Data/MC Comparisons for a QE Enriched.
SRS TIMING ANOMALY RD51 Mini-Week June 9, 2015 M. Phipps, BNL 1.
Beam test Analysis Micromegas TPC by Wenxin Wang.
Michele Faucci Giannelli
New TRD (&TOF) tracking algorithm
A. Zhang, S. Colafranceschi, M. Hohlmann
Analysis Test Beam Pixel TPC
TPC status - Offline Q&A
Recents Analysis Results From Micromegas TPC
SeaWinds AMSR-derived Impact Table
° status report analysis details: overview; “where we are”; plans: before finalizing result.. I.Larin 02/13/2009.
MINOS: a new vertex tracker for in-flight γ-ray spectroscopy
Status of LCTPC beam test analysis in Canada
Bi-Weekly Meeting 2004/09/08 Susumu Oda
Design of active-target TPC
A. Zhang, S. Colafranceschi, M. Hohlmann
Analysis Drift velocity of the SDD Detector
Update on POLA-01 measurements in Catania
° status report analysis details: overview; “where we are”; plans: before finalizing result.. I.Larin 02/13/2009.
Beam properties for run
Presentation transcript:

MINIDRFIT BEAM TEST APPLY IN-LAB UNIVERSAL CORRECTION EIC Tracking Meeting Oct. 27, 2013 B.Azmoun, M.Phipps, BNL

COMPARE RESOLUTIONS FROM DIFFERENT ERROR FUNCTIONS Res=141umRes=110umRes=104um Res=141umRes=125umRes=108um Universal Err Fcn derived from beam test data Universal Err Fcn derived from In-Lab measurements Un-correctedDo not distinguish N-hitsN-hits based correction 2

2PAD VS 3PAD ERROR FUNCTIONS  The similar N-Pad corrected result implies that the error function is truly universal, especially considering that the measurements taken during the beam test and the in-lab measurements used completely different pad rows on the same readout board.  The differing results from the multi-pad error function (no N-hit discrimination), is due to the fact that the beam test and in-lab measurements had differing N-hit distributions (beam test peaks at 3pad events, in-lab test peaks at 2pad events).  Since the 2-pad and 3-pad error functions are markedly different (below), a multi-pad error function will depend on the ratio of 2pad to 3pad events in the data set from which it is derived. 3

DIRECT COMPARISON OF ERROR FUNCTIONS Pink =Beam Test Blue: In-Lab Test Beam Test ErrFcn Overlay with 2D residual Vs Centroid Low statistics, poor ErrFcn Good Agreement Poor Agreement 4

CONCLUSIONS  ½ pad N-hit based error function appears to be universal.  N-hit error function yields a better result than a multi-hit error function.  N-hit error functions above 3 hits are not necessary since:  Events with hits above 3 pads are always low in number (even for angled tracks, since we are only interested in Nhits per time bin, which for a 3cm/us drift velocity, over 25nS, results in a few pads hit at most)  For Nhits above 3pads, the corresponding error function is not well defined since the response of the readout is derived from several different points along the chevron structure  Apply Error function based on the following method:  1 pad hit: No correction  2 pad hit: 2pad universal ErrFcn correction  3 pad hit: 3pad universal ErrFcn correction  > 3 pad hit: No correction 5