©Chelst & Canbolat Value-Added Decision Making Chapter 2 – Influence Diagrams Learn by example Learn vocabulary and grammar 9/19/2011 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Example 2.2 Estimating the Relationship between Price and Demand.
Advertisements

McGraw-Hill/Irwin ©2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies, All Rights Reserved TECHNOLOGY PLUG-IN T4 PROBLEM SOLVING USING EXCEL Goal Seek, Solver & Pivot Tables.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2007 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. 5 Capacity Planning For Products and Services.
Facilities and Aggregate Planning. A digression I am not an advocate of gambling, but use an example here that you might draw on later. Say I have a coin.
1 IES 303 Supplement A: Decision making Week 3 Nov 24, 2005 Objective: - Amazon.com Case discussion: competitive advantage - Understand practical techniques.
1 1 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved Slides by JOHN LOUCKS St. Edward’s University.
1 1 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or.
Slides prepared by JOHN LOUCKS St. Edward’s University.
Chapter 4 Decision Analysis.
Tutorial 10: Performing What-If Analyses
1 1 Slide © 2009 South-Western, a part of Cengage Learning Slides by John Loucks St. Edward’s University.
1 1 Slide © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole.
IES 303 Supplement A: Decision making Week 3 Nov 24, 2005 Objective:
Process Selection.
Strategy and Analysis in Using NPV (Chapter 8) Financial Policy and Planning MB 29.
4. Project Investment Decision-Making
Elements of Decision Problems
Engineering Economic Analysis Canadian Edition
23 Flexible Budgets and Performance Analysis Principles of Accounting
Lesson 5.6 – Key Information
Pricing Strategy Considerations for a New Business A Macro Overview of Setting & Influencing Prices Class 26 Marketing Pricing Strategies Tuesday November.
For Products and Services
1 1 Slide © 2005 Thomson/South-Western EMGT 501 HW Solutions Chapter 12 - SELF TEST 9 Chapter 12 - SELF TEST 18.
1 Chapter 3 Structuring Decision. 2 Structuring Decisions Learning Objectives Fundamental steps in model creation Identify and structure values and objectives.
IE 3265 Production & Operations Management Slide Series 2.
Copyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Chapter 7 Budgeting: Estimating Costs and Risks.
Predictive Modeling and Analysis 8-1.  Logic-Driven Modeling  Data-Driven Modeling  Analyzing Uncertainty and Model Assumptions  Model Analysis Using.
1 Capacity Planning under Uncertainty Capacity Planning under Uncertainty CHE: 5480 Economic Decision Making in the Process Industry Prof. Miguel Bagajewicz.
Introduction to Spreadsheet Modeling
1 Chapter 3 Structuring Decisions Dr. Greg Parnell Department of Mathematical Sciences Virginia Commonwealth University.
©Chelst & Canbolat Value-Added Decision Making Chapter 3 Common Decision Templates: Influence Diagrams Efficient construction of influence diagrams Learn.
The Development of Decision Analysis Jason R. W. Merrick Based on Smith and von Winterfeldt (2004). Decision Analysis in Management Science. Management.
Chapter 12 Inventory Models
Decision Trees and Influence Diagrams Dr. Ayham Jaaron.
Introduction to Theory of Constraints
Decision Analysis H.Malekinezhad Lecture 2. Definitions A decision is a choice between alternatives based on estimates of the values of those alternatives.
A – 1 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. Decision Making A For Operations Management, 9e by Krajewski/Ritzman/Malhotra.
Engineering Economic Analysis Canadian Edition
Decision & Risk Analysis Influence Diagrams, Decision Trees NOTE: Some materials for this presentation courtesy of Dr. Dan Maxwell Reference: Clemen &
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies, All Rights Reserved Chapter 4 Strategic Capacity Management.
Chapter 25 Short-Term Business Decisions
Chapter McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Risk and Capital Budgeting 13.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2007 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. 5 Capacity Planning For Products and Services.
Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Beni Asllani University of Tennessee at Chattanooga Operations Management - 5 th Edition Chapter 3 Roberta Russell.
1.11 Manage promotional activities to maximize return on promotional investments.
Models for Strategic Marketing Decision Making. Market Entry Decisions To enter first or to wait Sources of First-Mover Advantages –Technological leadership.
Risk Analysis in Capital Budgeting. Nature of Risk Risk exists because of the inability of the decision-maker to make perfect forecasts. the risk associated.
1.6 Organisational planning and decision making By the end of the lesson, you should be able to: Analyse and interpret business plans Compare and contrast.
DECISION MAKING TOOLS 1. Elements of Decision Problems 2.
©2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
1 1 © 2003 Thomson  /South-Western Slide Slides Prepared by JOHN S. LOUCKS St. Edward’s University.
Dynamic Strategic Planning Casablanca, Morocco March 23-28, 2009 Course Overview.
© John Wiley & Sons, 2005 Chapter 13: Joint Management of Revenues and Costs Eldenburg & Wolcott’s Cost Management, 1eSlide # 1 Cost Management Measuring,
1 Chapter 16 Relevant Costs and Benefits for Decision Making.
Table 1: Comparison of Management and Financial Accounting.
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.S7 – 1 Operations Management Supplement 7 – Capacity Planning © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. PowerPoint presentation to accompany.
5 © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2002 McGraw-Hill/Irwin 5 5 Slide 5-1 Target Costing,Theory of Constraints, and Life-Cycle Cost.
1 1 Slide © 2005 Thomson/South-Western Chapter 13 Decision Analysis n Problem Formulation n Decision Making without Probabilities n Decision Making with.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 4 Decision Analysis Building the Structure for Solving.
Approaches to quantifying uncertainty-related risk There are three approaches to dealing with financial and economic risk in benefit-cost analysis: = expected.
A – 1 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. Decision Making A For Operations Management, 9e by Krajewski/Ritzman/Malhotra.
Chapter 19 Decision Making
Chapter 13: joint management of revenues and costs
Supplement: Decision Making
Chapter 10 - Monte Carlo Simulation and the Evaluation of Risk
Capacity Planning For Products and Services
Capacity Planning For Products and Services
Stevenson 5 Capacity Planning.
Influence Diagrams, Decision
Capacity Planning For Products and Services
Presentation transcript:

©Chelst & Canbolat Value-Added Decision Making Chapter 2 – Influence Diagrams Learn by example Learn vocabulary and grammar 9/19/2011 1

©Chelst & Canbolat Value-Added Decision Making 9/19/ Two key elements of decision framing- often not considered  Multiple Objectives  Tradeoffs  If NOT upfront then when?  Multiple stretch goals  tradeoffs too late  Uncertainty  Risk  If you do NOT ADMIT the existence of uncertainty, you cannot manage it  If you do not QUANTIFY uncertainty, you cannot decide how much to invest to address its impact

©Chelst & Canbolat Value-Added Decision Making 9/19/ Elements of a Decision Frame Elements of a Decision Frame  Decision(s): Single, Multiple (Simultaneous or Sequential)  Alternatives within each decision  Uncertainty  Criteria--Goals--Values--Objectives = Context Specific  Scope – Time horizon and organizational breadth  Decision Makers & Stakeholders  Constraints  Implicit - restrict range of alternatives  Explicit – mathematical representation (not included here)

©Chelst & Canbolat Value-Added Decision Making 9/19/ Influence Diagram - Communication  Explicitly note the existence of randomness and uncertainty  Clarify the “main” values or objectives of decision  Emphasize the influence of uncertainty on values  Specify the sequence of decisions

©Chelst & Canbolat Value-Added Decision Making 9/19/2011 Categories of common objectives. Table 2.1  Min-Costs (variable and investment)  Min-Time to complete  Max-Profit—NPV, TARR, ROI  Min- Risk of not meeting targets  Min- Human resources required  Min (Max) -Management issues  Max-Long-term value  Min-Operational issues  Max-Performance Sales and/or market share  Min-Training requirements 5

©Chelst & Canbolat Value-Added Decision Making 9/19/2011 Common uncertainties. Table 2.2  Time needed to complete task or reach goal  Performance to specifications  Warranty claims and quality control  Resources required  Competitive actions  Cost  Is task doable?  Market demand  Revenue  Throughput–productivity  Will some specific event occur  who will be elected president  pandemic occurs 6

©Chelst & Canbolat Value-Added Decision Making 7 Framing decision with randomness influence diagrams: Vocabulary = Rectangles/Boxes = Circles/Ovals = Rounded rectangle = Diamond = Text box with list =Arrow Random Events Decisions Values/Goals Calculation Ultimate goal Influence Input/Data 9/19/2011

©Chelst & Canbolat Value-Added Decision Making 9/19/ Automation Investment Boss Controls  Manufacture an option to be made  Available to one million purchasers of cars  Uncertain take-rate (percent who buy option)  Deliver the option to (OEMs) at a price of $60.  Two alternatives: differ significantly in investment level automation and variable cost of production

©Chelst & Canbolat Value-Added Decision Making 9/19/ Automation Investment Take rate Automation Investment Profits Volume Variable Cost Investment

©Chelst & Canbolat Value-Added Decision Making 9/19/ Automation Investment: Expanded Take rate Automation Investment Profits Investment Volumes Variable Cost

©Chelst & Canbolat Value-Added Decision Making 9/19/2011 Figure 2.5: Theater Party Invitations % Yes Responses Percent No Shows Attendees Number Sent Invitations Maximize Goodwill Invitees Not Attending 11

©Chelst & Canbolat Value-Added Decision Making 9/19/2011 Figure 2.6: Divide and delay decision - Theater party invitations % Round 1 Yes Percent of No Shows Attendees Round 1 Invitations Maximize Goodwill Invitees Not Attending % Round 2 Yes Round 2 Invitations 12

©Chelst & Canbolat Value-Added Decision Making 13 Influence Diagram Symbols Microsoft PowerPoint  Pick appropriate shape: rectangle, oval, rounded rectangle, and diamond.  You may want to have specific fill color for each type of box  Right click on shape: “Add text” Can specify size of text and place on more than one line.  Move shapes to appropriate location.  Connect shapes with arrows  Be sure to link to a red dot on each shape  enables redesign  Shapes can be copied and text modified. 9/19/2011

©Chelst & Canbolat Value-Added Decision Making 9/19/ Influence Diagram Construction  Specify primary decision  Define values and ultimate goal  Identify relevant random variables or events  Specify downstream decisions that need to be analyzed to make primary decision  Add arrows to define relationships  Review layout  List data inputs

©Chelst & Canbolat Value-Added Decision Making 15 Example : Late to Market with New Product Case: A company is considering developing a product that will be ready 3 months after its competitor introduces a similar product. Random Event to Random Event – Conditional probability Random Event to Value – Random event directly influences the VALUE. The value will be uncertain. Competitive Action Sales Volumes Total Revenue Influence Diagram Arrows from Random Events: Connectors in PowerPoint 9/19/2011

©Chelst & Canbolat Value-Added Decision Making 9/19/ Influence Diagram Arrows from Random Events  Example : Late to Market with New Product  Random event to decision: Random event’s outcome is KNOWN before decision is to be made.  NEVER use an arrow from a circle to a decision to represent the fact that the decision is affected by the random event. This is the most common ERROR.  The arrow shows that the outcome of the chance node is known before the decision is made  Absence of an arrow from the chance node to the decision node does NOT mean that the uncertainty does not influence the decision.  Everything in the diagram affects the decision Competitor’s Price Launch Price

©Chelst & Canbolat Value-Added Decision Making 17 Decision to Decision - decision sequence (possibly influence) Decision to Random Event Price influences sales volume PriceProduct Features Price Sales Volume Influence Diagram Arrows from decisions 9/19/2011

©Chelst & Canbolat Value-Added Decision Making 18 Decision to Value – Decision directly influences value Pricing decision influences total revenue  Indirectly: by affecting sales volume and  Directly: since price  sales = Total Revenue Influence Diagram Arrows from Random Events Price Sales Volume Total Revenue 9/19/2011

©Chelst & Canbolat Value-Added Decision Making 19 If Total Revenue and/or Total Cost are influenced by random events then the Net Profit will be an uncertain value. However, once the other two values are known, Net Profit is no longer uncertain. Influence Diagram: value to value Net profit Total Revenue Total Cost 9/19/2011

©Chelst & Canbolat Value-Added Decision Making 9/19/ Competitor’s Price Launch Price Product Features Develop product Total Revenue Total Cost Net Profit Sales Volume All elements influence the decisions: to develop the product, its features & price Late to market with new product: 1 st lay out elements without arrows Engg. rates Labor rates Throughput

©Chelst & Canbolat Value-Added Decision Making 9/19/ Competitor’s Price Launch Price Product Features Develop product Total Revenue Total Cost Net Profit Sales Volume All elements influence the decisions: to develop the product, its features & price Late to market with new product – Add arrows Engg. rates Labor rates Throughput

©Chelst & Canbolat Value-Added Decision Making 22 Competitor’s features Modified Diagram? Competitor’s Price Launch Price Product Features Develop product Total Revenue Total Cost Net Profit Sales Volume Economy Manufacturing Cost PD Costs Actual Price Competitor’s product performance Engg. rates Labor rates Throughput 9/19/2011

©Chelst & Canbolat Value-Added Decision Making 9/19/ What New Objectives Might be Added  Maximize Market Share  Maximize Utilization of plant capacity  Minimize adding to labor workforce (Headcount)  Change overall goal – No longer just net profit – “value to corporation”

©Chelst & Canbolat Value-Added Decision Making 9/19/ Influence Diagram: Is not a Flow Diagram!  All elements of an Influence Diagram are analyzed and influence the decisions even if there are no nodes connected to the decisions  Forecasts of downstream uncertainties affect upstream decisions even without arrows linking the nodes.

©Chelst & Canbolat Value-Added Decision Making 9/19/ Limited Influence Diagram  Mainly uncertainties and only one or two objectives  Project management  complete project as planned (within time and budget)  Mainly multiple objectives and limited uncertainty  New car

©Chelst & Canbolat Value-Added Decision Making 9/19/2011 Figure 2.15: Buying a used car – value focused 26

©Chelst & Canbolat Value-Added Decision Making 9/19/2011 Figure 2.16: Used car revised – new information 27

©Chelst & Canbolat Value-Added Decision Making 9/19/2011 Figure 2.17: Oglethorpe diagram 28

©Chelst & Canbolat Value-Added Decision Making 9/19/ ALL Elements Represented in the Diagram Influence the Decisions Probabilistic forecasts of sales and the competitor’s price will affect forecasts of revenue and profit. These will influence the decisions:  Whether or not to introduce the product?  With what features?  And at what price?