IDCFA International Database of Craniofacial Anomalies A world-wide initiative supported by WHO – Human Genetics Programme NIDCR – National Institute.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control
Advertisements

Copyright restrictions may apply JAMA Pediatrics Journal Club Slides: Potential Impact of CCHD Screening Peterson C, Ailes E, Riehle-Colarusso T, et al.
Perinatal Health in Canada: An Overview K.S. Joseph MD, PhD Canadian Perinatal Surveillance System.
Case Identification for the Missouri Perinatal Hepatitis B Prevention Program Libby Landrum, RN, MSN Viral Hepatitis Prevention Manager Bureau HIV, STD,
Epidemiological features of HIV infection among pregnant women in Botswana Yadav Bindeshwar P Anderson Marina G Mine Madisa Moyo Sikhulile Seipone Khumo.
Feasibility of linkage between the CRANE Database and the National Pupil Database (NPD) to explore long term educational outcomes in children with a cleft.
Case-Control Studies (Retrospective Studies). What is a cohort?
Children with Orofacial Clefts in Massachusetts: Hospitalization and Associated Costs Emily Lu, MPH 12 th Annual Maternal and Child Health Epidemiology.
Congenital Malformation - Scope of the Problem Charles J. Macri MD Head, Division of Reproductive and Medical Genetics National Naval Medical Center.
Health and Wellness for all Arizonans Arizona Birth Defects Monitoring Program (ABDMP)
Congenital malformations and birth weight: a family perspective Dr. Kari K.Melve Department of Public Health & Primary Health Care University of Bergen,
Socioeconomic factors in relation to Autism Spectrum Disorders Dheeraj Rai and Selma Idring 17 March 2014
Chapter 15 Newborn (Perinatal) Guidelines ( )
1 Prevalence of Congenital Diseases among Perinates in China ( 1996 – 2002 ) Yongtang Jin, MD, PhD, professor Dept of Environmental and Occupational Health,
Michigan Birth Defects Registry Overview and Status.
Introduction to Medical Genetics Fadel A. Sharif.
Register-based research in the Nordic countries
Purposes and uses of cancer registration E.E.U. Akang Department of Pathology University College Hospital Ibadan, Nigeria.
Problems in Birth Registration What is the National Standard? Why is the data so important? Joanne M. Wesley Office of the State Registrar.
The Association between Antenatal Depression and Adverse Birth Outcomes among Women Receiving Medicaid in Washington State Amelia R. Gavin, PhD School.
Introducing HealthStats Eleanor Howell, MS Manager, Data Dissemination Unit State Center for Health Statistics February 2, 2012.
Copyright restrictions may apply Impact of Cleft Width in Clefts of Secondary Palate on the Risk of Velopharyngeal Insufficiency Lam DJ, Chiu LL, Sie KCY,
報 告 者 王瓊琦. postpartum depression : identification of women at risk.
Kenya Field Epidemiology and Laboratory Training Program (KFELTP)
P erinatal P eriods o f R isk Analytic Issues: Frequently Asked Data & Analytic Questions A CityMatCH “How-to-Do” Workshop.
SERIOUS ADVERSE EVENTS REPORTING Elizabeth Dayag IRB Administrator Naval Medical Center Portsmouth.
RARECARENet project High-resolution study in the Finnish Cancer Registry Maarit Leinonen Chief Medical Officer Finnish Cancer Registry, Helsinki.
Best Practices Outreach Management Case Management Expenses Management Common Mistakes.
Outcomes of screening mammography among women aged 40 to 43 Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences Toronto, Canada (2006)
Reduced Risks of Neural Tube Defects and Orofacial Clefts With Higher Diet Quality Carmichael SL, Yang W, Feldkamp ML, et al; National Birth Defects Prevention.
TM Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Epidemiology The Basics Only… Adapted with permission from a class presentation developed by Dr. Charles Lynch – University of Iowa, Iowa City.
International Collaborative Effort on Perinatal and Infant Mortality,
Neonatal Outcomes of Children Affected by Diabetes Robert Wallerstein, MD Silicon Valley Genetics Center Santa Clara Valley Medical Center.
Are hip fracture rates falling or rising over time? Using routine data to understand the Epidemiology. Scottish Faculty of Public Health Annual Conference,
Study Designs Afshin Ostovar Bushehr University of Medical Sciences Bushehr, /4/20151.
Statistics about unknown primary tumors Riccardo Capocaccia National Centre for Epidemiology, Surveillance and Health Promotion Istituto Superiore di Sanità,
الدكتور علي القصير اختصاص الجراحه التجميليه والتقويميه
Medical Coding II Seminar 6.
HIV and STI Department, Health Protection Agency - Colindale HIV and AIDS Reporting System HIV in the United Kingdom: 2012 Overview.
TEMPLATE DESIGN © Fetal outcome of prenatally diagnosed congenital abnormality: A Retrospective study” Vallikkannu Narayanan.
Dr. Johannes Michiel Luteijn Prof. Joan Morris BINOCAR Scientific Meeting Swansea, October 7 th, 2014 Thanks to: Lolkje de Jong-van den Berg Helen Dolk.
Indicators in Malaria Program Phases By Bayo S Fatunmbi [Technical Officer, Monitoring & Evaluation] ERAR-GMS, WHO Cambodia & Dr. Michael Lynch Epidemiologist.
Overview of California’s Child Welfare Indicator Data Barbara Needell, MSW, PhD Center for Social Services Research School of Social Welfare University.
Pediatric ACOs The Characteristics of Pediatric Populations and Their Impact on ACOs.
Biology Honors Project III By: Isaiah Walker S. Combs 1 st period.
Use of lung function tests in paediatric asthma care A nationwide registry study Grete Moth, MHSc, Ph.D Danish Paediatric Asthma Centre Aarhus University.
Dr Heather O Dickinson My web page Department of Child Health University of Newcastle My web page Audit of cancer registrations notified by National Health.
ICE Collaboration with EU Anne Mette T. Johansen & Birthe Frimodt-Møller Denmark International Collaborative Effort on Injury Statistics May.
The Royal College of Emergency Medicine The Royal College of Emergency Medicine Clinical Audits Initial management of the fitting child Clinical Audit.
Orofacial Clefts Disclaimer: The findings and conclusions in this presentation have not been formally disseminated by the Centers for Disease Control and.
MERS-CoV (Middle Eastern Respiratory Syndrome) Mike Wade – 16/06/15, updated 23/7/15.
Biostatistics Dr. Amjad El-Shanti MD, PMH,Dr PH University of Palestine 2016.
Assuming Care of Patients with Cleft Lip and/or Palate Columbine Che and Alison Kaye UMKC School of Medicine and Children’s Mercy Hospital, Kansas City,
The London Health Observatory: monitoring health and health care in the capital, supporting practitioners and informing decision-makers Disclosure control.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 28 – Consumer and Health Protection.
© 2010 Jones and Bartlett Publishers, LLC. Chapter 5 Descriptive Epidemiology According to Person, Place, and Time.
Use of Acyclovir, Valacyclovir, and Famciclovir in the First Trimester of Pregnancy and the Risk of Birth Defects Björn Pasternak; Anders Hviid R3 Jungwook.
Figure 1: Classification of CNS abnormality (%)
CARIS 1998 – 2014 annual report November 2015
Associations of Maternal Antidepressant Use During the First Trimester of Pregnancy With Preterm Birth, Small for Gestational Age, Autism Spectrum Disorder,
Congenital Anomalies Register -Of What Value?
Journal Club Notes.
Keerti Singh, C Greaves, L Mohammed, A Kumar.
Multidisciplinary counselling reduces rate of abortion and improves clinical outcomes of prenatally diagnosed congenital heart disease patients.
Guidelines and template for A vital statistics report
Local Tobacco Control Profiles The webinar will start at 1pm
Congenital heart defects – where the heart or the blood vessels near the heart do not develop normally before birth – are the most common congenital anomalies.
Surveillance of Tuberculosis
Presentation transcript:

IDCFA International Database of Craniofacial Anomalies A world-wide initiative supported by WHO – Human Genetics Programme NIDCR – National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research Coordinating Centre : ICBD – International Centre on Birth Defects Headquarter of the International Clearinghouse for Birth Defects Monitoring System Coordinators : Pierpaolo Mastroiacovo and Elisabeth Robert Gnansia Advisor : Eduardo E Castilla ICBD ICBD

The aim of the IDCFA World-wide databases in the same basket ICBD ICBD

Classical descriptive epidemiology Risk factors Quality of life Quality of health care services Other cranio-facial defects and / or syndromes General philosophy Syndromes with oral clefts Typical Oral Clefts ICBD ICBD

Long terms aims of the IDCFA To evaluate : –the incidence and prevalence of the various CFA in some populations around the world –the main risk factors –the main characteristics (e.g.: clinical, genetic, psyco-social) of persons with a CFA –the needs of persons with a CFA and of their families in the various populations –the answers of the health care services and social organizations to the patients’ and their families’ needs in the various countries ICBD ICBD

Long terms aims of the IDCFA Health care services Quality of life Prevention and risk factors Clinical and genetic studies Incidence and prevalence Areas who needs major attention, efforts and impulses Person’s needs

Main Sources of IDCFA Surgical Departments Clinical Genetic Services ECLAMC US NBDPN Eurocat ICBDMS Birth Defects Registries MADRE MMI Special Projects B A Support Associations

Each database provides specific information, it is based on : and is Periodically updated Established case by case information or ICBD ICBD

Some organizational aspects of IDCFA Each database will be anonymous at the central level –Key code available only to the local organizations All databases will be located within the WHO – Human Genetics Programme Aggregated data will be available on tables, figures and maps through the web site The access to case by case data of any database will be possible for any researcher according to specific rules developed by the IDCFA Steering Committee ICBD ICBD

Typical Oral Cleft Perinatal Database Source : Birth Defects Registries The first step Simple Descriptive Epidemiology ICBD ICBD

Definitions Cleft palate (749.0) Q35 A visible congenital malformation characterized by a closure defect of the hard palate and/or soft palate behind the foramen incisivum without cleft lip. Exclude : submucous cleft palate, occult cleft palate, cleft uvula. In some database cleft palate includes Pierre Robin Sequence Total, hard+soft Soft palate only ICBD ICBD

Cleft palate, ambition ! Cleft palate Hard Soft wide U shaped narrow V shaped wide U shaped narrow V shaped Pierre Robin Sequence ICBD ICBD

Working definition Pierre Robin Sequence (756.03) Q87.08 A congenital malformation characterized by a closure defect of the palate behind the foramen incisivum without cleft lip associated to (a significant) micrognathia (small mandible) with or without a clinically relevant glossoptosis (retroposition of tongue) or respiratory distress. This is not a multiple malformations condition but a sequence. This means that may be isolated or associated to unrelated defects or part of a known syndrome. In some database this condition has a distinct code and it is differentiated from usual cleft palates The critical point is “a significant” small mandible ICBD ICBD

Definitions Cleft lip (749.1) Q36 A congenital malformation characterized by partial or complete clefting of the upper lip. Exclude : median cleft lip part of Holoprosencephaly Sequence; rare and oblique facial clefts ICBD ICBD

Definitions Cleft lip and palate (749.2) Q37 A congenital malformation characterized by partial or complete clefting of the upper lip with clefting of the alveolar ridge and/or the hard palate. Exclude : any oral cleft part of the Holoprosencephaly Sequence; rare and oblique facial clefts ICBD ICBD

Definitions Isolated cases Any case with only one major defect registered. In this Database with only a oro-facial cleft. Cases with associated defects, multimalformed infant Any case with a major defect registered other than the orofacial cleft. Syndromes Any case with appropriate field filled by a name of recognized pattern of multiple malformations An algorithm is applied and a review is performed centrally, to define more uniformely cases with major associated malformations, the so called : multi- malformed infants (MMI). See Guidelines for MMI used at ICBD since 2001 ICBD ICBD

Typical Oral Cleft Perinatal Database Information for each case All information available in a participating register OR Suggested set of data OR Minimum dataset ICBD ICBD

Suggested and minimum information dataset Subject code (§) Date of birth (at least month and year) Place of birth, Area of residence codes (§) Sex, BW, GA, singleton/twin Maternal age, gravidity and parity Family history of birth defects Living status at registration Diagnosis ICD IX or ICD X Code –Verbatim description –Photographs, Rx, drawings, clinical evaluation, diagnosis of syndrome if appropriate (when and where) (§) All codes are hidden centrally, key available only locally In yellow the minimum data set ICBD ICBD

How data arrives at ICBD Any format, in Excel, is accepted. Just code’s keys needed

What ICBD does before sending “final” data to WHO General check of all data Create the appropriate variables needed (e.g.: date of birth by yy/mm/dd; specific field for OFC; country code; gravidity) Code the final diagnosis : –Isolated –Multimalformed infants, coded by number of associated unrelated malformations –Cases with syndromes, coded with OMIM Request of information when needed Interact with local registries ICBD ICBD

Request information When ? Median cleft lip (holoprosencephaly ? Syndrome ?) Bilateral cleft lip (only lip ?!) Cleft lip / palate in : –chromosomal syndromes (holoprosencephaly ?) –so called “amniotic band syndrome” Pierre Robin with cleft lip Any syndrome : –with a too generic name (eg.: first arch syndrome) –without a commonly available lab confirmation : please what is the evidence ? ICBD ICBD

Interaction with source database Sending back the final database and asking comments and agreement Asking comments to the ongoing results From May 1st, 2004 ICBD ICBD

Typical Oral Cleft Database Recent data 2001 – 2002 – (2003) ICBD ICBD

Participating registries – areas November 7, ICBD ICBD

Europe – EU15 Europe – Others 8 Reg Other Countries 7 Reg South America 9 Areas 17 Reg Exp Births/Year Exp Births/Year Exp Births/Year Exp Births/Year

1,300,000 births per year are expected Probably more, since some registries have expressed the desire to participate ICBD ICBD

Case by case information available Information# of Reg Problems Full minimum data set41 … but 3, do not report GA Maternal age24 Parity (SB + LB)21 Gravidity (ToP+Sab+SB+LV) 19 Maternal occupation18 Not aways spec before / during Maternal education9 Drugs in pregnancy19 Not always perfect (trimester; specific type) Smoking, alcohol16 Prenatal diagnosis, CVS11

Information# of Reg Problems Father age21 Father occupation18 Father education9 Consanguineity18 Nuclear family malformations 25 …. but, 2 report only sibs Often not specified Blood’s group Proband+Mother+Father 10 Verbatim, full description 1 ! Case by case information available

Routine tables or maps Variable X (e.g. sex ratio) CLCLP CL/P CPPR CPTotal Registers (41) Reg Grouped x 4 (or more) Gran Total Year(s) Sex ratio BW Median Class GA Median Class SGASGA Twins ToP Mother Age Median Class Parity Gravi- dity Isolated Multimalf Total Rates; Rate Ratios; Range of Values; Heterogeneity Test, Confidence Intervals Spec Synd Others, on request :

Number of Typical Oral Clefts Registries Set Period sent # of Reg. # of Cases Total Births Europe (1) Europe Others South America Other Countries Total (1) France Paris only ; Germany Saxony Anhalt also Total cases ICBD ICBD

Male sex proportion Cleft lip +/ – palateCleft palate “Not yet” heterogeneity for cleft lip vs cleft lip palate isolated vs MMI among registries or group of them Total cases ICBD ICBD M:F = 1.56 M:F = 0.75

Group of Registries CLCLPTotal CL +/- P CPP ierre R obin Tot CP Total Oral Clefts Europe Europe Others South America *0.1 * Other Countries Total Rates of Oral Clefts by Group of Registries Total cases Rates per births * Not yet reviewed centrally ICBD ICBD

Variations in oral clefts rates seems to be due mainly to CLP rates variations Cleft lip Cleft palate EU 15EU Others SAMOthers Cleft lip and palate Oral Clefts ICBD ICBD Total cases

Highest and lowest rates 16 Reg Northern Europe = 17.3 Southern Europe = (n=14) 13.4 (n=67) 5.6 (n=10) 6.6 (n=17) ICBD ICBD Total cases

8 Reg 18.7 (n=170) 11.1 (n=25) Highest and lowest rates ICBD ICBD Total cases

South America 9 Areas 14.7 (17) 27.6 (19) Equador Chile Highest and lowest rates Uruguay ICBD ICBD Total cases

Other Countries 7 Reg 24.0 (468) 8.3 (n=18) Highest and lowest rates ICBD ICBD Total cases

Grouped Registries CLCLPTot CP Ratio CL : CLP : CP Total Oral Clefts Europe Europe Others South America Other Countries Total Published 121 Rate Ratios of Oral Clefts by Group of Registries Total cases ICBD ICBD

Rate per of Cleft lip +/– palate Ratio Cleft Lip + Palate : Cleft Lip Higher rates of CL+/– P are associated to higher CLP : CL ratios = more severe types of primary palate defects South Africa Mexico r =0.35; p=0.036 ICBD ICBD

Proportion of specific types Only registries with less than 20% of unknown Registries SetC P hardCL bilateralCLP bilateral % Reg Cases % Reg Cases % Reg Cases Europe Europe Others Other Countries South America not yet coded ICBD ICBD Total cases

Proportion of specific types Only registries with less than 20% of unknown Registries SetC P hardCL bilateralCLP bilateral % Reg Cases % Reg Cases % Reg Cases Europe Europe Others Other Countries South America not yet coded Legittima suspicione ICBD ICBD Total cases

Proportion (%) of isolated cases Registries SetCLCLPTot CL +/- P CPP ierre R obin Tot CP Total Oral Clefts Other Countries Europe Europe Others ICBD ICBD Other european countries has lower ascertainment of associated defects ? Legittima suspicione South America not yet coded

Small for gestational age Weight < 10° centile for gestational age from Canadian data ( ). Pediatrics :2 CLCLPCPPR % (n) Europe (68)14.3 (112)11.7 (77)5.6 (18) Eu-Others 12.2 (41)26.2 (84)23.2 (69)28.6 (7) S America (1) 28.6 (56)20.0 (125)11.1 (55)25.0 (5) Others 21.2 (125)27.6 (234)25.6 (68)50.0 (5) Total cases ICBD ICBD Suggestion : compare between columns, not between rows

Registered syndromes CodeName Number Prevalence of……. with oral clefts Q91.4-7Trisomy : Q91.0-3Trisomy : Q90.0-9Trisomy 2171 : Q899AAmniotic band61 : Q93.34p –51: Van der Woude51 : Q899VVATER41 : Hemifacial Microsomia41 : E E C31 : ICBD ICBD

Registered syndromes CodeName Number Prevalence of……. with oral clefts Q91.4-7Trisomy : Q91.0-3Trisomy : Q90.0-9Trisomy 2171 : Q899AAmniotic band61 : Q93.34p –51: Van der Woude51 : Q899VVATER41 : Hemifacial Microsomia41 : E E C31 : : Exp 35 cases ICBD ICBD

Registries’s coordinator and local doctors should be ready to collaborate to improve the quality of data ICBD ICBD Quality of data may be improved

A specific syndrome database Source : Support Organization The second step Case Finding and Simple Epi ICBD ICBD

Craniofacial Anomalies Database Source : Surgical Dpts The third step Case Finding and Simple Epi ICBD ICBD

Requested information Date of form compilation Participating Hospital–Doctor New/old patient – new/old follow up Patient’s identity code Date of birth (mm/yy) Place of birth (Nation, region) Residence (Nation, region) Sex Date of diagnosis (mm/yy) Place of diagnosis Evidence of diagnosis Full and detailed description Copy of relevant medical record Consultation diary Informed consent and agreement to be furtherly contacted ICBD ICBD

Requested Information Selected clinical data –Month and year of CFA –Discovery (6) –Diagnosis confirmed Syndrome –Suspected –Diagnosis confirmed Selected data on surgical treatment of CFA –Surgery procedure(s) : yes/not Place (specify hospital name and city) Type of surgery Month and year Outcome ICBD ICBD

Father and Mother –working activity at present (*) –years of school attended (*) –affected or operated upon of any congenital anomaly (if yes specify) Siblings –Total number of sibs (include aborted fetuses after prenatal diagnosis of any congenital anomaly; specify sex and birthweight) –Affected sibs by any congenital anomaly (if yes specify) Requested Information (*) The common best indicator of socio-economic status ICBD ICBD

The fourth step World-wide databases in the same basket MADRE All cases with CL/P plus random controls (1:5) MMI All cases with CL/P ICBD ICBD