1 The Voice of Consumers, Making a Difference! GRCs: Process & Evaluation DRA FORUM May 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Regulation of Rates for Water Utilities Oregon Public Utility Commission.
Advertisements

Rate Plan. Value Story When asked, our customers identify the following topics as ways MidAmerican Energy provides value – Emergency Response.
Financial Management F OR A S MALL B USINESS. FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT 2 Welcome 1. Agenda 2. Ground Rules 3. Introductions.
The CPUC’s Role in San Onofre Nuclear Plant Decommissioning Presentation to the California State Senate August 13, 2013 Edward Randolph Director, Energy.
California Energy Commission Retail Electric Rate Scenarios: Key Drivers and Structure 2015 Integrated Energy Policy Report California Energy Commission.
Rate Setting in New York Case Study: Con Edison Electric Rate Proceeding Thomas Dvorsky Director, Office of Electric, Gas and Water New York State Public.
Presentation to CITY OF PALM COAST, FLORIDA WATER AND WASTEWATER RATE STUDY AND BOND FEASBILITY REPORT Prepared in Conjunction with the Issuance of Utility.
2013 Cost of Service Orientation Session Setting Rates on MIFRS – Review of Requirements for 2013 Filers July 9, 2012 Daria Babaie, P. Eng., CMA Manager,
Overview of tariff revision process under Regulatory Commission Prayas - EGI Skill-share workshop for Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan Delegates November 16-18,
South Carolina Finance Workshop for Small Water Systems June 4, 2013 Water Partnerships: Financial Advantages and Challenges SC Case Study: Lowcountry.
DRA Advocacy Joe Como, Acting Director. 2 DRA Facts The Voice of Consumers, Making a Difference! 3  History: CPUC created DRA (formerly known as the.
Containing the Cost of California’s RPS Yuliya Shmidt, Senior Analyst February 2, 2012.
California Public Utilities Commission Regulation and Natural Gas Infrastructure Richard Myers CPUC Energy Division May 14, 2009.
Development (Impact) Fee Program Changes to Comply with State Law Mayor and Council Study Session June 3, 2014.
City Of Phoenix Water Rates June 30, 2011 Denise Olson Deputy Finance Director Finance Department.
Incentive Regulation Topics Scott A. Struck, CPA Financial Analysis Division Public Utilities Bureau Illinois Commerce Commission.
® Investor Meetings June 7-8, 2010 PG&E Corporation.
DMH1 Overview of Mental Health Services Act Funding: Collection to Expenditure Tom Greene, Chair, Mental Health Funding and Policy Committee Mark Heilman,
Drafting Rate Case Orders Energy Regulatory Partnership Program Abuja, Nigeria July 14-18, 2008 Presented by Robert W. Kehres.
SoCalGas/SDG&E Natural Gas Pipeline Safety Enhancement Plan (A ) Dave Peck Dao Phan Tom Roberts Kelly Lee Pearlie Sabino ALJ: Long Commissioner:
File & Suspend Rate Cases Water & Wastewater Reference Manual1.
1 THE RATE CASE PROCESS A Blend of Science and Superstition Presentation to the Mongolian Energy Regulatory Board By Burl Haar Executive Secretary Minnesota.
KEEPING LABOR AND OVERHEAD COSTS DOWN Controlling Labor and Overhead Costs as a Long Term Strategy.
NASUCA Baltimore Meeting November 11-14, 2012 Mark Schuling, Iowa Consumer Advocate.
Dispatches from the Front: The Colorado Clean Air-Clean Jobs Act Platts 5 th Annual Rockies Gas and Oil Conference Ron Binz Public Policy Consulting April.
Highlights of Commission Activities Little Rock ASHRAE Monthly Meeting October 12, 2011 Presented By: John P. Bethel.
Presentation to CITY OF PALM COAST, FLORIDA WATER AND WASTEWATER RATE STUDY AND BOND FEASBILITY REPORT Prepared in Conjunction with the Issuance of Utility.
Determining and Setting Public Utility Rates Bill Wilks, Senior Project Manager November 19, 2014 AGFOA Fall Conference.
Example of Revenue Decoupling Utah Committee of Consumer Services Witness: David Dismukes Docket No T01 CCS Exhibit 1.1 Allowed Revenue per Customer.
Regulatory Update Dennis Derricks May 5, 2010 Regulatory Update Dennis Derricks May 5, 2010.
Limited Proceedings Water & Wastewater Reference Manual1.
Realigning Utility Incentives Commissioner Wayne E. Gardner Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Keystone Energy Efficiency Alliance Sept. 20, 2011.
Independent Review of FY 2008 Proposed Rates D.C. Water and Sewer Authority Public Hearing June 13, 2007.
VisTaTech Center Schoolcraft College September 14, 2006 Partners in Business Meeting 2007 Attachment O.
Net Metering Technical Conference Docket No PacifiCorp Avoided Costs October 21, 2008 Presented by Becky Wilson Executive Staff Director Utah.
SBIR Budgeting Leanne Robey Chief, Special Reviews Branch, NIH.
The Budget Process. The Phases Information Gathering Information Gathering Department Requests Department Requests Financial Projections Financial Projections.
Adult Education and Literacy Budget Development and Cost Allocation.
Discussion of Market Participant Choice for Transmission Connections Stakeholder Session October 14, 2011.
University of Minnesota Office of Internal / External Sales Fiscal Year-End Actions for Internal/External Sales Organizations.
Overview of a Water Action Plan: California Public Utilities Commission Paul G. Townsley, President Arizona American Water January 18, 2011.
THE FOSTER GROUP TFGTFG City of Detroit Water and Sewerage Department Wholesale Customer Rates Meeting Water Supply System Meeting #3 – Allocated FY
March 30, 2012 Wholesale Generation Interconnection Process Photovoltaic Program Power Purchase Agreements Request for Offers.
Role of the Commission and Recent Policy Actions Interconnection Workshop Carol Revelt Utah Public Service Commission December 4, 2007.
Evaluation of Wood Smoke Quantification and Attribution RTF PAC October 17, 2014.
NARUC SUMMER COMMITTEE MEETINGS Committee on Water Agenda California Regulatory Initiatives Case History – California American Water B. Kent Turner – President.
1 Is there LNG in California’s Future? “LNG: When East Meets West” Zeus Development Conference Long Beach, CA by David Maul Manager, Natural Gas Office.
Utility Financial Management AWWA Intermountain Section Leadership Forum Session Two November 10, 2015.
CPUC Public Agenda 3247 Thursday, January 21, 2010, 10:00 a.m. 505 Van Ness Ave, San Francisco Commissioners: Michael R. Peevey Dian M. Grueneich John.
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SM Southern California Edison Company’s Proposal to Participate in Convergence Bidding August 23, 2010.
California Energy Commission Retail Electric Rate Projections: Revised Cases 2015 Integrated Energy Policy Report California Energy Commission December.
1 Financial management for water, sewer, and storm water systems Most financial management of water, sewer, and storm water systems takes place in a government.
SELF-GENERATION INCENTIVE PROGRAM (SGIP) Website:
Pasadena Water and Power Public Hearing Water Capital Improvement Charge Pasadena City Council Meeting January 11, 2016 Item #12.
Alternative Rate Structure Paul Smith Vice President, Rates Duke Energy Ohio June 20, 2006.
California Energy Action Plan December 7, 2004 Energy Report: 2004 and 2005 Overview December 7, 2004.
Reliability-Must-Run (RMR) Cost Evaluation and Settlement Basis Ino González ERCOT RMR Workshop May 24, 2016.
AMCTO Conference Water Financial Plan Benchmarking and Performance Indicators Watson & Associates Economists Ltd Andrew Grunda, CMA, MBA Dan Wilson, BBA,
Presentation to CITY OF PALM COAST, FLORIDA FINANCIAL FORECAST AND CAPITAL FACILITIES FEES ANALYSIS Prepared in Conjunction With the Utility System Revenue.
Recent Activities for LIEE and CARE November 2007 Proposed decision submission (R ) Proposed decision submission (R ) IOU reporting.
Review of 2016–2021 Strategic Budget Plan Development Process and 2016 Budget Assumptions Financial Administration and Audit Committee April 14,
May 9 th, 2016 California Public Utilities Commission Power Charge Indifference Adjustment (PCIA) Workshop.
City of Sisters, OR 2017 Water & Sewer Rate Study
Revised Electric Rate Scenarios:
CPUC Rate Proceedings Relevant for TOU
10 C Strategy Management of Capital Expenditures hapter
City of Lebanon, Missouri Electric Department
Idyllwild Water District
FEE INCREASES Public Work Shop June 2, 2018.
Delta Water Supply Project
Presentation transcript:

1 The Voice of Consumers, Making a Difference! GRCs: Process & Evaluation DRA FORUM May 2012

The Voice of Consumers, Making a Difference! 2 1. Purpose of a General Rate Case (GRC) 2. Main Components in GRC 3. Utility Rate Case Plans 4. GRC Filing Requirements 5. GRC Process and Schedule 6. Results of Operations 7. Resource Commitment 8. Forecasting Methods 9. Post Test Year Ratemaking (Attrition) 10. Natural Gas Proceedings 11. Summary of GRC Process 12. Reference Tables & Additional Background Overview

The Voice of Consumers, Making a Difference! 3 1. Purpose of a General Rate Case (GRC)  Examine a utility’s costs (excluding fuel and purchased power).  Water utilities costs include – purchase water, power, and pump taxes.  Set revenue requirement.  Recover forecast of future reasonable costs.  Ensure safe and reliable operation of the utility.

4 2. Main Components in Energy and Water Ratemaking  GRCs - Revenue Requirement: The total amount of money a utility collects from its customers.  Determines the size of the pie  Revenue Allocation and Rate Design: Allocating the revenue requirement to different customer classes and setting rates.  Determines how the pie is sliced The Voice of Consumers, Making a Difference!

Main Components in a Water GRC  9 Class A water utilities with a total of 58 districts, and a combined total of over 1.1 million service connections. Serves 6.5+ million Californians.  Legislative Mandate requires all large regulated (Class A) utilities to file a general rate case every three years.  Costs of Service are reviewed in individual General Rate Cases (GRCs) for each water service district.  Main Components of costs of service review include operation & maintenance, administrative & general, general office, taxes, payroll, and return on capital investments.  Total Revenue Requirement for Class A regulated water utilities is over $1.4 billion.  Water Supply Costs are a pass-through to ratepayers and tracked in balancing accounts.  Water Customer Bills consist of a monthly service charge and a usage-based charge. Components of Water Service Costs Includes Costs for all Water Utilities in The Voice of Consumers, Making a Difference!

6 What’s Not Included in a GRC  Cost of Capital (Rate of Return)  Conducted in a generic proceeding  Energy Exception: Included in Small Utility GRC’s  Water Exception: Valencia Water Company  Energy Efficiency Program Costs  Conducted in the EE Proceeding  Energy Exception: Included in Small Utility GRC’s  Fuel Costs and Purchase Power Agreements (Electric)  Conducted in the ERRA (Energy Resource Recovery Accounts) or Energy Cost Adjustment Clause (ECAC) Proceedings  Energy Exception: Also included in small electric utility GRCs  Rate Base Offsets (Water)  Submitted through Tier 2 or 3 Advice Letter The Voice of Consumers, Making a Difference! 6

7 3. Utility Rate Case Plan  Initially established in D and modified by D  Three year cycle for major energy utilities.  Some variances have been adopted The Voice of Consumers, Making a Difference! Energy: Water:  Initially established in D and modified by D  To develop schedules and facilitate the issuing of general rate case decisions

8 4. GRC Filing Requirements  Master data request (prepared by DRA)  Five years of historical data  Forecasts of future costs  Reference and support documentation  Notice of Intent (NOI)  Deficiency review / DRA approval The Voice of Consumers, Making a Difference!

GRC Filing Requirements  Minimum data required by Rate Case Plan.  DRA still requires a Supplemental Data Request (SDR)  Proposed Application is tendered, reviewed, and corrected before acceptance and Application filing.  Deficiency review conducted by DRA  SDR not part of deficiency review - Additional Water Requirements - 9 The Voice of Consumers, Making a Difference!

10 5. GRC Process and Schedule  Notice of Intent (NOI): Tendered, reviewed, corrected, and accepted  Application filed: ALJ assigned and schedule set (by Commissioner’s Scoping Memo)  One Year Schedule: After application is filed  Water: 14 to 20 months  Discovery Process  Filings: Reports filed, Hearings held, and Briefs submitted  Proposed Decision: Comments, Alternates, and Final Decision  Resources: Requires significant DRA commitment The Voice of Consumers, Making a Difference!

11 6. Results of Operations  Summarizes results of GRC-related financial activity attributed to a utility’s operations.  A summary of the Results of Operations is captured in the “Summary of Earnings” table.  See reference slides, p. 24 The Voice of Consumers, Making a Difference!

12 Results of Operations Components include:  Operating Revenues  Operating Expenses  Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Expenses  Distribution, Transmission (non-FERC), Utility Owned Generation (UOG)  Customer-related  Administrative & General (A&G)  Taxes  Franchise Fees & Uncollectibles  Depreciation / Salvage Value of Assets  Return on Investment (Return on Rate Base)  Rate Base – Net investment in facilities and equipment The Voice of Consumers, Making a Difference!

13  Leak Surveys and Repair Work  Distribution / Transmission Integrity Management Programs  Cathodic Protection  Control corrosion of steel pipes  Maintenance of Gas Facilities  Gas Pipeline Replacement  Gas Reliability Results of Operations - Gas Functions Within a GRC - The Voice of Consumers, Making a Difference!

14  Leak Surveys and Repair Work  Distribution / Transmission Pipeline Repairs and Replacement Management Programs (aging infrastructure)  Water Quality - Compliance with California Department of Public Health (CDPH)and EPA drinking water rules  Sources of Water Supply  Water Storage Needs  Conservation  Water Reliability Water Results of Operations - Water Functions Within a GRC - The Voice of Consumers, Making a Difference!

15 7. Resource Commitment  Typical GRC filing for Energy & Water  Approximately 30 functional areas / 100 sub-accounts  Numerous boxes of workpapers and supporting documentation  DRA Witnesses  DRA Resource Commitment : Energy  20 DRA staff analysts  3 to 4 attorneys  Management oversight  DRA Resource Commitment: Water  3 to17 DRA staff analysts depending on size of utility  1 to 2 attorneys  Management oversight The Voice of Consumers, Making a Difference!

16  Notice of Intent (NOI)  Ensure five years of historical data  Ensure requests have explanation / support / backup / breakdown  Check cross references  Identify reasons for increases  Issue deficiencies  Accepts NOI  Specific Utility Accounts / Sub-Accounts / Major Work Categories  Detailed review of utility testimony & workpapers  Obtain utility studies / reports / programs  Issue data requests / gathering data  Audit utility records  Phone conferences  Field investigations Resource Commitment: DRA Staff Analysis The Voice of Consumers, Making a Difference! 16

17 Resource Commitment: DRA Staff Analysis  Results of Operations Modeling: Energy  Run computer model to produce the “Summary of Earnings”  Dynamically-link Excel spreadsheets and files  Compare utility’s requested vs. DRA’s recommended revenue requirement  Sign non-disclosure agreement: Run alternate scenarios for ALJs and Commissioners  Results of Operations Modeling: Water  Water IOU RO models not as sophisticated as Energy  Non-disclosure requirement not invoked at this time The Voice of Consumers, Making a Difference!

18 8. Forecasting Methods  Historical Data (3 - 5 year data)  Latest Recorded Year  Budget based  Unit cost / Work units  Independent approach and analysis  Benchmarking / comparison to other utilities  Normalizing for variances  Ratemaking adjustments  Charitable Contributions  Promotions / Advertising  Lobbying  Executive Incentives  Supplemental Pension for Executives / Stock Options The Voice of Consumers, Making a Difference!

19 9. Post Test Year Ratemaking (Attrition) Energy:  Provides increases between rate cases  Prior to 1981  No Attrition  Low Inflation  Higher Customer Growth  Historic Attrition  Expense Escalation (Labor and Non-labor)  Average Plant Estimates  CPI Basis  Negotiated Water: IOUs have two test years for plant, two attrition years for expenses, one attrition year for plant. The Voice of Consumers, Making a Difference!

Natural Gas Proceedings  Biennial Cost Allocation Proceeding (BCAP)  Allocation of costs to customer classes  PG&E – Gas Transmission & Storage Rate Case  SoCalGas - Firm Access Rights (FAR)  Gas Procurement Incentive Mechanisms  Annual monitoring and evaluation report prepared by DRA  Storage  Expansions of existing storage facilities  Construction of new storage facilities  Gas Hedging The Voice of Consumers, Making a Difference!

Summary of GRC Process  Evaluation and Acceptance of NOI  Independent analysis and forecasts of Utility Request  Modeling results  Written reports, spreadsheets, testimony  Serving as expert witness under utility cross examination - DRA Work Products - The Voice of Consumers, Making a Difference!

22 Summary of GRC Process  PG&E: D ; D  Sempra - SDG&E and SoCalGas: D  Edison: D Recent GRC Decisions for Large Energy Utilities - The Voice of Consumers, Making a Difference!

23  NOI Tendered: July/August  Deficiency Review: 25 days after NOI  NOI Filed: October  Application Filed: December  Pre-Hearing Conference: January  DRA Reports: April/May  Rebuttal: May  Hearings: June  Briefs: July  Reply Briefs: August  PD / Alternate: November  Final Decision: December+ Summary of GRC Process - Typical GRC Timeline - The Voice of Consumers, Making a Difference!

12. Reference Tables & Additional Background The Voice of Consumers, Making a Difference! 24

25 PG&E Electric Distribution Summary of Earnings The Voice of Consumers, Making a Difference!

26 PG&E Electric Distribution Rate Base The Voice of Consumers, Making a Difference!

27 PG&E Electric Generation Summary of Earnings The Voice of Consumers, Making a Difference!

28 PG&E Electric Generation Rate Base The Voice of Consumers, Making a Difference!

29 Utility-Owned Generation  Nuclear  Diablo Canyon (PG&E)  SONGS (SCE and SDG&E)  Palo Verde (SCE)  Coal  Four Corners (SCE) CPUC-approved sale effective Oct 2012  Hydroelectric  Helms Pumped Storage (PG&E)  Small hydro plants throughout CA (PG&E and SCE)  Gas  Palomar (SDG&E)  Mountain View (SCE) The Voice of Consumers, Making a Difference!

Presenters Mark Pocta – Manager, DRA Energy Cost of Service Branch Danilo Sanchez – Manager, DRA Water Branch The Voice of Consumers, Making a Difference! 30