Water Resources Planning and Management Daene C. McKinney Simulating System Performance.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Water Resources Planning and Management Daene C. McKinney
Advertisements

Preliminary Impacts of Wind Power Integration in the Hydro-Qubec System.
Climate Change and Water Resources Challenge in California Francis I Chung, Ph.D., P.E. Department of Water Resources.
Water Resources Planning and Management Daene C. McKinney Optimization.
Engineering Hydrology (ECIV 4323)
SUSTAINABLE OPERATION OF THE YAQUI RESERVOIR SYSTEM.
Defining the Status Quo. Definition of Status Quo The “Status Quo” describes existing or anticipated conditions of a water resources system if policies,
CVEN 5838 Aug 28, 2008 Lecture 2 Reservoir Capacity Yield Analysis (how to size a reservoir and measure its performance)
Water Resources Planning and Management Daene C. McKinney Capacity – Yield Relations.
Water Resources Planning and Management Daene C. McKinney River Basin Modeling.
Water Resources Systems Modeling for Planning and Management An Introduction to the Development and Application of Optimization and Simulation Models for.
Selection of Capacity Selection of capacity depends on: Physical characteristics Physical characteristics Inflow outflow characteristics Inflow outflow.
Long Term Storage Long term storage means to store water during high inflows years for the benefit of low inflows years. Long term storage means to store.
Network Capacity Planning IACT 418 IACT 918 Corporate Network Planning.
Background and Motivation. ENSO (El Niño Southern Oscillation) the water year for which the December to February Sea Surface Temperature in the NINO 3.4.
The Hydrologic (Water) Cycle. Surface Water Oceans Rivers and streams Lakes and ponds Springs – groundwater becomes surface water.
Colorado Basin River Forecast Center Water Supply Forecasting Method Michelle Stokes Hydrologist in Charge Colorado Basin River Forecast Center April 28,
Climate Change and Water Resources Management WEB pages on water management activities Max Campos San Jose – Costa Rica.
Preliminary Analysis of the SEE Future Infrastructure Development Plan and REM Benefits.
Analyses of Rainfall Hydrology and Water Resources RG744
SWAT – Land Phase of the Hydrologic Cycle Kristina Schneider Kristi Shaw.
Dr. David Ahlfeld Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering The Westfield River Basin Optimization Model Demonstration:
1 Sustainable Agricultural Economic benefits of reservoir scale expansion in Balkh Basin, Afghanistan Abdelaziz A. Gohar & Frank A. Ward New Mexico State.
Hydrologic Design Reading: Applied Hydrology Sections 13-1, 13-2.
ESET ALEMU WEST Consultants, Inc. Bellevue, Washington.
Water Supply Reallocation Workshop Determining Yield and Space Requirement.
WATER AVAILABILITY MODELING for the SULPHUR RIVER BASIN Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission Austin, Texas Consultant: R. J. Brandes Company.
Hydro Power 102. Hydroelectric Models in the Northwest.
Where the Research Meets the Road: Climate Science, Uncertainties, and Knowledge Gaps First National Expert and Stakeholder Workshop on Water Infrastructure.
Potential Effects of Climate Change on New York City Water Supply Quantity and Quality: An Integrated Modeling Approach Donald Pierson, Elliot Schneiderman.
South Africa PRIMA Operating Rules. Model Trans-boundary Operating Process PRIMA,TPTC etc Trans-boundary Agreement Operational Committee Representatives.
CE 424 HYDROLOGY 1 Instructor: Dr. Saleh A. AlHassoun.
ERCOT Planning WMS 10/20/2010 Target Reserve Margin and Effective Load Carrying Capability of Installed Wind Capacity for the ERCOT System – Methodology.
Engineering Hydrology (ECIV 4323)
Modeling Development CRFS—Technical Meeting November 14, 2012.
What is OASIS? Water resources simulation/optimization model
Climate Change Impact on Water Availability in NYC Water Supply Adao Matonse 1, Allan Frei 1, Donald Pierson 2, Mark Zion 2, Elliot Schneiderman 2, Aavudai.
NON-TREATY STORAGE AGREEMENT “Introduction to Operations and the Non Treaty Storage Scenarios” Presenter: Jim Gaspard.
Martin Rule Curve Study Ashley McVicar, APC Maurice James, Water Resources Consulting LLC.
PCWA MFP Operations Model All Models are Wrong But Some Models are Useful.
Reservoir Operation Simulation D Nagesh Kumar, IISc Water Resources Planning and Management: M7L2 Simulation.
OPERATING SYSTEMS CS 3530 Summer 2014 Systems and Models Chapter 03.
OASIS Basics Computer Aided Negotiations of Water Resources Disputes.
Stochastic Optimization
Water Resources Planning and Management
Multi-objective Optimization
Linear Programming Water Resources Planning and Management Daene McKinney.
Introduction and River Basin Simulation D Nagesh Kumar, IISc Water Resources Planning and Management: M7L1 Simulation.
Hydrology and application of the RIBASIM model SYMP: Su Yönetimi Modelleme Platformu RBE River Basin Explorer: A modeling tool for river basin planning.
Water Resources Planning and Management Daene C. McKinney System Performance Indicators.
Linear Programming and Applications
Water Resources Planning and Management Daene C. McKinney Introduction to GAMS.
Modeling with WEAP University of Utah Hydroinformatics - Fall 2015.
ADVANCES IN THE SUSTAINABLE MANAGEMENT OF THE YAQUI RIVER RESERVOIRS SYSTEM OCTOBER 20, 2003.
1 WaterWare description Data management, Objects Monitoring, time series Hydro-meteorological data, forecasts Rainfall-runoff: RRM, floods Irrigation water.
Analyses of Rainfall Hydrology and Water Resources RG744 Institute of Space Technology October 09, 2015.
HEC-ResSim 3.3 New Features to Support Complex Studies
Klamath ADR Hydrology Report
Engineering Hydrology (ECIV 4323)
Hazards Planning and Risk Management Flood Frequency Analysis
A sequential Simulation-Optimization Model for Water Allocation from the multi-Reservoir System in the Karkheh River Basin System, Iran M. Fereidoon1,2.
Other renewable energy sources
Flood Frequency Analysis
Environmental modeling application domains
Adaptive Resource Allocation in Multiuser OFDM Systems
Hydrology CIVL341.
Addressing uncertainty in a transshipment problem
Engineering Hydrology (ECIV 4323)
Hydrology CIVL341 Introduction
Engineering Hydrology (ECIV 4323)
Presentation transcript:

Water Resources Planning and Management Daene C. McKinney Simulating System Performance

Reservoir Management Important task for water managers around the world. Models used to – simulate or optimize reservoir performance – design reservoirs or associated facilities (spillways, etc.).

Operating Rules Allocate releases among purposes, reservoirs, and time intervals In operation (as opposed to design), certain system components are fixed: – Active and dead storage volume – Power plant and stream channel capacities – Reservoir head-capacity functions – Levee heights and flood plain areas – Monthly target outputs for irrigation, energy, water supply, etc Others are variable: Allocation of – stored water among reservoirs – stored and released water among purposes – stored and released water among time intervals

Standard Operating Policy QtQt X2 t K StSt RtRt X1 t DtDt RtRt DtDt DtDt D t +KS t + Q t Release available water & deficits occur Release demand spill excess Sufficient water to meet demands Reservoir fills and demand met Release demand & demand met Demand Reservoir operating policy - release as function of storage volume and inflow R t = R t (S t,Q t )

Hedging Rule Reduce releases in times of drought (hedging) to save water for future releases in case of an extended period of low inflows. hedging D K

Done? No System Simulation Create network representation of system Need inflows for each period for each node For each period:  Perform mass balance calculations for each node  Determine releases from reservoirs  Allocate water to users Start t = 0 S t = S 0 S t+1 = S t +Q t -R t Stop Yes t = t + 1 Read Q t File Compute R t, Xi t, i=1,…n Data Storage QtQt X3 t K StSt R X2 t X1 t Operating PolicyAllocation Policy

Example Using unregulated river for irrigation Proposed Reservoir Capacity: K = 40 million m 3 (active) Demand: D = 30  40  45 million m 3 Winter instream flow: 5 mil. m 3 min. 45 year historic flow record available Evaluate system performance for a 20 year period Simulate Two seasons/year, winter (1) summer(2) Continuity constraints Operating policy QtQt X2 t K StSt R X1 t Flow statistics

R 2,t DtDt DtDt D t +KS 2,t + Q 2,t K Release available water Release demand + excess Summer Operating Policy Storage at beginning of summer

Performance Evaluation How well will the system perform? – Define performance criteria Indices related to the ability to meet targets and the seriousness of missing targets – Simulate the system to evaluate the criteria – Interpret results Should design or policies be modified?

Performance Criteria - Reliability Reliability – Frequency with which demand was satisfied – Define a deficit as: Then reliability is: where n is the total number of simulation periods

Performance Criteria - Resilience Resilience = probability that once the system is in a period of deficit, the next period is not a deficit. How quickly does system recover from failure?

Performance Criteria - Vulnerability Vulnerability = average magnitude of deficits How bad are the consequences of failure?

Simulate the System System Policies Input Output x g(x) y h(y) Reservoir operating policy Allocation policy Hydrologic time series Model output Model

Uncertainty Deterministic process – Inputs assumed known. – Ignore variability – Assume inputs are well represented by average values. – Over estimates benefits and underestimates losses Stochastic process – Explicitly account for variability and uncertainty – Inputs are stochastic processes – Historic record is one realization of process.

F Y (y) Simulate the System Policies Simulate each Input sequence X F X (x) x g(x) y h(y) y Compute statistics of outputs System Generate multiple input sequences x g(x) Get multiple output sequences Reservoir operating policy Allocation policy Model Distribution of inputs

The Simulation Simulate reservoir operation – Perform 23 equally likely simulations – Each simulation is 20 years long – Each simulation uses a different sequence of inflows (realization)

Example – Realization 1 Rmin0.5K4 Realizatio n1 WinterSummer YearS1yQ1yS+QR1yS2yQ2yS+QD2yR2yDeficit Deficit Number2.000 %0.100

Results Average failure frequency = Average reliability = = = 83.5% Actual failure frequency  [0, 0.40] Actual Reliability  [100%, 60%]

Physical Environment Feedback Sub Model to FAV Salinity Temp Surface, Subsurface Light FAV Establishment and Growth FAV Patch Local Physical Environment (tides, freshwater flow) Nutrients Heavy metals Riparian Vegetation DO Wind, Flow Velocity Dispersal Substrate Org Matter Subsurface Light - Small Substrate Grain Size Understanding: High – green arrow Med – blue arrow Low - red arrow Importance: High – thick line Med – medium line Low – thin line Predictability: High – solid line Med – dashed line Low – dotted line Lars Anderson, UC Davis Stuart Siegel, WWR Mark Stacey, UCB