The St. Croix Basin– Protecting an Incredible Resource St. Croix River Watershed Partners- The St. Croix Basin Team, U.S. Forest Service, Minnesota Forest.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Roundtable on Sustainable Forests. Forests cover about 750 million acres -- more than a quarter of the entire United States -- and sustainable management.
Advertisements

Implement Wy-Kan-Ush-Mi Wa-Kish- Wit Watershed Assessment and Restoration Plan Now A Regional Support Program Sponsored by the Columbia River Inter-Tribal.
Protecting Forests for the Long Haul Potomac Conservancys approach to improving water quality through forest conservation.
FARM BILL UPDATE. LAST FARM BILL: A LOT ACCOMPLISHED ON WORKING LANDS.
1 Watershed Planning: A Key to Integrated Planning FHWA Environmental Conference Ann Campbell Wetlands Division.
Ecological and Recreational Flows Workgroup Colorado River Basin Water Supply and Demand Study Next Steps Urban Water Institute August 14, 2014 San Diego,
A Statewide Strategy for Restoring Arizona’s Forests A 20-YEAR ACTION PLAN.
USDA Forest Service Southwestern Region. Overview  Why Landscapes?  Other Landscape Efforts  Strategic Action Plan Summary  Region-wide Landscape.
Climate Adaptation: the Power of Conservation Across Boundaries Steven Fuller, NALCC The Wildlife Management Institute.
Restoration and Enhancement Delivery on Private Lands Lessard Outdoor Heritage Council Monday, January 26, 2009 Kevin Lines Board of Water and Soil Resources.
Incorporating the 9-Elements into a WMP Lindsey PhillipsMike Archer Source Water CoordinatorState Lakes Coordinator (402) (402)
State of Water: Minnesota’s Lakes, Rivers and Wetlands John Jaschke Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources Nov 13, 2014.
Natural Choices Greening the Gateway Kent & Medway 11 June 2011.
Amy Sheldon Watershed Coordinator February 3, 2004.
Watershed Management Framework Mission of watershed management –Coordinate and integrate the programs, tools, and resources of multiple stakeholder groups.
Protecting Forests for the Long Haul Potomac Conservancy’s approach to improving water quality through forest conservation.
Notes for a presentation to the EEN (Canada) Forum Blair Dimock Director, Research, Evaluation and Knowledge Management October 1, 2010 Sharing Practical.
Produce Safety Rule Phase 2 Workgroup 1.
Illinois Department of Natural Resources. Illinois Coastal Management Program Illinois was officially approved as a Coastal Management Program on Jan.
A gricultural E nvironmental M anagement NYS Soil & Water Conservation Committee Department of Agriculture & Markets A E MA E M.
Okanagan Basin Conservation Programs (SOSCP and OCCP) 80+ organizations (government and non-government) working together to achieve shared conservation.
Indian Valley Meadow Restoration acre meadow located atop the Sierra Crest in Alpine County, CA. Headwaters of the Mokelumne River. Source for agricultural,
Suwannee River Basin and Estuary-- Integrated Science Workshop  SR originates in the Okeefenokee Swamp, changing dramatically as it moves downstream,
A Network of Partners promoting comprehensive forestry education and awareness for all users and all uses Since 2004.
New England is one of 10 regions making up the 406 National Water Program, “A partnership of USDA CSREES and the Land Grant System”
Kent Local Nature Partnership – realising the value of nature.
Working to improve availability of plant materials for partner organizations Shannon Hatch DEVELOPMENT OF NATIVE PLANT MATERIALS FOR RIPARIAN RESTORATION.
Marin County Watershed Stewardship Plan
Integrated Catchment Management Key Elements - Julie Burke.
EPA’s Work Related to P2 and the Great Lakes Great Lakes Regional Pollution Prevention Round Table Summer Conference August 2005.
Clackamas River Basin Council Lower Columbia River Conservation and Recovery Plan Implementer’s Perspective August 19, 2013.
Guidance for AONB Partnership Members Welsh Member Training January 26/
Identifying the Role of Government in Forest Management.
Watershed Assessment and Planning. Review Watershed Hydrology Watershed Hydrology Watershed Characteristics and Processes Watershed Characteristics and.
Laila Racevskis 1, Tatiana Borisova 1, and Jennison Kipp 2 1 Assistant Professor, Food and Resource Economics Department, University of Florida 2 Resource.
May 27 th, 2003FRCV Conservation Plan Summary and Status Rock Creek Valley Conservation Plan & Priorities Prepared by Friends of Rock Creek Valley with.
1 Natural Resources Block Grant (NRBG) A Program that works to: – Streamline assistance and $$ to landowners – Coordinate activities of federal and state.
Canada’s Ocean Strategy. The Oceans Act In 1997, Canada entrenched its commitment to our oceans by adopting the Oceans Act. In 1997, Canada entrenched.
1 Survey of the Nation’s Lakes Presentation at NALMS’ 25 th Annual International Symposium Nov. 10, 2005.
Crosswalk of Public Health Accreditation and the Public Health Code of Ethics Highlighted items relate to the Water Supply case studied discussed in the.
_____?____ Soil & Water Conservation District (SWCD) *Insert District Logo if available.
Sustainable Dairying: Water Accord The Sustainable Dairying: Water Accord (the Accord) has been developed under the oversight of the Dairy Environment.
Presented by: Steve Litke, Fraser Basin Council Winnipeg, Manitoba June 18, 2012 Collaborative Approaches to Watershed Governance – Lessons from BC.
Chapter 11: Building Community Capacity to Take Action Operation: Military Kids Ready, Set, Go! Training.
Sierra Water Workgroup Water Summit Kings Beach, California June 11, 2013 Barry Hill, Hydrologist Pacific Southwest Region USDA Forest Service.
Flathead River to Lake Initiative Conservation and restoration through a diverse collaborative effort Part I – How it began Part II – Conservation Successes.
Watershed Stewardship Program Status of Marin County Public Works Watershed Program 11/7/08 11/7/08.
Identifying the Role of Government in Forest Management.
KEITH WOOD COMMUNITY PLANNING MANAGER NEWARK AND SHERWOOD DISTRICT COUNCIL A Presentation to the 3 rd Annual AAP Conference – 6 November 2009 The Role.
1 Developing Accountability in a Large Decentralized Agency U.S. Forest Service Raymond S. Thompson
Jeff Horan, Habitat GIT Chair February 16, 2012 CBP Decision Framework in Action.
JULIE MAWHORTER MID-ATLANTIC URBAN & COMMUNITY FORESTRY COORDINATOR CHESAPEAKE TREE CANOPY STRATEGY & WORKPLAN UPDATE CITIZEN’S ADVISORY.
Presented by: Brenton McCloskey, MD DNR Associate Director for Restoration Financing and Policy Watershed Restoration in Maryland Helping Advance Restoration.
Lake Management in Alberta. Lake Issues ~2500 lakes in total with 800 fish-bearing lakes in Alberta Many lakes have changed due to Watershed alteration.
For EBTJV meeting October 26, 2010 Executive Order Strategy for Protecting and Restoring the Chesapeake Bay Watershed.
Regional Peer Learning Workshop: Accelerated Landscape Restoration Siuslaw Stewardship Model and Collaborative Engagement.
CriteriaYesNoEffectiveness of CVC 1. Continuity of Participation4100% 2. Representation and Access3175% 3. Self Efficacy4100% 4. Information Exchange and.
“ To provide leadership to help people conserve, improve, and sustain the natural resources and environment of Highlands County”
Introduction to the Regional Conservation Partnership Program (RCPP) June 10, 2016 Carol Rivera– Program Manager An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer.
Partners in Conservation
Local Government Engagement and Communication Strategy
Clean Water Fund Grants
Assessing the Los Angeles River Watershed
Regional Restoration Planning for the Delaware Estuary
Creating Partnerships: EPA R8, NRCS, and States
Washington County Parks and Open Spaces
Watershed Literacy & Engagement
Implementation Guide for Linking Adults to Opportunity
LGAC Input on Outcomes.
Strategic Priorities and Actions:
Presentation transcript:

The St. Croix Basin– Protecting an Incredible Resource St. Croix River Watershed Partners- The St. Croix Basin Team, U.S. Forest Service, Minnesota Forest Resource Council, Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Washington County Conservation District, Chisago Soil and Water Conservation District, Kanabec County Soil and Water Conservation District, The Nature Conservancy Introduction and Overview: The St. Croix River Basin represents a large area, approximately 7,760 square miles, with 44 percent of the basin land area located within Minnesota and 56 percent within Wisconsin. The St. Croix River originates near Solon Springs, Wisconsin and flows west and south more than 160 miles until it joins the Mississippi River at Prescott, Wisconsin. Lake St. Croix is a naturally impounded riverine lake in the lower 25 miles of the St. Croix River. The St. Croix River is one of the cleanest tributaries to the Mississippi River and has high quality natural ecosystems, beautiful scenery, striking geologic features, unique cultural resources and abundant recreation opportunities. Annually, over one million people use this wild and scenic river for recreation. Working with Forested Landscapes: Forests play an important role in keeping water clean, which is vital to the economic and ecological health of the St. Croix basin. While the link between forests and clean water are well known, there have been few efforts to clearly define the significance of forests in the upper St. Croix watershed and bring stakeholders together to achieve shared goals within key basin communities. The Linking Sustainable Forestry with Water Quality in the Upper St. Croix Project was established in 2011 with initial funding from the US Forest Service Northeast Area State and Private Forestry Competitive Allocation program. The project is a unique collaboration between both public and private organizations with an interest in managing and protecting forests to achieve heightened water quality. With an approach based on partnerships, many organizations are working within the Basin to achieve a vision for the St. Croix as a place where: · Waters run free and clean. · Habitat remains plentiful to sustain our unique and diverse flora and fauna. · People have access to our National Park and the park flourishes. · Towns throughout the basin thrive and people celebrate the River. The primary project components include: Convening forestry and water quality partners in the St. Croix Basin to improve efficiency and effectiveness in achieving shared goals. Data synthesis to generate a clear picture of the water quality benefits of forests in a way that can be quantified and utilized to inform where forest cover is most important with respect to water quality Developing a State of the Forest Report for the St. Croix basin to document changes in land use and current forest resources within the basin, as well as Landscape Stewardship Plans to guide landowner forest management. Outreach and education that will provide information about how forests protect the health of the St. Croix and its tributary streams. Demonstration projects that show on-the- ground how forests keep St. Croix basin waters clean and healthy. Lake St. Croix TMDL: The Lake St. Croix TMDL was a collaborative effort among the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WDNR) and the St. Croix Basin Water Resources Planning Team (St. Croix Basin Team). The primary components of the TMDL were largely based on the results of past lake a nutrient loading studies. The key outcomes of the these studies and the TMDL are as follows: Lake St. Croix’s total annual loading capacity needed to meet and in-lake total phosphorus water quality standard of 40 µg/L in 360 metric tons/yr. The lake’s “current” loading (using 1990 baseline) is 460 metric tons/yr, meaning a 100 metric ton/yr reduction would be needed. However, this TMDL adopts a margin of safety and a reserve capacity which increases the needed load reduction to about 123 metric tons/yr. This equates to an overall needed phosphorus load reduction of 27 percent. The use of technology and natural resource management expertise has resulted in impressive achievements in reducing municipal and industrial pollution. Regulation has also played a central role in achieving water quality improvements. However, nonpoint sources of pollution are now the greatest remaining challenge in ensuring that Lake St. Croix meet water quality standards. The Lake St. Croix TMDL Implementation Plan uses civic engagement as a key strategy for reducing nonpoint phosphorus loading to Lake St. Croix. This approach acknowledges that citizens are key collaborators in achieving water quality goals, whether it is in the policy-making realm or when implementing Best Management Practices (BMPs) on the ground. “Civic Engagement means making resourceFULL decisions and taking collective action on public issues through processes of public discussion, reflection and collaboration.” - University of Minnesota Extension By combining scientific research in the natural sciences with data about people, community relationships and institutions, it is hoped that greater progress in solving the St. Croix River water problems will result over time. The desire is to build capacity for collaborative decision making at multiple levels. The longer-tem goal will be to create a functioning network of organizations working collaboratively toward the same vision - a healthy St. Croix River system. Beginning in 2012, multiple organizations within the watershed took initial steps towards engaging citizens in a more focused and intentional manner. Examples of initiatives towards increased civic engagement include participation in civic engagement trainings, the development of a farmer-led council project that puts farmers in leadership positions to develop pollutant reduction strategies, civic engagement in water planning at the county level and integrating civic engagement-related materials and information into the Annual St. Croix River Basin Conference. Key project components: Build a team of dedicated resource professionals to guide project activities and priorities. Develop a holistic prioritization model that includes habitat, water quality and recreational features for resource protection and management. Conduct field scale analysis to identify Best Management Practices (BMPs) in priority subwatersheds. Conduct a cost-benefit analysis of identified BMPs to develop a “to do” list of management options that includes a measure of cost per unit of resource managed or protected. (Ex. Cost per pounds of phosphorus reduced) Install identified BMPs in selected priority subwatersheds. Prioritizing Conservation: Multi-jurisdictional conservation efforts are complex and often lack focus and coordination in the St. Croix Basin. As a means to stream-line and focus conservation efforts on areas with the most critical need, the SCRA received an LCCMR grant in 2011 to develop a well coordinated project to determine priority areas for conservation within the basin. This project links local, state and federal governmental units, citizen-led non-profits, and design and technical expertise in an effective, well-coordinated partnership to set priorities, implement targeted on-the-ground project, protect wildlife habitat, and promote land and water stewardship to enhance and protect the very special place the St. Croix River Basin is to live, recreate and work. This project aims to enhance efficiencies and improve environmental outcomes. Acknowledgements: We are grateful for funding from the US Forest Service, the MN Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund and partner support from the MN Department of Natural Resources, WI Department of Natural Resources, The Nature Conservancy, Minnesota Forest Resources Council, National Park Service, MN Pollution Control Agency and the many organizations represented through the St. Croix Basin Team. Printed by Green Lands Blue Waters