Overview of MASH MASH training. What is a MASH?  Multi Agency Safeguarding Hub  A MASH is a centre which brings together agencies (and their information)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
London Borough of Harrow Childrens Access Team incorporating a Multi Agency Safeguarding Hub MASH Conference 15 February 2011 Dal Babu, Borough Commander,
Advertisements

Multi Agency Safeguarding A Good Practice Framework for London.
INFORMATION SHARING CONSENT OR NO CONSENT Dermot Kelly. Nov 2013.
Southwark Multi Agency Safeguarding Hub -MASH April Bald & Dermot Kelly
 Nationally Children’s Services work within a legislative framework. Two pivotal pieces of legislation are the Children Act 1989 and the Children and.
MSH M SH Multi-Agency Support Hub. Background and context Ensuring children and families receive help at the most appropriate level of need The Process:
Safeguarding September Context of presentation Definition Demonstrate the wide range of statutes, frameworks and strategies that are the bedrock.
Early Intervention Joint Protocol Service for Young People.
Early Help in Sandwell.
MASH Where are we now?.
Improving Multi-Agency Safeguarding Assessments A Children’s Social Care Perspective 2013: A golden opportunity for us to improve our safeguarding system.
Lead Practitioners for Safeguarding Support Group Autumn 2014.
Birmingham Multi-Agency Safeguarding Hub
MASH Understanding Multi-Agency Safeguarding Hubs 1.
Lancashire Assessment and Planning Framework Victoria Gent.
The New Inspection Framework The Multi agency arrangements for protecting children The multi-agency arrangements for the protection of children The multi-agency.
Multi-Agency Safeguarding Hubs
MASH Understanding Multi-Agency Safeguarding Hubs 1.
Bromley CYP Social Care Services
Child Protection Conferences Caroline Alexander Service Coordinator for Child Protection.
Child Sexual Exploitation National Context Safeguarding Children And Young People from Sexual Exploitation, DCSF, 2009 Tackling Child Sexual Exploitation.
Early Help for Shropshire Children & Families Children’s Trust Area Forum.
Blackpool Safeguarding Children Board Core Group Training Trainers: Ian Wheeler Jo Edwards.
Whole Systems Approach to GIRFEC 25 th February 2014.
Joint Area Review Overview. What is a JAR? Q. What is a Joint Area Review (JAR)? A. A JAR provides a comprehensive report on the outcomes for children.
Care and Risk Management (CARM) in Practice Stewart Simpson Practice Development Advisor Centre for Youth and Criminal Justice (CYCJ) developing,
Senior Management Team : Children’s Safeguarding and Child Protection Briefing This briefing will cover: What is safeguarding and child protection Policy.
Re-focusing services for families with multiple and complex needs: a whole family approach 123/10/2012 No Wrong Door 2012.
Information Advice Support Service. What is IASS: IASS deals with all telephone contacts and referrals for Children & Young People requiring information,
Yvonne Onyeka Business Manager Bromley SCB LCPP in Bromley.
‘A Healthier Dorset’ Safeguarding Children Primary Care Update September 22 nd 2011 Safeguarding Children: the role of Dentists.
Bromley Children’s Safeguarding Board Partnership Launch Partnership Working in Bromley Mark Thorn Head of Children’s Social Care Referral & Assessment.
CRT/ MASH 2015 Overview of Safeguarding, Child Protection & Multi Agency Safeguarding Hub (MASH) 2015.
November 2015 Common weaknesses in local authorities judged inadequate under the single inspection framework – a summary.
The Duties and Responsibility of Southend-on-Sea Borough Council Fieldwork Services Report to Children & Learning Scrutiny Committee 15 th October 2007.
The inspection of arrangements for the protection of children and young people Ofsted unannounced inspections from May 2012.
Managing Allegations: The Role of the Local Authority Designated Officer.
Leo Flatters County Head of Service. Same Way Together?
Multi Agency Safeguarding Hub (MASH). Schedule for the Day 9.30 – 10amRegistration and Coffee 10 – amWelcomeMASH Team – 10.45Introduction.
Common Assessment Framework (CAF) and the Early Help Offer – How this can support your family Barnet CAF Team.
Working Together has been modified by Working Together 2015 Regulation 5 of the Local Safeguarding Children Boards Regulations 2006 sets out the.
To Learn & Develop Christine Johnson Lead Nurse Safeguarding (named nurse) - STFT Health Visitors Roles and Responsibilities in Domestic Abuse.
PROJECT PHOENIX GREATER MANCHESTER’S APPROACH TO TACKLING CHILD SEXUAL EXPLOITATION.
Safeguarding & Social Care Patricia Denney Principal Officer Safeguarding & Social Care, Children, Schools & Families, LB Camden.
The Common Assessment Framework (CAF) & Lead Professional (LP)
Childrens Social Work Services & Partners Working Together in Localities Tina Russell Head Of Social Work & Safeguarding.
Solihull Safeguarding Learning Faculty Wednesday 4 November Sans Souci Joan McHugh- Development Manager SSAB Denise Lewis- Training and Development Officer.
Dudley Children’s Services Multi-Agency Briefing Stefan Chapleo Helen Ellis 1.
Police and communities together MASH Detective Superintendent Ian Critchley Head of Public Protection Detective Sergeant Alex Gornall Lancashire Constabulary.
Designated Safeguarding Officer Group 12 th July 2016.
Thresholds Conference
Multi-Agency Safeguarding Hubs
The threshold in which your referral is considered for Children’s Social Care intervention and the Continuum of Needs and Services model. Nationally Children’s.
Hampshire Futures Safeguarding Update July 2017.
Thresholds Conference
CYP Forum October 5th 2016.
Introduction – role etc
Chapter 7 Multi-professional Perspectives
The Multi-Agency Safeguarding Hub (MASH)
Multi Agency Safeguarding Hub (MASH) Damien Cole - Integrated Working Strategic Lead, Children’s Services Angela Allgood – MASH Regional Advisor, Met.
SEFTON MASH The Decision Making Process of MASH and how the current restructure will affect MASH.
Working together to support children and families in Cambridgeshire
Role & Responsibilities: Surrey Safeguarding Children Board (SSCB)
Welcome and Introductions
Management of Allegations Against Adults who work with Children Linda Evans (Head of Quality Assurance for Safeguarding) and Majella O’Hagan (Local Authority.
Inter-Agency Referral Discussion
Hampshire Futures Safeguarding Update July 2017.
Designated Safeguarding Leads meeting
Management and supervision of men convicted of sexual offences
Multi Agency Safeguarding Hub MASH
Presentation transcript:

Overview of MASH MASH training

What is a MASH?  Multi Agency Safeguarding Hub  A MASH is a centre which brings together agencies (and their information) in order to:  identify risks to children at the earliest possible point  and respond with the most effective interventions.  A MASH carries out joint confidential screening, research and referral of vulnerable children.  Agencies work together to ensure vulnerable children are identified and properly cared for and protected

Why MASH?  The Children Act 2004 states that partners agencies must make arrangements to promote co-operation between relevant partner agencies to improve the well-being of children in their area  The inability of statutory safeguarding agencies to join up the information picture has been subject to persistent criticism and recommendation  MASH is a direct response to a number of serious case reviews including the Laming report which directly attributed the lack of good information sharing and communication to the subsequent death of a child  The Munro review highlights the value of co-located multi-agency teams dealing with referrals and decision making. MASH is singled out as good practice, with early evaluation showing improved decision making and outcomes for children

Safeguarding best practice  London wide police research proved that:  Early identification of children's needs provides the best outcomes for children  Early identification of risk has the best impact as its allows agencies to respond quickly with the most effective interventions

Essential criteria for a MASH  There are five core elements that must be included in a MASH  All notifications relating to safeguarding and promoting the welfare of children must go through the hub  Co-location of professionals from core agencies  The hub is fire walled, keeping MASH activity confidential and separate from operational activity  An agreed process for analysing and assessing risk, based on the fullest information picture and dissemination of a suitable information product to the most appropriate agency for necessary action  A process to identify victims and emerging harm through research and analysis

Partners in MASH  To be a MASH, it is a requirement that, as a minimum, the following partners are co-located:  Children’s social care  Police  Health  Education  Probation  Housing  Youth Offending Service  Redbridge MASH is represented by all the services listed above

Redbridge MASH  Redbridge MASH is located on the 3 rd floor of Lynton House in Children's services  Staff are co-located in a secure area with limited access from the rest of Children’s services  The Head of the MASH has day to day management responsibility for the MASH. However, line management arrangements have not changed for partner agencies  Each agency will continue to access their own systems in the MASH. There is no requirement to access or learn new systems

Redbridge MASH structure chart

Multi-agency referral Anonymous referral MASH 4 hour target 1 day CAFCPATEI&FS MERLIN Review and summary of collated information Check eCAF MASH process RAG rate & pass to social worker Advice and info Single agency response Open social care case: details sent to case worker New case created on protocol Check protocol ICS Other local authority referral Initial screening on whether to MASH Decision making NFA Self referral

Redbridge MASH process  Step 1: Referral received into MASH screening  Step 2a/b: check Protocol to see whether the child/ family known to Redbridge children’s services.  Step 3: if no open case, create new case record and record any relevant information held on protocol ICS/eCaf.  Step 4a: Head of MASH decides whether to ‘MASH’  Step 4b: Head of MASH RAG rates case

Redbridge MASH process (contd.)  Step 5: MASH case assigned to a social worker with agreed target timescale.  High Risk – RED: completed within 4 hours  Medium risk – AMBER: completed within 24 hours  Low risk – GREEN: completed within 24 hours  The social worker handling the case then asks colleagues in the multi- agency teams in the MASH to check the child/family details against their databases and to collate any information they may have about the child referred.  The information is collated within the timescales set through the RAG rating and returned to the social worker.  Social worker reviews and analyses information received from partner agencies within the MASH and summarises that information on a MASH record on protocol ICS.  Based on this information reviewed, the social worker recommends what further action should be taken.

Redbridge MASH process (contd.)  Step 6: The Head of the MASH or MASH Practice Manager reviews the MASH record and decides the most appropriate action to take in relation to that contact.  Pathways include:  CPAT  EI&FS  CAF  Information & Advice  Single Agency response  The Referral & Initial Screening Officer contacts the referrer to advise them as to what has happened with the referral.

Redbridge MASH criteria  All NSPCC/ anonymous referrals  All children whose identity is unknown  Children/ YP who may have been trafficked  Children/ YP at risk of sexual or other exploitation  Transient families  All referrals where DV is an issue (where there are children in the family under 5 years old or unborn) and additional information is needed to determine the threshold  All referrals where there has been a previous MARAC discussion  Referrals about a child found begging whereby additional information is needed to determine the threshold  Minor concerns about a child on a repeat basis  Children involved in gangs  All other referrals deemed appropriate by MASH manager

Expected outcomes of MASH  Streamlines the referral process  Improves communications between professionals  Child’s needs responded to quickly and effectively  Earlier identification of vulnerable children  Most appropriate professional delivers interventions to meet the needs identified  Reduction in number of professionals involved and avoids unnecessary duplication and visits