Slide 1 Task 38 Australia New Zealand Participating Countries USA Canada Croatia Austria The Netherlands Denmark UK Sweden Norway Finland Ireland Task.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Carbon sequestration: Forest and soil objective of the presentation is to give a general picture on possibilities to achieve standard for accounts for.
Advertisements

European Commission: Environment Directorate General Slide: 1 The Second European Climate Change Programme Working Group III Carbon Capture and Geological.
Copernicus Institute Sustainable Development and Innovation GHG balances (and costs); integrating energy, products and forests IEA Bio-energy Task 38 Conference.
DG CLIMA Resource Efficiency Policies for Land Use related Climate Mitigation Adrian R. Tan BIO Intelligence Service, France November 2013.
Baltimore USDA 3 rd GHG Symposium.ppt 1 Carbon Sequestration: A Forest Products Company View Carbon Sequestration: A Forest Products Company View.
Bioenergy: GHG balances ‘Carbon lean’, not ‘carbon neutral’
Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry: Canada’s views and experience In-session workshop AWG-KP 5.1 April 2, 2008.
International Energy Agency Energy Conservation in Buildings and Community Systems Programme - ECBCS IEA Energy Conservation in Buildings & Community Systems.
Agriculture and Greenhouse Gases Jill Heemstra, University of Nebraska - Lincoln Building Environmental Leaders in Animal Agriculture (BELAA)
IEA Bioenergy Task 31: Biomass Production for Energy from Sustainable Forestry Participating Countries Canada Denmark Finland Germany Norway.
National Environmental Research Institute, University of Aarhus, Denmark Biofuels for transport – environmental effects and costs From Agenda to Action.
EUROCLIMA Bioenergy Workshop
The LULUCF sector: land use, land-use change and forestry
IPCC Mitigation Potential and Costs Land-Use Options Daniel Martino (Carbosur, Uruguay) CLA, Chapter 8 (Agriculture), WGIII Bonn, 12 May 2007.
FOREST SERVICE GHG ISSUES AND INFORMATION NEEDS Elizabeth Reinhardt, FS Climate Change Office.
A Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Guide for Electric Utilities Bren School of Environmental Science and Management 02 November 2004.
I N T E G R A T E D S I N K E N H A N C E M E N T A S S E S S M E N T INSEA PARTNERS INSEA and the AFOLU sector Review of AFOLU policies under the Kyoto.
Stakeholder consultation on discussion document on GHG mitigation potential within the agriculture and forest sector Portlaoise 15 May 2015 Eugene Hendrick.
UK POLICIES AND MEASURES SIAN PRIEST DEPARTMENT FOR ENVIRONMENT, FOOD AND RURAL AFFAIRS.
1 Facilitating Commercialisation and Market Deployment of Environmentally Sound, Sustainable and Cost-competitive Bioenergy Technologies………
Carbon and forest management Robert Matthews Forest Research Biometrics, Surveys and Statistics Division Alice Holt Research Station, Farnham.
Biomass Carbon Neutrality in the Context of Forest-based Fuels and Products Al Lucier, NCASI Reid Miner, NCASI
Climate Change and the Clean Development Mechanism
Measurement and Performance Tracking (MAPT) Enhancing capacity to measure emissions/emissions reductions and track performance towards meeting climate.
Discussion of Draft CEQ Guidelines for Addressing Climate Change in NEPA Projects Tim Stroope, NEPA Coordinator, GMUG National Forest
Fossil C emissions associated with C flows of wood products Kim Pingoud VTT Energy P.O.Box 1606 FIN VTT IEA Bioenergy Task.
European State Forest Association ‘Sinks’ in the EU Emissions Trading Scheme 26/06/08 Erik Kosenkranius – EUSTAFOR Executive Director Marianne Rubio -
Wood Bioenergy Carbon Accounting – Beyond Carbon Neutrality Ken Skog, Project Leader USDA Forest Service Forest Products Laboratory Madison, Wisconsin.
Carbon Emissions from Harvesting Wood Products and Bioenergy Justin Ford-Robertson.
CarboInvent: Methods for quantifying forest carbon budgets B. Schlamadinger & W. Galinski 3. USDA Symposium on GHGs in Agric. and Forestry Baltimore,
EPA Offsets Experience and Analysis Bill Irving Climate Change Division U.S. Environmental Protection Agency April 28, 2009.
The GAINS model State of play
Joint Committee on Agriculture, Food and the Marine Dr Eimear Cotter Senior Manager Environmental Protection Agency 8 April 2014.
Relationship between the EU ETS and the Kyoto Protocol Flexible Mechanisms, from the Perspective of Bioenergy and C Sequestration Relationship between.
Challenges and Opportunities in Developing Forest Carbon Accounting Approaches for Use in Regulatory and Financial Trading Schemes Biometrics Working Group.
Latest on Bioenergy in the EU Emissions Trading System and in the CDM Latest on Bioenergy in the EU Emissions Trading System and in the CDM B. Schlamadinger.
‹#› of [total number of slides] This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme.
Directorate General for Energy and Transport Euroforenet Conference 20/11/2007 Brussels European Commission Kyriakos MANIATIS Biofuels & Industry DG TREN.
Carbon Sequestration in Farm and Forest Ecosystems Sarah Hines April 2009
Implementation of the Kyoto Protocol: what does it mean for bioenergy and C sequestration? Implementation of the Kyoto Protocol: what does it mean for.
HOW SINKS IN WOOD PRODUCTS AFFECT THE COST OF KYOTO PROTOCOL AND WORLD TRADE OF WOOD PRODUCTS: results from a global economywide model Johanna Pohjola.
CDM and Forestry Sector in India Carbon Pool of Forestry Sector in India The growing stock of the country has been estimated to be 4,740 million m³.
Supply chains for the UK to 2050 A. Bauen (*), R. Slade, S. Jablonski and C. Panoutsou The context The aim of this work is to explore the potential for.
New Zealand Bioenergy Update Ian Nicholas. Image goes here Why Bioenergy in NZ?  Renewable  Carbon Neutral  Predicted and managed  Stored and transported.
Climate change Dr Nigel Mortimer Managing Director North Energy Associates, Sheffield.
© OECD/IEA 2010 BECCS at the IEA: The way forward Wolf Heidug.
Opportunities for Research and Collaboration Relevant to Climate Change and Forests Overview of Opportunities for Research and Collaboration Relevant to.
Setting the Boundaries Stephen Boyle, Principal Consultant, Climate Change and Policy 11 th March 2009 A world leading energy and climate change consultancy.
IEA Bioenergy, also known as the Implementing Agreement for a Programme of Research, Development and Demonstration on Bioenergy, functions within a Framework.
Seite 1 Stand: Article 3.4 and CDM outcomes: implications for wood based industries / bioenergy Bernhard Schlamadinger IEA Bioenergy Task 38,
Summary of the Harvested Wood Products Workshop Rotorua, New Zealand, February 2001 Justin Ford-Robertson and Angela Duignan.
TECHNOECOMICS OF BIOENERGY TRADE CHAINS - IEA BIOENERGY TASK 35.
Overview of a model to estimate the GHG balance of the New Zealand forest industry 22 March 2004 Isabel Loza-Balbuena PhD candidate School of Forestry.
V.Sedyakin A. Nakhutin Institute of Global Climate and Ecology (IGCE) Institute of Global Climate and Ecology (IGCE)
Land Use, Land Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF) European Commission expert group on forest fires Antalya, 26 April 2012 Ernst Schulte, DG ENV on behalf.
Page 1 Task 38 Australia New Zealand Participating Countries USA Canada Croatia Austria The Netherlands Denmark UK Sweden Norway Finland Ireland IEA Bioenergy.
Professor Jim Lynch Chief Executive, Forest Research, GB.
Page 1 Task 38 Australia New Zealand Participating Countries USA Canada Croatia Austria The Netherlands Denmark UK Sweden Norway Finland Ireland Highlights.
Brief Overview of Legal Framework: UNFCCC and Kyoto Protocol M.J.Mace Climate Change and Energy Programme, FIELD LDC Workshop Montreal Canada November.
Ministry of the Environment and Energy Sweden Government Offices of Sweden Swedish perspectives on the role of boreal forests in CO 2 balance Joshua Prentice.
Role of forests in Finnish climate change policy Ministerial conference and workshop on the role of boreal forest in CO 2 balance Dr. Tatu Torniainen.
Climate Change Mitigation and Complexity Agus P Sari Country Director, Indonesia EcoSecurities.
BioEnergy Sustaining The Future 2 BESTF2 Briefing Event 11 th December 2013 Dr Megan Cooper, BESTF co-ordinator.
IEA Bioenergy Task 38 Case Study on the Greenhouse Gas Budgets of Peat Use for Energy in Ireland Kenneth Byrne and Sari Lappi Forest Ecosystem Research.
JOHN MULDOWNEY DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, FOOD AND THE MARINE JULY 2016 Climate Action – Implications for the Beef Sector.
Biomass and Bioenergy Approaches to Assessing Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Potential Carly Green 20 November 2003IEA Bioenergy Task 38 National Meeting -
GHG INVENTORY IN VIET NAM
Robin Matthews Climate Change Theme Leader Macaulay Institute
Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Targets
Susanne Woess-Gallasch, Neil Bird
Presentation transcript:

Slide 1 Task 38 Australia New Zealand Participating Countries USA Canada Croatia Austria The Netherlands Denmark UK Sweden Norway Finland Ireland Task 38 Greenhouse Gas Balances of Biomass and Bioenergy Systems Ken Byrne, Department of Environmental Resource Management, University College Dublin

Slide 2 Task 38 Participating Countries 1/2 National CountryTeam LeaderInstitution AustraliaA. CowieState Forests New South Wales AustriaB. SchlamadingerJoanneum Research CanadaT. HattonCanadian Forest Service, NRCan CroatiaS. Fijan- ParlovEKONERG DenmarkN. HedingDanish Forest and Landscape Research Inst. FinlandI. SavolainenVTT- Processes K. PingoudVTT- Processes IrelandK. ByrneUniversity College Dublin

Slide 3 Task 38 Participating Countries 1/2 Country National Team Institution Leader New Zealand K. Robertson Forest Research Norway B. Solberg Agricultural University of Norway Sweden L. Gustavsson Mid Sweden University The NetherlandsK. Kwant NOVEM A. Faiij Utrecht University United KingdomR. Matthews Forestry Commission Research Agency USA M. Ringer National Renewable Energy Laboratory

Slide 4 Task 38 Objectives – scientific Develop, compare and make available  models for assessing GHG balances Assess the life cycle GHG balance of  bioenergy and C sequestration systems Analyze the country and regional potential of  bioenergy, afforestation and other biomass based mitigation strategies Identify and analyze synergies between  afforestation and other land based activities for carbon sequestration and enhanced bioenergy use

Slide 5 Task 38 Objectives – implementation Aid decision makers  in selecting mitigation strategies that optimize GHG benefits Assist in the implementation  of LULUCF articles of the Kyoto Protocol Contribute to work  of the IPCC/OECD/IEA related to GHG inventories involving carbon sequestration, wood products, or bioenergy Contribute to the development  of international standards for GHG accounting and verification in LULUCF sectors

Slide 6 Task 38 Systems-analytical assessment of GHG (CO 2, CH 4, N 2 O) balances, flows, stocks, emissions in biomass production, biomass conversion and carbon sequestration systems. Carbon pools include: above and below- ground biomass, litter and woody debris, soils, wood products, fossil fuel reservoirs. Work Scope 1/2

Slide 7 Task 38 Investigation of trade-offs within and among these systems Analysis on short-term vs. long-term mitigation effects, considering the time value of carbon Cost / benefit analysis of GHG mitigation through biotic options Involvement of industrial participants with a view on implementing biomass- based GHG mitigation projects Work Scope 2/2

Slide 8 Task 38 Task 38 work (2001 – 2003) Completed work:  Frequently Asked Questions paper  Task 38 Folder Current and upcoming work:  Country reports  Case Studies  Country Specific Baselines  Soil Carbon and Bioenergy  Biofuel Trade

Slide 9 Task 38 Country Reports Background information on the general energy system and GHG emissions, on bioenergy systems and on national LULUCF situation Bioenergy and carbon sequestration policies and measures at national, regional and local levels Bioenergy and carbon sequestration implementation projects and research programmes

Slide 10 Task 38 Case Studies1/2 Apply the ‘standard methodology’ to actual bioenergy and/or C sequestration projects Assess and compare GHG balances of different projects Compare to fossil energy systems Recommendations for optimizations 7 in participating countries

Slide 11 Task 38 Case Studies 2/2  Australia: GHG balance of 2 bioenergy systems (coal co- firing biomass, wood fired plant) from timber plantations;  Canada: GHG balance of small pyrolysis plant for bio-Oil production using sawmill residues and thinnings;  Finland and Sweden: GHG balances of increased use of construction wood and of biomass-fired CHP plants;  Ireland: GHG budgets of peat use for energy in Ireland  New Zealand: GHG balance of a bioenergy CHP plant using sawmill residues (in comparison to natural gas);  UK: GHG balances of 2 small scaleheat systems, using conventional forestry and Miscanthus;  Croatia: GHG reduction potential by biodiesel in context of Joint Implementation;  USA: GHG reduction potential by anaerobic digestion.

Slide 12 Task 38 Key activities 1/2 Online Bibliography: Greenhouse Gas Balances of Bioenergy, Forestry, Wood Products, Land Use, and Land-Use Change Standard Methodology for GHG Balances of Bioenergy Systems (Biomass and Bioenergy) Position paper: The Role of Bioenergy in Greenhouse Gas Mitigation

Slide 13 Task 38 Key activities 2/2 Project-based Greenhouse Gas Accounting: Guiding Principles with a Focus on Baselines and Additionality (Energy Policy) Task Website (new structure under development) Posters, overheads Semi-annual workshops Workshop Proceedings electronic and hard copy

Slide 14 Task 38 Standard Methodology Carbon stock dynamics Trade-offs and synergies Permanence Emission factors Efficiency Up stream energy inputs By-products Leakage Other GHG’s

Slide 15 Task 38

Slide 16 Task 38 Workshop Topics 1/2 Carbon accounting and emissions trading related to bioenergy, wood products and carbon sequestration. Land-Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry: the road to COP6 Carbon sequestration and energy balance models Bioenergy for mitigation of CO2 emissions: the power, transportation and industrial sectors

Slide 17 Task 38 Workshop Topics 2/2 The role of bioenergy in achieving the targets stipulated in the Kyoto Protocol Effects of the Kyoto Protocol on forestry and bioenergy projects for GHG mitigation Forestry, Forest Products and Energy Biofuel Trade (jointly with Task 35)

Slide 18 Task 38 Australia New Zealand Participating Countries USA Canada Croatia Austria The Netherlands Denmark UK Sweden Norway Finland Ireland Task 38 Greenhouse Gas Balances of Biomass and Bioenergy Systems