1 Discussion on some details for the simulation of IMT-A China Communications Standards Association CJK-B3G #20 in Zhangjiajie China, 8-10 April 2009 Qin.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Submitted By Riaz ( ) A Wideband MIMO Channel Model Derived From the Geometric Elliptical Scattering Model Space Signal Processing Home Work # 04.
Advertisements

Status of Channel Models IEEE WG Session #7 March 15-19, 2004 Qiang Guo Editor, Channel Modeling Correspondence Group C /30.
College of Engineering Capacity Allocation in Multi-cell UMTS Networks for Different Spreading Factors with Perfect and Imperfect Power Control Robert.
The Mobile MIMO Channel and Its Measurements
Underwater Acoustic MIMO Channel Capacity
Comparison of different MIMO-OFDM signal detectors for LTE
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/0996r2 Aug 2013 Josiam, Taori, Tong - SamsungSlide 1 Outdoor Channel Model Candidates for HEW Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0630r0 Submission May 2015 Intel CorporationSlide 1 Verification of IEEE ad Channel Model for Enterprise Cubical Environment.
Introduction to Cognitive radios Part two HY 539 Presented by: George Fortetsanakis.
50 users per cell (N U =600) N T =6  System uses frequency reuse factor 1. This is not a frequency reuse pattern.  Mitigating inter-cell interference.
Cellular System Capacity Maximum number of users a cellular system can support in any cell. Can be defined for any system. Typically assumes symmetric.
MIMO and TCP: A CASE for CROSS LAYER DESIGN Soon Y. Oh, Mario Gerla Computer Science Dept. University of California, Los Angeles {soonoh,
Interference Minimization and Uplink Relaying For a 3G/WLAN Network Ju Wang Virginia Commonwealth University May, 2005.
July 2015 doc.: IEEE /XXXXr0 July 2015
Doc.: IEEE /1391r0 Submission Nov Yakun Sun, et. Al.Slide 1 About SINR conversion for PHY Abstraction Date: Authors:
Supervisor: Prof. Jyri Hämäläinen Instructor: M.Sc Zhong Zheng A part of NETS2020 project Ying Yang
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-11/1455r0 Nov 2011 Fei Tong,Les Smith, CSRSlide ah network outdoor deployment issues Date: 2011-Nov-03 Authors:
MULTIPLE INPUT MULTIPLE OUTPUT SYSTEMS (MIMO)
For 3-G Systems Tara Larzelere EE 497A Semester Project.
John Thornton, Yuriy Zakharov, David Grace
SMART ANTENNA SYSTEMS IN BWA Submitted by M. Venkateswararao.
POWER CONTROL IN COGNITIVE RADIO SYSTEMS BASED ON SPECTRUM SENSING SIDE INFORMATION Karama Hamdi, Wei Zhang, and Khaled Ben Letaief The Hong Kong University.
by P. Sriploy, M. Uthansakul and R. Wongsan
1 PROPAGATION ASPECTS FOR SMART ANTENNAS IN WIRELESS SYSTEMS JACK H. WINTERS AT&T Labs - Research Red Bank, NJ July 17,
Antenna Design and Link Engineering Pattern lobes Pattern lobe is a portion of the radiation pattern with a local maximum Lobes are classified as: major,
Doc.: IEEE /0493r1 Submission May 2010 Changsoon Choi, IHP microelectronicsSlide 1 Beamforming training for IEEE ad Date: Authors:
College of Engineering WiFi and WCDMA Network Design Robert Akl, D.Sc. Department of Computer Science and Engineering Robert Akl, D.Sc. Department of Computer.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-14/0627r0 May 2014 Josiam et.al., SamsungSlide 1 Outdoor Channel Models for System Level Simulations Date: Authors:
報告人:陳柏偉 日期: 指導老師:林永松.  ABSTRACT  INTRODUCTION  MODEL FOR ELASTIC TRAFFIC  INTERFERENCE COORDINATION SCHEMES  SELF-ORGANIZING INTERFERENCE.
Philipp Hasselbach Capacity Optimization for Self- organizing Networks: Analysis and Algorithms Philipp Hasselbach.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/0536r0 May 2013 Wookbong Lee, LG ElectronicsSlide 1 HEW SG PHY Considerations For Outdoor Environment Date: Authors:
Smart Antennas and Transmit Diversity for GSM Systems 指導教授:黃文傑 博士 學 生:曾凱霖 學 號: M 無線通訊實驗室.
Doc.: IEEE /1011r0 Submission September 2009 Alexander Maltsev, IntelSlide 1 Verification of Polarization Impact Model by Experimental Data Date:
Efficient Beam Selection for Hybrid Beamforming
Doc.: IEEE /0251r0 Submission February 2011 Ron Porat, Broadcom Outdoor Channel Models for ah Date: Authors: Slide 1.
1 HAP Smart Antenna George White, Zhengyi Xu, Yuriy Zakharov University of York.
A Distributed Relay-Assignment Algorithm for Cooperative Communications in Wireless Networks ICC 2006 Ahmed K. Sadek, Zhu Han, and K. J. Ray Liu Department.
Cognitive Radio for Dynamic Spectrum Allocation Systems Xiaohua (Edward) Li and Juite Hwu Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering State University.
Yschen, CSIE, CCU1 Chapter 5: The Cellular Concept Associate Prof. Yuh-Shyan Chen Dept. of Computer Science and Information Engineering National Chung-Cheng.
Doc.: IEEE /0431r0 Submission April 2009 Alexander Maltsev, Intel CorporationSlide 1 Polarization Model for 60 GHz Date: Authors:
Study of Broadband Postbeamformer Interference Canceler Antenna Array Processor using Orthogonal Interference Beamformer Lal C. Godara and Presila Israt.
Doc.: IEEE /0493r0 Submission May 2010 Changsoon Choi, IHP microelectronicsSlide 1 Beamforming training for IEEE ad Date: Authors:
MU-MIMO System Performance of 8TX codebook IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-09/0803 Date Submitted:
Coexistence in heterogeneous networks Discuss the interference issue
EE359 – Lecture 12 Outline Combining Techniques
Multiple Frequency Reuse Schemes in the Two-hop IEEE j Wireless Relay Networks with Asymmetrical Topology Weiwei Wang a, Zihua Guo b, Jun Cai c,
Doc.: thz Fast Beam Searching Concept Submission Match 2015 Bile Peng (TU Braunschweig). Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for.
Doc.: IEEE /1229r1 Submission November 2009 Alexander Maltsev, IntelSlide 1 Application of 60 GHz Channel Models for Comparison of TGad Proposals.
Outline Transmitters (Chapters 3 and 4, Source Coding and Modulation) (week 1 and 2) Receivers (Chapter 5) (week 3 and 4) Received Signal Synchronization.
Doc.: IEEE /0632r0 Submission May 2015 Intel CorporationSlide 1 Experimental Measurements for Short Range LOS SU-MIMO Date: Authors:
CJK#20 B3G-WG CCSA Wang Li Evaluation Schedule for CJK EVAL SIG.
EENG473 Mobile Communications Module 3 : Week # (10) Mobile Radio Propagation: Large-Scale Path Loss.
Multi-Beamforming in Polarized Channels for 11ay
Antenna Arrays and Automotive Applications
Outline Importance of spatial channel model (SCM)
Outline Introduction Wireless channel & model Jakes channel model
Active Antennas Solutions 1st European Trial of AAU3902
A Physical Interpretation of Beamforming, BLAST and SVD Algorithms
LRTC 3.4 – 3.8 GHz Ericsson input PT1 XO 29 – 31/
ECE 7930 Advanced Topics in Wireless Networks
WF on scenarios and evaluation assumptions for flexible duplex
Evaluation Model for LTE-Advanced
Diversity Lecture 7.
Concept of Power Control in Cellular Communication Channels
5G Micro Cell Deployment in Coexistence with Fixed Service
Royal Institute of Technology Dept. of Signals, Sensors and Systems
Month Year November 2018 November 2018
doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 Date:
PHY Performance Evaluation with 60 GHz WLAN Channel Models
Presentation transcript:

1 Discussion on some details for the simulation of IMT-A China Communications Standards Association CJK-B3G #20 in Zhangjiajie China, 8-10 April 2009 Qin Fei

2 Content Introduction Polarized antenna modeling Inter-cell interference modeling Smart antenna pattern Preliminary Geometry Distribution

3 Introduction IMT.EVAL give a good guideline on the modeling and evaluation of IMT-Advanced. This document focus on some important details which not defined in IMT.EVAL, but will very important in system level simulation. Purpose of this document is to raising those issues for discussion and to exchange views, trying to get common understanding if possible.

4 Polarized antenna modeling IMT-A system will support more antenna elements number, up to 8. Dual-polarized antenna is a good solution to minimal the antenna size and make it easy to implementation in engineering. Polarized antenna will be an important antenna configuration in the evaluation of IMT-A. Polarized antenna channel impulse response formula are not clearly defined in IMT.EVAL. Polarization power loss should be correctly considered in the simulation.

5 Polarized antenna modeling - Channel impulse response The SCM channel model for the polarized antenna are defined in the IMT.EVAL. The formula of the channel impulse response is given as following: Where, the Frx,u,V, Frx,u,H, Ftx,s,V, Ftx,s,H are the channel response vector projected on the V and H direction including the antenna gain at the MS and BS sides. See the following figure1. The formulas for these values Frx,u,V, Frx,u,H, Ftx,s,V, Ftx,s,H are not clearly defined.

6 In Fig. 1, the transmitted signal in each antenna is divided into the v-component and h-component. At the receiving antenna, the signals include the v-component and h- component, and the cross-talk between each component. Fig.1 Polarization impulse response Polarized antenna modeling - Channel impulse response

7 The projections of the 4 components are the function of tilt angle of MS antenna and BS antenna, and also the AOA and AOD. It can be given as where Polarized antenna modeling - Channel impulse response

8 Polarized antenna modeling – Polrization power loss The introduction of the polarized antenna channel model will decrease the channel response power that can be called polarization power loss. According to the channel model for polarized antenna system, the polarization power loss for the nth path can be given as: For example, the BS antenna is ±45°cross-polarized, the UE antenna is vertical, the AoD and AoA is 0°, and the polarization power loss of the nth path is: For all N paths, the mean polarization power loss is:

9 In system simulations, usually the channel from a MS to a far away BS with weak interference will not be modeled. In this case, the weak interference is considered as white noise with equal power considering the large scale fading. So, when calculating the power of the weak interference, the polarization power loss must be added to the large scale fading and path loss. The polarization power loss should also be considered when calculating the Geometry in the simulation. If the polarization power loss is ignored, the performance of polarized antenna system in the simulation will be lower than the correct value. The performance loss is decided by the number of neighbors which are considered as white noise. Polarized antenna modeling – Polrization power loss

10 Inter-cell interference modeling Method 1: Establish SCM channel model for the UE to all 57 neighbor sectors to calculate the SINR. Simulation efficiency is very low! CPU and Memory exhausting! Method 2: Establish UE to the strongest (ordered by large scale fading) N cell’s SCM channel response, N=3 to 6. The other cells interference are modeling with Rayl fading plus pathloss and shadow fading. Method 3: Establish UE to the strongest (ordered by large scale fading) N cell’s SCM channel response, N=3 to 6. The other cells interference are considered as AWGN only take into the large scale fading( pathloss and shadow fading) when calculating the power. Method4:Establish UE to the anchor cell’s SCM channel response. All the neighbour cells interference are considered as AWGN or Raly. Simulation efficiency: Method1<Method2<Method3<Method4 Accuracy:Method1>Method2>Method3>Method4 Selection by the simulation requirement, but Method2 is preferred.

11 Smart Antenna Pattern Cause the different antenna structure, the unit gain pattern is different from the traditional 70 degree 3 sector pattern. The unit gain pattern of smart antenna is wider than 70 degree; usually, two patterns are suggested. 1)the idea model of the unlimited baffle-board model, about 120 degree, Fig. 2. 2)the measurement pattern, about 90 degree, Fig.3. The sector gain pattern is composed by proper sector beamforming weight for different unit gain pattern 。 For example, the sector beamforming weight for 4+4 polarized antenna array is w = [ i, i, i, i] for unit pattern 1), Fig.2; w = [0.35, 1, 1, -0.6] for unit pattern 2). Fig.3.

12 The 120 degree Unit gain pattern, the composed sector gain pattern(4 antenna with 0.5 lamda spacing) and the traditional 70 degree pattern are showed as the following figure 2. Smart Antenna Pattern

13 The 90 degree Unit gain pattern, the composed sector gain pattern(4 antenna with 0.5 lamda spacing) and the traditional 70 degree pattern are showed as the following figure 3. Smart Antenna Pattern

14 Preliminary Geometry Distribution ITU Urban Macro VS 3GPP Case1(Both ISD = 500) Geomety(dB) CDF — Case1, Am = 25 — Uma, SF Cr — Uma, No SF Cr

15