Overview of NSW trigger electronics Lorne Levinson NSW Electronics Design Reviews, February 2015 1 Lorne Levinson, Overview of NSW trigger electronics.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Track Trigger Designs for Phase II Ulrich Heintz (Brown University) for U.H., M. Narain (Brown U) M. Johnson, R. Lipton (Fermilab) E. Hazen, S.X. Wu, (Boston.
Advertisements

Ancillary firmware for the NSW Trigger Processor Lorne Levinson, Weizmann Institute for the NSW Trigger Processor Working Group NSW Electronics Design.
E-link IP for FE ASICs VFAT3/GdSP ASIC design meeting 19/07/2011.
CHL -2 Level 1 Trigger System Fully Pipelined Custom ElectronicsDigitization Drift Chamber Pre-amp The GlueX experiment will utilize fully pipelined front.
8th Workshop on Electronics for LHC Experiment, Colmar, France, 10 Sep R.Ichimiya, ATLAS Japan 1 Sector Logic Implementation for the ATLAS Endcap.
Requirements for the NSW VMM3 readout ASIC and the NSW Readout Controller ASIC NSW Readout Working Group NSW Electronics Design Reviews, February 2015.
S. Silverstein For ATLAS TDAQ Level-1 Trigger updates for Phase 1.
The Belle SVD Trigger  Tom Ziegler  Vertex 2002  Kailua-Kona, Hawaii, 4-8 th nov The Belle SVD Trigger Tom Ziegler on behalf of the Belle SVD.
GEM Design Plans Jason Gilmore TAMU Workshop 1 Oct
Front-End ASIC for the ATLAS New Small Wheels
Various Topics Related to FEB Liang Han, Ge Jin University of Science and Technology of China Dec.21,2013.
February 19th 2009AlbaNova Instrumentation Seminar1 Christian Bohm Instrumentation Physics, SU Upgrading the ATLAS detector Overview Motivation The current.
October 1st th Workshop on Electronics for LHC Experiment at Amsterdam 1 Beam Test Result of the ATLAS End-cap Muon Level-1 Trigger Chikara Fukunaga.
The Track-Finding Processor for the Level-1 Trigger of the CMS Endcap Muon System D.Acosta, A.Madorsky, B.Scurlock, S.M.Wang University of Florida A.Atamanchuk,
Erez Etzion, Tel Aviv University
An Asynchronous Level-1 Tracking Trigger for Future LHC Detector Upgrades A. Madorsky, D. Acosta University of Florida/Physics, POB , Gainesville,
SPHENIX GEM Tracker R&D at BNL Craig Woody BNL sPHENIX Design Study Meeting September 7, 2011.
U N C L A S S I F I E D FVTX Detector Readout Concept S. Butsyk For LANL P-25 group.
PicoTDC Features of the picoTDC (operating at 1280 MHz with 64 delay cells) Focus of the unit on very small time bins, 12ps basic, 3ps interpolation Interpolation.
Muon New Small Wheel sTGC Trigger for Phase I ATLAS New Small Wheel Electronics Workshop Les Houches December 2012 Lorne Levinson L. Levinson, December.
M. Lo Vetere 1,2, S. Minutoli 1, E. Robutti 1 1 I.N.F.N Genova, via Dodecaneso, GENOVA (Italy); 2 University of GENOVA (Italy) The TOTEM T1.
Trigger processor John Huth Harvard. NSW + TGC of BW’s track fitting track position (R,  ) d  : deviation of incidence angle from infinite pT muons.
September 8-14, th Workshop on Electronics for LHC1 Channel Control ASIC for the CMS Hadron Calorimeter Front End Readout Module Ray Yarema, Alan.
STGC Trigger Demonstrator sTGC Trigger Demonstrator ATLAS Israel Annual Meeting 30 December 2012 Lorne Levinson, Julia Narevicius, Alex Roich, Meir Shoa,
The ATLAS New Small Wheel Trigger Lorne Levinson For the ATLAS NSW collaboration ACES workshop, 19 March 2014 Thanks to my NSW colleagues for many slides.
Elec 関係、情報収集 ( 中。。 ). Design review for NSW electronics (2015/2) Design review for NSW ASIC (2015/4)
CPT Week, April 2001Darin Acosta1 Status of the Next Generation CSC Track-Finder D.Acosta University of Florida.
14/6/2000 End Cap Muon Trigger Review at CERN 1 Muon Track Trigger Processing on Slave and Hi-pT Boards C.Fukunaga/Tokyo Metropolitan University TGC electronics.
NUMI Off Axis NUMI Off Axis Workshop Workshop Argonne Meeting Electronics for RPCs Gary Drake, Charlie Nelson Apr. 25, 2003 p. 1.
FPGA firmware of DC5 FEE. Outline List of issue Data loss issue Command error issue (DCM to FEM) Command lost issue (PC with USB connection to GANDALF)
Some thoughts on the New Small Wheel Trigger Issues V. Polychronakos, BNL 10 May,
March 9, 2005 HBD CDR Review 1 HBD Electronics Preamp/cable driver on the detector. –Specification –Schematics –Test result Rest of the electronics chain.
T. Kawamoto1 ATLAS muon small wheels for ATLAS phase-1 upgrade LHCC T. Kawamoto (New) small wheels ? Why new small wheels for high.
LHCb front-end electronics and its interface to the DAQ.
1 07/10/07 Forward Vertex Detector Technical Design – Electronics DAQ Readout electronics split into two parts – Near the detector (ROC) – Compresses and.
TGC Timing Adjustment Chikara Fukunaga (TMU) ATLAS Timing Workshop 5 July ‘07.
Transfering Trigger Data to USA15 V. Polychonakos, BNL.
KLM Trigger Status Barrel KLM RPC Front-End Brandon Kunkler, Gerard Visser Belle II Trigger and Data Acquistion Workshop January 17, 2012.
VMM ASIC ― Status Report - April 2013 Gianluigi De Geronimo
CERN, 18 december 2003Coincidence Matrix ASIC PRR Coincidence ASIC modifications E.Petrolo, R.Vari, S.Veneziano INFN-Rome.
Design Studies of the ATLAS Muon Level-1 Trigger based on the MDT Detector for the LHC Upgrade O.Sasaki, Y.Suzuki, K.Nagano, M.Ishino, M.Ikeno (KEK), K.Bendtz,
STGC Front end boards sTGC Front end boards NSW Electronics workshop November 2013 L. Levinson Weizmann Institute NSW Electronics workshop, November 20131L.
A Super-TFC for a Super-LHCb (II) 1. S-TFC on xTCA – Mapping TFC on Marseille hardware 2. ECS+TFC relay in FE Interface 3. Protocol and commands for FE/BE.
FPGAs in ATLAS Front-End Electronics Henrik Åkerstedt, Steffen Muschter and Christian Bohm Stockholm University.
1 Level 1 Pre Processor and Interface L1PPI Guido Haefeli L1 Review 14. June 2002.
Prototyping electronics and data acquisition for sTGC
STGC Trigger Electronics sTGC Trigger Electronics ATLAS New Small Wheel Milestone Meeting January 2013 Lorne Levinson L. Levinson, sTGC Trigger Electronics1NSW.
Overview of NSW trigger electronics Lorne Levinson Weizmann Institute of Science TDS and ART ASIC Design Review, 21 July Lorne Levinson, Overview.
VMM Update Front End ASIC for the ATLAS Muon Upgrade V. Polychronakos BNL RD51 - V. Polychronakos, BNL10/15/131.
August 24, 2011IDAP Kick-off meeting - TileCal ATLAS TileCal Upgrade LHC and ATLAS current status LHC designed for cm -2 s 7+7 TeV Limited to.
Muon New Small Wheel sTGC Trigger for Phase I ATLAS NSW sTGC Workshop July 2012 Lorne Levinson, Nachman Lupu, Giora Mikenberg, Julia Narevicius,
NSW Electronics Preliminary Design Review Feb 2015 Introduction and Review Scope Feb 2015 NSW ELTX PDR S. Zimmermann 1 Stephanie Zimmermann.
ATLAS small wheels and muon trigger upgrade Osamu Sasaki High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK) INPUTS from RPC : S.Veneziano sTGC : N.Lupu.
C.Beigbeder, D.Breton, M.El Berni, J.Maalmi, V.Tocut – LAL/In2p3/CNRS L.Leterrier, S. Drouet - LPC/In2p3/CNRS P. Vallerand - GANIL/CNRS/CEA SuperB -Collaboration.
29/05/09A. Salamon – TDAQ WG - CERN1 LKr calorimeter L0 trigger V. Bonaiuto, L. Cesaroni, A. Fucci, A. Salamon, G. Salina, F. Sargeni.
Off-Detector Processing for Phase II Track Trigger Ulrich Heintz (Brown University) for U.H., M. Narain (Brown U) M. Johnson, R. Lipton (Fermilab) E. Hazen,
On behalf of the ATLAS muon collaboration
Jitter requirements for FPGA reference clocks on the NSW Rim
Kenneth Johns University of Arizona
ATLAS calorimeter and topological trigger upgrades for Phase 1
Jinfan Chang Experimental Physics Center , IHEP Feb 18 , 2011
VMM ASIC ― Status Report - April 2013 Gianluigi De Geronimo
Optical data transmission for
VMM Update Front End ASIC for the ATLAS Muon Upgrade
CMS EMU TRIGGER ELECTRONICS
ATLAS L1Calo Phase2 Upgrade
NSW Electronics workshop, November 2013
PID meeting Mechanical implementation Electronics architecture
SVT detector electronics
The LHCb Front-end Electronics System Status and Future Development
Presentation transcript:

Overview of NSW trigger electronics Lorne Levinson NSW Electronics Design Reviews, February Lorne Levinson, Overview of NSW trigger electronics NSW Electronics Design Reviews, February 2015

   NSW trigger concept 2 Phase I upgrade: Increased backgrounds, but must maintain existing trigger rate Filter “Big Wheel” muon candidates to remove tracks that are not from the IP Only track “A” should be a trigger candidate: pointing:  <  7.5mrad Challenge is latency: 500nsec for electronics + 500ns fibres to be in time for Big Wheel Micromegas: 2M strips, 0.4mm sTGC: 280K strips (3.2mm), 45K pads, 28K wires sTGC, MM find candidates independently, list merged for Sector Logic Hit per layer: sTGC: hit is centroid of 3-5 strips Micromegas: hit is address of strip Lorne Levinson, Overview of NSW trigger electronicsNSW Electronics Design Reviews, February 2015

Present Small Wheel – defines basic layout and envelopes 16 detector layers in total 2 technologies, MicroMegas and sTGC Micro-Mesh Gaseous detectors (Micromegas): primary precision tracker Space resolution < 100 μm independent of track incidence angle Good track separation due to small 0.5 mm readout granularity (strips) Excellent high rate capability due to small gas amplification region and small space charge effects sTGCs: primary trigger detector Bunch ID with good timing resolution – additional suppression of fakes Good space resolution providing track vectors with < 1 mrad angular resolution Based on proven TGC technology; Pads & strips, instead of only strips as in current detector Lorne Levinson, Overview of NSW trigger electronics 3 Detector layout Detector layout 9.3m NSW Electronics Design Reviews, February 2015

Lorne Levinson, Overview of NSW trigger electronicsNSW Electronics Design Reviews, February VMM, TDS, ART, ROC Are ASICs (IBM 130nm) MM & sTGC versions: different cable to E-link mapping

Lorne Levinson, Overview of NSW trigger electronicsNSW Electronics Design Reviews, February VMM, TDS, ART, ROC ASICs Planned for IBM 130nm Front end boards MM & sTGC versions: different cable to E-link mapping

Off- detector architecture with FELIX Functions can now be separated, physically, or just logically. “ROD” = Event fragment builder/processor for ATLAS central Read Out System L1DDC Readout Controller VMMs Lorne Levinson, Overview of NSW trigger electronicsNSW Electronics Design Reviews, February “ROD” ……………..

coarse time counter: 12-bit Gray-code test pulse generator: 10-bit adjustable coarse threshold generator: 10-bit adjustable temperature sensor: ~ 725 mV mV/°C configuration registers: 80-bit + 24-bit / channel PROMPT (courtesy of CERN): export regulations (ITAR) compliance circuit analog1 data1 data2 analog2 CA shaper logic or neighbor addr. 6-b ADC flg1-bit thr1-bit addr6-bit ampl10-bit time8-bit BC12-bit ART (flag + serial address) ART clock 12-b BC Gray count 10-b ADC 8-b ADC BC clock logic time peak VMM2 Front end ASIC architecture 4X FIFO data/TGC clock mux tk clock pulser trim bias registers tp clock TGC out (ToT, TtP, PtT, PtP, 6bADC) tempDAC reset test 64 channels analog mon. technology: IBM CMOS 130nm power dissipation: mV/ch. transistor count: > 5 million prompt 7

VMM3 and Readout Controller ASICs VMM2 has only simple, non-pipelined readout; needs ATLAS L0, L1 pipelines and collecting all hits belonging to the trigger RO Controller interfaces VMM3 to the ATLAS GBTx of the readout system. Collect data from up to 8 VMMs to one Read out Controller – one ROC per Front end board Architecture: – VMM keeps hits until Level-0 Accept; – RO Controller keeps hits until Level-1 Accept, formats output GBT: aggregates many 80, 160 or 320 Mb/s “E-links” to one 3.2Gb/s fibre – Aggregate several readout companions into one GBT – One GBT per layer on each detector edge  32 per 1/16 th sector – GBT is bi-directional: other direction carries Trigger, Timing & Control (TTC) data – One bi-dir E-link per Front End board for configuring ASICs and Detector Control system: monitoring temperatures and voltages Lorne Levinson, Hong Kong, 31 May 2014ATLAS Muon NSW Trigger 8

sTGC strips: one output per channel 6-bit flash ADC of strip signal peak  charge; serial output at 160Mb/s Centroid of 3 to 5 3.2mm strips gives track coordinate in a layer sTGC pads: one output per channel 10nsec pulse at peak, or use leading edge of Time-over- Threshold Coincidence in 8-layer tower of pads chooses which strips to transfer to centroid finder Front end outputs for trigger path Lorne Levinson, Overview of NSW trigger electronics9NSW Electronics Design Reviews, February 2015 Micromegas: one output per 64-channel chip Address in Real Time (ART) of first (in time) strip hit in each BC per chip Address of the 0.4mm strip gives track coordinate “  TPC” mode probably 1 st

sTCGsTCG sTCGsTCG sTCGsTCG sTCGsTCG sTCGsTCG sTCGsTCG sTCGsTCG sTCGsTCG sTGC trigger scheme 10 On-chamber ASICS On Rim of NSW FPGAs USA 15 Pad Trigger Strip TDS Strip TDS Pad TDS Pad TDS Pad VMM Pad VMM sTGC Trigger Processor sTGC Trigger Processor Strip VMM Strip VMM sTCGsTCG sTCGsTCG sTCGsTCG sTCGsTCG sTCGsTCG sTCGsTCG sTCGsTCG sTCGsTCG Strip VMM Strip VMM 9 Pad trigger uses pad tower coincidence to choose ONLY the relevant band of strips. Physical pads staggered by ½ pad in both directions Logical pad-tower defined by projecting from 8 layers of staggered pad boundaries Pad-tower coincidence = 2  3-out-4 overlapping pads Router 1/16 th sector Problem: no BW to read all strips Strip TDS Strip TDS Only one Strip TDS chosen Lorne Levinson, Overview of NSW trigger electronicsNSW Electronics Design Reviews, February 2015

11 Lorne Levinson, Overview of NSW trigger electronicsNSW Electronics Design Reviews, February 2015

Strip Trigger Data Serializer ASIC Prepare strip trigger data to send to centroid finder: – Use pad tower ID from Pad Trigger to select a band of strips – serialize the FADC values of the band of strips for transmission to the Router board on the rim  BCID, as determined by the Pad Trigger, is appended to the data  path to Trigger Processor has fixed latency, but is not sync’ed to BC at every step. Sync’ed to BC only on output to Sector Logic Rad tol, SEU mitigation, IBM 130nm 1 st TDS prototype delivered, being tested Requires 5G serial output over twinax to Router – Serializer modified from GBT and – 5G serializer core submitted Feb 2014: ~1mm 2, 300 mW, 1.5 V, – Successful test results were presented in July 12Lorne Levinson, Overview of NSW trigger electronicsNSW Electronics Design Reviews, February 2015

sTGC Pad Trigger Data Serializer ASIC A second mode of the strip TDS ASIC Assigns each pad signal to a bunch crossing – 1 bit per pad per BC Serialize and transmit up to 104 pads in 1 BC to Pad Trigger on rim of wheel. Uses same 5G serializer as for strips Rad tol, SEU mitigation, IBM 130nm Lorne Levinson, Overview of NSW trigger electronics13NSW Electronics Design Reviews, February 2015

One per 1/16 th sector, on rim of wheel Receives: Pad signals synchronized to BC clock Builds tower coincidences from 3-out-4 coincidences in the two quads Identifies which bands of strips should be read out to the centroid logic Priority encode bands so there is at most four (was three) coincidences per sector Send band ID,  -ID, BCID for each candidate to strip TDS Provides the BCID tagging of the strip trigger data FPGA, so it can be programmable, but On periphery of wheel, so SEU mitigation still required Readout on Level-1 Accept, but also must report monitoring of non- triggering BCs. Being prototyped with Xilinx Kintex sTGC Pad trigger Lorne Levinson, Overview of NSW trigger electronics14NSW Electronics Design Reviews, February 2015

sTGC Router Routes strip hits from strip TDS to Trigger Processor in USA15 One Router per layer per sector 5G serial inputs from several TDS ASICs Sends output from up to 4 TDS ASICs (i.e. 4 Pad Tower triggers) in each bunch crossing and routes that them to Trigger Processor in USA15 – Up to 4 (was 3) output fibres per Router to USA15 – Will use FPGA serializer/deserialize, not GBTx Reduces latency by discovering which inputs are active before the whole frame is received and sets up routing for that link (“cut-through routing”) On periphery of wheel, but SEU mitigation still required Being prototyped with Xilinx Artix Option to send output at up to 6.6G (Artix limit) Uses repeaters to regenerate serial inputs Lorne Levinson, Overview of NSW trigger electronics 15 NSW Electronics Design Reviews, February 2015

Lorne Levinson, Overview of NSW trigger electronics sTCGsTCG sTCGsTCG sTCGsTCG sTCGsTCG sTCGsTCG sTCGsTCG sTCGsTCG sTCGsTCG Micromegas trigger scheme 16 On-chamber ASICS USA 15 ART VMM Strip VMM Strip MM Trigger Processor MM Trigger Processor VMM Strip VMM Strip sTCGsTCG sTCGsTCG sTCGsTCG sTCGsTCG sTCGsTCG sTCGsTCG MIcRomegasMIcRomegas MIcRomegasMIcRomegas VMM Strip VMM Strip 9 Each VMMs send address of its first hit in each BC to an ART ASIC. 64 channels = 2.6cm Use the coordinate of the center of the strip for the slope calculation ART chooses up to 8 addresses from 32 VMMs to send Less accurate than sTGC centroid Simpler architecture Plan to use GBT for transmission 1/16 th sector NSW Electronics Design Reviews, February 2015

Micromegas trigger “ART” ASIC 32 serial ART inputs from 32 VMM front-end chips chooses up to 8 hits for transmission to Trigger Processor via GBT Rad tol, SEU mitigation, IBM 130nm 1 st prototype received, 4mm x 2.85 mm Lorne Levinson, Overview of NSW trigger electronics chips: 32 per 1/16 th sector 4 per layer NSW Electronics Design Reviews, February 2015 First prototype Second prototype

Trigger Processor One sTGC and one MM Trigger Processor per 1/16 th sector Large Xilinx FPGA; ATCA in USA15 (radiation protected area) Receives 32 fibres (90m) from ART ASICs or 32 (was 24) fibres from Router sTGC: centroid finder; MM uses ART address as hit Find valid track segments that can corroborate hits in the Big Wheel Combine list from MM and sTGC, removing duplicates Send valid segments to Sector Logic for matching to the Big Wheel hits. – Up to 8 per BC Input and output data read out to ATLAS on Level-1 Accept Monitoring and diagnostic data sent to a monitor PC Lorne Levinson, Overview of NSW trigger electronicsNSW Electronics Design Reviews, February

Lorne Levinson, Overview of NSW trigger electronicsNSW Electronics Design Reviews, February

Trigger processor platform 20 LAr SRS ATCA-based FPGA boards, one board per octant, 2 crates Two MM & two sTGC sectors per carrier One sTGC or one MM sector per FPGA Input fibers per sector: MM: 32, sTGC: 32 Transfer candidates between MM & sTGC FPGAs via low latency lines Avoid development of yet-another-ATCA-FPGA board Two candidate carriers & mezz’s: LAr, SRS NSW Electronics Design Reviews, February 2015 SRS: two FPGAs per mezz ×2 36 input, 36 output fibres LAr: one FPGA per AMC mezz ×4 48 input, 48 output fibres

Latency Our major issue: sTGC is at the limit of our allocated latency: 1025ns from IP to Sector Logic input Want at least 100ns contingency Work is in progress to understand in detail every element and their interconnections in order to determine how to reduce latency: Previously used VMM pulse-at-peak for pads; actually using Time-over-Threshold: saves 10-15ns Higher speed clocks in the Pad Trigger Widen the parallel path from Pad Trigger to strip TDS: 2 pairs  10 pairs and new protocol, could save 15-20ns (but more cable volume) Detailed study of the strip TDS to see where time can be saved between receiving the Pad Trigger info and sending the data out Router deserialization–serialization: could reduce by 10-15ns Fiber length to USA15: needs to be accurately determined. Currently a worst case number. Could save 25ns Sector Logic has given us 50ns, 15-25ns to be used for merging candidates  Bottom line from above: reduce by 85 – 110ns  promising, but… not proven   More to add, e.g. 2m  5m fiber to Sector Logic, gaps in counting, … Lorne Levinson, Overview of NSW trigger electronicsNSW Electronics Design Reviews, February

   NSW trigger concept 22 Phase I upgrade: Increased backgrounds, but must maintain existing trigger rate Filter “Big Wheel” muon candidates to remove tracks that are not from the IP Only track “A” should be a trigger candidate: pointing:  <  7.5mrad Challenge is latency: 500nsec for electronics + 500ns fibres to be in time for Big Wheel Micromegas: 2M strips, 0.4mm sTGC: 280K strips (3.2mm), 45K pads, 28K wires sTGC, MM find candidates independently, list merged for Sector Logic Hit per layer: sTGC: hit is centroid of 3-5 strips Micromegas: hit is address of strip Lorne Levinson, Overview of NSW trigger electronicsNSW Electronics Design Reviews, February 2015

Thank you Lorne Levinson, Overview of NSW trigger electronicsNSW Electronics Design Reviews, February

Lorne Levinson, Overview of NSW trigger electronicsNSW Electronics Design Reviews, February Connections between the ROC and up to 8 VMMs

MM Latency min (ns) max (ns) Notes TOF from interaction point to MM (z=7.744 m)30.2 To periphery of + 5 cm IP Earliest arrival hit5075Depends onsite of rolling window (2 or 3 BC) VMM2 chip latency1015ART at threshold crossing instead of peak FEB to Trigger Driver cable33Twin-ax cable ns/m Trigger driver latency41 ART encoding (companion chip): from VMM to until first data bunch is output to GBT Uplink GBT latency (Tx)99111GBTx measured Mar 2014 Fiber to Trigger Processor card in USA15 (80-90 m) ns/m (fiber length might be reduceable) Uplink GBT latency (Rx)44 GBT-FPGA (optimized) - includes GTX-TX (Kai Chen) Trigger Algorithm MHz clock Re-synch to 320 MHz clock driving output serializer ° phase chosen to best match pipeline length Output to Sector Logic serializer (Tx only)2530Deserializer on Sector Logic latency budget Fiber to Sector Logic m 5ns/m Total763869TDR was ns

sTGC Latency min (ns) max (ns) Notes TOF from interaction point to NSW (z=7.8 m) 2931 To periphery of Pad signal jitter in chamber 510 Worst case due to tracks midway between wires (late signals due to long drift time) Pad ASD (VMM) 4050 ASD latency + time-to-peak Serialize 32 Gbps 1620 TDS to pad triger on rim, max 4 m 1823 Twin-ax cable delta R = 3-4 m + delta Z = ns/m Deserialize 32 pads 3040 On Pad Trigger Pad trigger (incl deskew) 1525 Strips are pipelined until pad trigger arrives Serializer of Pad Trigger output ns for Gbits/sec (simultaneous with deserializer) Pad trigger to on-chamber TDS ASIC 1823 Twin-ax cable delta R = 3-4 m + delta Z = ns/m TDS: Trigger Data Serializer 95 (Strip data transferred while waiting for pad trigger) On chamber cabling (up to 3-4m) to Router 1823 Twin-ax cable delta R = 3-4 m + delta Z = ns/m Router 8595 Include deserialization, switch (10 ns), serialization Fiber to Centroid card in USA15 (80-90) ns/m (fiber length might be reduceable) Trigger processor input deserializer 40 sTGC trigger algorithm 56 8 layers done in parallel, measured to be 13 clocks + 5 estimated Re-synch to 320 MHz clock driving output serializer ° phase chosen to best match pipeline length Centroid to Sector Logic serializer (Tx only) 2530 Deserializer on Sector Logic latency budget Fiber to Sector Logic 510 Total TDR was ns

sTGC trigger algorithm 27 Use average of centroids in each quad to define space points R1 & R2 1, 2, or even 3 of the 4 centroids of a quadruplet are omitted from averaging if: –  -ray's: wide (>5 strips) – Neutrons: large charge or wide – Noise: single strip – Pileup, i.e. pulse in a component strip is active before the trigger Lorne Levinson, Overview of NSW trigger electronicsNSW Electronics Design Reviews, February 2015

How does a muon look in a background environment Need to reject individual layer measurements to get good coordinates  -ray neutron Lorne Levinson, Overview of NSW trigger electronicsNSW Electronics Design Reviews, February

sTGC centroid finder demonstrator Cosmic ray test of one quadruplet Trigger demonstrator using Xilinx Virtex-6 evaluation board Custom mezzanine cards to accept the ToT signals from 8 (16-chan) FE VMMs, 4 strip + 4 pad layers: – Triggers on 3-out-of-4 pad layers – Calculates Time-over-Thresholds (VMM1 does not have 6-bit FADC) – Finds 4 centroids – Selects and averages centroids – Sends inputs and outputs to ethernet for recording, playback Latency of centroid calc: ~45ns A cosmic ray passing at an angle thru’ a quadruplet.  are the centroids (values on the left) Vertical line is the calculated average. 29 Lorne Levinson, Overview of NSW trigger electronicsNSW Electronics Design Reviews, February 2015

sTGC centroid calculation & averaging 30 Lorne Levinson, Overview of NSW trigger electronicsNSW Electronics Design Reviews, February 2015

cm MicroMegas Layers Multilayer 18.5 cm X planeU planeV plane Interaction Point z Strip #S2 Strip #S1 X0X0 X1X1 X2X2 X3X3 U V Slope X 0 = LookUpTable (#S2 - #S1) Local straight track selection based on strip number difference with strip precision Layer Pair Slope Average rms=1.7 mrad Theta Resolution at the entrance of the Muon System Local segment slopes calculation between hits of Layers belonging to the same Layer Pair over 3 BCs. Layer Pair X0X0 X1X1 X2X2 X3X3 UV Contacts: Matching slope = track candidate Micromegas trigger algorithm I Lorne Levinson, Overview of NSW trigger electronicsNSW Electronics Design Reviews, February 2015

Implementation for 2048 strips x 8 Layers 32 Lorne Levinson, Overview of NSW trigger electronicsNSW Electronics Design Reviews, February 2015

Lorne Levinson, Overview of NSW trigger electronics Micromegas trigger algorithm II θ Projective “global” slope easy to estimate from slope road Local slope easily calculated through local fit “Global” stereo slope calculated to determine ROI in φ 37 ns latency Arrival of the last hit on the GBT linkCoincidence candidate formed Global horizontal/stereo slopes calculated Local slope calculated ROI determined Projective roads help: create coincidences quickly, reject background from the start 33 NSW Electronics Design Reviews, February 2015

Algorithm efficiency essentially 100% Inefficiencies related to hits with late raise times, detector gaps, low-ionization hits Inefficiencies caused by simulated incoherent backgrounds are small Irreducible inefficiencies due to muon 1 TeV at 5% from showering Algorithm intrinsic resolution of measurement of θ - θ is 1.33mrad but affected by multiple scattering in the calorimeter Performance summary -- algorithm II 34 Lorne Levinson, Overview of NSW trigger electronicsNSW Electronics Design Reviews, February 2015

Lorne Levinson, Overview of NSW trigger electronics 35 Finds candidates in R-  tagged by p T Mismatch of NSW and BW detector boundaries  fan-out to several modules Big Wheel Regions-of-Interest to be confirmed by NSW. Red lines are NSW sector boundaries. Sector Logic NSW Electronics Design Reviews, February 2015