Swarm Data Processing and First Scientific Results

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Space Weather dependence of the air drag as observed by CHAMP Hermann Lühr 1) and Huixin Liu 2) 1) GeoForschungsZentrum Potsdam, Germany 2) Dept. Earth.
Advertisements

4 th Swarm DQW – Magnetic Session 23 Dec 2014Potsdam (D) ELM – “EXTENDED” LESUR MODEL OF DISTURBANCE CHARACTERISATION AND VFM CALIBRATION Lars Tøffner-Clausen,
Time & Frequency Products R. Peřestý, J. Kraus, SWRM 4 th Data Quality Workshop 2-5 December 2014 GFZ Potsdam Recent results on ACC Data Processing 1 SWARM.
© NERC All rights reserved Update on MMA, QL and AUX_OBS products Susan Macmillan, Brian Hamilton, Alan Thomson Various observations on 1st year of MMA,
No. 1 Characteristics of field-aligned currents derived from the Swarm constellation Hermann Lühr, Jaeheung Park, Jan Rauberg, Ingo Michaelis, Guram Kervalishvili.
Repeat station crustal biases and accuracy determined from regional field models M. Korte, E. Thébault* and M. Mandea, GeoForschungsZentrum Potsdam (*now.
Coestimating models of the large-scale internal, external, and corresponding induced Hermean magnetic fields Michael Purucker and Terence Sabaka Raytheon.
Paul T.M. Loto’aniu 1,2 and H.J. Singer 1 NOAA Space Environment Center 1 CIRES, University of Colorado 2 Paul T.M. Loto’aniu 1,2 and H.J. Singer 1 NOAA.
Spatio-temporal structures of equatorial F-region plasma irregularities & Geomagnetic Regular Daily Variations (Sq, Solar quiet) as seen in space and at.
Monitoring of auroral oval location and geomagnetic activity based on magnetic measurements from satellites in low Earth orbit. S. Vennerstrom Technical.
TOR TanDEM-X 16th International Workshop on Laser Ranging, Poznan, October 2008 ILRS Support for TerraSAR-X and TanDEM-X - Status and Future Prospects.
The Four Candidate Earth Explorer Core Missions Consultative Workshop October 1999, Granada, Spain, Revised by CCT GOCE S 59 Performance.
4 th Swarm QWG Meeting 2 – 5 December 2014GFZ Potsdam/D On Calibrating the Magnetometry Package Data Nils Olsen, DTU Space.
J. Ebbing & N. Holzrichter – University of Kiel Johannes Bouman – DGFI Munich Ronny Stolz – IPHT Jena SPP Dynamic EarthPotsdam, 03/04 July 2014 Swarm &
Physical Approach to the ASM-VFM residual investigation National Space Institute, DTU 3. December 2014.
ESA Presentation | P. Vogel | Potsdam | 02/12/2014 | Slide 1 ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use SWARM QWG Overview of ASM, VFM and STR instruments status.
Overview of the L1B Dataset, Product Baselines updates and data availability. L2 Commissioning Status. Giuseppe Ottavianelli, Ivan Di Lodovico, Igino.
MTR, swarm E2E study, Nov 11, 2003, DSRI Copenhagen, nio #1 7-Sep-15 swarm End-To-End Mission Performance Study Mid Term Review The swarm E2E Consortium.
Study of an Improved Comprehensive Magnetic Field Inversion Analysis for Swarm PM1, E2Eplus Study Work performed by Nils Olsen, Terence J. Sabaka, Luis.
4 th Swarm QWG Meeting 2 – 5 December 2014GFZ Potsdam/D Data Selection Model Parameterization Results: Statistics, Lithospheric Field, Core Field Perspective.
Kick off meeting, swarm E2E study, nio #1 8-Sep-15 Development Approach Task 1: Industrial Module –to be used by industry for their system simulation –Output:
T SPP1788 “DynamicEarth“ Workshop, GFZ Potsdam, 3 July 2014 No. 1 Calibration/Validation of Swarm Data Products: German activities Hermann Lühr and Cal/Val.
Secular variation in Germany from repeat station data and a recent global field model Monika Korte and Vincent Lesur Helmholtz Centre Potsdam, German Research.
Final Presentation, Swarm E2E study, June 18, 2004, ESTEC, nio #1 1-Nov-15 Swarm End-To-End Mission Performance Study Final Presentation The Swarm E2E.
Joint International GRACE Science Team Meeting and DFG SPP 1257 Symposium, Oct. 2007, GFZ Potsdam Folie 1 Retrieval of electron density profiles.
Introducing POMME Potsdam Magnetic Model of the Earth Star camera calibration Ring current field Static and annually varying external fields Internal field.
GP33A-06 / Fall AGU Meeting, San Francisco, December 2004 Magnetic signals generated by the ocean circulation and their variability. Manoj,
Swarm ASM-VFM meeting 9-10 Apr 2015ESTEC (NL) Ideas for improving the disturbance model or Welcome to the Null-Space! Nils Olsen, Lars Tøffner-Clausen,
C H A M P International Laser Ranging Service - General Assembly, October 2005 Eastbourne, UK L. Grunwaldt, R. Schmidt, D. König, R. König, F.-H. Massmann.
Study on the Impact of Combined Magnetic and Electric Field Analysis and of Ocean Circulation Effects on Swarm Mission Performance by S. Vennerstrom, E.
Study of an Improved Comprehensive Magnetic Field Inversion Analysis for Swarm MTR, E2Eplus Study Work performed by Nils Olsen, Terence J. Sabaka, Luis.
Earth’s Dynamic Magnetic Field: The State of the Art Comprehensive Model Terence J. Sabaka Geodynamics Branch NASA/GSFC with special thanks to Nils Olsen.
STSE Swarm + Innovation Science Study: MTR Meeting Magnetic Tidal Signals and Their Use in Mapping the Electrical Conductivity of the Lithosphere and Upper.
Sensitivity Analysis and Building Laterally-Variable Ocean Conductivity Grid 1 N. R. Schnepf (UoC/CIRES) C. Manoj (UoC/CIRES) A. V. Kuvshinov (ETHZ)
STSE Tides to Sense Earth, MTR 25 January 2016DTU, Lyngby/DK REPORT ON WP2X00: TIDAL SIGNAL RECOVERY USING THE COMPREHENSIVE INVERSION (CI) RESULTS FROM.
Astronomical Institute University of Bern Astronomical Institute, University of Bern Swarm Gravity Field Results with the CMA Adrian Jäggi, Daniel Arnold,
Astronomical Institute University of Bern 1 Astronomical Institute, University of Bern, Switzerland 2 German Research Centre for Geosciences, Potsdam,
5 th Swarm Data Quality Workshop 7 – 10 September 2015IPG Paris/F About ESL Level 2 Processing and Data Products Some Selected Science Results Plasma depletion.
5 th Swarm Data Quality Workshop 7 – 10 September 2015IPG Paris/F PRELIMINARY NEW VERSION OF THE COMPREHENSIVE INVERSION (CI) LEVEL-2 PRODUCTS Terence.
CAS e-pop 26/27 April 2016 Montreal Swarm Level 1 and Level 2 Data Products and Processing Some Selected Science Results Models of the Earth’s magnetic.
IUGG 2015 Prague 25 June 2015IUGG-4186 SCARF: Level 2 Data Products and Processing Some Selected Science Results Plasma depletion seen in different parameters.
SC4MGV – ESA Contract No /13/NL/MV 5th International GOCE User Workshop November 2014, Paris, France ESA SC4MGV Search strategy for.
Magnetic Measurement Expert Group10-11 March 2016Warsaw / PL MAGNETOMETER – STAR-IMAGER ALIGNMENT: APPARENT EULER ANGLE VARIATION DUE TO MAGNETOSPHERIC.
ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use Overview of the L1B and L2 Datasets and Processors. Giuseppe Ottavianelli, Igino Coco, Livia D'Alba, Antonio De La.
Summary of Session 2M Swarm 5th Data Quality Workshop
Jaeheung Park1, Hermann Lühr1, Claudia Stolle1,
3rd Swarm Science Meeting, Copenhagen, 19 May 2014
Update of the Swarm Data Visualisation Tool (VirES)
Swarm DISC call for ideas
GOCE L1b processing Frommknecht, Bjoern 1; Stummer, Claudia 2; Gilles, Pascal 1; Floberghagen, Rune 1; Cesare, Stefano 3; Catastini, Giuseppe 3; Meloni,
The 3rd Swarm Science Meeting, June 2014, Copenhagen, Denmark
The Instruments Faraday Cup CfA/U of Mich & MIT
Magnetic Splinter Meeting
Rapid core field variations just before Swarm
Danish National Space Center, Copenhagen, Denmark
Atmosphere-Ionosphere Wave Coupling as Revealed in Swarm Plasma Densities and Drifts Jeffrey M. Forbes Department of Aerospace Engineering Sciences, University.
Summary of part of L2 session
Introduction to geodesy & accelerometry with Swarm
The Swarm D NanoMagSat project Latest News
swarm End-To-End Mission Performance Study Working meeting on Task 2
First validation of Level 2 CAT-2 products: FAC/IBI/TEC
OceanMag II EM-Raying the Ocean
New "quite time" concept: application to Champ lithospheric field modelling Nils Olsen, Jesper Gjerløv & Co.
First Validation of Level 2 Cat-2 products: EEF
Requirements Swarm Cal/Val Team Workshop 18/06/2014
Summary & recommendations multi-mission synergies session 9
Swarm Magnetic Package Calibrations Way Forward
In flight calibration of the experimental ASM vector mode on board the Swarm satellites Thomas Jager, François Bertrand, Viviane Cattin & Jean-Michel.
Session 5: Higher level products (Internal)
Richard B. Horne British Antarctic Survey Cambridge UK
Presentation transcript:

Swarm Data Processing and First Scientific Results Nils Olsen and the Swarm SCARF Team Swarm Data Overview Magnetic Level 1b Data assessment SCARF: Level 2 Data Products and Processing Model of the Earth’s magnetic field including Swarm data Patrick Alken, Ciaran D Beggan, Stephan C. Buchert, Johnathan Burchill, Arnaud Chulliat, Eelco Doornbos, Joao Teixeira da Encarnacao, Ludwig Grunwaldt, Brian Hamilton, Rune Floberghagen, Eigil Friis-Christensen, Giuseppe Ottavianelli, Gauthier Hulot, Jose van den IJssel, David J. Knudsen, Alexey Kuvshinov, Jean-Michel Leger, Vincent Lesur, Hermann Luehr, Susan Macmillan, Stefan Maus, Ingo Michaelis, Max Noja, Nils Olsen, Poul Erik H Olsen, Jaeheung Park, Radek Peresty, Gernot Plank, Christoph Puethe, Jan Rauberg, Patricia Ritter, Martin Rother, Terence J Sabaka, Reyko Schachtschneider, Olivier Sirol, Claudia Stolle, Erwan Thebault, Alan W P Thomson, Lars Toeffner-Clausen, Jakub Velımsky, Pierre Vigneron, Pieter N Visser

Swarm Data Processing Hierarchy L0 L1b Processor L1b L2 Processor L2 scientific users

Level-1b Data Products Magnetic Products Plasma Products Ephemeris Products x = A, B or C  Type Descriptive Name MAGx_LR Low Rate magnetic data MAGx_HR High Rate magnetic data MAGx_CA Magnetic calibration data ASMxAUX Magnetic stray fields at ASM sensor VFMxAUX Magnetic stray fields at VFM sensor Type Descriptive Name EFIx_PL Plasma data LP_x_CA Langmuir probe calibration data TIIx_CA Thermal Ion Imager calibration data More on Swarm Level 1b Data Processing in Poster “ESA Swarm Mission - Level 1b Products” by Lars Tøffner-Clausen et al Type Descriptive Name GPSx_RO RINEX Observations GPSx_RN RINEX Navigation  data GPSxNAV Navigational Solution MODx_SC Medium-Precision Orbit Determination STRxATT Attitude ACCx_PR Non-gravitational Accelerations More on Plasma Products in Presentation “First results from the Swarm Electric Field Instruments” by David Knudsen et al

Magnetic Level-1b Data Product MAGx_LR 1 Hz magnetic field observations: time, position, F, BNEC and BVFM Element Contents Frame Units Timestamp Time of observation - CDF_EPOCH SyncStatus Time reference information Latitude Latitude of observation ITRF degree Longitude Longitude of observation Radius Radius of observation m F Magnetic field intensity nT dF_AOCS Magnetic stray field correction intensity related to attitude control magneto-torquers dF_other Magnetic stray field correction intensity of all other sources F_error Error estimate on magnetic field intensity B_VFM Magnetic field vector VFM B_NEC NEC dB_AOCS Magnetic stray field correction vector related to attitude control magneto-torquers dB_other Magnetic stray field correction vector of all other sources B_error Error estimates on magnetic field vector (B_VFM) q_NEC_CRF Rotation from NEC frame to STR Common Reference Frame (CRF), quaternion NEC  CRF Att_error Error estimate on attitude information degree/103 Flags_F Flags characterizing the magnetic field intensity Flags_B Flags characterizing the magnetic field vector measurement B_VFM and B_NEC Flags_q Flags characterizing the attitude information Flags_Platform Flags characterizing the spacecraft platform information ASM_Freq_Dev ASM reference frequency calibration data deviation – for ASM stability assessment Hz½

Swarm-A 1 sec Level1b Data MAGA_LR 2 December 2013 Quiet day (Kp  0+)

Swarm-A 1 sec Level1b Data MAGA_LR 2 December 2013 Quiet day (Kp  0+) CHAOS-4 model subtracted

Swarm-A and Swarm-B 1 sec Level1b Data MAGA_LR 2 December 2013 Quiet day (Kp  0+) CHAOS-4 model subtracted Difference Swarm A -Swarm B

Swarm Data Processing Hierarchy L0 L1b Processor (Prototype Processor) L1b Processor (Operational Processor) L1b L2 Processor L2 scientific users

Level1b Data from Operational Processor CHAOS-4 model subtracted Difference Swarm A -Swarm B

Level1b Data from Prototype Processor (non-validated data) CHAOS-4 model subtracted Swarm-B data shifted by 15s since satellite flies 120 km behind Swarm-A (on that day) Difference Swarm A -Swarm B More on Swarm Scalar Field Measurements from ASM in Presentations by Gauthier Hulot and co-workers

Swarm Level-2 Data Products

Swarm Level-2 Data Processing Swarm SCARF (Satellite Constellation Application and Research Facility) Consortium of 6 European partners (DTU, GFZ, IPGP, ETH, DEOS, BGS) with support from NASA/GSFC, CIRES and CUP ESA funded activity for Development, Implementation and Operation of a distributed L2 Processing Facility Cat-1 chains with “scientists in the loop” (operated by SCARF) advanced geomagnetic models, mantle conductivity … Cat-2 chains with automatic processing (operated by ESRIN) products describing Earth environment, NRT capability Development phase: Oct 2010 – March 2014 Exploitation phase: 2014 – 2018+ (at least 5 years)

Swarm Data Processing Hierarchy L0 L1b Processor (Prototype Processor) L1b Processor (Operational Processor) L1b L2 Processor SCARF L2 Processing Facility L2 scientific users

Level-2 Data Products Cat-1: Complex algorithms to derive Level-2 products describing specific sources of the Earth’s magnetic field. Product derived by SCARF since scientific experience is required to derive these products.

Level-2 Data Products Cat-2: Algorithms leading to Level-2 products with minimum delay, e.g. for space weather applications. Near real-time capability. Provided in CDF. Algorithms designed by SCARF, data processed by PDGS More on Swarm Level 2 Data Processing in Poster “SCARF - The Swarm Satellite Constellation Application and Research Facility” by Nils Olsen et al More on Swarm Cat-2 Data Products in talk “The Swarm Level-2 Cat-2 Data Products” by Hermann Lühr et al and Poster ”Swarm Equatorial Electric Field Inversion” by Patrick Alken et al.

Field Modelling using Swarm data First Results based on non-validated data Data spaning 26 Nov 2013 to 27 April 2014 Non-validated data from L1b Prototype Processor Geomagnetic quiet conditions (Kp < 2o, |dDst/dt| < 2 nT/hr) “Dark regions” (sun at least 10 degrees below horizon) Model Parameterization Spherical Harmonic Model up to degree n=40 (static) linear time dependence (up to n=8) External field “CHAOS-4 parameterization” (SM, GSM, RC-dependence) Co-estimation of Euler angles describing VFM-STR transformation in bins of 10 days for each of the 3 Swarm satellites (as for CHAOS-4)

Spatial Data Distribution Swarm A, B and C satellites Geomagnetic quiet conditions (Kp < 2o, |dDst/dt| < 2 nT/hr) ”Dark regions” (sun at least 10o below horizon) Swarm scalar data Swarm vector data

Spatial Data Distribution Swarm A, B and C satellites Geomagnetic quiet conditions (Kp < 2o, |dDst/dt| < 2 nT/hr) ”Dark regions” (sun at least 10o below horizon)

Spatial Data Distribution Swarm A, B and C satellites Geomagnetic quiet conditions (Kp < 2o, |dDst/dt| < 2 nT/hr) ”Dark regions” (sun at least 10o below horizon) Swarm scalar data Swarm vector data CHAMP scalar data (propagated in time by 3.5 years using CHAOS-4)

Geomagnetic Spectrum

Difference in Br wrt CHAOS-4 Crustal Field (n=15-30) Good agreement of Swarm_04c and CHAOS-4

Difference in Br wrt CHAOS-4 Core Field (n=1-14) Extrapolation error of CHAOS-4 (latest vector data: Sept 2010, latest scalar data: Jul 2013)

Difference in Br wrt CHAOS-4plus Core Field (n=1-14) CHAOS-4plus: Update of CHAOS-4, combining Ørsted, CHAMP, SAC-C and Swarm data

Model rms misfit Swarm-04c CHAOS-4plus Swarm-only model SW-A SW-B SW-C 4.82 nT 4.44 nT 4.49 nT Br 3.15 nT 2.16 nT 2.31 nT Bq 4.21 nT 3.51 nT 3.60 nT Bf 2.83 nT 2.70 nT 2.67 nT SW-A SW-B SW-C CHAMP Ørsted F 4.46 nT 4.37 nT 4.41 nT 4.84 nT 3.38 nT Br 1.97 nT 2.39 nT 2.58 nT 2.80 nT 4.45 nT Bq 3.08 nT 3.37 nT 3.39 nT 3.59 nT 5.36 nT Bf 2.85 nT 2.87 nT 2.83 nT 2.76 nT 5.06 nT CHAOS-4plus combined model Model coefficients available at CHAOS-4 homepage www.spacecenter.dk/files/magnetic-models/CHAOS-4/ More on CHAOS-4plus in Poster “Towards CHAOS-5 - How can Swarm contribute?” by Christopher C. Finlay et al

Conclusions We are waiting for more Swarm data! Very good Swarm magnetic data quality inter-satellite agreement in scalar intensity during quiet dark conditions is better than 5 ppm (0.2 nT) CHAOS-4plus: Magnetic field model spanning 16 years of data show excellent agreement of data from 6 different satellites (Ørsted, CHAMP, SAC-C and 3 x Swarm) First Level-2 products expected at end of 2014 … … and already very soon for the CAT-2 products We are waiting for more Swarm data!