[Part 15] 1/24 Discrete Choice Modeling Aggregate Share Data - BLP Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
[Part 12] 1/38 Discrete Choice Modeling Stated Preference Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University 0Introduction.
Advertisements

Econometric Analysis of Panel Data Panel Data Analysis: Extension –Generalized Random Effects Model Seemingly Unrelated Regression –Cross Section Correlation.
[Part 13] 1/30 Discrete Choice Modeling Hybrid Choice Models Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University 0Introduction.
Longitudinal and Multilevel Methods for Models with Discrete Outcomes with Parametric and Non-Parametric Corrections for Unobserved Heterogeneity David.
Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University.
Industry Empirical Studies NEIO and Industry Models of Market Power Based on the lectures of Dr Christos Genakos (University of Cambridge)
1 ESTIMATION OF DRIVERS ROUTE CHOICE USING MULTI-PERIOD MULTINOMIAL CHOICE MODELS Stephen Clark and Dr Richard Batley Institute for Transport Studies University.
[Part 1] 1/15 Discrete Choice Modeling Econometric Methodology Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University 0Introduction.
Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University.
Part 24: Bayesian Estimation 24-1/35 Econometrics I Professor William Greene Stern School of Business Department of Economics.
A N E CONOMIC E STIMATION OF THE P RODUCTION C OSTS OF I MPROVING A UTOMOBILE F UEL E FFICIENCY Takahiko Kiso August 8, 2011 Camp Resources XVIII.
1/54: Topic 5.1 – Modeling Stated Preference Data Microeconometric Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University New York NY USA.
Chapter 3 The Goods Market Blanchard: Macroeconomics.
Housing Demand in Germany and Japan Borsch-Supan, Heiss, and Seko, JHE 10, (2001) Presented by Mark L. Trueman, 11/25/02.
1/62: Topic 2.3 – Panel Data Binary Choice Models Microeconometric Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University New York NY USA.
Part 23: Simulation Based Estimation 23-1/26 Econometrics I Professor William Greene Stern School of Business Department of Economics.
Choice modelling in marketing- some examples Hans S. Solgaard, Department of Environmental and Business Economics June 2008.
15. Stated Preference Experiments. Panel Data Repeated Choice Situations Typically RP/SP constructions (experimental) Accommodating “panel data” Multinomial.
Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University.
ECON 6012 Cost Benefit Analysis Memorial University of Newfoundland
Substitution between Mass-Produced and High-End Beers Daniel Toro-Gonzalez Ph.D. candidate, School of Economic Sciences (SES) Jill J. McCluskey Visiting.
Discrete Choice Models William Greene Stern School of Business New York University.
Microeconometric Modeling
GUY ARIE OLEG BARANOV BENN EIFERT HECTOR PEREZ-SAIZ BEN SKRAINKA Bundling Software: An MPEC Approach to BLP.
Empirical Methods for Microeconomic Applications University of Lugano, Switzerland May 27-31, 2013 William Greene Department of Economics Stern School.
Efficiency Measurement William Greene Stern School of Business New York University.
Berry-Levensohn-Pakes EMA (1995) Paper Notes ECON 721.
1/54: Topic 5.1 – Modeling Stated Preference Data Microeconometric Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University New York NY USA.
[Part 4] 1/43 Discrete Choice Modeling Bivariate & Multivariate Probit Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University.
Part 24: Stated Choice [1/117] Econometric Analysis of Panel Data William Greene Department of Economics Stern School of Business.
Consumer Valuation of Medicare Part D Plans VERY PRELIMINARY-Please do not quote Claudio Lucarelli Dept of Policy Analysis and Management, Cornell University.
Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University.
Overview of Optimization in Ag Economics Lecture 2.
Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University.
1/62: Topic 2.3 – Panel Data Binary Choice Models Microeconometric Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University New York NY USA.
Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University.
Industry Empirical Studies Differentiated Products Structural Models Based on the lectures of Dr Christos Genakos (University of Cambridge)
[Part 15] 1/24 Discrete Choice Modeling Aggregate Share Data - BLP Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University.
[Part 8] 1/26 Discrete Choice Modeling Nested Logit Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University 0Introduction.
[Part 5] 1/43 Discrete Choice Modeling Ordered Choice Models Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University 0Introduction.
Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University.
STRUCTURAL MODELS Eva Hromádková, Applied Econometrics JEM007, IES Lecture 10.
Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University April 26-27, 2012 Georgetown University, Washington, DC.
1 Measuring the Welfare Effect of Entry in Differentiated Product Markets: The Case of Medicare HMOs Shiko Maruyama University of New South Wales 19 June,
Logit Models Alexander Spermann, University of Freiburg, SS Logit Models.
William Greene Stern School of Business New York University
Microeconometric Modeling
M.Sc. in Economics Econometrics Module I
Consumer Willingness to Pay for Vehicle Attributes: What Do We know?
Discrete Choice Modeling
Econometric Analysis of Panel Data
Discrete Choice Models
Discrete Choice Modeling
Introduction to microeconometrics
Microeconometric Modeling
Microeconometric Modeling
William Greene Stern School of Business New York University
Discrete Choice Modeling
Microeconometric Modeling
Microeconometric Modeling
Econometrics Chengyuan Yin School of Mathematics.
Microeconometric Modeling
Microeconometric Modeling
Econometric Analysis of Panel Data
William Greene Stern School of Business New York University
MPHIL AdvancedEconometrics
Microeconometric Modeling
Microeconometric Modeling
Microeconometric Modeling
Presentation transcript:

[Part 15] 1/24 Discrete Choice Modeling Aggregate Share Data - BLP Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University 0Introduction 1Summary 2Binary Choice 3Panel Data 4Bivariate Probit 5Ordered Choice 6Count Data 7Multinomial Choice 8Nested Logit 9Heterogeneity 10Latent Class 11Mixed Logit 12Stated Preference 13Hybrid Choice 14. Spatial Data 15. Aggregate Market Data

[Part 15] 2/24 Discrete Choice Modeling Aggregate Share Data - BLP Aggregate Data and Multinomial Choice: The Model of Berry, Levinsohn and Pakes

[Part 15] 3/24 Discrete Choice Modeling Aggregate Share Data - BLP Resources  Automobile Prices in Market Equilibrium, S. Berry, J. Levinsohn, A. Pakes, Econometrica, 63, 4, 1995, (BLP)  A Practitioner’s Guide to Estimation of Random-Coefficients Logit Models of Demand, A. Nevo, Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 9, 4, 2000, BLP.pdf  A New Computational Algorithm for Random Coefficients Model with Aggregate-level Data, Jinyoung Lee, UCLA Economics, Dissertation, BLP.pdf

[Part 15] 4/24 Discrete Choice Modeling Aggregate Share Data - BLP Theoretical Foundation  Consumer market for J differentiated brands of a good j =1,…, J t brands or types i = 1,…, N consumers t = i,…,T “markets” (like panel data)  Consumer i’s utility for brand j (in market t) depends on p = price x = observable attributes f = unobserved attributes w = unobserved heterogeneity across consumers ε = idiosyncratic aspects of consumer preferences  Observed data consist of aggregate choices, prices and features of the brands.

[Part 15] 5/24 Discrete Choice Modeling Aggregate Share Data - BLP BLP Automobile Market t JtJt

[Part 15] 6/24 Discrete Choice Modeling Aggregate Share Data - BLP Random Utility Model  Utility: U ijt =U(w i,p jt,x jt,f jt |), i = 1,…,(large)N, j=1,…,J w i = individual heterogeneity; time (market) invariant. w has a continuous distribution across the population. p jt, x jt, f jt, = price, observed attributes, unobserved features of brand j; all may vary through time (across markets)  Revealed Preference: Choice j provides maximum utility  Across the population, given market t, set of prices p t and features (X t,f t ), there is a set of values of w i that induces choice j, for each j=1,…,J t ; then, s j (p t,X t,f t |) is the market share of brand j in market t.  There is an outside good that attracts a nonnegligible market share, j=0. Therefore,

[Part 15] 7/24 Discrete Choice Modeling Aggregate Share Data - BLP Functional Form  (Assume one market for now so drop “’t.”) U ij =U(w i,p j,x j,f j |)= x j 'β – αp j + f j + ε ij = δ j + ε ij  E consumers i [ε ij ] = 0, δ j is E[Utility].  Will assume logit form to make integration unnecessary. The expectation has a closed form.

[Part 15] 8/24 Discrete Choice Modeling Aggregate Share Data - BLP Heterogeneity  Assumptions so far imply IIA. Cross price elasticities depend only on market shares.  Individual heterogeneity: Random parameters  U ij =U(w i,p j,x j,f j | i )= x j 'β i – αp j + f j + ε ij β ik = β k + σ k v ik.  The mixed model only imposes IIA for a particular consumer, but not for the market as a whole.

[Part 15] 9/24 Discrete Choice Modeling Aggregate Share Data - BLP Endogenous Prices: Demand side  U ij =U(w i,p j,x j,f j |)= x j 'β i – αp j + f j + ε ij  f j is unobserved  Utility responds to the unobserved f j  Price p j is partly determined by features f j.  In a choice model based on observables, price is correlated with the unobservables that determine the observed choices.

[Part 15] 10/24 Discrete Choice Modeling Aggregate Share Data - BLP Endogenous Price: Supply Side  There are a small number of competitors in this market  Price is determined by firms that maximize profits given the features of its products and its competitors.  mc j = g(observed cost characteristics c, unobserved cost characteristics h)  At equilibrium, for a profit maximizing firm that produces one product, s j + (p j -mc j )s j /p j = 0  Market share depends on unobserved cost characteristics as well as unobserved demand characteristics, and price is correlated with both.

[Part 15] 11/24 Discrete Choice Modeling Aggregate Share Data - BLP Instrumental Variables (ξ and ω are our h and f.)

[Part 15] 12/24 Discrete Choice Modeling Aggregate Share Data - BLP Econometrics: Essential Components

[Part 15] 13/24 Discrete Choice Modeling Aggregate Share Data - BLP Econometrics

[Part 15] 14/24 Discrete Choice Modeling Aggregate Share Data - BLP GMM Estimation Strategy - 1

[Part 15] 15/24 Discrete Choice Modeling Aggregate Share Data - BLP GMM Estimation Strategy - 2

[Part 15] 16/24 Discrete Choice Modeling Aggregate Share Data - BLP BLP Iteration

[Part 15] 17/24 Discrete Choice Modeling Aggregate Share Data - BLP ABLP Iteration ξ t is our f t.  is our (β,  ) No superscript is our (M); superscript 0 is our (M-1).

[Part 15] 18/24 Discrete Choice Modeling Aggregate Share Data - BLP Side Results

[Part 15] 19/24 Discrete Choice Modeling Aggregate Share Data - BLP ABLP Iterative Estimator

[Part 15] 20/24 Discrete Choice Modeling Aggregate Share Data - BLP BLP Design Data

[Part 15] 21/24 Discrete Choice Modeling Aggregate Share Data - BLP Exogenous price and nonrandom parameters

[Part 15] 22/24 Discrete Choice Modeling Aggregate Share Data - BLP IV Estimation

[Part 15] 23/24 Discrete Choice Modeling Aggregate Share Data - BLP Full Model

[Part 15] 24/24 Discrete Choice Modeling Aggregate Share Data - BLP Some Elasticities