MSD P13038 Hearing Aid Design System Design Review January 11, 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Project leader: Benjamin Danziger, EE Todd Bentley, ISE Jim Corcoran, CE Jay Radhakrishnan, EE Peter Drexel, EE Vianna Mullar, EE.
Advertisements

Kyle Desrosiers (ME)- Team Lead Brad Fiedler (EE) Greg Wodzicki (EE) Chris VanWagenen (EE) George Slack- Faculty Guide P ACTIVE NOISE CANCELLATION.
MCHAS Modernising Children’s Hearing Aid Services Acoustic Feedback Reduction.
RockSat-C 2012 CoDR Minnesota Sound Wreckers Conceptual Design Review University of Minnesota Alexander Richman Jacob Schultz Justine Topel Will Thorson.
P11462: Thermoelectric and Fan System for Cook Stove Jared RuggProject Manager (ME) Brad SawyerLead Engineer (ME) Jeff BirdMechanical Engineer Tom GorevskiElectrical.
Christian Seemayer Rob Proetti Tim DeBellis Tim Giguere Will Kelly.
1 Electrical and Computer Engineering Cam Proctor Ramsey Khudairi Tom Gilbert Chad Young Project Orion TekBand.
MSD-I Project Review Modular Motion Tracking Sensors 1.
P08009 Audible Memo Board Phase II Friday, February 22, 2008 P08009: Audible Memo Board Phase II Sponsor: Dr. Hopkins Advisor: Professor Slack Jon GosligaElectrical.
EDGE™ Project Review P Automation/Improvement of Wegmans Cookie Line Packaging Project Team: Stephanie Rager (IE), Bruno Coelho (ME), Mark Voss (ME),
Design Reviews.1 KGCOE Multidisciplinary Sr. Design Borkholder 2006 R I T Design Reviews Objectives of the Design Review Participants for a successful.
P08009 Audible Memo Board Phase II Monday, October 22, 2007 P08009: Audible Memo Board Phase II Sponsor: Tala Hopkins Jon GosligaAudio Output Lead Loic.
P13625 – Indoor AIR Quality Monitor
1 Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Advisor: Professor Zink Team Acoustic Beamformer Preliminary Design Review 10/18/2013.
HEARING AID HEURISTICS ANALYSIS. Objective: To conduct usability and human factors testing on hearing aid device to assess if the required specifications.
Use of FOS for Airborne Radar Target Detection of other Aircraft Example PDS Presentation for EEE 455 / 457 Preliminary Design Specification Presentation.
Harvesting Waste Energy: Bicycle Power Generation RIT-MSD-I Detailed Design Review Winter/Spring P12414.
Detailed Design Review Project P13363 Members: Justine Converse (IE) James Cover (CE) Alexander Eschbach (EE) Jason Hang (ME) Ashley Trode (EE) Guide:
Milestone 2: Project Proposal and Statement of Work TEAM 8: ANDRE ELLIOTTPROJECT: BITCOIN WALLET MARK NIXON KISHEN PATEL ZACH HOELZLE.
FPGA-Based Arcade Emulation Danny Funk, Cory Mohling, Tony Milosch, David Gartner, John Alexander Advisor: Philip Jones Client: Joseph Zambreno.
Design Problems  Limited Market  Too Many Other Devices  No Standard Design Among Devices.
Assistive Technology Tools WHAT ARE THEY? HOW ARE THEY USED IN THE CLASSROOM? WHAT ARE THE POSSIBLE GAINS AND DRAWBACKS FOR THE CLASSROOM?
Bicycle Harvesting Waste Energy: Bicycle Power Generation MSD-I RIT-Systems Design Review Winter/Spring P12414 January 13, 2012 Group # P12414.
1. 2  Team Members:  Dan Fenton (CE) – Team Lead  Ryan Muckel (ME)  Christopher Freeman (ME)  Derek Zielinski (EE)  Eric Welch (EE)  Kennedy Kong.
Communication Device for Handicapped Kids Dec Client Heartland Area Agency Sue Young Advisor Yao Ma Advisor Yao Ma Alex Leith Brian Grove Steve Peters.
MSD P13038 Hearing Aid Design Detailed Design Review February 8, 2012.
P13363 Touch Sensitive Piano Keys Justine Converse (ISE) James Cover (CE) Alexander Eschbach (EE) Jason Hang (ME) Ashley Trode (EE)
By the end of this chapter, you should:  Understand the properties of an engineering requirement and know how to develop well-formed requirements that.
Bi-Directional RF Data Communication A Robot Control Device Team BDRFC.
Kyle Merkert ECE 791/792 Senior Design Project October 2009 – May 2010 Faculty Advisor: Dr. Wayne Smith.
[ Rhythm Reloaded ] Team 6 CEAC Presentation. Team 6 Reintroduction Andy Gabler Ben Moes Nathan Brinks David van Geest.
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Team BeepachU November 26, 2013 Midway Design Review.
Noise Canceling Headphones Team Members Doan Thanh Khiet Tran Jasmine Khadem Kalina Guentcheva.
Software Engineering Management Lecture 1 The Software Process.
Alternative Lower Cost Hearing Aid Dec03-10 Client: Herb Harmison Advisor: Edwin Jones Jr. Team Members: Hassan Qureshi Hamdan Al-Mehrezi Trong Do Nathan.
Introduction to Design. Five Stage Electronic Design and Fabrication Process Design Stage Drawing Stage Experimentation Prototyping Stage Testing / Troubleshooting.
KAITLIN PERANSKI: IE, PROJECT MANAGER JEREMY BERKE: EE, SCRIBE/LEAD SOFTWARE CHRIS CAPORALE: EE, LEAD HARDWARE SPENCER WASILEWSKI: ME, MODELING/MACHINIST.
Cook Stove for Haiti Enhancements System Level Design Review Friday, January 14 th :00 AM – 12:30 PM Project
Introductory Client: Herb Harmison 2692 Meadow Glen Road Ames, IA Faculty Advisor: Edwin Jones Jr. Team Members: Hassan Qureshi CprE Hamdan Al-Mehrezi.
AP-1 5. Project Management. AP-2 Software Failure Software fails at a significant rate What is failure? Not delivering it on time is an estimation failure.
RockSat-C 2012 ISTR Individual Subsystem Testing Report Minnesota Sound Wreckers University of Minnesota 2/13/12 1 Alexander Richman Jacob Schultz Justine.
P16221 – FSAE Shock Dynamometer System Level Design Review September 29, 2015.
Hearing Amplification. Hearing loss due to Inner ear pathologies.
Nick Dominesey Matthew Myers Michael Edson Ellie Sanford Chris Smith Jason Inman.
Solar Power Array Management for the Solar Racing Team Mark Calotes Ginah Colón Alemneh Haile Nidhi Joshi Michael Lu School of Electrical and Computer.
HEARING AID HEURISTICS ANALYSIS. Objective: To conduct usability and human factors testing on hearing aid device to assess if the required specifications.
Systems Analysis and Design in a Changing World, Fourth Edition
Headphone Amplifier, Equalizer, and Sound Stage Abstract Some portable media devices, such as mp3 players, have insufficient power to drive top-of-the-line.
Business Analysis. Business Analysis Concepts Enterprise Analysis ► Identify business opportunities ► Understand the business strategy ► Identify Business.
P16221 – FSAE Shock Dynamometer Preliminary Detailed Design Review November 13, 2015.
Voice-Activated Television Remote Control (VAR) Senior Design I Final Presentation [1]
P16680: AATech Universal Oil and Bag System Bryce Mowers Jessica Reed Maria King Nicole Anklam Philip Couturier Samantha Orlando.
Hybrid Power Controller (HPC) Final Presentation Senior Design II.
Path The purpose of this project is to design a universal data recording device to monitor the health of a Dresser-Rand compressor during operation. In.
Electrophotographic Cascade Development Apparatus Team 15503:Zach Foggetti (ME) Dalton Mead (ME) Bridget Kearney (EE) Ruishi Shen (ISE) Tom Wossner (ME)
Electrophotographic Cascade Development Apparatus Zachary FoggettiBridget Kearney Dalton MeadRuishi Shen Michael WarrenThomas Wossner.
Marketing Requirements Engineering RequirementsJustification 10 A. User interface will consist of a single on/off switch. The system does not.
EDGE™ Final Project Plan Presentation P09001 – RFID Reader & Active Tag Philip Davenport (Industrial and Systems Engineering)
Project: P08371 Portable Command Post Rick Chadwick ME Harith Wijetungage IE Scott Pudlewski EE Sponsors: Technet Global Services DiLorenzo Electronics.
Fall 2006P7305: Freshman Practicum AM Receiver P7305: Learning Module for EE Freshman Practicum Chris Urban: Lead Engineer Hans-Christian Rotmann: Project.
P10203 LV1 MOTOR CONTROLLER FINAL REVIEW MAY 14, 2010 Electrical: Kory Williams, Adam Gillon, Oladipo Tokunboh Mechanical: Louis Shogry, Andrew Krall.
MSD P13038 Hearing Aid Design
P07203 Dynamometry Laboratory Infrastructure
Project Management Essentials Connecting PI to PM
Unit 3 – Fundamentals of Electronics Examination Specifications
Duy Dang, Robert Kern, Esteban Kleckner
Team P15441 Mini Air Sub-System Design Review
P11017 Tactile Navigation Interface
Detailed Design Review (Phase 4)
Therapeutic equipment I
Presentation transcript:

MSD P13038 Hearing Aid Design System Design Review January 11, 2012

Team Members Alissa Anderson Team Manager Conor Murphy System Integration Engineer Ronald Dries Lead Electrical Kelly Murosky Lead Mechanical Nanxi Yu EDGE Master Paula Garcia Secretary Eric Lew Budget Master Marbella Vidals Customer Relations Sarah Brownell Guide

Agenda Project Overview (5 minutes) - Background - Motivation - Major customer needs, specs, and functions Mechanical Design (10 minutes) - Enclosure renderings - Mechanical architecture - Hot Topic: User-centered design Electrical Design (20 minutes) - Electrical architecture - Hot Topic: micro-processor selection and power distribution Software Design (15 minutes) - Software architecture - Hot Topic: System simulation and filtering methods Project Plan (10 minutes) - Critical Path - Major risk summary - Budget review

Background & Motivation Expected Project Benefits: (1) De-stigmatize hearing aids as medical devices by creating an audio accessory that is socially accepted and used by both hearing and hard of hearing individuals. (2) Provide hard-of-hearing market with an alternative hearing aid device that offers similar features contained within a new physical form (3) Project is to serve as an initial proof of concept for future MSD projects to focus on improvements in device adjustability and functionality Target Audience: hearing and hard-of-hearing, young hearing aid users Oticon, Agile

Functional Decomposition amplify sound process sound capture sound modify sound filter sound adjust by frequency supply power store energy transform energy output energy accept energy interface with user accept ear fits comfortably protects user resists water and shock controls volume manages heat program device accepts data stores data user input recognizes input stores input adjusts system to input raise sound level track power level modify function to data output sound

Design Constraints (ME/ID) Customer NeedRankDescription CN29The device fits most adult ears ages 15-25years CN39The device does not draw attention to the user as a hard of hearing individual CN49 The device supports an active lifestyle (stays on the ear during everyday activities and light activities) CN79The device is rechargeable by computer USB port SpecSourceSpecificationDirection Units of measure MarginalIdeal S9 CN2, CN4, CN11 Range of adult ear size accommodatedmaxpercentile25th to 75th10th to 90th S10 CN4, CN6, CN10, CN11 Weight of earpieceming<15<12 S14CN3 Percent of serveyed people who identify a picture of the device as something other than a hearing aid. maxpercent>60>80 S15CN3 Percent of surveyed hard of hearing people who prefer the form of the new device to standard behind the ear hearing aids maxpercent>50>75 S17CN11 Percent of surveyed people who feel the device is comfortable to wear maxpercent>60>80

Benchmarking

Enclosure Proposal Key Features: Processes and amplifies sound based on custom user hearing profiles Rechargeable power source Reprogrammable software for changes in user application Interfaces with USB 2.0 User control of volume, power, and profile setting Interfaces with standard ear tube and ear mold styles (custom fit, dome, etc.) Optimized number and location of microphones for sound capture

Enclosure Proposal detachable “Transfer Module”

Design Constraints (EE) Customer NeedRankDescription CN19The device amplifies sound CN79The device is rechargeable by computer USB port Spec #SourceSpecification Directi on Units of measure MarginalIdeal S1CN1Lowest level of sound detectedmindB<60<30 S2CN1Frequencies amplifiedmaxHzN/A S3CN1, CN6Maximum amplificationtargetdB S5CN7Time to charge earpieceminminutes<60<30 S7CN7 Connects to standard USB 2.0 computer port targetyes/no yes S12CN8 Earpiece battery life at maximum amplification maxhours>16>48

Proposed Budget ItemQtyCost ea.Total Evaluation Boards7$200$1400 Microphones2$100$200 Microprocessor3$150$450 Amplifier components1$70 Speaker2$50$100 USB Interface1$20 Rechargeable Battery10$15$150 PCB4$50$200 Acoustic Test Stand1$500 3D Printing Costs7$75$525 MiscellaneousXX$1000 TOTAL$4615

Timeline: Critical Dates DateEventDRI Jan 7 Enclosure sketches due (select 2 potential product options) Finalize scope, deliverables, needs ID Jan 11System Design ReviewALL Jan 17Order Eval Boards EE February 7 Printed Circuit Board (PCS) 1.0 Printed Enclosure Alpha Printed EE February 15Detailed Design ReviewALL March 29 Final PCB printed and on campus (for integration) Final enclosure printed (for integration) ME April 1Start integration and debugALL April 26WORKING PROTOTYPE DUEALL May 4Imagine RITALL May 10Final MSD Review (Week 10)ALL

Risk Assessment IDRisk ItemEffectCause Likelih ood Severity Impor tance Action to Minimize RiskOwner 1 Project Scope too large due to large scope, deliverable list is too large and project is not completed on time Team approves too many deliverables; poor resource planning; poor benchmarking and feasibility causes team to believe they have the resources to complete a task 339 Focus on main goals of project, discuss, research, and prove feasibility of optional functionality. Discuss goals of project with guide and experts to determine feasibility and likelihood of success. Drop dead date for deliverable list is at system design review (Friday Week 5) Team Lead, Engineerin g Leads 5 Difficulty getting electronics small enough for hearing aid Prototype is larger then originally intended Components chosen too large, not enough space left for electronics in main hearing aid shell. System integration not thought of before mechanical and electrical systems are built 339 Keep small form factor in mind when choosing technologies and functionality Lead Electrical Engineer / System Integration Engineer 10 No experience/exper tise with ON Semi chip DSP Hybrid chip If chosen, could run out of time, not have a happy customer, potential product failure Too difficult to implement, Run out of time trying to learn new product 339 Seek advice from experts at ON Semi, Plan for difficult implementation and put a large amount of scheduled time Lead Electrical Engineer/ Systems Engineer 15 Team member feels overloaded with work from MSD team loses support and quality of work from stressed team member. team member loses motivation to work for the team Team member volunteers for too many projects; unbalances work assignments; team member is under qualified for assigned tasks and does not seek necessary support (or vocalize need for support) 339 team manager should monitor work loads of team members to help facilitate an equal distribution of work; individual team members should speak up (to manager or team) if they feel over loaded or that the work is not equally divided among qualified members team members (and team manager)

Backup

MatLab Code Overview: amplifies sound and reduces noise for a patient with “ski-slope” hearing loss Frequency Shaper: Breaks hearing loss into piecewise functions and calculates the required gain for each section Applies Fourier Transform on the input signal, and multiplies transformed signal by the required gain function The Inverse Fourier Transform of the signal converts signal back to the time domain. Amplitude Shaper: Output signal is inputted into an amplitude shaper to remove noise and confirms signal is in acceptable (not harmful) range.

Types of Ear Molds Oticon Intiga Hearing aid with “dome” style earmold Oticon DigiFocus II Hearing aid with “custom” style earmold Motorola HK200 Bluetooth Headset, “dome” style earmold

Customer Needs Customer NeedRankDescription CN19The device amplifies sound CN29The device fits most adult ears ages 15-25years CN39The device does not draw attention to the user as a hard of hearing individual CN49The device supports an active lifestyle (stays on the ear during everyday activities and light activities) CN59The device includes a way for the user to adjust the volume while on the ear CN69The device is safe to use CN79The device is rechargeable by computer USB port CN83The power in the earpiece should lasts at least 48 non-continuous hours CN93The device interfaces with a standard tube and ear mold CN103The weight of the device is similar to existing earpieces CN113The device is comfortable to wear CN123The device does not generate excessive heat during use or charging CN131 The device includes an additional method for toggling between functions (for later use to switch between programs or turn on Bluetooth, etc.) CN141The device has a cost similar to current devices when in production CN150Optional: The device communicates with a cell phone or music player by Bluetooth CN160Optional: The device has noise cancellation capabilities

Specifications Spec #SourceSpecificationDirectionUnits of measureMarginalIdealNotesDRI S1CN1Lowest level of sound detectedmindB<60<30lowest range of normal hearingEE S2CN1Frequencies amplifiedmaxHz marginal values are those used in radio, 85 is lowest male voice EE S3CN1, CN6Maximum amplificationtargetdB max considered safeEE S4CN5Levels of volume adjustmentmaxlevels520adjusted in steps or continuousEE S5CN7Time to charge earpieceminminutes<60<30 EE S7CN7Connects to standard USB 2.0 computer porttargetyes/no yes EE S8CN11, CN12Maximum temperature at outside surface of deviceminoFbody temp + 10body temp MEE E S9CN2, CN4, CN11Range of adult ear size accommodatedmaxpercentile25th to 75th10th to 90th ISE S10 CN4, CN6, CN10, CN11 Weight of earpieceming<15<12 marginal values will depend on ergonomic info ISE S12CN8Earpiece battery life at maximum amplificationmaxhours>16>48 EE S14CN3 Percent of serveyed people who identify a picture of the device as something other than a hearing aid. maxpercent>60>80 team should conduct surveys (at imagine RIT? thoughts?) ID S15CN3 Percent of surveyed hard of hearing people who prefer the form of the new device to standard behind the ear hearing aids maxpercent>50>75team should conduct surveysID S16CN3 Percent of surveyed hearing people who would use the device for Bluetooth or music listening maxpercent>50>70team should conduct surveysID S17CN11 Percent of surveyed people who feel the device is comfortable to wear maxpercent>60>80team should conduct surveysID S18CN9Attaches to a standard ear tube and ear moldyes/no yes maybe should interview audiologist for final decision ID S19CN14Manufactured cost (estimated)min$<2000<1000 not as important in first round of prototyping, but should be considered ISE

User Interface Logic Board Enclosure Dummy Ear mold Speaker Microphone USB Battery System Architecture (Physical) Ear Tube