Radon and Healthy Housing: What’s Happening Now, What’s in Store for the Future Bill Long US EPA
Acknowledgements Antonio Neri MD, MPH Medical Epidemiologist CDC Comprehensive Cancer Control Branch R. William Field, PhD, MS Professor, Department of Occupational and Environmental Health Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, University of Iowa Phil Jalbert US EPA radon program
Radon Decay Products Lead-210 Polonium-214 Bismuth-214 Lead-214 Polonium-218 Radon-222 Lead-206 Polonium-210 Bismuth-210 22 yrs 4 day 3 min 27 min 20 min 0.2 ms 5 day 138 day Stable Po-218 and Po-214 deliver the majority of radiation dose to the lung.
Ionizing radiation can directly and indirectly damage DNA Alpha Particle Defects in tumor suppressor genes – p53 At risk individuals–GSTM 1 (glutathione S-transferase M1) Double –strand DNA breaks Free radical formation
Reading Prong
From NCRP Report No. 160, “Ionizing Radiation Exposure of the Population of the United States” (2009)
U.S. Radon Potential n Based on geology and surveys n Expected closed building radon (pCi/L): Zone 1: 4.0 and above Zone 1: 4.0 and above Zone 2: between 2.0 & 4.0 Zone 2: between 2.0 & 4.0 Zone 3: 2.0 and lower Zone 3: 2.0 and lower EPA Radon Action Level 4 pCi/L
National Academy of Sciences BEIR VI 1999 Risk estimates based primarily on radon- exposed miners Estimated 18,600 lung cancer deaths each year in the U.S. from residential radon exposure
BEIR VI Conclusions Serious public health problem Second-leading cause of lung cancer No evidence of a threshold Effects of Radon & Smoking more powerful in combination Radon contributed to 15K or 21K US lung cancer deaths in 1995 [2,100 or 2,900 in never smokers]. Reduction of residential radon levels above 4 pCi/L could prevent approx. 1/3 of the annual deaths
Residential Radon Case-Control Around the World European Studies 13 Studies from 9 Countries Austria Czech Republic Finland [nationwide] Finland [south] France Germany [eastern] Germany [western] Italy Spain Sweden [nationwide] Sweden [never smokers] Sweden [Stockholm] United Kingdom Total 7,148 cases and 14,208 controls North American Studies 7 Studies from 2 countries: New Jersey Winnipeg Missouri I [non-smoking women] Missouri II [women] IowaIowa Connecticut Utah-South Idaho Total 3,622 cases and 4,966 controls
In 2003, the EPA updated the BEIR VI risk estimates to 21,000 radon-related lung cancer deaths each year in the United States.
EPA Radon Assessment Results Modified & extended the NAS BEIR VI report [consultation with SAB and NAS panel members] Best estimate of US population risk in homes is about 21,000 lung cancer deaths per year. [At US average indoor radon conc.] Current Risks at Action Level Smokers 6/100 Never Smokers 7/1000
Cancer Statistics 2014 CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians Volume 64, Issue 1, pages 9-29, 7 JAN 2014 DOI: /caac Volume 64, Issue 1,
CANCER MORTALITY – 2014 CANCER TYPEESTIMATED U.S. DEATHS in Lung and Bronchus 159, Colon and Rectum 50, Breast Cancer 40, Pancreas39, Prostate29, Leukemia 24, Liver and Bile Duct 23, Lymphoma20, Urinary Bladder15, Esophagus15, Ovary14, Kidney and Renal Pelvis13, Myeloma 11, Stomach10, Melanoma - skin9,710
CANCER MORTALITY – 2014 CANCER TYPEESTIMATED U.S. DEATHS in Lung and Bronchus159, Colon and Rectum50, Breast Cancer40, Pancreas39, Prostate29, Leukemia24, Liver and Bile Duct23,000 Radon- Induced Lung Cancer21, Lymphoma20, Urinary Bladder15, Esophagus15, Ovary14, Kidney and Renal Pelvis13, Myeloma11, Stomach10, Melanoma - skin9,710
Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) Title III (1988) Indoor Radon Abatement Act (IRAA) Section 306. Grant Assistance to States for Radon Programs Governor Designates the Recipient Recipient can be a Department, Agency or State Institution, e.g., University EPA Responsibilities Delegated to Regional Administrators & Assistant Administrator for OAR 17
18 21,000 Radon-related U.S. Lung Cancer Deaths Annually Leading Environmental Cause of Cancer Mortality Long-term Exposure to 1.25 pCi/L Average Indoor Radon Level in U.S. Homes 7,083,000 Homes ≥4pCi/L 2 ways to reduce risk: mitigate high homes; build homes radon-resistant EPA Radon Program
Radon Interventions ≤ $20 / test, $300 – $2,000 remediate < $250 – $750 to build radon resistant homes EPA $8 million to state radon programs/yr education, testing, remediation, policy-related radon activities Intervention = ↓ exposure Vent air from under house Seal basement cracks Laws 28 states + DC have laws specific to radon Req. testing, Req. Disclosure, Voluntary Testing Radon-Resistant New Construction o Int’l Building Code adoption Website:
States with Radon-specific Cancer Activities 2005 – 2011 Tribes and Territories with Radon-specific Cancer Plan Activities include: Alaska Native Tribal Healthcare Corporation, Fon du Lac Tribe, Northern Plains Native American Tribal CCC Program, Tohono O'odham Tribe, and Guam. Note that Alaska, Hawaii, and DC do not have radon-specific cancer plan activities
States with Radon-specific Laws in 2014 * * Washington, DC has one radon-specific law. The ELI database does not review or track radon laws for tribes
Annual Radon-related Lung Cancer Deaths State Draft
Annual Radon-related Lung Cancer Deaths State Draft
Progress on Risk Reduction 7.1M Homes ≥4pCi/L Mitigate existing homes (2 – 4 pCi/L) 1,244,000 mitigation systems installed since ,100 lives saved (lung cancer deaths avoided) 1,542 mitigated homes saves 1 life Multi-pronged demand/supply strategy (partnerships [ELI, CRCPD, NCSL, NEHA, KSU], PSAs, real estate, home inspection, stakeholder trainings) 24
State Indoor Radon Grant (SIRG) Program 45 states participating 5 Not Participating (NH, MD, LA, AR, HI) Tribes: FY Awards = $304,000Tribes: FY Awards = $304,000 Philip Jalbert , ogram.html
Federal Radon Action Plan Federal leadership required to accelerate action on radon risk reduction – a key Healthy Homes concern An example of Inter-Agency Collaboration (USDA, DOD, DOE, EPA, GSA, HHS, HUD, DOI, VA) A special focus on families and low income communities
Framework for Federal Action: Our Areas of Focus Demonstrate Importance of radon risk reduction Provide Incentives to encourage testing and mitigation Build Demand for testing and mitigation
Key Milestones Tracking Our Progress Nov 2010:Held Federal Radon Summit where agencies agreed to develop the Federal Radon Action Plan Jun 2011:Launched the Action Plan at the Healthy Homes Conference Jan 2012:Released the Action Plan Scorecard Aug 2012:Celebrated one-year anniversary at CDC’s National Cancer Conference in Washington DC Feb 2013:Released the Accomplishments Report in conjunction with the unveiling of the Advancing Healthy Housing – A Strategy for Action.
AgencyGreen – CompletedYellow – On TrackRed – No Progress USDA6 DoD111 DOE22 EPA11 GSA11 HHS21 HUD31 DOI21 VA11 Multi13 TOTAL Total Commitments To access Scorecard visit 33 Total Commitments To access Scorecard visit Status of Commitments
Build Demand for Testing & Mitigation The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) wrote new radon testing and mitigation requirements for their multifamily housing mortgage insurance programs, estimated to reach 105,000 housing units in The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is investing in 4 new standards of practice. New provisional standard for radon mitigation in multifamily housing released this year. Provide Incentives to Encourage Testing and Mitigation The Department of Agriculture (USDA) issued new secretary-level guidance to all of its field office housing, community, loan (~301K this year), and public information programs to promote radon mitigation and new construction.
Demonstrate the importance of radon testing & mitigation The Department of Health and Human Services reported that 27 CDC sponsored state five-year cancer plans now include radon, representing 41% of existing cancer plans. –Of that total, two cancer programs have included radon activities for the first time and two have expanded radon activities within their plans.
Moving Forward: Leadership, Leverage and Visibility
Priorities for the Near-term Future Federal Radon Action Plan (FRAP) Allied Leaders Partnerships with NGOs Standards of Practice Code adoption Labelling programs 34